Rushing Clean Energy Could Stifle Everyone

Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)
Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)
TT

Rushing Clean Energy Could Stifle Everyone

Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)
Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)

In December 2021, the Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman al-Saud warned that the world is heading towards an energy crisis if investments in the oil sector continue to decrease.

Prince Abdulaziz touted investment as the only way to preserve energy supplies and meet market needs.

Last week, the price of an oil barrel shot up to $140 per barrel. The price hike can be traced back to an increase in demand and a drop in supplies as well as political events the world is experiencing today, the most important of which is the Russian-Ukrainian war and the Iranian nuclear talks.

Prince Abdulaziz’s warning came in response to an international drive towards reducing investment in fossil fuels, gas and oil, which led to a decrease in direct and indirect investments in the energy sector, estimated at hundreds of billions of dollars from 2014 until 2021.

Companies Roll back Investments

A report issued by CleanTechnica – a US-based website specializing in clean energy - indicated that multinational companies’ volume of investments taken out of fossil fuels in 2014 amounted to about $52 billion. In 2018, it amounted to more than $125 billion.

In 2019, 1110 institutions with assets of more than 11 trillion dollars committed to getting rid of fossil fuels. The once strong industry started witnessing a steady decline in its position. Because of the decrease in the number of institutional investors, lower profits, and weak expectations, companies such as BP, Equinor and Repsol wrote off a total of more than $11 billion in North American shale oil assets.

In 2020, 42 investment institutions from 14 countries announced the withdrawal of their investments from fossil fuels, and BlackRock, the world’s largest investment management company, announced that environmental sustainability would be a key and decisive factor in future investment decisions.

Moreover, the New York State Pension Fund decided to phase out oil and gas companies by 2024 and completely decarbonize its portfolio, estimated to be worth more than $500 billion, by 2040.

Increasing Taxes, Selling Assets

Mazen Al-Sudairy, head of research at Al-Rajhi Capital, said that the most important problems facing companies investing in fossil fuels include the increase in the cost of taxes in exchange for subsidizing renewable energy, and some countries, especially in Europe, adopting strict policies to get companies to invest in renewable energy.

Al-Sudairy noted that the decision by EU leaders to impose a “carbon tax” to reduce the use of fossil fuels had an evident impact on oil companies, especially considering current crises.

These policies prompted some companies to sell part of their assets, such as Shell and the Italian Eni, Al-Sudairy told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Moreover, BP is currently selling its stake in the Russian company, Rosneft, which constitutes 15% of the company’s production.

The London-based multinational oil and gas company has also exited fossil fuel investments in the US and is expected to pull the plug faster on its fossil fuel investments in the near future.

This puts pressure on the oil industry.

Al-Sudairy added that BP announced its intentions to sell its fossil fuel assets at a value of $25 billion by 2025, which is equivalent to about 13% of the company’s total fixed assets. The research expert said the move would “make matters worse,” especially with the increase in global demand for fossil fuels.

The structural lack of investments and insufficient capital spending will have major impacts on global production of fossil fuels, stressed Al-Sudairy.

He pointed out that in the event of continued reluctance to invest in the sector, the market would lose about 16 million oil barrels by 2030.

There is a need for investments in fossil fuels to exceed 450 billion dollars annually, emphasized Al-Sudairy.

The world’s largest international oil companies, or IOCs, sold over $198 billion of assets between 2015 and 2020, over four times the amount they invested into clean energy technologies, said a Bloomberg New Energy Finance report.

European IOCs notably diverged from their US peers. Equinor was the only IOC to see clean energy investment outstrip divestment proceeds.

Despite high levels of divestment from ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips, they collectively invested just $757 million in clean energy, only 1% of the divestment proceeds.

Paris Agreement Battle

The Paris Climate Accords, signed in Paris in 2015, had entered into force in November 2016. The international climate treaty focuses on facing the problem of greenhouse gas emissions and finding solutions to adapt and mitigate their damage to the environment.

It also looks seriously at the obvious effects of climate change and seeks to launch initiatives that contribute to reducing emissions to get rid of dependence on fossil fuels.

One of the architects of this agreement is former US Secretary of State John Kerry, who is now the presidential envoy on climate affairs.

The Paris agreement was followed by calls from international institutions to get rid of investment in fossil fuels to access renewable energy, with the International Energy Agency leading a campaign of warnings against investors for not financing new oil, gas and coal projects.

