Tottenham, Manchester City Prepare to Join the All England Club

 Raheem Sterling beats Kieran Trippier during Manchester City’s 1-0 Premier League win over Spurs in October. Photograph: MB Media/Getty Images
Raheem Sterling beats Kieran Trippier during Manchester City’s 1-0 Premier League win over Spurs in October. Photograph: MB Media/Getty Images
TT

Tottenham, Manchester City Prepare to Join the All England Club

 Raheem Sterling beats Kieran Trippier during Manchester City’s 1-0 Premier League win over Spurs in October. Photograph: MB Media/Getty Images
Raheem Sterling beats Kieran Trippier during Manchester City’s 1-0 Premier League win over Spurs in October. Photograph: MB Media/Getty Images

A new chapter in the colourful history of English teams meeting each other in the Champions League is set to open on Tuesday, when the first European game at Tottenham’s shiny new stadium is bound to generate an atmosphere all of its own.

In such circumstances anything can happen, and all-England European nights already have a reputation for taking on a life of their own, sharing a similarity to derbies in which form and league placing are temporarily set aside.

Manchester City will be favourites to make it to the last four but Pep Guardiola and his players will also be uncomfortably aware of what happened at this stage last season, when the expected progress against Liverpool simply failed to materialise.

Spurs are in a position almost identical to that of Liverpool last year going into the quarter-final. The Champions League is their only remaining hope of glory this season, with no other distractions apart from the necessity of securing another top-four finish.

Liverpool finished fourth last season, City were champions with a record number of points, but there was only ever going to be one winner after the home side scored three goals in a stunning 20-minute burst at Anfield. City did not play badly in either leg but ended up losing them both.

After beating Manchester United en route to the Europa League final two years earlier, Liverpool had rediscovered the art of making European nights spine-tingling even when the opponents were familiar, something Spurs might do well to try to emulate.

Normally in Champions League ties there is a certain reserve; the teams do not know each other all that well and tend to overdo the respect and caution. It is harder to get the approach right when you see the opposition every week, and in fact to emphasise that point City and Spurs meet in a Premier League match straight after the second leg.

“We know them but they know us as well, that’s the thing,” Riyad Mahrez says. “We’ve faced them many times and beaten them, but maybe knowing each other very well could also be a disadvantage.”

Liverpool can vouch for that. When Bob Paisley’s side met Brian Clough’s Nottingham Forest in the first all-English encounter in the European Cup in 1978 the competition was still in its old format. Forest had qualified for the first time by winning the league; Liverpool joined them as holders and rather too predictably for most people’s liking the pair were drawn together in the opening round.

The record books show that Forest won 2-0 on their own ground and held Liverpool to a goalless draw at Anfield on their way to eventually winning the trophy, though that does not tell the whole story. Kenny Dalglish described Liverpool as naive at the City Ground for chasing the game and conceding a second goal when they would most likely have been able to recover from a 1-0 first-leg deficit at home. Garry Birtles remembers the Forest team coach making an unusual detour on the way to Anfield to pick up a passenger who turned out to be Bill Shankly. “Don’t ask me why or how that happened, it just did. You didn’t ask any questions.”

The point about the tie was that because it was so unusual it was played on English, rather than European terms. Birtles said Forest were initially disappointed by the draw, first because they were likely to lose and second because they had been hoping for a more exotic destination for their first European Cup foray. Dalglish thought the reason Liverpool played like European novices in the first leg was because Forest were such familiar opponents. They would have settled for a 1-0 defeat in a continental stadium.

Liverpool came up against Chelsea in the Champions League five years in a row between 2005 and 2009, meaning two sides who had never really had a domestic rivalry ended up with a grudging respect for each other through Europe. Liverpool cannot really sing their history song any more, at least not with as much fervour, for Chelsea eventually acquired some. They have won the Champions League more recently than Liverpool, after all, not to mention five league titles in the last 15 years. Even in 2005 José Mourinho was well on the way to changing the perception of Chelsea as Champions League interlopers.

They would win the English title that year, as well as the next, while Liverpool finished behind Everton in the table and outside the top four, only qualifying for the following season’s Champions League by virtue of a rule-change after winning the thing in Istanbul.

Yet once again league form was overturned, with Luis García’s “phantom goal” settling the tie, ruining Mourinho’s mood and allowing Liverpool to proceed to the most dramatic of finals.

Arguably the best-remembered meeting of English clubs in Europe was in 2008, the only time so far it has happened in a final apart from when Tottenham beat Wolves in the first final of the Uefa Cup over two legs in 1972. If the restructuring of the old Fairs Cup did not quite capture the imagination to the extent that the organisers had hoped, the meeting of Chelsea and Manchester United in Moscow 36 years later certainly did.

