Sadr Followers Enter Iraqi Parliament in Show of Force

Supporters of Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr protest against corruption inside the parliament building in Baghdad, Iraq July 27, 2022. (Reuters)
Supporters of Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr protest against corruption inside the parliament building in Baghdad, Iraq July 27, 2022. (Reuters)
TT

Sadr Followers Enter Iraqi Parliament in Show of Force

Supporters of Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr protest against corruption inside the parliament building in Baghdad, Iraq July 27, 2022. (Reuters)
Supporters of Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr protest against corruption inside the parliament building in Baghdad, Iraq July 27, 2022. (Reuters)

Hundreds of Iraqi protesters breached Baghdad’s parliament Wednesday chanting anti-Iran curses in a demonstration against a nominee for prime minister by Iran-backed parties.

The majority of the protesters were followers of influential Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. The demonstrators, all of them men, were seen walking on tables of the parliament floor, leafing through folders, sitting in the chairs of lawmakers and waving Iraqi flags.

The incident raised the stakes in the political struggle for Iraq nearly ten months after federal elections.

No lawmakers were present. Only security forces were inside the building and they appeared to allow the protesters in with relative ease.

The demonstrators were protesting the recent selection of Mohammed al-Sudani as the official nominee of the Coordination Framework bloc, a coalition led by Iran-backed Shiite parties and their allies.

It was the largest protest since federal elections were held in October, and the second time Sadr has used his ability to mobilize masses to send a message to his political rivals this month. Earlier in July, thousands heeded his call for a mass prayer, an event many feared would devolve into destabilizing protests.

Hours after his followers occupied parliament, Sadr issued a statement on Twitter telling them their message had been received, and “to return safely to your homes,” signaling there would be no further escalation to the sit-in. Shortly after, protesters began making their way out of the parliament building with security forces supervising.

The incident, and Sadr's subsequent show of control over his followers, carried an implicit warning to the Framework party of a potential escalation to come if the government forms with Sudani at the helm.

Sadr's ability to mobilize and control his large grassroots following gives him powerful leverage over his rivals. In a similar fashion, his followers stormed the Green Zone in 2016 and entered the country’s parliament building to demand political reform.

Earlier in the day, demonstrators breached Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone, which houses the parliament and other government buildings, as well as foreign embassies.

Protesters chanted curses against Iran and said, “Sudani, out!”

Riot police had attempted to repel the protesters using water cannons, but demonstrators scaled the cement barrier walls and pulled down slabs using ropes to enter the Green Zone.

The demonstrators walked down the zone's main thoroughfare with little resistance from security forces. One security personnel was seen handing a protester a water bottle.

Caretaker Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi called for calm and restraint, and for protesters to “immediately withdraw” from the area.

Sadr recently stepped down from the political process despite having won the most seats in the October federal election. Protesters carried portraits of the cleric.

Sudani was selected by State of Law leader and former premier Nouri al-Maliki, a Sadr rival. Before Sudani can face parliament to be seated officially as premier-designate, parties must first select a president. Protesters also chanted: “Maliki, garbage!”

The Framework, in a statement, said they had known of “calls urging chaos, stirring up strife,” within the last 24 hours since nominating Sudani.

Sadr exited government formation talks after he was not able to corral enough lawmakers to get the majority required to elect Iraq’s next president.

By replacing his lawmakers, the Framework leader pushed ahead to form the next government. Many fear doing so also opens the doors to street protests organized by Sadr's large popular following and instability.



Lebanese Officials Says Efforts Underway for Ceasefire in Lebanon 

A Lebanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed residential building the day after an Israeli airstrike in the Ain Mreisseh neighborhood of Beirut, Lebanon, 09 April 2026. EPA/WAEL HAMZEH
A Lebanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed residential building the day after an Israeli airstrike in the Ain Mreisseh neighborhood of Beirut, Lebanon, 09 April 2026. EPA/WAEL HAMZEH
TT

Lebanese Officials Says Efforts Underway for Ceasefire in Lebanon 

A Lebanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed residential building the day after an Israeli airstrike in the Ain Mreisseh neighborhood of Beirut, Lebanon, 09 April 2026. EPA/WAEL HAMZEH
A Lebanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed residential building the day after an Israeli airstrike in the Ain Mreisseh neighborhood of Beirut, Lebanon, 09 April 2026. EPA/WAEL HAMZEH

Two senior Lebanese officials told Reuters on Wednesday they had been briefed that efforts were underway for a ceasefire in Lebanon, but did not have details on when it would begin or how long it would last.

The officials both said it was likely the ceasefire's duration would be linked to how long a truce between the United States and Iran holds.

One of the officials said the US had been pressuring Israel, including in talks in Washington on Tuesday, to work towards a ceasefire in Lebanon.


Hezbollah Escalates Politically and Militarily Over Lebanon-Israel Talks

A photograph taken from the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon shows destroyed buildings in southern Lebanon on April 15, 2026.(Photo by Jack GUEZ / AFP)
A photograph taken from the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon shows destroyed buildings in southern Lebanon on April 15, 2026.(Photo by Jack GUEZ / AFP)
TT

Hezbollah Escalates Politically and Militarily Over Lebanon-Israel Talks

A photograph taken from the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon shows destroyed buildings in southern Lebanon on April 15, 2026.(Photo by Jack GUEZ / AFP)
A photograph taken from the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon shows destroyed buildings in southern Lebanon on April 15, 2026.(Photo by Jack GUEZ / AFP)

Hezbollah is responding to direct negotiations between Lebanon and Israel, under US sponsorship, on two tracks: political and military. Politically, it is disavowing the talks and calling on the state to “reconsider its decision to negotiate with Israel,” describing the move as one that “will deepen divisions among Lebanese.” At the same time, it has intensified rocket fire toward Israel to signal that any response will play out on the battlefield.

