Saudi-French Meeting in Paris Focuses on Lebanon’s Presidential Vacuum

The seat of the President of the Republic in Lebanon, which has become vacant since the end of President Michel Aoun's term at the end of last October (Reuters)
The seat of the President of the Republic in Lebanon, which has become vacant since the end of President Michel Aoun's term at the end of last October (Reuters)
TT

Saudi-French Meeting in Paris Focuses on Lebanon’s Presidential Vacuum

The seat of the President of the Republic in Lebanon, which has become vacant since the end of President Michel Aoun's term at the end of last October (Reuters)
The seat of the President of the Republic in Lebanon, which has become vacant since the end of President Michel Aoun's term at the end of last October (Reuters)

Discussions during Saudi royal envoy Nizar Al-Aloula’s recent meeting with French President Advisor Patrick Durrell in Paris centered on Lebanon. The counterparts’ meeting, hosted at the Élysée Palace, follows an official visit by Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan to Paris earlier this week.

Prince Faisal met with his French counterpart Catherine Colonna to chiefly talk over the Saudi-Iranian agreement sponsored by China.

While the two top diplomats examined the deal, which stipulates restoring diplomatic relations between the Kingdom and Iran within two months, they also touched on the presidential vacuum in Lebanon.

Al-Aloula represented Saudi Arabia last month at a five-way meeting about Lebanon hosted by Paris. The panel included representatives from the US, Egypt, and Qatar, in addition to Al-Aloula and Durrell.

At the meeting, they agreed on each communicating with Lebanese bodies they enjoy the best ties with to try to end the presidential vacuum in the Mediterranean nation.

Sources observing developments in the region and their impact on Lebanon believe that the recent Saudi-Iran deal could bring about change needed to break the political stalemate preventing the election of a president.

Lebanon has been ailing from a presidential and institutional vacuum since last October. Moreover, the country is suffering from an economic and financial meltdown that keeps getting worse.

Asharq Al-Awsat learned that the French mobilization to end Lebanon’s crisis, what some call the “French initiative,” is based on proposing an “integrated basket” that includes a president, a prime minister, and a commitment to a reform program capable of putting an end to economic collapse.

Paris believes that the way out of the impasse is to accept the candidacy of former minister and lawmaker Suleiman Frangieh for president in exchange for naming Nawaf Salam as prime minister.

Salam is a championed reformist and enjoys good Arab and international relations.

Saudi Arabia’s official stance is that Riyadh would not intervene by backing any candidate for any position. For the Kingdom, the matter concerns the Lebanese alone.

Nevertheless, Saudi Arabia has expressed concern regarding the “characteristics” of any elected candidate, what policies they intend to pursue, and whether they incorporate the reforms needed for Lebanon to bounce back. The reforms mentioned by the Kingdom include the recommendations of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).



Arab Leaders Congratulate Saudi Leadership on Founding Day

Saudi Arabia marking Founding Day - SPA
Saudi Arabia marking Founding Day - SPA
TT

Arab Leaders Congratulate Saudi Leadership on Founding Day

Saudi Arabia marking Founding Day - SPA
Saudi Arabia marking Founding Day - SPA

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas extended his congratulations to Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud and Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Crown Prince and Prime Minister, on the occasion of Founding Day.

In two cables, President Abbas expressed his heartfelt congratulations and best wishes to the Saudi leadership, government, and people for continued prosperity and progress.

According to SPA, he also expressed hope that the deep-rooted relations between the two countries would continue to develop and advance.

Furthermore, the Palestinian president commended the Kingdom’s honorable and supportive stance toward the Palestinian people and praised its historic success in securing recognition of the independent State of Palestine by major countries.

For his part, Sultan Haitham bin Tarik of Oman has sent a cable of congratulations to the Saudi King and Crown Prince expressing his warmest congratulations and sincere best wishes.

He prayed to Allah Almighty to bless the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its people with lasting stability, progress, and prosperity.

