Libya's Dbeibeh Seeks to Tighten Control Over Tripoli

Interior Minister Khaled Mazen during the security meeting in Tripoli (Interior Ministry)
Interior Minister Khaled Mazen during the security meeting in Tripoli (Interior Ministry)
TT
20

Libya's Dbeibeh Seeks to Tighten Control Over Tripoli

Interior Minister Khaled Mazen during the security meeting in Tripoli (Interior Ministry)
Interior Minister Khaled Mazen during the security meeting in Tripoli (Interior Ministry)

The interim Libyan unity government, headed by Abdulhamid Dbeibeh, seeks to consolidate its control over Tripoli's "relatively weak" security situation, but it ignored the armed clashes between militias last Monday night.

Interior Minister Khaled Mazen discussed the joint security plan to secure the capital and impose security control over it, including the possibility of forming a joint security room.

The security meeting included several security leaders in the ministry and other security and military services affiliated with the government and the Presidential Council.

The minister reviewed the issues and obstacles facing the security and military agencies to improve the security situation in Tripoli.

Mazen said in a statement that the meeting concluded with "doubling security and traffic efforts ... and dismantling criminal gangs to maintain the security and safety of citizens."

He discussed the joint security plan "No. 2" for the current year, which he said aims to secure Tripoli, calling on all the ministry's agencies to double their efforts and maintain security and stability.

The head of the Criminal Investigation Agency reported that the crime rate dropped during Ramadan month.

Despite it being the first meeting held by the Interior Minister with security leaders after the clashes in Tripoli, Mazen did not comment on the incidents.

Clashes erupted recently between the Stabilization Support Apparatus and the al-Nawasi Brigade, which resulted in the killing of eight people and several damages to the infrastructure.

Meanwhile, the High Council of State (HCS) sent a new invitation for dialogue to the House of Representatives (HoR).

Several High Council of State members confirmed their willingness to hold talks with the HoR once they received the UN invitation.

The House of Representatives did not attend the meeting called by the UN advisor Stephanie Williams in Tunisia with the HCS delegation to complete the stalled dialogue on the constitutional basis necessary for holding the presidential and parliamentary elections.

The new invitation came following a meeting between the First Deputy of Khalid al-Mishri with the Turkish Ambassador, Kanaan Yilmaz, in Tripoli.

The two parties agreed on the importance of dialogue to ease tensions, create a unified executive authority, and complete the electoral process.

Furthermore, Williams said that she had received a positive response from the HoR Speaker, Aguila Saleh, as he welcomed the initiative of the UN, adding that the situation now is only a matter of bringing the HoR and HCS together then launching negotiations.

Williams expressed her optimism that the conditions would allow for an actual meeting of the HoR and HCS.

The UN official added that the UN initiative "did not come from Mars, but the 12th constitutional amendment."

"We do not have to go back to square one. We can build on the consensus that was achieved last January and February. We resorted to another clause in the constitutional amendment, which specifically requires the combination of the two chambers to set a constitutional basis for elections." Williams explained.

Williams said that setting a date for holding elections in Libya is a decision taken by the Libyan authorities and people, adding that the sooner the HoR and the HCS reach a consensus on the constitutional basis, the more realistic the hope of getting to the election stage is.

Williams said the UN had not adopted and would not adopt a position on recognizing one government or another, stressing that the UN is in contact with both sides and that the most important message the UN sends is that all parties need to maintain calm on the ground in Libya.



Lebanese President Sponsors Dialogue with Hezbollah on its Weapons, State Monopoly over Arms 

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meet at the Baabda presidential palace on Monday. (Lebanese Presidency)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meet at the Baabda presidential palace on Monday. (Lebanese Presidency)
TT
20

Lebanese President Sponsors Dialogue with Hezbollah on its Weapons, State Monopoly over Arms 

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meet at the Baabda presidential palace on Monday. (Lebanese Presidency)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meet at the Baabda presidential palace on Monday. (Lebanese Presidency)

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and parliament Speaker Nabih Berri held a meeting at the Baabda presidential palace on Monday to pave the way for dialogue with Hezbollah leaders on the Iran-backed party’s possession of arms and need for the state to have monopoly over arms in the country.

Official sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that dialogue with Hezbollah aims to test the waters and the extent to which it is prepared to reach an agreement on its arsenal. Berri, Hezbollah’s sole remaining ally in Lebanon, supports intervening on behalf of the party – if necessary – to bridge any divides in the dialogue.

Any agreement will be followed with the drafting of a national security strategy for Lebanon, including a defense strategy, added the sources.

The sources said direct dialogue between Aoun and Hezbollah over the state monopoly over arms remains the better option than referring the issue to a dialogue table with other political parties seeing as agreements reached during past rounds of talks over the years were never implemented.

Deputy US special envoy to the Middle East Morgan Ortagus, who was in Lebanon last week, expressed to Aoun her understanding of his desire to hold direct dialogue with Hezbollah.

However, she stressed that time is not in Lebanon’s favor as it needs to resolve the issue which would pave the way for other solutions to its numerous crises.

Ortagus met during her visit with Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and Berri.

Talks with the Lebanese leaders helped “soften the American stance” over Lebanon’s approach towards Hezbollah’s weapons possession because “resorting to force to disarm the party will jeopardize civil peace in the country,” said the sources.

Ortagus stated she was willing to travel to Beirut for a third time this year, possibly at the end of April or early May, to follow up on financial reforms and efforts to limit the possession of weapons to the state.

She has stressed the need for Lebanon to meet its obligations “as soon as possible” to avoid the dialogue becoming a waste of time and to prevent Lebanon from heading towards a collision course with the international community which has set as a priority the state achieving monopoly over arms.

Fulfilling that demand will restore confidence in Lebanon and speed up international efforts to help it resolve its crises.

The sources said Hezbollah is aware that limiting the possession of weapons won’t happen “at the press of a button.” However, stalling over the issue will not provide it with excuses to renege on its commitment to implement United Nations Security Council resolution 1701 and declaration that it will stand by the state in reaching diplomatic solutions that would make Israel respect the ceasefire and withdraw from the South.

Hezbollah has effectively become isolated with no allies but Berri. The party cannot escape local, Arab and international pressure to disarm, especially after the weakening of the “Resistance Axis”, which it is a part of, and Iran’s waning influence in the region, political sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Iran’s sole concern now is protecting its regime, they stressed.

So, Hezbollah has no choice but to join efforts to build a state and commit to conditions that have been imposed by the changes in the region and Lebanon, they went to say.

Hezbollah’s launch of its “support front” with Gaza and dragging Lebanon into a reckless confrontation with Israel has cost it dearly and it can no longer rise from under the rubble – in the political sense – without outside financial and economic support to help it rebuild what Israel destroyed, said the sources.

The question remains: will dialogue lead Hezbollah to disarm and agree to the state to have monopoly over weapons? Or will it use the dialogue to gain time as Iran seeks to improve its conditions as it prepares to hold negotiations with the US?

European parties had advised the party to reassess its calculations and reconsider its stances so that it places Lebanon first in its political choices so that it can reconcile with its political parties after years of tensions sparked by its monopoly of the decision of war and peace.