Uefa were worried about English domination by this stage. It was the fourth year running that at least one Premier League team had made it to the final and the second consecutive season (a third would follow) when three of the four semi-finalists came from these shores.

What is recalled most readily about Manchester United’s third conquering of Europe is John Terry slipping and hitting a post with the penalty that could have won the shootout for Chelsea and brought a first Champions League success to London four years before it finally happened under Roberto Di Matteo. Terry was distraught, and everyone remembers that too, though what tends to be overlooked is the fact that Didier Drogba might have been taking the penalty if he hadn’t got himself sent off four minutes from time for wafting his hand in Nemanja Vidic’s face.

Terry’s miss sent the shootout into sudden death, where Edwin van der Sar denied Nicolas Anelka to secure a 6-5 win. Avram Grant’s Chelsea came second in the league to Manchester United that year, too – the poor results that resulted in Mourinho’s dismissal had left them with too much ground to make up – yet it could easily have been different in Russia.

One notable aspect of the most recent meeting between English clubs in Europe was the apparent inability of Merseyside police to protect City’s team coach as it made its way through the streets near Anfield. Unsavoury evidence of new ill-feeling between the clubs – City have never before managed to get in the way of Liverpool’s traditional antipathy towards United – came raining down in the form of bottles, missiles and flares. Champions League meetings appear to have the ability to create new hostility as well as new rivalries, though relations between City and Spurs fans have been described as healthy, and let us hope they stay that way. These are two of England’s best attacking teams; the world is waiting to be entertained.

The Guardian Sport



Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)

When Algeria and Austria meet in their last group game in Kansas City on Saturday, it will not only be key to both countries’ hopes of progressing at the World Cup but will also revive memories of one of the tournament’s darkest moments.

The only previous time the sides shared a group, Austria were accused of conniving with West Germany to ensure both teams advanced in the tournament and Algeria were eliminated.

The game was later dubbed the "Disgrace of Gijon" after the Spanish city where the 1982 World Cup proved an eventful debut for the North Africans, who upset West Germany in their first match with a shock 2-1 victory.

There were 24 teams in the tournament for the first time in ‌1982, divided into ‌six groups of four with the top two advancing to a second ‌round ⁠of group matches.

Algeria ⁠lost their second group game to Austria and beat Chile 3-2, leaving them with four points from their three games at a time when two points were awarded for a win.

NEIGHBORS CONTRIVED RESULT TO BOTH GO THROUGH

The group concluded 24 hours later in Gijon with Austria playing neighbors West Germany and a 1-0 win for the Germans would send both sides through.

West Germany went ahead after 10 minutes through Horst Hrubesch, after which both teams passed the ball around with no intention of adding to the score and contrived a ⁠result that squeezed Algeria out on goal difference.

“Even though we had somewhat ‌expected it, we were all angry, outraged and stunned,” said ‌Rabah Madjer, Algeria’s former African Footballer of the Year.

“That two major football nations could agree to eliminate a small ‌country like Algeria, playing in its first World Cup and just emerging on the international stage, ‌was shocking.”

German sports magazine Kicker described the proceedings as “after about 20 minutes, the attacking intensity faded”.

“The Austrians, for their part, made no effort to exploit the additional space going forward. Suddenly, nobody seemed interested in playing serious football anymore. What followed was an endless exchange of passes, with few challenges and almost no urgency. Possession was ‌lost mainly through misplaced passes.”

French daily L’Equipe said there should have been 22 red cards shown to the players of both sides.

SPECTATORS WAVED WHITE ⁠SCARVES TO PROTEST

Spanish spectators ⁠waved white scarves in a traditional sign of disapproval while on Austrian television, commentator Robert Seeger told his viewers: "Turn it off!"

German defender Paul Breitner, a World Cup winner in 1974, saw little wrong.

"The public is stupid if it doesn't understand that qualification was all that mattered here,” he said, and FIFA ruled the teams were within their rights to play as passively as they did, in response to an Algerian protest.

The Germans won their three-team second-round group, ahead of England and hosts Spain, and advanced to the semi-finals, where they beat France on penalties before losing to Italy in the final. Austria finished behind France in their second group.

A direct result of the "Disgrace of Gijon" was FIFA changing the rule to ensure the final matches in World Cup group stages are played simultaneously to prevent teams having advance knowledge of what they require to advance and the possibility of manufacturing the outcome of games.