Also, Kuwait's Emir Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah congratulated the Saudi leadership on this occasion. In two cables, the Kuwaiti Emir praised the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s international standing, its continuous contributions to civilization and development, and its significant role in supporting security, stability, and promoting peace in the region.

Sheikh Meshal expressed deep pride in the enduring and close fraternal relations that have united the two families throughout history. He acknowledged the strong bonds between Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and prayed for further progress and prosperity for the Kingdom under the wise leadership of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques.

Additionally, Crown Prince of the State of Kuwait Sheikh Sabah Khaled Al-Hamad Al-Sabah sent two similar cables congratulating the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques and the Crown Prince. He praised the Kingdom’s civilizational and developmental achievements, praying for further progress and prosperity for the Kingdom and its people.

Prime Minister of the State of Kuwait Sheikh Ahmad Abdullah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah also sent two cables of congratulations to the Saudi King and Crown Prince on this occasion. 


Saudi Researcher: Women Played Pivotal Role in Historic Battles

A view of Diriyah, which witnessed numerous historic events during the First and Second Saudi States (Diriyah Gate Development Authority)
A view of Diriyah, which witnessed numerous historic events during the First and Second Saudi States (Diriyah Gate Development Authority)
TT

Saudi Researcher: Women Played Pivotal Role in Historic Battles

A view of Diriyah, which witnessed numerous historic events during the First and Second Saudi States (Diriyah Gate Development Authority)
A view of Diriyah, which witnessed numerous historic events during the First and Second Saudi States (Diriyah Gate Development Authority)

Women’s resistance during the Ottoman campaigns against Diriyah and other regions of the First Saudi State, and later the Second Saudi State, was a hard test of society’s capacity to endure.

The confrontation was not confined to the battlefield. It spread across the social fabric, where women played a decisive role in preserving cohesion and sustaining the community under siege and in the face of destruction.

Dr. Fatmah bint Hussein Al Fardan Alqhtani, professor of history at King Saud University, told Asharq Al-Awsat that recognizing women’s presence in the resistance does not mean casting them in stereotypical combat roles. It means acknowledging the practical responsibilities imposed by society and by the historical moment itself.

Daily resilience under siege

During the Ottoman siege, Diriyah was not merely a battlefield. It was a community under total pressure, and women stood at its center.

They ran households in the absence of men, shielded children and property, tended the wounded, secured what food they could and held the social fabric together at a decisive existential moment.

Ottoman reports, Alqhtani noted, treated Diriyah not as an isolated military force but as a full society. That helps explain the sweeping captivity and deportation measures imposed on women and children after the city’s fall, an implicit recognition that resistance was not only about weapons but about a community that believed in its cause and defended it to the end.

Foreign accounts add another layer. Harford Jones, tasked by the British Empire in the region, cited French historian Felix Mengin, who was then at the court of Muhammad Ali Pasha and had access to correspondence related to Ibrahim Pasha's campaign.

According to that account, when Imam Abdullah bin Saud learned Ibrahim Pasha was absent from his camp, he ordered attacks on all Turkish lines. The battle raged for hours in searing heat, with sustained gunfire and fierce exchanges.

Amid the clash, women of the Saudi state were seen carrying water jars, moving through live fire to supply defending fighters. The image is stark: women not as distant symbols of morale, but as active participants in danger, embodying sacrifice and solidarity in defense of their state and identity.

From trenches to vigilance

Alqhtani pointed to events in Shaqra in 1233 AH (1818) as a clear example of women’s direct engagement during Ibrahim Pasha’s march toward Diriyah.

The town was encircled by a trench whose construction had begun in the days of Tusun Pasha before stalling. As the threat intensified, the emir ordered the trench completed in anticipation of a prolonged siege.

Men and women mobilized together. Women took part in digging and in support tasks, enduring harsh conditions. Their role, Alqhtani said, went beyond moral backing. They were physically involved in fortifying the town and safeguarding the community.

