A Democratic Party View of 2023: Modest Victories and a Bumpy Road Ahead

An image of former President Donald Trump is displayed during the committee's third hearing on June 16. (AFP/Getty Images)
An image of former President Donald Trump is displayed during the committee's third hearing on June 16. (AFP/Getty Images)
TT

A Democratic Party View of 2023: Modest Victories and a Bumpy Road Ahead

An image of former President Donald Trump is displayed during the committee's third hearing on June 16. (AFP/Getty Images)
An image of former President Donald Trump is displayed during the committee's third hearing on June 16. (AFP/Getty Images)

Democrats have good reason to be happy with 2022. In Congress and at the polls, they had an extraordinary year. Led by President Joe Biden, Congress passed a $1 trillion infrastructure bill, a $750 billion package to fight climate change and reduce the cost of prescription drugs for senior citizens, a $52 billion measure to revive the US semiconductor industry, and the first gun safety law in 30 years.

Internationally, President Biden led the world in helping Ukraine push back the Russian invasion and killed al-Qaeda terrorist leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. Quite a record for President Biden and his party, which did it all with a tiny majority in the House of Representatives and the slimmest possible majority in the Senate.

But if US history is to be believed, the President's party loses – and loses big – at the polls two years into his term. The thing is...that's not what happened. Instead of picking up 30, 40, or more seats in the House, the Republicans only gained nine. In the Senate, the Democrats did even better. Rather than losing seats, they picked up one.

Taken together, that's virtually unheard of. Analysts say that popular opposition to the Supreme Court's overruling of Roe v. Wade, which guaranteed the right to abortion, and incompetent, even buffoonish, candidates backed by former President Donald Trump drove the Democrats' strong electoral performance.

But 2023 ain't gonna be 2022...to say the least. Republicans now control the House, and that's going to make a huge difference.

Democrats will lose the ability to drive bills through the lower chamber, and Republicans will unleash their House committees to investigate everything from serious issues like the Afghanistan withdrawal and migrants and drugs crossing America's borders to conspiracy theories about Hunter Biden, Covid vaccines, and virtually anything else they can think of.

The Democrats still control the Senate, but not with a filibuster-proof margin – so moving legislation will remain difficult and require compromise with Republicans.

Given the headwinds, Democrats options are limited. They'll have to curtail their agenda and be prepared to defend the Biden Administration. Nevertheless, there are still things the Democrats can achieve.

First, their ability to approve the President's nominees for executive branch positions and federal judgeships – which come with life-long appointments – has grown substantially. Even though the Democrats only upped their Senate majority by one seat, from 50 to 51, that one seat makes a big difference. In a 50/50 Senate, committees were divided 50/50 between Democrats and Republicans. But now the Democrats will have a majority on every Senate Committee and will be able to advance President Biden's nominees on their own, speeding the process in the usually plodding Senate.

Second, given that legislating in a divided Congress will be exceptionally more difficult, Democrats' attention will turn to getting the most out of President Biden's executive powers. They'll seek to work with the President and the various cabinet departments to see that laws are implemented and money is spent in accordance with their shared priorities.

Democrats will try to contrast their legislative successes of 2022 in which they seek to use the power of government to help people and grow the economy against Republican efforts in 2023 to cut taxes and shrink the size of the government. This debate has echoed in the United States across many decades and will do so again next year on key issues, including climate change, healthcare, transportation, energy, and education.

Third, just as Republicans will utilize House committees to investigate President Biden's agenda, family, and cabinet members, the Democrats will seek to awaken the investigative powers of Senate committees. Unlike House Republicans, however, they don't have an Administration of the opposite party to rake over the coals. Even if grass roots Democrats think Congress should still try to expose excesses of the former Trump Administration, the general public may be done looking through the rear-view mirror – so Senate Democratic-run committees will have to pick their battles carefully.

Finally, during the last decade, Democrats were relatively unified when in the majority. While there were certainly divisions between the far left and moderates, in the end, they usually stood together on big picture items even with their slim majorities.