On the political front, Hezbollah MP Hussein Fadlallah, a member of the party’s “Loyalty to the Resistance” parliamentary bloc, said “the authority in Beirut is unfit, with personal interests, and at times sectarian ones, prevailing over the national interest.” At a press conference in parliament, he said it was “continuing to make concessions to the enemy and has entered a misguided path that will widen the rift among Lebanese.”

He added: “The Lebanese authorities must reconsider their calculations and return to their people,” noting that “it was the authorities that withdrew the army from the south, leaving it exposed to occupation and granting it free opportunities.”

Fadlallah said that “despite the enemy destroying the Bint Jbeil stadium, it failed to capture any images inside it,” arguing that “the enemy tried to compensate for its battlefield defeat in the Washington negotiations.”

He called on the Lebanese government to “reconsider its decision to negotiate with Israel, as this step will increase divisions among Lebanese.”

His remarks came a day after Hezbollah political council member Wafiq Safa said the group was not concerned with the ongoing negotiations, telling The Associated Press the group would not abide by any agreements reached in the talks.

Field escalation

Hezbollah sought to reinforce that stance by launching around 40 rockets toward Israel within a single hour, particularly targeting northern settlements. It also released footage showing the launch of a cruise missile toward a military site in the Upper Galilee, saying it targeted a gathering of Israeli soldiers at the Misgav Am site. The group also announced additional operations, including the launch of drone swarms and rocket barrages at various positions.

A negotiation formula outside the state

Commenting on the implications of the escalation, retired brigadier general Saeed Qazah told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the party is trying at this stage to establish a clear equation for Israel: it is not concerned with any negotiations conducted through the Lebanese state, but is instead seeking to entrench itself as the sole party that can be addressed to reach a ceasefire, as happened in previous phases.”

He added that “the party effectively does not recognize the authority of the Lebanese state in this matter, nor its ability to negotiate with Israel, particularly on the security dimension along the southern border.”

Qazah said this approach aims, first, to consolidate its role as a party capable of imposing negotiation terms, and second, to keep this card in Iran’s hands for use within its broader negotiations with the United States.

He also linked the escalation to timing, noting that “military operations in the south are ongoing, and the party remains engaged in field clashes with the Israeli military.”

He said that “the launch of around 40 rockets this morning, coinciding with the reopening of schools in Israeli settlements, carries implications beyond the immediate military dimension. It falls within the framework of asserting presence and sending a message that the war has not stopped, and that any negotiating track in Washington does not automatically mean de-escalation on the Lebanese front.”

He added that “the party is seeking to reproduce the pattern of indirect negotiations that prevailed in earlier phases, such as in 1993, 1996, and 2000, up to the 2006 war, when communication channels were conducted through international mediators, without the Lebanese state being the effective party managing the process.” He said this approach also extended to more recent episodes, including the maritime border demarcation file, where understandings were effectively reached under a formula imposed by the party, while the Lebanese state was in the position of recipient, or the party completing the formal framework of the agreement.

Political messages under military cover

Retired brigadier general Naji Malaeb offered a different reading of the military dimension, saying the escalation “does not carry decisive military value so much as it serves to assert political and military presence.” He explained that “Iran’s missile doctrine relies on launching multiple waves of missiles or drones to exhaust air defenses in order to ensure that the main ballistic missile reaches its target, but what is happening now does not reach that level of effectiveness.”

Malaeb added that “the military effort Hezbollah is exerting today does not alter the balance of power and inflicts only limited losses on Israel, given Israel’s comprehensive readiness, both in terms of defenses and infrastructure, including shelters that protect civilians,” noting that “Israel’s technological superiority, particularly in the field of drones, makes it difficult to confront this type of operation on the ground.”

He linked the escalation to the negotiation context, saying “what is happening is more of a political message than a military action, aimed at showing that the decision of war and peace remains in the party’s hands, not the Lebanese state.”

Malaeb added that “the continuation of operations is part of reinforcing an equation: if Israel continues fighting, we will also continue, but without meaningful military impact.”


UNHCR Chief Calls for ‘Urgent’ Support to Lebanon During War

Displaced children queue to get toys at a shelter in Tyre, south Lebanon, April 14, 2026. (Reuters)
Displaced children queue to get toys at a shelter in Tyre, south Lebanon, April 14, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

UNHCR Chief Calls for ‘Urgent’ Support to Lebanon During War

Displaced children queue to get toys at a shelter in Tyre, south Lebanon, April 14, 2026. (Reuters)
Displaced children queue to get toys at a shelter in Tyre, south Lebanon, April 14, 2026. (Reuters)

United Nations refugee chief Barham Salih on Wednesday called on the international community to provide urgent support to Lebanon, with a fifth of the country's population displaced by the Israel-Hezbollah war.

"I call upon the international community to provide urgent support and relief to Lebanon," he said after meeting Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam.

"The humanitarian consequences of this war are immense, and I emphasize the need to spare civilians and civilian infrastructure from the ravages of attack. Lebanon does not deserve to be trapped in a recurring cycle of violence, it deserves support and stability."

He added that UNHCR has received "a portion" of the $61 million it had appealed for during the war to support Lebanon in its "unprecedented" displacement crisis, as more than a million people, or a fifth of the Lebanese population, are displaced by the conflict.

Of them, more than 140,000 are in government shelters.

The $61 million is part of the Lebanon Flash Appeal, launched by UN chief Antonio Guterres last month to gather $308 million to help the country.

War-ravaged Lebanon has been dealing with an unprecedented financial crisis since 2019 and was still reeling from the 2024 Israel-Hezbollah war when the Iran-backed group drew it into the Middle East conflict last month.