Women were also part of the broader security awareness of war. During the siege of Al-Rass, Ottoman forces attempted to tunnel under the city wall to infiltrate it at night. A woman grinding grain late into the night heard unfamiliar sounds near her home and sensed the danger.

She reported it to Sheikh Qurnas bin Abdulrahman bin Qurnas, Emir of Al-Rass. The alert enabled defenders to act swiftly. The sheikh ordered a counter-trench to block the attempt.

The episode, Alqhtani said, underscores that women’s role in resistance was neither emotional nor symbolic. It was vigilant, responsible and operational, part of a collective defense effort spanning all segments of society.

When survival meant bearing arms

Women’s involvement was not limited to endurance and support. A contextual reading of Najdi and Ottoman sources suggests that in moments of extreme peril, particularly during sieges, some women took part in armed defense.

“In besieged societies, where survival itself becomes a battle, carrying weapons was not absolutely confined to men,” Alqhtani said. “It could become a direct act of defending self and place.”

Although sources do not record specific female names in these instances, references to fighting inside the city and to the participation of the “people of Diriyah” in its defense allow for a broader understanding of women as part of an armed home front when necessary.

Alqhtani cited Ghalia Al-Baqamiyya as one of the most prominent examples of direct female military leadership during the Ottoman campaigns against the First Saudi State.

Felix Mengin, then the French consul in Cairo, described the circumstances surrounding the Ottoman advance, including the arrival of forces in Turbah and the three-day siege it faced in a bid to subdue it.

The town held firm. Ghalia Al-Baqamiyya played a central role, raising the morale of fighters from her tribe, Al-Buqum. Some sources indicate she went out at the head of a group of her men to confront the attackers.

The standoff coincided with the arrival of Saudi reinforcements, leading to the Battle of Wadi Al-Sulaym. The fighting was fierce and ended with Ottoman forces defeated and withdrawing toward Taif, leaving behind casualties and substantial spoils in one of the most severe setbacks of those campaigns.

The episode, Alqhtani said, makes one point clear: women were not on the margins of resistance. At pivotal moments, they assumed leadership roles that directly shaped the course of battle, embedding their presence in the history of defending the state and society.


Political, Economic Stability Went Hand in Hand in Founding of the Saudi State

Agricultural activity in Diriyah formed the primary pillar of the First Saudi State’s economy (Ministry of Tourism).
Agricultural activity in Diriyah formed the primary pillar of the First Saudi State’s economy (Ministry of Tourism).
TT

Political, Economic Stability Went Hand in Hand in Founding of the Saudi State

Agricultural activity in Diriyah formed the primary pillar of the First Saudi State’s economy (Ministry of Tourism).
Agricultural activity in Diriyah formed the primary pillar of the First Saudi State’s economy (Ministry of Tourism).

Dr. Hala bint Dhiab Al-Mutairi, Secretary-General of the Saudi Historical Society, said the experience of Imam Muhammad bin Saud demonstrates that economic revival in the First Saudi State was inseparable from social and political reform.

She stressed that security was the decisive factor behind the prosperity that followed, particularly in agriculture, the backbone of the early state’s economy.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Al-Mutairi explained that the First Saudi State arose in central Arabia at a time of deep political and economic fragmentation. Prior to its establishment, Najd was divided among rival local powers, with no central authority capable of maintaining order or protecting public interests.

This instability weighed heavily on economic life. Agriculture and trade declined amid frequent conflicts, raids, and highway robbery. Caravans were exposed to danger, weakening commercial links between Najd and neighboring regions. Economic activity was limited and unregulated, and residents relied largely on modest individual efforts to sustain themselves, in the absence of organized financial structures or reliable public revenues.

