Hill to Asharq Al-Awsat: Biden’s Policy Towards Syria Only Media Statements

Republican Representative French Hill
Republican Representative French Hill
TT
20

Hill to Asharq Al-Awsat: Biden’s Policy Towards Syria Only Media Statements

Republican Representative French Hill
Republican Representative French Hill

Republican Representative French Hill criticized US President Joe Biden's policies towards the Syrian crisis, saying that they do not go beyond "nothing more than tweets and statements," calling for a clear and strong strategy and policy towards Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, in fighting the drug trade, which he considered a threat to the US national security.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Rep. Hill confirmed that he continues to push for the adoption of the "anti-narcotics" legislation, which was dropped from the National Defense Authorization Act for the Fiscal year 2022, despite the vote on it by a large majority in the House of Representatives.

Rep. Hill and Rep. Brendan Boyle introduced a new amendment in a separate legislative process last week countering Assad’s Proliferation, Trafficking, and Garnering of Narcotics (CAPTAGON) Act.
Mr. Hill elaborated that the legislative process for the NDAA was disjointed this year. However, he knew there was support for the provision.

The 65-year-old Republican Representative from Arkansas considered that the Captagon trade threatens the national security of the United States.

“We note that the Captagon trade is a cause of instability in the Middle East that has negative implications for the national security of the United States and its allies and partners,” he added.

“We support the development of a strategy to guide appropriate action against narcotics production and trafficking and affiliated networks linked to the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria.”

When asked about his assessment of the performance of the US president's administration in foreign policy toward Syria, he said: “I’ve been less than impressed with how the administration has engaged on Syria, which has consisted of nothing more than tweets and statements, and no action.”

Hill warned about the consequences of this “mishandled” policy and the lack of any clear strategy to deal with Syria.

“If Afghanistan is the example of how this administration acts, then I fully expect them to try to clandestinely normalize with Assad. Though, I was pleased to see the Executive Order imposing sanctions on foreigners involved in the global illicit drug trade.”

In response to a question about the gas pipeline initiative, which was talked about in the political corridors in Washington, and aims to extend gas from Egypt to Lebanon, through Jordan and Syria, Hill said: “I am concerned because it demonstrates an unwillingness to strictly enforce the Caesar Act and could open the door to legitimizing the Syrian regime.”

It is credited to Hill, the initiative to enact a law in the House of Representatives requiring the US administration to develop a joint strategy between federal agencies, to disrupt and dismantle drug production in Syria, and the affiliated networks associated with the Assad regime.

Although the Biden administration does not stand in the way of crafting such a strategy, many observers have noted that it has also not prioritized the issue yet, by crafting a government-wide approach to responding to the Assad regime's drug trade.
The US administration faces lots of criticism due to the ineffectiveness of its position in the Syrian crisis, unlike the previous US administration under President Trump. Josh Rogen, columnist for The Washington Post, questioned Biden's strategy in Syria, and mentioned that during his presidential campaign he had promised to recommit the US leadership to resolving the crisis in Syria.

He added: "Now, a year after his inauguration, the Biden administration's policy toward Syria is at the same time inconsistent and contradictory, and the gap between what Biden's team says and does, has left the region feeling confused, and the Syrian people feeling abandoned."

However, Ethan Goldrich, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, who is concerned with following up the Syrian file, in a meeting with the Syrian opposition two months ago, identified three main American goals for the US administration in its dealings with the crisis in Syria.

First, the continuation of American humanitarian aid, in partnership with international organizations to distribute aid and subsidies. Second, to continue fighting ISIS, in which the United States leads the international coalition. Finally, the US will work to prevent the escalation of violence in Syria and to emphasize a political solution in accordance with UN resolution 2254.



UN Envoy to Sudan: Foreign Arms Fuel Military Illusions, Prolong War

The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra (UN Photo) 
The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra (UN Photo) 
TT
20

UN Envoy to Sudan: Foreign Arms Fuel Military Illusions, Prolong War

The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra (UN Photo) 
The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra (UN Photo) 

The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra, has issued a stark warning about the continued flow of weapons into the war-torn country, saying it only “feeds military delusions” and delays peace.

