Al-Burhan: I Broke The ‘Three No’s’ In the Interest of My Country, No Secret Visits to Tel Aviv

General Abdel Fattah Abdelrahman al-Burhan (PHOTO CREDIT: Bashir Saleh)
General Abdel Fattah Abdelrahman al-Burhan (PHOTO CREDIT: Bashir Saleh)
TT
20

Al-Burhan: I Broke The ‘Three No’s’ In the Interest of My Country, No Secret Visits to Tel Aviv

General Abdel Fattah Abdelrahman al-Burhan (PHOTO CREDIT: Bashir Saleh)
General Abdel Fattah Abdelrahman al-Burhan (PHOTO CREDIT: Bashir Saleh)

General Abdel Fattah Abdelrahman al-Burhan, chairman of the Sudanese Transitional Sovereignty Council, revealed that there is a major Saudi investment initiative for which Sudan is preparing the right environment to accommodate.

“The Kingdom is always ready to invest in Sudan,” al-Burhan told Asharq Al-Awsat in Riyadh.

“Sudan is only required to create the appropriate environment to accommodate Saudi investment and provide adequate guarantees to protect it, especially since capital needs a safe environment so that it can operate in a manner that maximizes its returns and benefits.”

Al-Burhan stressed that repeated Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia go beyond destabilizing the security and stability of the Kingdom to the whole region. He reiterated Khartoum's support for Riyadh and emphasized continued intelligence, security, and political cooperation to ward off any terrorist act and secure the navigation of the Red Sea.

“There is continuous cooperation between Sudan and Saudi Arabia regarding securing the Red Sea, and we are working together by employing our intelligence and security services, as we have previously cooperated together in thwarting many terrorist operations that were directed against the two countries,” al-Burhan told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Al-Burhan acknowledged the political, economic and security imbalances and distortions that persisted with the expansion of the transitional government. Nevertheless, he attributed them to political strife and fragmentation.
“All these political, economic, and security imbalances are not the result of coincidence, but rather the result of old accumulations that have increased during the past three years.”

“Of course, any politically unstable country will inevitably suffer an imbalance in its economic and security situation.”

He said that since October 25, he has extended his hand to political and national forces from across the political spectrum to meet with the aim of laying out a roadmap to complete the transitional phase.

The general expressed full commitment to the democratic transition process and to completing the transition to the electoral phase in cooperation with all “national partners who are keen on Sudan’s interest.”

As for measures undertaken by Sudanese authorities to hold accountable those involved in killing youths protesting on the North African country’s streets, al-Burhan affirmed that executive and sovereignty agencies will not interfere with judicial work.

“There are procedures that are in full swing, as there are a number of detainees, both from the official agencies and from others suspected of carrying out the killings of some victims from other sides,” said al-Burhan, adding that third parties may also be involved in the deaths of protesters.

The chairman affirmed that judicial work is on track to prosecute the detainees.

Options for resolving the stalemate in the relationship between the current transitional government and civilians are dwindling.

“Political forces do not have many options for solutions,” noted al-Burhan, adding that either an agreement is found, or everyone must wait until the elections start.

“When these forces sit together and reach an understanding and agreement between them, then we will announce our readiness to meet and agree with them,” explained al-Burhan.

“We will offer them everything that helps them from the military component,” he affirmed.

Al-Burhan indicated that the proposal of the United Nations mission and the African Union is more acceptable to many segments of Sudanese society. This means that it is possible to meet around the proposal and evolve it towards a comprehensive vision of the crisis.

Although he declared that he did not intend to run in the planned elections, in which he claimed that 80% of the dues of its institutions had been completed, Al-Burhan admitted that the work of his government without a head had caused many problems.

Despite the troubles facing the headless government, al-Burhan ruled out Abdalla Hamdok returning to the post of prime minister.

Moreover, al-Burhan expressed belief that his country is subjected to systematic and deliberate media misinformation campaigns by some parties seeking to implement personal agendas.

“Currently, it is known to all that Sudan is subjected to a process of systematic and deliberate media distortion and misinformation by some parties who see the interest of Sudan with a narrow partisan eye to achieve personal interests,” said al-Burhan.

He defended the Juba Peace Agreement, asserting that it is not linked to turmoil in eastern Sudan.