That may not be the case with Republicans. Their Trumpian far-right, now with even more members, has much greater power in the Republican Party and is not particularly interested in governing. The future Republican Speaker of the House will struggle to round up 218 Republican votes to pass key appropriations bills or raise the debt ceiling. This means Speaker Kevin McCarthy – or whoever wins that post – will likely have to turn to Democrats to keep the government operating and the country out of default...and the new House Democratic minority leadership will be waiting to exploit the division to press for greater domestic spending on health, education, and the environment.

We shouldn't be surprised if we see a meltdown or two in the House Republican conference, possibly leading to a government shutdown, before major bills pass.

Even though Democrats and Republicans are deeply divided at home – especially on former President Trump's twisted efforts to overturn the election of 2020 – the parties have often been more united on foreign policy. For the most part, they both support efforts to help Ukraine battle Russia, share concerns about the Iranian nuclear program and support popular demonstrators, and recognize the challenges posed by China.

But there are definitely distinctions. Some on the Republican MAGA right have had sympathies for Vladimir Putin's Russia, and Republican leadership in the Senate and House will look for ways to placate them with enhanced oversight and legislative gimmicks which will seem like they are pushing back against Biden's policy when they really aren't.

On Iran, disagreements about former President Barack Obama's Iran nuclear deal have, for the time being, given way to bipartisan support for the women and men taking on the Iranian regime. But Iran's expanding nuclear program and its growing stockpile of enriched uranium will likely capture American attention once again, reinvigorating disputes over how to keep the Ayatollahs from building an atomic weapon.

And while both parties are increasingly concerned about China's threats against Taiwan and its expanding military presence in the South China Sea, congressional Republicans are decidedly more hawkish.

No discussion of 2023 would be complete without talking about 2024. In America, the next election begins as soon as the last one ends and both parties will begin the process of selecting their presidential candidates in the coming year.

On the Democratic side, President Biden is the obvious front-runner and almost certainly will be the party's candidate. But he is 80 years old and whispers of concern across the party may grow.

For Republicans, their top candidate remains former President Trump. But he is substantially weakened given his party's poor performance in the 2022 elections and may face indictments in the coming year for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, his improper possession and storage of classified documents, and his business practices, for which his company has already been criminally convicted. Regardless, many believe Trump can again win his party's nomination among a divided Republican field, potentially teeing up a rematch with President Biden.

So, buckle in and put your tray tables in their upright and locked position because 2023 is going to be a bumpy political year. We'll likely see fights over policy and politics, possible indictment of a former president, and even a government shutdown or two. Save me a seat and buy me some popcorn. Let's watch together.

*Jason Steinbaum worked on Capitol Hill for more than three decades, during which time he served as Staff Director of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.



Iranians Chant Slogans Against Supreme Leader at Memorials for Slain Protesters

An Iranian man holds the Iranian national flag during a memorial ceremony for those killed in anti-government protests earlier last month, at the Mosalla mosque in Tehran, Iran, 17 February 2026. (EPA)
An Iranian man holds the Iranian national flag during a memorial ceremony for those killed in anti-government protests earlier last month, at the Mosalla mosque in Tehran, Iran, 17 February 2026. (EPA)
TT

Iranians Chant Slogans Against Supreme Leader at Memorials for Slain Protesters

An Iranian man holds the Iranian national flag during a memorial ceremony for those killed in anti-government protests earlier last month, at the Mosalla mosque in Tehran, Iran, 17 February 2026. (EPA)
An Iranian man holds the Iranian national flag during a memorial ceremony for those killed in anti-government protests earlier last month, at the Mosalla mosque in Tehran, Iran, 17 February 2026. (EPA)

Iranians shouted slogans against Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on Tuesday as they gathered to commemorate protesters killed in a crackdown on nationwide demonstrations that rights groups said left thousands dead, according to videos verified by AFP.

The country's clerical authorities also staged a commemoration in the capital Tehran to mark the 40th day since the deaths at the peak of the protests on January 8 and 9.

Officials acknowledge more than 3,000 people died during the unrest, but attribute the violence to "terrorist acts", while rights groups say many more thousands of people were killed, shot dead by security forces in a violent crackdown.

The protests, sparked by anger over the rising cost of living before exploding in size and anti-government fervor, subsided after the crackdown, but in recent days Iranians have chanted slogans from the relative safety of homes and rooftops at night.

