Raging Conflicts Afflict the Middle East Region

Maj. Gen. Sayed Ghoneim (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Maj. Gen. Sayed Ghoneim (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Raging Conflicts Afflict the Middle East Region

Maj. Gen. Sayed Ghoneim (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Maj. Gen. Sayed Ghoneim (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Flaming conflicts have always ailed the world. Most of these disputes have erupted in the heart of the continents of the Old World (Asia, Africa, and Europe), and a few of them have affected the New World.

Today, the world stands afraid of a third world war raging out of escalated fighting in Ukraine. At the same time, there are other conflicts that are just as violent but have figured lower on the agenda of global concerns which is chiefly preoccupied with the Russian-Ukrainian war.

Mounting tensions continue to rage on the sides of the global map, and at the heart of it is the Middle East, which has the lion’s share of raging conflicts.

The Global Conflict Tracker of the US-based Council of Foreign Relations has identified 27 hot spots of live conflict that are still raging worldwide in 2022. The tracker categorizes conflict into three groups: “worsening,” “unchanging,” and “improving.”

Right now, there’s not a single conflict described as “improving.”

According to international experts and political analysts who spoke to Asharq Al-Awsat, the repercussions of raging conflicts in and around the Middle East seem more complex than many imagine.

This can be traced back to these tensions attracting interference from regional and international forces that seek managing their interests via local proxies. Not only does foreign interference prolong these conflicts, but it also constantly threatens to have them spill over to neighboring regions, doubling their risk and threat.

A report prepared by the International Crisis Group revealed that six out of ten world conflicts in 2022 are located within the Middle East region.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, upheaval in Yemen, Afghanistan, Ethiopia, and Iran as well as the spread of terrorism in Africa make the top of the list of the most prominent conflicts during 2022. Hot conflicts in Ukraine, Myanmar, China, Taiwan, and Haiti also make the list, according to the report.

Conflict hotspots in the Middle East aren’t exclusive to the Arab region. The African continent also seems to be a place for both risk and opportunity. A 2021 report prepared by the US-based think tank, the Fund for Peace, said that 11 of the 15 most fragile countries in the world are in Africa.

The slow collapse of states in the Sahel-Saharan region, the expansion of jihadist terrorist groups from Mali to neighboring countries, such as Niger and Burkina Faso, and turmoil following military coups in Mali, Chad and Guinea, put Africa at the heart of ever raging conflicts.

If we take into consideration the civil war in Ethiopia, the African “arc of conflicts” expands to include the east and west of the continent.

The Ethiopian conflict appears to be on the brink of the abyss. Its adverse effects have impacted the unity of the state and the safety of the countries of the region.

“Ethiopia is a large and important country in the region, and it has common borders with several countries,” affirmed International Crisis Group senior analyst William Davidson.

“The absence of strong and stable governments in the country often pushes matters towards volatility, which is reflected in the relations of Addis Ababa with the countries of the region,” explained Davidson to Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Internal crises and conflicts in Ethiopia have cast a shadow over the country’s relations with Egypt and Sudan,” added Davidson.

Ethiopia’s focus on taking vital diplomatic steps to reach a solution to the dispute with Cairo and Khartoum over the Renaissance Dam “is clearly declining with the increasing complexity of the internal crisis.”

The Ethiopian leadership appears to be “distracted” due to the security challenges and internal divisions that have escalated in the recent period, noted Davidson.

This prompted the government to “focus sometimes on the external dimension, blaming Egypt and Sudan to ease the pressures associated with the escalating internal crises.”

In such a case, Ethiopia’s internal crisis has become a key obstacle preventing an agreement between the three countries.

The protracted conflict in Ethiopia and its expansion to neighboring countries may produce serious repercussions throughout the Red Sea and Horn of Africa regions, according to Davidson.

Moreover, Davidson voiced his fears towards the Ethiopian crisis potentially leading to more disintegration and the emergence of more economic and social problems. This could make room for the activity of terrorist groups and irregular actors.

The crises in Syria and Libya represent another example of the overlap between internal and external conflicts, according to Maj. Gen. Sayed Ghoneim.

“It is absurd to imagine that there are cosmic conspiracies running the hot conflicts in the world,” Ghoneim told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Unfortunately, the theatre of conflict has expanded in our Arab region to include 5 countries: Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya and Lebanon,” noted Ghoneim, adding that there are both Arab and non-Arab actors involved in those countries.