In his first in-depth interview since assuming the role earlier this year, Lamamra told Asharq Al-Awsat that peace in Sudan cannot be imposed from outside but must be forged by Sudanese themselves through collective will and unity.

“Peace is not imposed, it is made,” he said. “And if Sudanese do not make it, it will not come to them from the outside.”

Lamamra, an Algerian diplomat and former foreign minister with decades of experience in African mediation, emphasized that no military solution is possible in Sudan’s conflict. Instead, he called for an urgent political settlement, warning that “each day of delay means more fragmentation, more bloodshed.”

Following meetings in Port Sudan with Sovereign Council leader Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and ongoing communications with the leadership of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), Lamamra acknowledged that the path to peace remains long and difficult.

He condemned what he described as a dangerous “logic of dominance” driving the conflict—a belief that complete military victory is possible, regardless of the cost to Sudan’s social fabric. “Some actors still think peace can wait until one side wins,” he said. “But that’s a delusion. There is no military solution.”

Instead, he stressed: “Sudan needs a political solution based on compromise, not revenge.”

Since taking office, Lamamra has focused on coordinating rather than expanding international mediation efforts. He voiced concern about the “overcrowding of mediators,” which he said has allowed Sudanese factions to exploit international divisions.

To address this, Lamamra launched a consultative group that includes the African Union, the Arab League, and peace-sponsoring countries. The group has met in Cairo, Djibouti, and Mauritania and plans to convene again in Brussels under EU sponsorship.

“What we need is not more mediators, but consensus around a unified vision,” he said. “Multiple tracks have allowed some parties to bet on contradictory international positions, delaying serious efforts toward peace.”

He pointed to UN Security Council Resolution 2724, which tasked him with coordinating peace efforts, emphasizing that its implementation hinges on aligning international efforts behind a single, realistic peace strategy.

Asked whether Sudan’s war has faded from global attention, Lamamra acknowledged that media coverage may fluctuate but said the humanitarian catastrophe continues to deepen.

“The suffering is daily and ongoing,” he said, highlighting the dire conditions in North Darfur and the rapidly deteriorating situation in Zamzam camp. “The tragedy breaks the heart.”

With over 13 million internally displaced and millions more seeking refuge abroad, Lamamra described Sudan as the site of the world’s largest humanitarian crisis today. “This is a country under siege by arms, division, and international silence,” he said.

He praised the special attention paid by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who has longstanding ties to Sudan dating back to his leadership of the UN refugee agency.

Lamamra was especially vocal about the dangerous role of foreign military support. “Feeding the war with weapons is not support for resolution—it is participation in prolonging delusion and division,” he said.

He accused some regional and international actors of backing Sudanese factions in hopes of future influence. “They forget that war leaves nothing intact to control,” he noted. “It’s in no one’s interest to see Sudan collapse.”

The envoy reiterated the UN’s calls for a total halt to arms shipments and strict enforcement of Security Council resolutions aimed at cutting off military funding.

Despite international interference, Lamamra emphasized that the ultimate responsibility for ending the war lies with Sudanese themselves. “History will judge them first and foremost,” he underlined.

Lamamra said the Jeddah Declaration—an agreement brokered by Saudi Arabia to ensure humanitarian access and civilian protection—remains a viable starting point for peace efforts. He commended Riyadh’s efforts and urged regional actors to intensify pressure on warring factions.

He also pointed to the upcoming Arab League summit in Baghdad as a potential turning point. “Sudan is central to the Arab identity. This is not a crisis that allows for neutrality,” he said.

In a direct message to the Sudanese public, Lamamra expressed admiration for their resilience. “I visited Port Sudan recently and met with leaders and citizens. I was moved by their hospitality and strong will to take charge of their future,” he said.

He pledged the UN’s continued support, acknowledging the scale of the humanitarian challenge: “Children, women, and innocent civilians are being stripped of life’s basic necessities. This crisis demands a moral awakening—not just from governments, but from everyone who hears and sees.”

Lamamra concluded: “Peace is not a one-time event—it’s a long-term project. And if we don’t begin now, there may be nothing left to build on in a few months.”