“I think that the Juba Peace Agreement achieved many of the benefits of peace in Sudan,” said al-Burhan.

“We are working with everyone to achieve what remains to complete the peace process,” he added.

Regarding the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, al-Burhan said that Sudan supports dialogue and negotiation.

He admitted that he dared to break the famous Khartoum Resolution, but said he did so in the interest of Sudan and its people.

Al-Burhan clarified that events have changed from back when the resolution was established on August 29, 1967.

“I justify to the Sudanese people that Sudan’s interest in that period, when Khartoum raised its Three No’s in the face of Israel, was different from what it is in Sudan’s interest today,” said al-Burhan.

“We are looking for interests for the country’s future,” he affirmed.

The 1967 Arab League summit was held on August 29 in Khartoum as the fourth Arab League Summit in the aftermath of the Arab defeat by Israel in the Six-Day War, and is famous for its Khartoum Resolution known as “The Three No's”; No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel.”

Al-Burhan rejected the characterization of exchanged visits between Khartoum and Tel Aviv as confidential, as they do not go beyond being visits aimed at exchanging information.

“There are no high-level visits, as all the visits that are currently taking place are aimed at exchanging intelligence and information and do not need to be announced or hidden.”

Concerning the normalization of ties with Israel, al-Burhan said that the relationship with Tel Aviv was still developing.

“The next government may be able to do it,” he added about the normalization.



Al-Hadi Idris to Asharq Al-Awsat: The Parallel Government Aims to Prevent Sudan’s Fragmentation

Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).
Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).
TT
20

Al-Hadi Idris to Asharq Al-Awsat: The Parallel Government Aims to Prevent Sudan’s Fragmentation

Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).
Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).

As Sudan grapples with ongoing turmoil following the outbreak of war in April 2023, the establishment of a “parallel government” in areas controlled by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has sparked widespread concern. Domestically, regionally, and internationally, fears are mounting over Sudan’s future, the risk of further division, and the threat of another partition. However, supporters of this initiative—who recently signed a new constitution and a governance roadmap—view it as a major opportunity to build a new Sudan founded on freedom, democracy, and justice, preventing the country from descending into chaos and fragmentation.

A Government for Peace and Unity

The new administration, known as the “Government of Peace and Unity,” aims to rebuild the state on principles of justice and equality while ensuring essential services for all Sudanese citizens—not just those in RSF-controlled areas. Its proponents have sought to reassure both Sudanese citizens and neighboring countries that their objective is to preserve Sudan’s unity.

Emerging at a critical juncture, this initiative presents itself as an alternative to the military-backed government based in Port Sudan, which serves as Sudan’s temporary capital. The parallel government hopes to earn the trust of Sudanese citizens and secure international support by demonstrating a serious commitment to ending the war and reconstructing the state on democratic, secular, and decentralized foundations.

Will this government succeed in bringing about the desired peace, or will the challenges it faces prove insurmountable? Asharq Al-Awsat spoke with Dr. Al-Hadi Idris, a key leader in the “Tasis” coalition behind the formation of the parallel government.

Why Form a Parallel Government?

Idris, a former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council during the transitional government led by Dr. Abdalla Hamdok, emphasized that their goal is to establish a “government of peace and unity.”

“As a political and military force, we have always been committed to resolving Sudan’s crisis, which erupted on April 15, 2023, through peaceful means,” Idris explained. “We have made extensive efforts to push those supporting the war toward dialogue and engagement with peace initiatives, including those in Jeddah, Manama, and Geneva. However, the army and the de facto authorities in Port Sudan have refused to negotiate. This left us with no choice but to explore more effective ways to bring the warring parties to the table and stop the conflict. The formation of a parallel government is a step toward fulfilling our responsibilities to the many people who have been neglected and left without adequate care.”

Why Is the Army Refusing Dialogue?

Idris, who also leads the Revolutionary Front—a coalition of armed movements from Darfur and political groups outside the region, such as the Beja Congress led by Osama Saeed and the Kush Movement from northern Sudan—claims that the military’s reluctance to negotiate stems from external influences.

“We understand why the army refuses to come to the negotiating table,” he said. “It is under the control of the Islamic movement and remnants of the former regime, who fear that any political process will remove them from power and diminish their influence. They are keen on prolonging the war despite the devastation, suffering, and displacement it causes to civilians.”