Ghoneim believes that many hotbeds of conflict in and around the Arab region attract the attention of regional and international powers in a remarkable way.

He considered this attraction as “natural” given the region’s global significance at the level of international energy and navigation security.

According to Ghoneim, the region oversees the most important straits that control the movement of global trade. Moreover, the region is home to some of the world’s largest oil and gas deposits.

Beyond resources and geography, the region is known for having one of the oldest live conflicts with no prospect for a solution soon. It is the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

“It is inconceivable that stability will occur in the region in light of the continuation of the Israeli occupation and its persistent violations of international law, treaties and covenants,” said Palestinian researcher Jihad al-Haziran.

Haziran believes that the international will of actors such as the US and some European countries could determine launching a successful peace track for Israelis and Palestinians.

“It seems that the policy of double standards is still in control as these forces provide legal and political cover for the Israeli occupation, through international mechanisms, including the right of veto,” added Haziran.

These facts raise more questions about the price the world is paying because of these flaming conflicts and raise more questions about the efficacy of the solutions being proposed.



Defying Trump with Brief Iran Fight, Israel Seeks Sway over Peace Talks

 An Israeli security personnel inspects an impact site, after Iran launched missiles towards Israel, in an Israeli settlement in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 8, 2026. (Reuters)
An Israeli security personnel inspects an impact site, after Iran launched missiles towards Israel, in an Israeli settlement in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 8, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Defying Trump with Brief Iran Fight, Israel Seeks Sway over Peace Talks

 An Israeli security personnel inspects an impact site, after Iran launched missiles towards Israel, in an Israeli settlement in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 8, 2026. (Reuters)
An Israeli security personnel inspects an impact site, after Iran launched missiles towards Israel, in an Israeli settlement in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 8, 2026. (Reuters)

In launching renewed strikes on Iran on Monday in apparent open defiance of Donald Trump, Israel has tried to make its case to have a say at the peace negotiating table, where it has so far been kept at arm's length by the US president.

Despite Trump publicly calling for Israel to hold fire, it struck targets in Iran for the first time since a ceasefire in April, after Iran fired missiles at Israel in what Tehran said was retaliation for Israeli strikes on Lebanon's capital.

Israel and Iran both called a halt to the exchange on Monday shortly after Trump told them to stop shooting, although they each left the door open to a possible resumption.

But in launching the strikes, Israel had sent a message to Washington that no final ‌agreement with Iran ‌can be reached if Israel's interests are ignored, said Danny Orbach, a military historian at ‌Israel's ⁠Hebrew University.

"Because if ⁠it tramples too heavily on Israeli interests, Israel can overturn the table."

TRUMP EXCLUDES ISRAEL FROM NEGOTIATIONS

Trump, who launched the war alongside Israel in February, has been trying to reach a negotiated settlement with Iran, while excluding Israel from those talks.

He has publicly prodded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to refrain from actions that could scupper the talks, including by holding fire in Lebanon, which Israel invaded in March in pursuit of the Iran-aligned Hezbollah movement.

Iran says it will not agree to any peace deal with Washington unless a ceasefire also holds in Lebanon.

Last week Netanyahu called off airstrikes on Beirut after a phone call with Trump. Trump later confirmed he ⁠had called the Israeli leader "[expletive] crazy" in the heated exchange, although he also said they ‌still get along well.

Netanyahu's domestic critics accused him of effectively surrendering sovereignty by ‌restricting Israeli military actions to sustain US negotiations, without a seat at the table.

ISRAEL SEEKS TO RETAIN ABILITY TO ATTACK IN LEBANON

After ‌Israel's strike on Lebanon on Sunday, and Iran's decision to fire at Israel in response, Trump made clear he believed ‌that should be the end of the matter.

"Each of them had their fun," he told the Axios website. "Israel had its strike and Iran had its strike. We don't need another one," Trump said.

But Israel concluded that only by striking Iran itself in response could it establish that Iran should not be granted future say over Israeli actions in Lebanon.

Israel could not accept a scenario in which Iranian ‌strikes on Israel were considered a justifiable "tit-for-tat response" to Israeli strikes on Lebanon, a senior Israeli defense official told Reuters.

Before deciding to strike Iran, Netanyahu convened a meeting of top security ⁠and defense officials to discuss ⁠goals of a potential short-term escalation, according to the senior defense official and two other Israeli officials familiar with the deliberations.

