Sunni Threat of Withdrawal from Politics in Lebanon Turns into Opportunity

Former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri was visibly emotional as he announced he is suspending his work in politics and will not run in May's parliamentary elections. (AP)
Former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri was visibly emotional as he announced he is suspending his work in politics and will not run in May's parliamentary elections. (AP)
TT

Sunni Threat of Withdrawal from Politics in Lebanon Turns into Opportunity

Former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri was visibly emotional as he announced he is suspending his work in politics and will not run in May's parliamentary elections. (AP)
Former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri was visibly emotional as he announced he is suspending his work in politics and will not run in May's parliamentary elections. (AP)

Head of the Mustaqbal movement, former Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri's decision to refrain from running in the upcoming parliamentary elections has delivered contradictory messages over the future role that will be played by Lebanon's Sunnis, the country's largest sect.

Some sides have been alarmed by the Sunni leader's to step aside during a pivotal year for Lebanon, which is expected to witness parliamentary elections in May and presidential elections in the fall.

Other sides, however, see the move as an opportunity.

A former prime minister has said the current efforts by Sunni leaderships to achieve a Sunni electoral push away from Hariri and his movement is indeed an opportunity.

The Mustaqbal has been leading the Sunni political scene since the early 1990s.

Up until this moment, it appears that the Sunnis who will run in the elections will not be united under a single leadership. Rather, prominent individual Sunni figures will likely wage the elections under a single slogan related to Lebanon's sovereignty, Arab belonging and confronting the Iranian threat. They will also promote slogans related to Lebanon's development and economic recovery, negotiations with the IMF and pushing reforms forward.

The lack of central Sunni authority for the entire country, as has been the case in previous elections when the Mustaqbal represented the vast majority of the sect, will produce small parliamentary blocs. They, in turn, will reach understandings with each other to form a united front ahead of major political events in Lebanon, most notably the presidential elections and appointing a new prime minister.

Another former prime minister said that running elections demands an effective electoral leadership, which currently does not exist. Dar al-Fatwa and Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Latif Derian appear unwilling to become embroiled in the elections and would rather preserve a unifying national role for the Sunnis.

Former prime ministers have also said they will not run in the elections, which has added pressure on Dar al-Fatwa to become more politically engaged to preserve the Sunni role and Lebanon's Arab identity.

Dar al-Fatwa has called for addressing the situation through cooperation, consultations and united ranks.

Derian earlier this week said Dar al-Fatwa has always carried out its unifying religious national role and it will continue to do so to safeguard Lebanon and the rights of its people.

On the other hand, some sides believe that the confusion sparked by Hariri's suspension of his political career will serve as an opportunity to end the major national crisis Lebanon is enduing.

They have cited the Sunni sect's largely unwavering and consistent national stance.

Former ministers Nouhad al-Mashnouq and Ashraf Rifi, meanwhile, said the elections may produce new Sunni leaderships

Moreover, Mashnouq dismissed concerns that Hezbollah will be able to achieve a major breakthrough in the sect through the elections.

Electoral experts suspect the party will take advantage of the void left behind by Mustaqbal to influence Sunni voters in several districts, such as Beirut, the northern province of Akkar, the norther, western and central Bekaa in the east, and the Chouf in Mount Lebanon.

Sunni votes in the previous polls in 2018 played a major role in the election of lawmakers from other sects, especially in Akkar, Beirut, Mount Lebanon and the western and central Bekaa.



Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
TT

Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)

It is difficult to predict what the outcomes will be of the discussions between Iran, France, Britain and Germany about Tehran’s nuclear program in Geneva on Friday.

Last week, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution again ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a "comprehensive" report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.

Britain, France, Germany and the United States, which proposed the resolution, dismissed as insufficient and insincere a last-minute Iranian move to cap its stock of uranium that is close to weapons-grade. Diplomats said Iran's move was conditional on scrapping the resolution.

Iran has been weighing its response to the censure, debating whether to increase uranium enrichment or by being open to the proposals expected at the Geneva talks.

The discussions may seek a new nuclear deal instead of the 2015 one with Tehran that is in tatters.

As it stands, Iran is likely to opt for negotiations instead of escalation due to a number of internal, regional and international reasons.

Diplomatic sources in Paris noted US President-elect Donald Trump’s appointments of officials handling Middle East affairs, underscoring their unreserved support to Israel and clear hostility to Iran.

These appointments may lead Iran to think twice before resorting to any escalation.

Even before Trump has taken office, his circles have said that the new president will take “several executive decisions related to Iran and that will be declared on his first day in office.” The decisions will be binding and do not need Congress’ approval.

However, Trump is unpredictable and the sources did not rule out the surprise possibility of him striking a deal with Iran related to its nuclear program and behavior in the Middle East. This means that Tehran will have to make major concessions, including abandoning its policy of “exporting the revolution”.

This remains a far-fatched possibility, however. In all likelihood, Washington under Trump will return to his “maximum pressure” policy against Iran on political, diplomatic and economic levels to make it return to the negotiations table and agree on a deal that completely ends its nuclear ambitions.

So, at the Geneva meeting on Friday, Tehran will seek to achieve two main goals: a nuclear breakthrough during what remains of US President Joe Biden’s time in office, and attempt to lure the European powers away from Trump.

The truth is that Tehran is wading in the unknown. One only has to go back to Trump’s past statements about how Israel should have struck Iran’s nuclear facilities during its October 26 attack on the country.

Trump has already shown Iran his hardline stance when he ordered the assassination of Quds Forces leader Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad airport in January 2020.

Based on this, Tehran is scrambling to avert a joint American-Israeli strike that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been dreaming of.

Iran is vulnerable now due to two main reasons: the Israeli strike in October weakened Iran’s air defenses and Netanyahu has said that Israeli jets can now run rampant over Iran without any worries.

And Tehran can no longer rely on its allied militias to threaten Israel with all-out war. Hamas in Gaza is no longer in a position to threaten Israel and neither is Hezbollah in Lebanon.

So, Iran now finds itself exposed and would rather turn to negotiations with Europe than risk escalation that would cost it dearly with Israel now that it can no longer rely on Hamas and Hezbollah.