Accusations of Division Policies

Idris accused Sudan’s military leaders of implementing measures that risk deepening the country’s divisions. These include issuing a new currency exclusive to areas under their control, restricting access to education in certain regions, and selectively issuing travel and identity documents.

“Such actions could lead to the country’s partition, which we completely oppose,” he stressed.

A Government for All Sudanese

Idris rejected claims that the new government is tied solely to Darfur or the RSF.

“Our government is not for Darfur alone, nor for the RSF or any single region,” he said. “It represents all of Sudan—from north to south, east to west. We have drafted a constitution that guarantees equal rights for all, signed by individuals and entities from across the country. The new government will be responsible for rebuilding the state and delivering essential services, including education, healthcare, and security.”

Local and Regional Concerns

Despite strong opposition to a parallel government from neighboring states, as well as international and regional organizations—including the United Nations and IGAD (Intergovernmental Authority on Development)—Idris remains confident that these concerns will dissipate once the government takes shape.

“People have a right to be worried,” he admitted. “But once they see our government in action, they will understand that we stand for unity, peace, and stability—not the opposite.”

International Recognition: A Secondary Concern

Idris dismissed concerns over whether the new government would gain international recognition.

“This is not something that worries us,” he said. “We have already engaged with countries like Uganda, Kenya, Ethiopia, and Chad, where we have encountered sympathy for our cause. These nations have a vested interest in Sudan’s stability. In Uganda, we were received by President Yoweri Museveni himself, and in Kenya, President William Ruto welcomed us with open arms.”

The Failure of the Old State Model

According to Idris, Sudan’s traditional state structure has failed and is no longer viable.

“The world is changing around us,” he observed. “Lebanon has entered a new era, and Syria has moved past its oppressive old regime. The old political systems have no future. Since Sudan’s independence in 1956, no government has succeeded in establishing a stable, unified national state. Our history is marked by conflict and instability. That is why, during our meetings in Nairobi, we emphasized the need for a democratic, secular, and decentralized state that protects the rights of all citizens, regardless of their regional or ethnic background.”

A Role for the US in Ending the War

Idris believes the United States can play a decisive role in resolving the Sudanese conflict.

“Washington was heavily involved from the beginning of the war in 2023,” he said. “President Joe Biden’s administration made significant efforts to help Sudan, though it was unable to stop the war. We hope that the new US administration under Donald Trump will take a more effective approach, using a mix of incentives and pressure on all parties to achieve peace. We are open to working with anyone who can help resolve the crisis. Our government is a government of peace, and we are ready to engage with all stakeholders.”

Protecting Civilians from Airstrikes

Idris stressed that any legitimate government must prioritize civilian protection.

“A government that does not protect its citizens has no value,” he asserted. “We will appoint a defense minister whose primary mission will be to develop defensive strategies aimed at safeguarding civilians by all possible means. Additionally, we are working to establish the nucleus of a new national army, drawing from our allied forces, including the RSF, the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North, the Sudan Liberation Movement-Transitional Council, and other armed factions. A unified Joint Chiefs of Staff will be formed, and after the war ends, this force will serve as the foundation for a restructured national army dedicated solely to border protection and internal security—completely detached from politics.”

“There will no longer be two separate armies,” Idris declared. “There will be one unified military.”

Currency and Travel Documents

Idris confirmed that the new government will introduce its own currency, passports, and travel documents.

“The currency issue was a major factor in our decision to establish this government,” he said. “In many parts of Sudan, people rely on bartering because the Port Sudan government has drained cash supplies from areas outside its control. As a result, goods like salt, sugar, and wheat are traded in lieu of money. In some regions, cash is virtually nonexistent, making daily life incredibly difficult.”

When Will the New Government Be Announced?

Idris revealed that intensive consultations are underway to finalize the launch date.

“We expect to announce the new government within a month, from inside Sudan,” he said. “We have several options for where the announcement will take place, and we will reveal the location in the coming days.”

Participation in Future Negotiations

As for potential peace talks, Idris made it clear: “We are open to any serious and responsible initiative—whether local, regional, or international—but we will only engage in negotiations as the legitimate government of Sudan, a government of peace.”