One goal was to establish that any future US-Iran deal would not remove Israel's right to attack Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and keep its troops deployed there, the senior defense official said.

Netanyahu had raised this consideration in weekend phone calls with Trump, the senior defense official said.

Netanyahu has not made any public comments or appearances since resuming attacks on Iran early on Monday. His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

ISRAEL CANNOT SUSTAIN LONG IRAN AIR CAMPAIGN ALONE, ANALYSTS SAY

The brief resumption of Israel-Iran fighting and Netanyahu's defiance of Trump's demands are the latest episode to lay bare the strains that have at times emerged between the two conservative leaders.

In private, Netanyahu has acknowledged difficulty influencing Trump's thinking on Iran, telling aides he has "no maneuver" to steer the president's decision-making.

But although Israel has the capability to strike Iran without US support, it would still need Washington's blessing and support to sustain such an air campaign for more than a few weeks, say military experts.

"There's no doubt that Israel (cannot) go alone in this war for a long, long time, because (the) ammunition is consumable," said Yehoshua Kalisky, a senior researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies.


A Timeline of the Escalating Tensions Between Iran and Israel over Lebanon

Pro-government Iranian demonstrators wave flags of Iran and Lebanon's Hezbollah movement after Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs in Tehran on June 7, 2026. (AFP)
Pro-government Iranian demonstrators wave flags of Iran and Lebanon's Hezbollah movement after Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs in Tehran on June 7, 2026. (AFP)
TT

A Timeline of the Escalating Tensions Between Iran and Israel over Lebanon

Pro-government Iranian demonstrators wave flags of Iran and Lebanon's Hezbollah movement after Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs in Tehran on June 7, 2026. (AFP)
Pro-government Iranian demonstrators wave flags of Iran and Lebanon's Hezbollah movement after Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs in Tehran on June 7, 2026. (AFP)

The Middle East is suddenly bracing for war again. Iran fired missiles at Israel late Sunday in the first such bombardment in the two months since a ceasefire. Israel launched airstrikes early Monday targeting central and western Iran in response.

The truce in the Iran war that was reached in April has not spread to Lebanon, where Israel has been battling the Iranian-backed Hezbollah group. Israel says it is defending its northern communities that face Hezbollah drone and rocket fire.

Iran sees Israel’s ground invasion, with thousands of troops, and airstrikes in Lebanon as a ceasefire violation. It insists that any deal with the United States must end the fighting there. Israel disagrees.

Here’s a timeline of key events.

Feb. 28 The United States and Israel attack Iran. War begins.

March 2 Hezbollah enters the war by firing rockets at Israel. Israel retaliates.

April 7 A fragile ceasefire in the Iran war is announced, with talks to continue. Israel is not included in them.

April 8 Israel bombards Lebanon’s capital, Beirut, killing over 300 people in a 10-minute attack.

April 14 Lebanon and Israel hold their first direct diplomatic talks in decades in Washington.

April 17 A fragile ceasefire is announced between Israel and Lebanon, but Hezbollah plays no part. Fighting soon resumes from both sides.

May 31 Israel’s ground invasion of Lebanon makes its deepest incursion in over a quarter-century.

June 1 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatens to strike Beirut if Hezbollah attacks don’t stop. US President Donald Trump says Israel and Hezbollah agree to calm the fighting.

June 2 Israeli drone strikes in Lebanon kill 11 people.

June 3 Israel and Lebanon say they agree to renew the fragile ceasefire and create security zones that exclude Hezbollah.

June 4 Hezbollah’s leader rejects the ceasefire agreement and demands that Israel withdraw from Lebanon.

June 5 Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard says “there will be no calm in the region ” if Israel doesn’t withdraw.

June 6 Israeli airstrikes on southern Lebanon kill three members of the Lebanese military.

June 7 Hezbollah again fires at Israel. Israel strikes Beirut’s southern suburbs. Iran fires at Israel.

June 8 Israel launches airstrikes in the early morning targeting central and western Iran in response to Iranian missile fire. Iranian state television reports the sound of explosions being heard in Isfahan, Tabriz and Tehran, without elaborating.


