De Mistura Says Truce in the South is Temporary, Understands Syrians’ Concerns over Partition

UN Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura addresses the media in Vienna, Austria, November 14, 2015 (Leonhard Foeger/ Reute
UN Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura addresses the media in Vienna, Austria, November 14, 2015 (Leonhard Foeger/ Reute
TT
20

De Mistura Says Truce in the South is Temporary, Understands Syrians’ Concerns over Partition

UN Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura addresses the media in Vienna, Austria, November 14, 2015 (Leonhard Foeger/ Reute
UN Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura addresses the media in Vienna, Austria, November 14, 2015 (Leonhard Foeger/ Reute

UN Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura said that the agreed truce in southwest Syria was a “positive step in the right direction”, noting the presence of common interests between the US and Russia, including fighting ISIS and easing the crisis in the Middle Eastern country.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper, the envoy hoped an agreement would be reached between the US and Russia over the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 2254. He said the de-escalation zones were a temporary solution and stressed that partition would not be part of Syria’s future.

De Mistura said, during the phone interview, that the ongoing round of indirect talks in Geneva would achieve “some cumulative progress in understanding some of the preparatory work that needs to be done”.

Asked about the agreed truce in the South between the US and Russia, the UN envoy said: “Ceasefire is always good news for the Syrian people; after six years of war, I can sadly tell you that unfortunately around 400,000 people have been perhaps killed. The first thing the Syrian people ask for is a ceasefire.”

He added that the agreement, which was achieved by Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in southwest Syria, “is a positive step in the right direction.”

“It came following a series of meetings in Amman and Astana,” he noted.

As for the mechanism to monitor the good implementation of the truce, De Mistura said that talks were ongoing in Amman on how to achieve an effective monitoring mechanism.

“We have learned that ceasefire does not last because of the goodwill of the parties, but is sustained by a good monitoring mechanism that prevents problems from becoming irreversible,” he stated.

“Another point is that we must keep in mind that this truce is temporary. This is why it has been called a temporary de-escalation zone, and that the principle of Syrian unity should not be affected or threatened by this step,” the envoy added.

De Mistura told the interviewer that he was well aware of the Syrian people’s fears over partition in the wake of the establishment of de-escalation zones.

“But I want the Syrians to know that the United Nations and the international community are determined that these temporary areas would not be part of Syria’s future,” he stated.

The international envoy noted the presence of common interests between the US and Russia, including defeating ISIS terrorist group and easing tensions in Syria, in order to promote the region’s stability.

He said he hoped both sides would agree on a mechanism to implement UN Security Council Resolution 2254 through a political process in Geneva.

Asked about the ongoing indirect talks in Geneva, and whether it would end in the unification of the opposition factions, De Mistura said: “We are not seeking to have a unified opposition, because this might take a long time; instead, we want the opposition to have a unified stance over key issues, such as the constitution, the elections, governance and fighting terrorism.”

On whether he was optimistic over the current round of talks, the international envoy said: “I am realistic. Perhaps this specific week of negotiations will make some cumulative progress in understanding some of the preparatory work that needs to be done.”

Only through strenuous efforts and hard work that positive result could be achieved, he added.



Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
TT
20

Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon

The former US special envoy, Amos Hochstein, said the maritime border agreement struck between Lebanon and Israel in 2022 and the ceasefire deal reached between Israel and Hezbollah at the end of last year show that a land border demarcation “is within reach.”

“We can get to a deal but there has to be political willingness,” he said.

“The agreement of the maritime boundary was unique because we’d been trying to work on it for over 10 years,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I understood that a simple diplomatic push for a line was not going to work. It had to be a more complicated and comprehensive agreement. And there was a real threat that people didn’t realize that if we didn’t reach an agreement we would have ended up in a conflict - in a hot conflict - or war over resources.”

He said there is a possibility to reach a Lebanese-Israeli land border agreement because there’s a “provision that mandated the beginning of talks on the land boundary.”

“I believe with concerted effort they can be done quickly,” he said, adding: “It is within reach.”

Hochstein described communication with Hezbollah as “complicated,” saying “I never had only one interlocutor with Hezbollah .... and the first step is to do shuttle diplomacy between Lebanon, Lebanon and Lebanon, and then you had to go to Israel and do shuttle diplomacy between the different factions” there.

“The reality of today and the reality of 2022 are different. Hezbollah had a lock on the political system in Lebanon in the way it doesn’t today.”

North of Litani

The 2024 ceasefire agreement requires Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and for the Lebanese army to take full operational control of the south Litani region, all the way up to the border. It requires Hezbollah to demilitarize and move further north of the Litani region, he said.

“I don’t want to get into the details of other violations,” he said, but stated that the ceasefire works if both conditions are met.

Lebanon’s opportunity

“Lebanon can rewrite its future ... but it has to be a fundamental change,” he said.

“There is so much potential in Lebanon and if you can bring back opportunity and jobs - and through economic and legal reforms in the country - I think that the future is very bright,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Hezbollah is not trying to control the politics and remember that Hezbollah is just an arm of Iran” which “should not be imposing its political will in Lebanon, Israel should not be imposing its military will in Lebanon, Syria should not. No one should. This a moment for Lebanon to make decisions for itself,” he added.