On Tuesday, videos verified by AFP showed crowds gathering at memorials for some of those killed again shouting slogans against the theocratic government in place since the 1979 revolution.

In videos geolocated by AFP shared on social media, a crowd in Abadan in western Iran holds up flowers and commemorative photos of a young man as they shout "death to Khamenei" and "long live the shah", in support of the ousted monarchy.

Another video from the same city shows people running in panic from the sounds of shots, though it wasn't immediately clear if they were from live fire.

In the northeastern city of Mashhad a crowd in the street chanted, "One person killed, thousands have his back", another verified video showed.

Gatherings also took place in other parts of the country, according to videos shared by rights groups.

- Official commemorations -

At the government-organized memorial in Tehran crowds carried Iranian flags and portraits of those killed as nationalist songs played and chants of "Death to America" and "Death to Israel" echoed through the Khomeini Grand Mosalla mosque.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attended a similar event at the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad.

Authorities have accused sworn enemies the United States and Israel of fueling "foreign-instigated riots", saying they hijacked peaceful protests with killings and vandalism.

Senior officials, including First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref and Revolutionary Guards commander Esmail Qaani, attended the ceremony.

"Those who supported rioters and terrorists are criminals and will face the consequences," Qaani said, according to Tasnim news agency.

International organizations have said evidence shows Iranian security forces targeted protesters with live fire under the cover of an internet blackout.

The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) has recorded more than 7,000 killings in the crackdown, the vast majority protesters, though rights groups warn the toll is likely far higher.

More than 53,500 people have been arrested in the ongoing crackdown, HRANA added, with rights groups warning protesters could face execution.

Tuesday's gatherings coincided with a second round of nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States in Geneva, amid heightened tensions after Washington deployed an aircraft carrier group to the Middle East following Iran's crackdown on the protests.


Independent UN Body Condemns ‘Vicious Attacks’ on UN Expert on Palestinian Rights

United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese looks on at the end of a press conference on the human rights situation in Gaza in Geneva on September 15, 2025. (AFP)
United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese looks on at the end of a press conference on the human rights situation in Gaza in Geneva on September 15, 2025. (AFP)
TT

Independent UN Body Condemns ‘Vicious Attacks’ on UN Expert on Palestinian Rights

United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese looks on at the end of a press conference on the human rights situation in Gaza in Geneva on September 15, 2025. (AFP)
United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese looks on at the end of a press conference on the human rights situation in Gaza in Geneva on September 15, 2025. (AFP)

An ‌independent United Nations body on Tuesday condemned what it described as vicious attacks based on disinformation by several European ministers against the organization's special rapporteur for Palestine, Francesca Albanese.

In the past week several European countries, including Germany, France and Italy, called for Albanese’s resignation over her alleged criticism of Israel. Albanese, an Italian lawyer, denies making the remarks.

On Friday, the Czech Republic's Foreign Minister Petr Macinka quoted Albanese on X as having called Israel a "common enemy of humanity", and he ‌also called for ‌her resignation.

A transcript of Albanese's remarks ‌made ⁠in Doha on ⁠February 7 seen by Reuters did not characterize Israel in this way, although she has consistently criticized the country in the past over the Gaza conflict.

The UN Coordination Committee - a body of six independent experts which coordinates and facilitates the work of Special Rapporteurs - accused European ministers of relying on "manufactured ⁠facts".

"Instead of demanding Ms. Albanese's resignation ‌for performing her mandate...these government representatives ‌should join forces to hold accountable, including before the International Criminal Court, ‌leaders and officials accused of committing war crimes and ‌crimes against humanity in Gaza," the Committee said.

It said the pressure exerted on Albanese was part of an increasing trend of politically motivated and malicious attacks against independent human rights experts, UN officials ‌and judges of international courts.

US President Donald Trump's administration imposed sanctions on Albanese after she wrote ⁠letters ⁠to US companies accusing them of contributing to gross human rights violations by Israel in Gaza and the West Bank.

UN experts are commissioned by the Geneva-based Human Rights Council to monitor and document specific human rights crises but are independent of the organization itself.

There is no precedent for removing a special rapporteur during their term, although diplomats said that states on the 47-member council could in theory propose a motion to do so.