Security First

When Imam Muhammad bin Saud assumed leadership in Diriyah, he recognized that a durable state could not be built without security and disciplined management of resources. He worked to consolidate authority in surrounding areas, secure trade and pilgrimage routes, and protect caravans from attack.

As order was restored, confidence returned to Najd’s trade routes, many of which had been abandoned or considered unsafe. Merchants resumed overland journeys, stimulating internal trade and strengthening links with other parts of the Arabian Peninsula.

Al-Mutairi noted that the impact of security was particularly evident in agriculture. Diriyah and Wadi Hanifa experienced notable agricultural expansion once stability took hold. Production of staple crops - grains, dates, and vegetables - increased, strengthening food supplies for the population.

Farmers were encouraged to reclaim land, improve irrigation systems, and adopt better cultivation practices. A degree of self-sufficiency emerged, reducing reliance on imports. Agricultural surpluses supported local markets and provisioned caravans, reinforcing economic ties between settled communities and surrounding tribes.

Diriyah’s Commercial Rise

As agricultural output grew, Diriyah’s markets flourished and became among the most important commercial hubs in Najd. Merchants from across the region were drawn to its markets, where local produce, handicrafts, and imported goods were exchanged.

Craft industries expanded alongside trade. Carpentry, blacksmithing, and the manufacture of farming tools created new employment opportunities and improved living standards. Markets also functioned as centers of social interaction and knowledge exchange, enhancing Diriyah’s stature as both an economic and cultural center.

Al-Mutairi noted that the First Saudi State’s financial system was marked by simplicity, organization, and adherence to Islamic principles. Revenue was derived primarily from zakat and charitable contributions, collected and administered in an orderly manner. Additional income came from modest market levies, agricultural production, trade activity, and resources from territories under state authority.

The system avoided excessive taxation, sparing merchants and residents undue burden. At the same time, it provided sufficient revenue to fund administration and defense, maintain security, and ensure a measure of financial stability. This balance strengthened public confidence in the emerging state.

Economic Policy as Statecraft

Financial stability enabled Imam Muhammad bin Saud to invest in infrastructure and public order. Roads were secured and improved, markets were developed, and agriculture was supported. Crucially, political expansion was pursued without draining local resources or undermining economic vitality.

The resulting prosperity had tangible social effects. Living standards improved, disputes over resources declined, and bonds between tribes and the people of Diriyah were reinforced. Economic strength also bolstered political authority, allowing gradual territorial expansion without exclusive reliance on military force.

According to Al-Mutairi, this experience underscores how closely economic development was intertwined with social cohesion and political stability. As agriculture expanded and markets thrived, social solidarity deepened and loyalty to the state increased.

Diriyah’s strategic location along Wadi Hanifa further contributed to its success. The valley supported agricultural activity, while its position along caravan routes connected internal markets to wider regional networks. The steady movement of goods and capital generated employment and enhanced Diriyah’s role as a key economic center in the Arabian Peninsula.

Building Trust Between State and Society

Al-Mutairi emphasized that examining the economic foundations of the First Saudi State during Imam Muhammad bin Saud’s rule reveals the central role of economic management in state-building.

Security, agricultural growth, active markets, and organized financial administration collectively fostered social and political stability. Balanced economic policies addressed immediate challenges while laying the groundwork for sustainable development.

By promoting the values of work and productivity and linking economic discipline to religious and ethical principles, commercial dealings became more regulated. Fraud and monopolistic practices declined, while predictable zakat collection and equitable distribution strengthened social solidarity. Those with means supported the poor, narrowing disparities and reducing social tensions.

This framework fostered mutual trust among merchants, communities, and the state. Clear and straightforward economic regulations encouraged broader participation in productive activity, expanding the state’s economic base.

Al-Mutairi added that these policies were not merely tools for increasing revenue, but instruments for building a cohesive society and a resilient economy. In the formative years of the Saudi state, political and economic stability were not separate tracks, but mutually reinforcing pillars that ensured its endurance.