“Many people apologized afterwards. It's good to acknowledge the harm you've caused, but it didn’t change anything for us,” Madjer said.


Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
TT

Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)

Thomas Tuchel's England were riding a wave of optimism at the World Cup after their opening 4-2 demolition of Croatia, but Tuesday's 0-0 draw against Ghana served as a reminder that progress at major tournaments is not always straightforward.

The victory over Croatia had showcased England at their best, with fluid attacking football, goals and a sense that Tuchel's methods were taking hold.

Against Ghana, however, they encountered an entirely different challenge. Carlos Queiroz's side defended deep, remained organized and physical, and frustrated England for much of the ‌night as they ‌emerged with a valuable point.

England remain top of Group L ‌and ⁠are still firmly ⁠on course for the knockout stages, but the stalemate raised fresh questions about whether Tuchel's side possess the creativity and variety required to break down stubborn opponents.

Ghana appeared content to sit back and absorb pressure, surrendering possession but denying England space in dangerous areas.

"It is difficult to find a way through when someone plays a 4-5-1 and completely deep and is committed to it," Tuchel said afterwards. "They celebrated a 0-0 like a win. You cannot ⁠lose your head about it."

For all of England's dominance on the ‌ball, the Three Lions struggled to create clear ‌chances. Harry Kane, who scored twice in the opening victory over Croatia, was largely isolated and ‌tightly marked.

His frustration was summed up in stoppage time when he blazed his shot ‌over the bar from six yards after Nico O'Reilly's header had struck the crossbar.

The performance also reignited debate about England's attacking options. Anthony Gordon again struggled before being replaced by Bukayo Saka, whose introduction injected some urgency and unpredictability into England's play, forcing a save from Ghana goalkeeper ‌Benjamin Asare late on.

Marcus Rashford may also be pushing for greater involvement after England's lack of penetration against a compact defense.

Declan ⁠Rice and Elliot Anderson ⁠provided control but little creativity in midfield, allowing Ghana to remain comfortable for long stretches.

Rice insisted there was no cause for concern.

"We have one more group game to top the group, so we have to be positive," he said.

England's emphatic win over Croatia had sparked talk of momentum, belief and the possibility that Tuchel's new-look side might be finding its stride early.

Ninety minutes against Ghana quickly cooled that enthusiasm.

For the fourth major tournament in succession, England failed to win their second group game, exchanging the exhilaration of a four-goal display for a frustrating stalemate.

The surge of optimism generated by the Croatia victory has been checked, at least temporarily.

And while England remain well-placed to reach the knockout stages, the sense of optimism that followed their opening performance has been replaced by familiar questions about flare, consistency and whether they can break down organized opposition when space is at a premium.


Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
TT

Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has defended the introduction of hydration breaks at the World Cup, insisting that for football's governing body they are driven purely by sporting considerations and not commercial interests.

Mandatory three-minute breaks, introduced in the 22nd and 67th minutes of every match at the tournament, have drawn criticism from players, coaches and fans since the opening round of fixtures.

The breaks, introduced to help players cope with high temperatures across North America, have opened up additional advertising windows for broadcasters, Reuters reported.

This has fueled debate over their impact on the game, with some viewers complaining about being exposed to commercials during the three-minute stoppages.

"There is no ⁠additional revenue for ⁠FIFA, as all commercial agreements were signed well in advance. So, this is not a financial issue for us. For us, it is purely a sporting matter," Infantino said in a statement on Wednesday.

The breaks allow coaching staff to give in-game tactical instructions, a shift critics say disrupts match momentum and fundamentally alters the nature ⁠of the game.

England manager Thomas Tuchel said the additional break "interrupts and changes the identity of the football match,” while Uruguay coach Marcelo Bielsa said dividing matches into shorter segments takes away the fundamental characteristic of the game.

Spain coach Luis de la Fuente and Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk have supported the intent behind the rule in extreme heat, but questioned the need for it in cooler conditions and at covered venues.

"The main reason is the heat, but we also have to understand that in a competition like the (FIFA) ⁠World Cup, played ⁠over 39 days, with teams potentially playing eight matches in those 39 days, having a moment to rest is extremely important,” Infantino said.

"What matters even more to us is ensuring that all teams, in every match, are playing under the same conditions.

"It's very difficult to accept that a coach might have the opportunity to influence a match by making adjustments simply because it's hotter, while in another match, where the temperature is slightly lower, the same coach doesn’t have the same opportunity."

Infantino added that the breaks had not reduced the intensity of matches, suggesting players were able to maintain a high level of performance throughout games.