Yemenis Barely Celebrate GPC’s 40th Anniversary

General People's Congress’s Sana’a wing holds a meeting after the killing of former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh (Reuters)
General People's Congress’s Sana’a wing holds a meeting after the killing of former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh (Reuters)
TT
20

Yemenis Barely Celebrate GPC’s 40th Anniversary

General People's Congress’s Sana’a wing holds a meeting after the killing of former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh (Reuters)
General People's Congress’s Sana’a wing holds a meeting after the killing of former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh (Reuters)

Yemenis home and abroad are faintly celebrating the 40th anniversary of the founding of the General People's Congress (GPC), one of the largest political parties in Yemen. The reason behind this is that the GPC has faced fragmentation over the years and lost its decision-making power to Houthi militias.

Marking the occasion on August 24, GPC leaders kept exchanging cables of congratulations.

Founded by the slain Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, the GPC was used as a political lever to rule the country for over three decades. This stopped at the death of Saleh on December 4, 2017, at the hands of the Houthi militia.

Many observers of Yemeni affairs believe that the party can still be a figure in shaping the country's future.

However, the GPC needs to first overcome internal divisions that have splintered the party into different wings vying for leadership.

According to Sanaa-based GPC sources, Houthi militias have barred GPC leaders from holding any form of celebration to mark the party’s 40th.

Despite banning the usual rallies, Houthis allowed GPC leaders to broadcast messages regarding the anniversary on Houthi-run media, sources revealed.

Moreover, the official statement issued by GPC leaders in Sana’a avoided mentioning Saleh and stressed that Sadiq Abu Ras is the legitimate head of the party.

Ras had previously affirmed his continued alliance with the Houthi militias.

GPC leaders in Taiz Governorate announced that they had withdrawn from holding a celebration on the occasion.

Meanwhile, some party leaders and activists contented themselves with holding a humble celebration in the Egyptian capital, Cairo. The event was attended by one of Saleh's sons.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Yemeni journalist Abdullah al-Snami said that the GPC is going through its worst days since its foundation.

Snami admitted that the party hasn’t enjoyed the same influence after the death of Saleh in 2017.



Israel Shocks Lebanon with Plan to Link Withdrawal to Normalization

Israeli soldiers patrol near the Israel-Lebanon border, in Israel, March 12, 2025. REUTERS/Avi Ohayon
Israeli soldiers patrol near the Israel-Lebanon border, in Israel, March 12, 2025. REUTERS/Avi Ohayon
TT
20

Israel Shocks Lebanon with Plan to Link Withdrawal to Normalization

Israeli soldiers patrol near the Israel-Lebanon border, in Israel, March 12, 2025. REUTERS/Avi Ohayon
Israeli soldiers patrol near the Israel-Lebanon border, in Israel, March 12, 2025. REUTERS/Avi Ohayon

Lebanon’s government and public were caught off guard by Israeli leaks suggesting a potential deal that would link Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanese territory and the demarcation of land borders to a normalization agreement between Beirut and Tel Aviv.

However, Lebanon firmly rejects the idea, stressing that border talks are strictly security-focused, limited to Israel’s withdrawal, border delineation, and the release of detainees.

The leaks, attributed to an Israeli political source, emerged a day after Israel released four Lebanese detainees in what it described as a “goodwill gesture.” The development coincided with preparations for negotiations on disputed border points.

Israeli media quoted a political source as saying that talks with Lebanon are part of a broader, comprehensive plan.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s policies have reshaped the Middle East, and Israel wants to maintain this momentum to achieve normalization with Lebanon, the source said.

Just as Lebanon has demands regarding the border, Israel has its own demands as well, and these issues will be discussed, the source further stated.

The remarks were seen as an Israeli attempt to link border demarcation and withdrawal from Lebanese territory to a normalization agreement, according to a Lebanese lawmaker following the developments.

However, Lebanon firmly rejects any such linkage, considering it an overreach beyond the mandate of the committee overseeing the implementation of the ceasefire agreement that took effect on November 26.

A senior Lebanese official told Asharq Al-Awsat that the idea of linking border discussions to normalization with Israel is “not on the table for Lebanon.”

The official emphasized that the mandate of the five-nation committee, formed after the recent conflict, is “security-focused, not political,” and is strictly limited to implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1701.

The official explained that the committee's role is “confined to overseeing Israel’s withdrawal from five remaining occupied border points, demarcating the 13 disputed border areas, and securing the release of Lebanese detainees held by Israel.”

While the remarks were attributed to an unnamed source rather than an official spokesperson, they caught Lebanese officials off guard.

Diplomatic sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Lebanon’s Foreign Ministry had not been informed of any such proposal and that no international official had raised the issue so far.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun met on Tuesday with US General Jasper Jeffers, head of the ceasefire monitoring committee, alongside US Ambassador Lisa Johnson, ahead of a committee meeting in Naqoura.

According to the Lebanese presidency, Aoun urged the committee chief to pressure Israel to implement the agreement, withdraw from the five occupied hills, and release Lebanese detainees.