Washington Mulling Cutback in Funding for Sudan’s Military

Sudanese protesters burn tires to block a road in Khartoum (File photo: AFP)
Sudanese protesters burn tires to block a road in Khartoum (File photo: AFP)
TT

Washington Mulling Cutback in Funding for Sudan’s Military

Sudanese protesters burn tires to block a road in Khartoum (File photo: AFP)
Sudanese protesters burn tires to block a road in Khartoum (File photo: AFP)

The US State Department confirmed to Sudan’s military leaders that Washington is prepared to apply additional costs if violence continues.

Washington has also accused Moscow of “playing a negative role” and backing the “coup” in Sudan.

“We are now reviewing the full range of traditional and non-traditional tools at our disposal to further reduce the funds available to Sudan’s military regime, to isolate its military-controlled companies, and to increase the reputational risk for any who choose to continue to engage in ‘business-as-usual’ with Sudanese security services and their economic enterprises,” US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Molly Phee said in remarks to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Phee added that “we’re looking very hard right now at non-traditional methods of pressure, particularly in terms of, for example, the illicit gold mining that takes place, and we're also looking at the many enterprises that are owned by security forces.”

She also addressed Russia's role in the crisis in Sudan, saying Moscow is interested in exploiting insecurity for tactical and financial gains.

The official warned that Moscow plays a negative role in supporting coups in Africa, including Sudan, which is a source of concern.

Phee cautioned that "Russia is the old Sudan," noting that leaders of Sudan's security forces have a choice "they can be the leaders who help Sudan complete this historic transition or they can be the leaders that fail. We want a Sudan that has a partnership with the US and with our like-minded partners in the world and not with Russia."

Phee repeatedly reiterated that the Sudanese security forces are not monolithic, as "some of them truly would like to affect a transition. They do not know how to do it. They are falling back on their own playbook."

She also reiterated its call on the security forces to cease force and violence against peaceful demonstrators.

"The Sudanese people are amazing. They are committed. They are creative. They have a vision of what they want, and they will not let that vision go. I haven't seen that kind of strength and cohesion in other difficult environments in which I have worked."

Despite these statements, bipartisan committee members strongly criticized the US official. They indicated the US administration failed to use the tools at its disposal to impose sanctions.

They also stressed that Congress would set certain conditions before releasing any aid to Sudan, specifically the $700 million that the administration froze after October 25.

Democratic Committee Chairman Bob Menendez said that despite publicly committing to dialogue to resolve the current crisis, the "Sudanese military continues to kill, torture, abuse and detain protesters and civil society activists."

Menendez warned that the security forces had killed nearly 80 civilians since the coup, including a 27-year-old man, last weekend.

"While a dialogue is necessary, there must also be consequences for those responsible for human rights abuses and for those of the highest levels who have engineered the coup," said Menendez.

He announced his support to the Biden administration to immediately suspend $700 million in aid. However, he noted that these actions are "insufficient to end the violence and force the generals to the negotiating table."

Menendez questioned the UN initiative to resolve the crisis, saying that although the United Nations Mission in Sudan indicated that it would facilitate the Sudanese-led talks, it did not have any means to compel participation or hold the participants accountable for their commitments.

The committee's senior Republican, Senator Jim Risch, sharply criticized Sudan's military leaders, saying: "The well-documented violence against civilians before and following the October 25 coup proves that Sudan's military is brutal, can't be trusted, and incapable of leading Sudan's democratic transition."

"We may need to engage Generals Burhan and Hemedti to find a path toward restoring civilian control. We must put them on notice."

The lawmaker repeated calls for the US administration to describe the events of October 25 as a "military coup" and not a military takeover.



