Libya’s Presidential Council to Intervene if Geneva Talks Fail

Libyan outgoing Prime Minister, Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh, with the British ambassador Caroline Hurndall (Media office of Libyan Gov)
Libyan outgoing Prime Minister, Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh, with the British ambassador Caroline Hurndall (Media office of Libyan Gov)
TT

Libya’s Presidential Council to Intervene if Geneva Talks Fail

Libyan outgoing Prime Minister, Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh, with the British ambassador Caroline Hurndall (Media office of Libyan Gov)
Libyan outgoing Prime Minister, Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh, with the British ambassador Caroline Hurndall (Media office of Libyan Gov)

Head of Libya’s Presidential Council will intervene to determine the legal framework for the country’s electoral process if the meeting of the leaders of the House of Representatives (HoR) and High Council of State (HoS) in Geneva failed.

The chairman, Mohamed al-Menfi, said during his meeting in Tripoli with tribal leaders that if the meeting fails, the Presidential Council will intervene using its sovereign authority.

Menfi pointed out that the Council continued to push all parties involved in the political process to agree on an electoral legal framework, that includes all and achieves the aspirations of the Libyan people.

A statement by the Council said that Menfi discussed with the representatives the recent developments and several local affairs, namely national reconciliation, and the political challenges facing the country.

Later, Vice President of the Council Musa al-Koni confirmed that the Council will use its powers if Speaker Aguila Saleh and head of the HoS Khaled al-Meshri do not agree on the constitutional basis for the elections.

Koni renewed the Council's pledge to hand over power to a president elected by the people to end the transitional phases according to a constitutional base agreed upon by all political parties.

He stressed the importance of holding parliamentary and presidential elections, reiterating that it will lead to stability.

Meanwhile, the Chairman of the High National Elections Commission (HNEC), Imad al-Sayeh, affirmed the readiness to engage in any electoral process, whether it is a general election or a referendum.

Sayeh said the Commission can implement any electoral law or referendum within only a week or ten days, noting that if all parties agreed on a referendum, it can be completed within 70 days.

Furthermore, the UN Secretary-General's Special Adviser on Libya, Stephanie Williams, announced that Saleh and Meshri will meet in Geneva Tuesday to discuss the constitutional framework for elections.

Speaking in a televised interview, Williams said the members of the constitutional committee managed to settle some disputed issues on the constitutional document, calling on the Libyan parties to refrain from any unilateral move that would undermine confidence in the political track.

She explained that the upcoming talks will focus on transitional measures and the elections, reiterating that an elected and sovereign Libyan government can engage in discussions on the presence of mercenaries and foreign forces in the country.

Saleh lauded the efforts of the HoR and HoS to achieve consensus on the constitutional path by settling the controversial points in the draft constitution, stating that the efforts exerted indicate everyone's keenness to end the political division.

Saleh praised the role of Egypt in support of consensus and achieving stability in Libya, and the UN mission's efforts in facilitating the work of the Constitutional Track Committee and bringing the views of the two committees closer.

On Sunday, outgoing Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh discussed with British Ambassador Caroline Hurndall UK’s role in supporting the elections.

Dbeibeh stressed the need to support the role of the UN Special Advisor in her efforts to support the holding of elections, in respect of the desire of nearly three million Libyans.

The meeting addressed the ongoing oil closure and its impact on the service and economic sector in the country, especially its impact on the supply of gas to electricity production plants.



Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
TT

Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)

Baghdad has been preoccupied this week with serious possibilities that Israel may expand its war on Gaza and Lebanon by striking several targets in Iraq in retaliation to attacks by Iran-backed armed factions.

Concern has been high that Israel may attack government buildings, oil fields and strategic locations, not just the positions of the armed factions that have previously launched attacks against Israel, said sources close to the pro-Iran ruling Coordination Framework.

Media sources have spoken of government speculation that Iraq could come under “300 Israeli attacks”.

The fears in Iraq have been compounded by an Israeli complaint to the United Nations Security Council against seven armed factions and holding Baghdad responsible for the attacks they have carried out against it.

This prompted the government, through the foreign ministry, to send an official letter to the Security Council, UN Secretary-General, Arab League and Organization of Islamic Cooperation in response to the Israeli threats.

The ministry said on Saturday that Iraq is “the cornerstone of stability in the region and world and it is one of the countries that are most committed to the UN Charter.”

“The Zionist entity’s letter to the Security Council is part of a systematic policy aimed at creating claims and excuses in an attempt to expand the conflict in the region.”

It said Iraq has turned to the Security Council out of Iraq’s keenness on the international body carrying out its duty in maintaining international peace and security and the need to rein in the “Zionist aggression in Gaza and Lebanon.”

Moreover, it stressed that Iraq has been keen on exercising restraint when it comes to the use of its airspace to attack a neighboring country.

Israel has used Iraqi airspace to launch attacks against Iran in October.

Iraq underscored the importance of the international community stepping in to “stop this hostile behavior that is a flagrant violation of international law.”

It called for international efforts to stop the Israeli escalation in the region and ensure that international laws and treaties are respected to consolidate security and stability.

Meanwhile, a source close to the Coordination Framework said the main Shiite parties are taking the Israeli threats “very seriously”, urging Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's government to take “all the necessary measures to avert a potential Israeli strike.”

All leaders of armed factions, as well as Shiite leaders, have taken up alternative locations and are moving under great secrecy, confirming that they have changed the majority of their military positions, said the source.

It also dismissed claims that Israeli jets have overflown Iraq, saying nothing has been confirmed, but not ruling out the possibility, especially since US forces have control over Iraqi skies and Iraq is helpless against stopping these violations.

Iraq had submitted a formal complaint to the UN and Security Council over Israel’s use and violation of its airspace to attack Iran.

Analyst and former diplomat Ghazi Faisal said the pro-Iran armed factions have been gathering their forces in the Sinjar province, which is strategic for Iran’s arms deliveries and logistic support to Syria where attacks can be carried out against American forces and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

Sinjar is one of the most important strategic bases for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, he added.

Furthermore, he noted that the armed factions insist on continuing the war against Israel, rejecting government calls for calm and neutrality.

The government’s statements are aimed at delivering a message that it “is not directly responsible for the strategy of these factions,” which follow Iran’s policies.

Iraq has repeatedly said that it refuses for its territory to be used to attack another country, but some observers believe that it may allow Iran to do so should Israel strike.