Health Workers at the Epicenter of Congo’s Ebola Outbreak Labor with Little Pay or Rest

A health worker disinfects an ambulance at the Mongbwalu treatment center that transported a suspected Ebola patient in Mongbwalu, Congo, Friday, June 5, 2026. (AP)
A health worker disinfects an ambulance at the Mongbwalu treatment center that transported a suspected Ebola patient in Mongbwalu, Congo, Friday, June 5, 2026. (AP)
TT

Health Workers at the Epicenter of Congo’s Ebola Outbreak Labor with Little Pay or Rest

A health worker disinfects an ambulance at the Mongbwalu treatment center that transported a suspected Ebola patient in Mongbwalu, Congo, Friday, June 5, 2026. (AP)
A health worker disinfects an ambulance at the Mongbwalu treatment center that transported a suspected Ebola patient in Mongbwalu, Congo, Friday, June 5, 2026. (AP)

Dr. Richard Lokudu, the medical director of Mongbwalu General Referral Hospital, has received barely any compensation for his work on the front line of one of Congo's deadliest Ebola virus outbreaks.

Lokudu and several of his colleagues work all day at the hospital treating an influx of patients. Notifications of suspected cases come even late at night.

“I have not received my allowance (and) what happened to others could happen to me as well,” Lokudu told The Associated Press. “Despite all the infection prevention and control measures we are implementing, we do not know what may happen.”

Health authorities believe the outbreak, which took the eastern region of Congo by surprise after spreading silently for weeks without detection, started in the bustling mining area of Mongbwalu in Ituri province.

Mining conditions conducive to virus spread Mongbwalu has emerged as the epicenter of the rare Bundibugyo type. The town attracts large numbers of laborers who work in large gold mines with muddy pools of gold deposits, narrow pits and caves. They live in low-income areas including crowded camps and have little access to proper health protocols.

The conditions increase the possibility of transmitting the disease, which spreads through close contact with bodily fluids of the sick and deceased such as sweat, blood, feces and vomit.

There also has been widespread skepticism regarding the disease, making the job of medical treatment more difficult for Lokudu and his colleagues, while some of the health workers and first responders have died from the disease.

“It is one thing to be far away and hear statistics being reported, but what is happening on the ground is enormous,” Lokudu said. “People are sacrificing their rest and comfort for this cause. There should be recognition that they deserve compensation. These workers should receive their salaries regularly.”

The Congolese government did not respond to a request for comment from the AP.

Minimal resources available

Congolese authorities have confirmed 452 cases including 82 deaths. On Thursday, the Central African nation recorded 71 new cases in a day, which authorities said is a sign of “active community transmission.”

The rare Bundibugyo type has no approved vaccines or treatment, so health workers have been targeting symptoms. The government said at least five people have recovered from Ebola since the outbreak was officially confirmed by Congo's Ministry of Health on May 15.

The disease “had a big head start,” according to World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Hospitals in the region could not test for the right type of Ebola that had begun spreading several weeks before confirmation.

Health workers are handling the disease with minimal resources as agencies have been scrambling to bring aid into the region. Masks, gloves, boots and medications were initially all in short supply.

“There has been an erosion of the health system,” said Heather Kerr, country director for the International Rescue Committee in Congo. “There has not been investment in the health system, and this has been going on for years.”

Tough conditions for health workers

“During the first week, we did not even have time to go home and eat. The second week was the same. We only eat once a day, what amounts to breakfast in the evening,” said Alice Bamuhinga, a nurse at the Mongbwalu hospital.

Even with widespread skepticism and disregard for health protocols, many in the town are becoming aware of the outbreak's grave reality.

Asero Jeanne had five children. Two died from the disease within two weeks. When her daughter became ill, the family thought it was malaria and neighbors advised them to avoid the hospital, saying “anyone who went there would die immediately,” according to Jeanne, 52.

The daughter died after three weeks of moving between hospitals and home, followed by a son who died days after. Then Jeanne became sick.

“I saw about 20 people die,” Jeanne said. “I watched them being taken to the morgue, yet God is allowing me to leave here alive. I thank the doctors.”

World Health Organization offers a plan

Tedros, the WHO director-general, on Friday launched a $518 million plan to combat the outbreak, saying “containing Ebola depends on political commitment, sustained financing, and the trust and engagement of communities.”

Efforts to contain the disease also have been hindered by the conflict between the government and Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group, in addition to attacks by extremist militants.

For health workers on the front line of Congo's Ebola outbreak, the work has become harder as the disease spreads faster than their current treatment capacity.

“Despite the alerts we receive and the teams we have on site, we lack the means to travel into the field,” Lokudu said. “As a result, there are alerts we are unable to investigate.”