First Ever Ancient Egyptian Dressing Discovered

An international research team from Germany, Italy and the US have announced the first-ever discovery of an ancient Egyptian dressing. (International Journal of Paleopathology)
An international research team from Germany, Italy and the US have announced the first-ever discovery of an ancient Egyptian dressing. (International Journal of Paleopathology)
TT
20

First Ever Ancient Egyptian Dressing Discovered

An international research team from Germany, Italy and the US have announced the first-ever discovery of an ancient Egyptian dressing. (International Journal of Paleopathology)
An international research team from Germany, Italy and the US have announced the first-ever discovery of an ancient Egyptian dressing. (International Journal of Paleopathology)

An international research team from Germany, Italy and the US have announced the first-ever discovery of an ancient Egyptian dressing.

They found the “bandage-like structure” in a female child mummy, one of 21 child mummies included in the study. The International Journal of Paleopathology will publish the study in the volume that will be released in March. It published a summary on its website a few days ago.

In the summary, the researchers say that the treatment was reported in the Edwin Smith Papyrus, a medical text from ancient Egypt (ca. 1650–1550 BCE), but this is the first to “physically note an original ancient Egyptian dressing” in an Egyptian mummy.

The mummy is of a two-and-a-half to four year-old girl. Using computed tomography (CT) imaging, they were able to see a bandage-like structure at the left lower leg that is most likely a dressing of a skin lesion.

As the mummy was completely wrapped by thick layers of textile, the bandage is believed to be original.

The researchers also noticed that the dressing “overlies masses within the adjacent soft tissues, which are consistent with dried pus, thus indicating the individual had purulent cellulitis or abscess.”

Most of the 21 child mummies included in the study date back to the Ptolemaic Period (332–30 BCE) and Roman Period (30 BCE–395 CE). They estimate that children’s ages at death ranged from around one to 12–14 years, with a mean of 4.8 years. According to their assessments, 12 of the children were male, and seven were female, while two of the children’s sex could not be determined. They also found radiological evidence of purulent infections in three of them.

Among the purulent infections found was purulent sinusitis in a child aged between nine and eleven (Ptolemaic–Roman Period), with the researchers coming to this conclusion based on CT imaging that demonstrated dried masses, especially in the basal parts of both maxillary sinuses.

The researchers also found a dried fluid level in the enlarged capsule of the right hip in the mummy of a two to three-year-old boy (1st–2nd century CE), likely indicating dried pus in septic arthritis.



Brazil Court Majority Favors Tougher Social Media Rules

Brazil's Supreme Court has already taken a strong stance on social media regulation. Evaristo Sa / AFP/File
Brazil's Supreme Court has already taken a strong stance on social media regulation. Evaristo Sa / AFP/File
TT
20

Brazil Court Majority Favors Tougher Social Media Rules

Brazil's Supreme Court has already taken a strong stance on social media regulation. Evaristo Sa / AFP/File
Brazil's Supreme Court has already taken a strong stance on social media regulation. Evaristo Sa / AFP/File

Brazil's Supreme Court reached a majority Wednesday in favor of toughening social media regulation, in a groundbreaking case for Latin America on the spread of fake news and hate speech.

The South American country's highest court is seeking to determine to what extent companies like X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook are responsible for removing illegal content, and how they can be sanctioned if they do not, reported AFP.

The judges' final ruling will create a precedent that will affect tens of millions of social media users in Brazil.

At issue is a clause in the country's so-called Civil Framework for the Internet -- a law in effect since 2014 that says platforms are only responsible for harm caused by a post if they ignore a judge's order to remove it.

By Wednesday, six of the court's 11 judges had ruled in favor of higher accountability, meaning sites should monitor content and remove problematic posts on their own initiative, without judicial intervention.

One judge has voted against tougher regulation, and four have yet to express an opinion.

"We must, as a court, move in the direction of freedom with responsibility and regulated freedom, which is the only true freedom," Judge Flavio Dino said during Wednesday's session, broadcast online.

Not doing so would be like "trying to open an airline without regulation in the name of the right of free movement," he added.

Google, for its part, said in a statement that changing the rules "will not contribute to ending the circulation of unwanted content on the internet."

Coup plot

Alexandre de Moraes, one of the court's judges, has repeatedly clashed with X owner Elon Musk and various right-wing personalities over social media posts.

The review is taking place in parallel with the Supreme Court trial of far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is alleged to have collaborated on a coup plot to remain in power after his 2022 election defeat.

Prosecutors say Bolsonaro's followers used social media to lie about the reliability of the electoral system and plot the downfall of successor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.

Last year, Moraes blocked X for 40 days for failing to comply with a series of court orders against online disinformation.

He had previously ordered X to suspend the accounts of several Bolsonaro supporters.

Musk and other critics say Moraes is stifling free speech, and US President Donald Trump's administration is weighing sanctions against the judge, whom Bolsonaro accuses of judicial "persecution."

Lula, who emerged the victor in the tightly-fought 2022 election against Bolsonaro, is advocating for "accelerating regulation" of online platforms.