Smotrich Again Calls For Reduction of Half of Gaza’s Population

Settler activists dance at a conference calling for the establishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza, close to the Israel-Gaza border, October 21, 2024. (Jeremy Sharon/Times of Israel)
Settler activists dance at a conference calling for the establishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza, close to the Israel-Gaza border, October 21, 2024. (Jeremy Sharon/Times of Israel)
TT

Smotrich Again Calls For Reduction of Half of Gaza’s Population

Settler activists dance at a conference calling for the establishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza, close to the Israel-Gaza border, October 21, 2024. (Jeremy Sharon/Times of Israel)
Settler activists dance at a conference calling for the establishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza, close to the Israel-Gaza border, October 21, 2024. (Jeremy Sharon/Times of Israel)

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Monday again called for the occupation of the Gaza Strip and the reduction of its Palestinian population “by half within two years,” raising concerns about the presence of similar plans.
Speaking at a conference organized by the Yesha Council, an umbrella group representing Israeli municipalities in the West Bank, Smotrich said that “it is possible to create a situation where Gaza’s population will be reduced to half its current size in two years.”
“It won’t cost too much money. Even if it does, we should not be afraid to pay for it,” he added.
Smotrich’s calls for the occupation of Gaza are not new. However, they reflect the unstated goals of the current war in Gaza, including a prolonged occupation, military rule and rebuilding of settlements.
Israel continues to announce that its goals of the Gaza war are the “elimination of Hamas” and “returning of the captives.” However, developments in Tel Aviv and the Gaza Strip do not support such claims.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not yet announced a plan for the post-war phase in Gaza, where Israel is working to deepen its control by expanding the axes it holds and establishing permanent military outposts.
Meanwhile, Smotrich’s speech revealed that the minister is setting a budget for the occupation of Gaza.
He said that “Occupying Gaza is not a dirty word.”
“If the cost of security control is 5 billion shekels ($1.37 billion), I will accept it with open arms. If that is what it takes to ensure the security of Israel, then so be it,” the Minister added.
He appeared to be referencing concerns raised by members of Israel’s security establishment along with Treasury officials who have warned about the massive implications that occupying Gaza would have on Israel’s economy.
Smotrich insisted that the only way to defeat Hamas is to replace its governing capabilities in Gaza and that Israel is the only party that can do so, even if that means making the Israeli Army responsible for managing the civilian affairs of Palestinians in Gaza.
Smotrich claimed that once the success of “encouraged migration” is proven in Gaza, it can be replicated in the West Bank, where another three million Palestinians live.
The Religious Zionism party chairman has long spoken in favor of annexing large parts of the West Bank and declared earlier this month that US President-elect Donald Trump’s election victory offers an opportunity to see that vision through.
Smotrich was one of several government ministers who attended an event last month calling for the reestablishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza.
Ahead of his attendance at the conference, Smotrich said that territory relinquished by Israel in the past had turned into “Iranian forward terror bases,” and endangered the country.
But is Smotrich capable of reoccupying and rebuilding settlements in Gaza? For many Israelis, the matter depends on how the war in the Strip ends.
In an article published by The Times of Israel, Eran Hildesheim accused Smotrich of trying to convince the public of a new narrative that if Israel achieves its goals in the war and defeats its enemies, peace and security will return to the region.
The author said this narrative aims primarily to prepare the public opinion that the war should continue, while at the same time promoting the vision of rebuilding settlements in the Gaza Strip.
According to Hildesheim, “the end of the war, as Smotrich put it, implies a large land seizure in the Gaza Strip.”
In the first phase, the minister said the army would distribute food to the population.
Later, Smotrich plans a full military rule to directly manage the lives of the Palestinian population. The ultimate goal of this plan is to rebuild settlements in the Gaza Strip.
“Smotrich's vision places an unbearably heavy financial burden on Israel,” Hildesheim wrote.
He added that such a plan would cost about NIS 20 billion per year, not taking into account the costs of rebuilding the Strip.
He said while the state does not currently own this amount, Israel will therefore be forced to adopt an “economy based on God’s help” to get out of this situation peacefully.