Saddam’s Tribe: Revenge behind Preventing Our Return Home

 US forces in the city center of Tikrit, April 2003 (Getty Images)
US forces in the city center of Tikrit, April 2003 (Getty Images)
TT
20

Saddam’s Tribe: Revenge behind Preventing Our Return Home

 US forces in the city center of Tikrit, April 2003 (Getty Images)
US forces in the city center of Tikrit, April 2003 (Getty Images)

More than a thousand families from the Iraqi village of Al-Awja, the hometown of the late Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, have been living away from their homes for nearly a decade.

In 2014, the rise of ISIS and its grip on large swathes of provinces west and north of Iraq, including Saladin Governorate, where Al-Awja is situated, forced families to leave their homes.

Military authorities in Al-Awja, which is located on the banks of the Tigris River and is about 10 km south of the city of Tikrit, the center of Saladin, offer various reasons and excuses for not allowing the return of these uprooted families.

The authorities are claiming that some of the families had sympathized with the terrorist group, accusing some of even participating in some of the crimes carried out by ISIS.

Some, however, believe that the matter has to do with taking revenge on the region and its residents as most of them are relatives and kinsmen of Saddam. Before the fall of his rule in 2003, the region enjoyed significant influence and power.

Today, many of Al-Awja’s locals took refuge in the Kurdistan region. Some of them went to live in Tikrit, and some preferred to move to Turkiye or other Western countries.

“We are not alone as there are other families who were not allowed to return to their homes, such as the people of Jurf al-Sakhr, but our misfortune seems exceptional given our closeness to the late President Saddam Hussein,” Falah al-Nada, the son of the head of Al-Bu Nasir tribe, told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Saddam was a member of the Al-Bu Nasir tribe.

“The new regime placed us in the category of permanent enemies who are not allowed to return,” added al-Nada.

“In 2003, Law No. 88 was issued. It considered all the people of Al-Awja to be pawns of Saddam’s regime, and decided to seize their movable and immovable money,” reminded al-Nada, adding that the law was revoked in 2018.

Al-Nada voiced his surprise regarding the decision to prevent the return of the people to their homes and said there is no justification other than “the will for revenge.”

When asked about the conditions of the city of Al-Awja 20 years after the overthrow of Saddam’s regime, al-Nada said: “We do not know, but the city has turned into a military barrack controlled by a faction affiliated with the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF).”



Lebanon’s President Reveals the Country’s Stance on Relations with Israel

 Lebanese President Joseph Aoun looks on during a meeting with Cyprus' President Nikos Christodoulides at the Presidential Palace in the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Wednesday, July 9, 2025. (AP)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun looks on during a meeting with Cyprus' President Nikos Christodoulides at the Presidential Palace in the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Wednesday, July 9, 2025. (AP)
TT
20

Lebanon’s President Reveals the Country’s Stance on Relations with Israel

 Lebanese President Joseph Aoun looks on during a meeting with Cyprus' President Nikos Christodoulides at the Presidential Palace in the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Wednesday, July 9, 2025. (AP)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun looks on during a meeting with Cyprus' President Nikos Christodoulides at the Presidential Palace in the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Wednesday, July 9, 2025. (AP)

Lebanon has no plans to have normal relations with Israel at the present time, and Beirut’s main aim is to reach a “state of no war” with its southern neighbor, the country’s president said Friday.

President Joseph Aoun’s comments came as the Trump administration is trying to expand the Abraham Accords signed in 2020 in which Israel signed historic pacts with United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.

In May, Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa said during a visit to France that his country is holding indirect talks with Israel to prevent military activities along their border from going out of control. Talks about peace between Israel and Syria have increased following the ouster of President Bashar al-Assad from power in December.

Aoun added in comments released by his office that only the Lebanese state will have weapons in the future, and the decision on whether Lebanon would go to war or not would be for the Lebanese government.

Aoun’s comments were an apparent reference to the armed Hezbollah group that fought a 14-month war with Israel, during which it suffered major blows including the killing of some of its top political and military commanders.

Hezbollah says it has ended its armed presence near the border with Israel, but is refusing to disarm in the rest of Lebanon before Israel withdraws from five overlooking border points and ends its almost daily airstrikes on Lebanon.

Earlier this week, US envoy Tom Barrack met with Lebanese leaders in Beirut, saying he was satisfied with the Lebanese government’s response to a proposal to disarm Hezbollah.

Hezbollah’s weapons have been one of the principal sticking points since Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000. Since then, Hezbollah fought two wars with Israel, one in 2006, and the other starting a day after the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which triggered the war in Gaza.

The Hezbollah-Israel war, which ended with a US-brokered ceasefire in November, left more than 4,000 people dead in Lebanon and caused destruction estimated at $11 billion. In Israel, 127 people, including 80 soldiers, were killed during the war.

“Peace is the state of no war and this is what is important for us in Lebanon at the present time,” Aoun was quoted as telling visitors on Friday. He added that “the matter of normalization (with Israel) is not included in Lebanon’s current foreign policy.”

Lebanon and Israel have been at a state of war since 1948.