I Want a Game Where the Black Voice Can Be Heard and Respected

Manchester United’s Paul Pogba takes a knee and gestures in support of the Black Lives Matter movement prior to the Premier League match against Bournemouth in July. (AP)
Manchester United’s Paul Pogba takes a knee and gestures in support of the Black Lives Matter movement prior to the Premier League match against Bournemouth in July. (AP)
TT

I Want a Game Where the Black Voice Can Be Heard and Respected

Manchester United’s Paul Pogba takes a knee and gestures in support of the Black Lives Matter movement prior to the Premier League match against Bournemouth in July. (AP)
Manchester United’s Paul Pogba takes a knee and gestures in support of the Black Lives Matter movement prior to the Premier League match against Bournemouth in July. (AP)

The year 2020 will be remembered for so many different and difficult reasons. We have been stopped in our tracks, and many a carefree attitude has been jolted. And a year-long season in unprecedented circumstances has led to the shortest of breaks. But football is back.

In the US, the killing of Breonna Taylor in her own home, closely followed by George Floyd’s senseless killing, witnessed a surge towards the Black Lives Matter movement. People from different backgrounds and colors have protested about the social injustices that have continued to blight the very existence of black and brown people. These protests are not a new thing, they just seem to be carrying more weight and spread globally, with the realization from sporting figures that their voices carry so much strength and are waiting to be heard.

The cowardly shooting of Jacob Blake was the final straw to ignite a reaction from US sport as boycotts of matches took place, alongside powerful statements and reactions. Those players have had enough. American sports stars and their allies are standing in solidarity and globally we need to be there with them, not just with our own words but constructively with our own actions.

News outlets were reporting almost in a state of shock but we have been left in shock every single time a life of one of our own has been taken and not protected. We have started to recall our experiences as black people, and our stories are too similar. We are empowered, we are growing in strength, we have become unified.

And therein lies the problem for those that have sat comfortably for far too long. You hear the whispers: “It’s enough now, let’s get back to how it was, they’ve had their say.” There are still many who want things to remain as they were, history to be untouched, privilege to stand where it’s always stood.

Before lockdown, the 2019-20 season was yet again one of those where black players were constantly victimized for being black and good at what they do, at all levels of the game. From Romelu Lukaku in Cagliari, to Mario Balotelli from Lazio fans, to Shakhtar Donetsk’s Taison sent off for reacting to racist abuse, to England’s black players being abused in Bulgaria. From Tom Loizou, the manager of Haringey Borough, taking his team off the field in an FA Cup tie after racist abuse; to Jonathan Leko from West Brom, who had to wait almost six months to prove what he knew he’d heard from a Leeds player was trusted by the game. Or Cyrus Christie of Fulham, whose sister was hit and racially abused in the stands while he was playing; or the abuse targeting Theo Robinson, then of Southend, with his family there. Even after lockdown the winner of the Premier League’s official fantasy league had to be stripped of his title for comments about a player in a “private” online group.

But there are a good many who are listening and learning, understanding and appreciating. So here are my hopes and dreams for the season ahead.

I want a game where the black voice can be heard and respected alongside their white counterparts. Where a woman’s voice can be as powerful as man’s voice.

Where judgment is based on the content and the nature of an individual, not on their color, background or faith. Where we can challenge without fear and feel a wave of support rather than be damned.

Where “equal” means we appreciate difference and we will accept all that it brings. Where fans need not fear supporting their teams because the game is truly for all. Where the game unites from top to bottom, from the grassroots to the Premier League.

We all cannot wait for fans to return to stadiums. The talk around Black Lives Matter will continue – it must. My hope is that the taking of the knee will also continue into the new season, and it will set the tone of zero tolerance in its message. That is controversial for some and if social media is anything to go by, there are those who are prepared to give up season tickets if the players and clubs do that in their presence. A minority of FC Dallas fans recently booed their own players for kneeling during the national anthem before an MLS game. Surely, we can expect better.

The FA’s equality in football leadership code, which is due sometime in October, has been designed to improve the diversity at clubs. The code will be voluntary, and I must admit I’m always slightly wary of any title that has voluntary as its standout feature in this day and age. I’m wondering how many more voluntary programs must be run before we finally get the better representation we crave. But let’s await the launch of the code before we judge.