Saudi Warnings

Prince Abdulaziz renewed his warning of challenges emerging to policymakers due to the rise in prices, describing the campaign against investments in the oil and gas sectors as “short-sighted and will have an impact on global welfare.”

The energy minister stressed that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would continue to invest in the oil and gas sectors as well as renewable energy.

He explained that the world is going through a stage of energy transition, “and it is wrong to focus on one aspect such as renewable energy because the world economy requires various sources of energy to develop.”

Prince Abdulaziz said that sustainability, which is the result of the circular economy of carbon, will be dependent on technology capable of ensuring a rise in the demand for fossil fuels while addressing emissions through technology.

It is noteworthy that G20 countries had agreed to adopt the circular economy approach to carbon, which was proposed by Saudi Arabia at the G20 Riyadh Summit in 2020.

For its part, the International Energy Agency said it expected a decline in demand to coincide with an increase in supplies during the coming period, expecting a decrease in oil demand by about 100,000 barrels per day in 2021 and 2022.

“Supplies may rise by 6.4 million barrels per day next year, compared to an increase of 1.5 million barrels in 2021,” said the agency in its December 2021 report.

“Continuing to retreat from the cuts may lead to a surplus of about two million barrels in the second quarter of 2022,” the report added.

On the other hand, a report issued by OPEC in 2020 predicted that global demand for crude oil will grow by 2025 to 103.7 million barrels per day, and by 2030 it will rise to 107.2 million barrels per day, then to 108.9 million barrels per day by 2035.

According to the report, global oil demands will grow to 109.3 million barrels per day by 2040.



Oil Rises on Upbeat China Data, Shaky Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE - Pump jacks work in a field near Lovington, N.M., April 24, 2015. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File)
FILE - Pump jacks work in a field near Lovington, N.M., April 24, 2015. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File)
TT

Oil Rises on Upbeat China Data, Shaky Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE - Pump jacks work in a field near Lovington, N.M., April 24, 2015. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File)
FILE - Pump jacks work in a field near Lovington, N.M., April 24, 2015. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File)

Oil prices rose on Monday, supported by strong factory activity in China, the world's second-largest oil consumer, and heightened tensions in the Middle East as Israel resumed attacks on Lebanon despite a ceasefire agreement.
Brent crude futures climbed 57 cents, or 0.79%, to $72.41 a barrel by 0700 GMT while US West Texas Intermediate crude was at $68.58 a barrel, up 58 cents, or 0.85%.
"Oil prices have managed to stabilize into the new week, with the continued expansion in China's manufacturing activities reflecting some degree of policy success from recent stimulus efforts," said Yeap Jun Rong, market strategist at IG.
This offered slight relief that oil demand from China may hold for now, he added.
A private-sector survey showed China's factory activity expanded at the fastest pace in five months in November, boosting Chinese firms' optimism just as US President-elect Donald Trump ramps up his trade threats.
Still, traders are eyeing developments in Syria, weighing if they could widen tension across the Middle East, Yeap said.
A truce between Israel and Lebanon took effect on Wednesday, but each side accused the other of breaching the ceasefire.
In a statement, the Lebanese health ministry said several people were wounded in two Israeli strikes in south Lebanon. Air strikes also intensified in Syria, as President Bashar al-Assad vowed to crush insurgents who had swept into the city of Aleppo.
Last week, both benchmarks suffered a weekly decline of more than 3%, on easing concerns over supply risks from the Israel-Hezbollah conflict and forecasts of surplus supply in 2025, even as OPEC+ is expected to extend output cuts.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies, known as OPEC+, postponed its meeting to Dec. 5, sources told Reuters last week.
This week's meeting will decide policy for the early months of 2025.
Since the group's production hike had been widely expected, the market's focus may be on the extent of delay to sway crude prices, said IG's Yeap.
"An indefinite delay may be the best case for oil prices, given that earlier rounds of delays by a month or so have failed to drive higher oil prices in line with what OPEC+ intended."
Brent is expected to average $74.53 per barrel in 2025 as economic weakness in China clouds the demand picture and ample global supplies outweigh support from an expected delay to a planned OPEC+ output hike, a Reuters monthly oil price poll showed on Friday.
That is the seventh straight downward revision in the 2025 consensus for the global benchmark, which has averaged $80 per barrel so far in 2024.