However, they said strong support for Palestinian rights within the body means that such a motion was unlikely to pass.


US Plans to Deploy More Missile Launchers to the Philippines Despite China’s Alarm 

A US M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) fires a missile during a Combined Joint Littoral Live Fire Exercise at the joint military exercise called "Balikatan", Tagalog for shoulder-to-shoulder in a Naval station in Zambales province, northern Philippines on Wednesday, April 26, 2023. (AP)
A US M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) fires a missile during a Combined Joint Littoral Live Fire Exercise at the joint military exercise called "Balikatan", Tagalog for shoulder-to-shoulder in a Naval station in Zambales province, northern Philippines on Wednesday, April 26, 2023. (AP)
TT

US Plans to Deploy More Missile Launchers to the Philippines Despite China’s Alarm 

A US M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) fires a missile during a Combined Joint Littoral Live Fire Exercise at the joint military exercise called "Balikatan", Tagalog for shoulder-to-shoulder in a Naval station in Zambales province, northern Philippines on Wednesday, April 26, 2023. (AP)
A US M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) fires a missile during a Combined Joint Littoral Live Fire Exercise at the joint military exercise called "Balikatan", Tagalog for shoulder-to-shoulder in a Naval station in Zambales province, northern Philippines on Wednesday, April 26, 2023. (AP)

The United States plans to deploy more high-tech missile systems to the Philippines to help deter aggression in the South China Sea, where the treaty allies on Tuesday condemned what they called China’s "illegal, coercive, aggressive, and deceptive activities."

Beijing has repeatedly expressed alarm over the installation in the northern Philippines of a US mid-range missile system called the Typhon in 2024 and of an anti-ship missile launcher last year. It said the US weapons were aimed at containing China’s rise and warned that these were a threat to regional stability.

China has asked the Philippines to withdraw the missile launchers from its territory, but officials led by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. have rejected the demand.

US and Philippine officials held annual talks Monday in Manila on broadening security, political and economic engagements and boosting collaboration with regional security allies.

The US and the Philippines outlined in a joint statement Tuesday specific defense and security plans for this year, including joint military exercises, Washington's support to help modernize the Philippine military and efforts "to increase deployments of US cutting-edge missile and unmanned systems to the Philippines."

The longtime allies "underscored their support for preserving freedom of navigation and overflight, unimpeded lawful commerce and other lawful uses of the sea for all nations," the statement said.

"Both sides condemned China’s illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive activities in the South China Sea, recognizing their adverse effects on regional peace and stability and the economies of the Indo-Pacific and beyond," it added.

Confrontations between Chinese and Philippine coast guard forces have spiked in the disputed waters in recent years. Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan are also involved in the territorial standoffs.

Neither side elaborated on the planned missile deployments but Philippine ambassador to Washington, Jose Manuel Romualdez, who took part in Monday’s talks, said US and Filipino defense officials discussed the possible deployment this year of "upgraded" types of US missile launchers that the Philippines may eventually decide to purchase.

"It’s a kind of system that’s really very sophisticated and will be deployed here in the hope that, down the road, we will be able to get our own," Romualdez told The Associated Press.

The Typhon missile system that the US Army deployed to the main northern Philippine region of Luzon in April 2024 and an anti-missile launcher called the Navy Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System that was deployed in April last year also to Luzon have remained in the Philippines, Romualdez said.

During joint drills, US forces have exhibited the missile systems to batches of Filipino forces to familiarize them with the weapons’ capabilities and usage, military officials said.

Romualdez said the US missile deployments to the Philippines did not aim to antagonize any country.

"It’s purely for deterrence," he said. "Every time the Chinese show any kind of aggression, it only strengthens our resolve to have these types."

The Typhon missile launchers, a land-based weapon, can fire the Standard Missile-6 and the Tomahawk Land Attack Missile. Tomahawk missiles can travel over 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers), which places China within their target range, from the northern Philippine region of Luzon.

Last year, the US Marines deployed the anti-ship missile launcher, the Navy Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System, to Batan island in the northernmost Philippine province of Batanes, which faces the Bashi Channel just south of Taiwan.

The sea passage is a critical trade and military route that the US and Chinese militaries have tried to gain strategic control of.