Grouping together footballers as “BAME” is another bone of contention for me. If I ask about black managers and coaches, I don’t want joint figures on black, Asian and minority ethnic coaches. If I want to understand the lack of pathways for Asian players, I don’t want figures for black players – I want to understand and appreciate from an Asian person and player’s perspective. Who are we describing as minority ethnic in football, because that seems to just be everyone else? We deserve clarity.

Another issue that cannot continue in the same vein as it did last season is the targeted abuse on social media. The likes of Ian Wright and Wilfried Zaha have recently exposed the horrendous direct messages they have received. The age of the individuals makes me wonder, where all that hate comes from. The platforms were often slow to react and sometimes just ignored them – those same platforms who were very quick to posts statements in support of Black Lives Matter statements.

The Premier League has launched its own reporting system for players, managers, coaches and their family members who receive discriminatory online abuse and to see it highlighted and actioned for abuse received by Brighton’s Neal Maupay recently is the kind of progress that has been much needed.

At Kick It Out we are also working alongside a company called Signify, who as well as highlighting users, can track a user’s online history and link them to their previous transgressions. All of this must be a positive as football is at the forefront of driving hate off these platforms or at the very minimum holding the perpetrators accountable.

Let’s be proactive, open, honest and provide solutions to where we have failed and let’s look to fail no more. No excuses. With the power of the game we can unite, there are so many of us who believe. But the game needs to trust and believe in us.

Troy Townsend is head of development at Kick It Out.

The Guardian Sport



Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)

When Algeria and Austria meet in their last group game in Kansas City on Saturday, it will not only be key to both countries’ hopes of progressing at the World Cup but will also revive memories of one of the tournament’s darkest moments.

The only previous time the sides shared a group, Austria were accused of conniving with West Germany to ensure both teams advanced in the tournament and Algeria were eliminated.

The game was later dubbed the "Disgrace of Gijon" after the Spanish city where the 1982 World Cup proved an eventful debut for the North Africans, who upset West Germany in their first match with a shock 2-1 victory.

There were 24 teams in the tournament for the first time in ‌1982, divided into ‌six groups of four with the top two advancing to a second ‌round ⁠of group matches.

Algeria ⁠lost their second group game to Austria and beat Chile 3-2, leaving them with four points from their three games at a time when two points were awarded for a win.

NEIGHBORS CONTRIVED RESULT TO BOTH GO THROUGH

The group concluded 24 hours later in Gijon with Austria playing neighbors West Germany and a 1-0 win for the Germans would send both sides through.

West Germany went ahead after 10 minutes through Horst Hrubesch, after which both teams passed the ball around with no intention of adding to the score and contrived a ⁠result that squeezed Algeria out on goal difference.

“Even though we had somewhat ‌expected it, we were all angry, outraged and stunned,” said ‌Rabah Madjer, Algeria’s former African Footballer of the Year.

“That two major football nations could agree to eliminate a small ‌country like Algeria, playing in its first World Cup and just emerging on the international stage, ‌was shocking.”

German sports magazine Kicker described the proceedings as “after about 20 minutes, the attacking intensity faded”.

“The Austrians, for their part, made no effort to exploit the additional space going forward. Suddenly, nobody seemed interested in playing serious football anymore. What followed was an endless exchange of passes, with few challenges and almost no urgency. Possession was ‌lost mainly through misplaced passes.”

French daily L’Equipe said there should have been 22 red cards shown to the players of both sides.

SPECTATORS WAVED WHITE ⁠SCARVES TO PROTEST

Spanish spectators ⁠waved white scarves in a traditional sign of disapproval while on Austrian television, commentator Robert Seeger told his viewers: "Turn it off!"

German defender Paul Breitner, a World Cup winner in 1974, saw little wrong.

"The public is stupid if it doesn't understand that qualification was all that mattered here,” he said, and FIFA ruled the teams were within their rights to play as passively as they did, in response to an Algerian protest.

The Germans won their three-team second-round group, ahead of England and hosts Spain, and advanced to the semi-finals, where they beat France on penalties before losing to Italy in the final. Austria finished behind France in their second group.

A direct result of the "Disgrace of Gijon" was FIFA changing the rule to ensure the final matches in World Cup group stages are played simultaneously to prevent teams having advance knowledge of what they require to advance and the possibility of manufacturing the outcome of games.

“Many people apologized afterwards. It's good to acknowledge the harm you've caused, but it didn’t change anything for us,” Madjer said.


Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
TT

Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)

Thomas Tuchel's England were riding a wave of optimism at the World Cup after their opening 4-2 demolition of Croatia, but Tuesday's 0-0 draw against Ghana served as a reminder that progress at major tournaments is not always straightforward.

The victory over Croatia had showcased England at their best, with fluid attacking football, goals and a sense that Tuchel's methods were taking hold.

Against Ghana, however, they encountered an entirely different challenge. Carlos Queiroz's side defended deep, remained organized and physical, and frustrated England for much of the ‌night as they ‌emerged with a valuable point.

England remain top of Group L ‌and ⁠are still firmly ⁠on course for the knockout stages, but the stalemate raised fresh questions about whether Tuchel's side possess the creativity and variety required to break down stubborn opponents.

Ghana appeared content to sit back and absorb pressure, surrendering possession but denying England space in dangerous areas.

"It is difficult to find a way through when someone plays a 4-5-1 and completely deep and is committed to it," Tuchel said afterwards. "They celebrated a 0-0 like a win. You cannot ⁠lose your head about it."

For all of England's dominance on the ‌ball, the Three Lions struggled to create clear ‌chances. Harry Kane, who scored twice in the opening victory over Croatia, was largely isolated and ‌tightly marked.

His frustration was summed up in stoppage time when he blazed his shot ‌over the bar from six yards after Nico O'Reilly's header had struck the crossbar.

The performance also reignited debate about England's attacking options. Anthony Gordon again struggled before being replaced by Bukayo Saka, whose introduction injected some urgency and unpredictability into England's play, forcing a save from Ghana goalkeeper ‌Benjamin Asare late on.

Marcus Rashford may also be pushing for greater involvement after England's lack of penetration against a compact defense.

Declan ⁠Rice and Elliot Anderson ⁠provided control but little creativity in midfield, allowing Ghana to remain comfortable for long stretches.

Rice insisted there was no cause for concern.

"We have one more group game to top the group, so we have to be positive," he said.

England's emphatic win over Croatia had sparked talk of momentum, belief and the possibility that Tuchel's new-look side might be finding its stride early.

Ninety minutes against Ghana quickly cooled that enthusiasm.

For the fourth major tournament in succession, England failed to win their second group game, exchanging the exhilaration of a four-goal display for a frustrating stalemate.

The surge of optimism generated by the Croatia victory has been checked, at least temporarily.

And while England remain well-placed to reach the knockout stages, the sense of optimism that followed their opening performance has been replaced by familiar questions about flare, consistency and whether they can break down organized opposition when space is at a premium.


Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
TT

Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has defended the introduction of hydration breaks at the World Cup, insisting that for football's governing body they are driven purely by sporting considerations and not commercial interests.

Mandatory three-minute breaks, introduced in the 22nd and 67th minutes of every match at the tournament, have drawn criticism from players, coaches and fans since the opening round of fixtures.

The breaks, introduced to help players cope with high temperatures across North America, have opened up additional advertising windows for broadcasters, Reuters reported.

This has fueled debate over their impact on the game, with some viewers complaining about being exposed to commercials during the three-minute stoppages.

"There is no ⁠additional revenue for ⁠FIFA, as all commercial agreements were signed well in advance. So, this is not a financial issue for us. For us, it is purely a sporting matter," Infantino said in a statement on Wednesday.

The breaks allow coaching staff to give in-game tactical instructions, a shift critics say disrupts match momentum and fundamentally alters the nature ⁠of the game.

England manager Thomas Tuchel said the additional break "interrupts and changes the identity of the football match,” while Uruguay coach Marcelo Bielsa said dividing matches into shorter segments takes away the fundamental characteristic of the game.

Spain coach Luis de la Fuente and Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk have supported the intent behind the rule in extreme heat, but questioned the need for it in cooler conditions and at covered venues.

"The main reason is the heat, but we also have to understand that in a competition like the (FIFA) ⁠World Cup, played ⁠over 39 days, with teams potentially playing eight matches in those 39 days, having a moment to rest is extremely important,” Infantino said.

"What matters even more to us is ensuring that all teams, in every match, are playing under the same conditions.

"It's very difficult to accept that a coach might have the opportunity to influence a match by making adjustments simply because it's hotter, while in another match, where the temperature is slightly lower, the same coach doesn’t have the same opportunity."

Infantino added that the breaks had not reduced the intensity of matches, suggesting players were able to maintain a high level of performance throughout games.