Ahmadinejad: Resolving Iran, Saudi Arabia’s Issues Would Be a Lasting Favor to the Region, World

Ahmadinejad: Resolving Iran, Saudi Arabia’s Issues Would Be a Lasting Favor to the Region, World
TT

Ahmadinejad: Resolving Iran, Saudi Arabia’s Issues Would Be a Lasting Favor to the Region, World

Ahmadinejad: Resolving Iran, Saudi Arabia’s Issues Would Be a Lasting Favor to the Region, World

The former Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has not left the country’s political scene. The forthcoming presidential election in 2021 along with economic frustrations over Hassan Rouhani’s administration in the past three and half years have once again attracted attention to Ahmadinejad as a possible candidate in the presidential race.

Unlike other former presidents, he has a different perspective towards the region. It is reported that Ahmadinejad was rare among Iranian officials who opposed the country’s interference in Syrian affairs from the start of protests against president Bashar Assad’s regime. It was, however, the Supreme Leader who ordered the army to act upon preventing Assad’s downfall.

In contrast to harsh rhetoric used by other Iranian top officials against countries in the region, in particular Saudi Arabia, Ahmadinejad recently sent a letter to Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammad bin Salman, asking for direct negotiations aimed at de-escalating regional tensions.

In an exclusive interview with the Independent Persian, Ahmadinejad maintains that priority should be given to détente and establishing favorable relations with Saudi Arabia devoid of foreign involvement.

Ahmadinejad’s name in Iran’s political arena has always been accompanied with controversy. It derives in part from his own different performance and attitude, and in part from his particular relationship with the media. But Iran’s former president is adamant that one changes with the passage of time.

In a live Instagram interview with Camelia Entekhabifard, Chief Editor of Independent Persian, Ahmadinejad talks about Iran’s internal and international policies, the coronavirus pandemic and presidential elections in Iran and the United States:

Camelia Entekhabifard: Mr. Ahmadinejad, along with Iran’s nuclear and missile programs, a number of analysts refer to Iran’s issues with its neighbors - in particular Saudi Arabia - as an obstacle on the way of Tehran’s normalization of its relations with the rest of the world. You have repeatedly visited Saudi Arabia and were a guest of King Abdullah at the Makkah Conference. It seemed at the time that the bilateral relationship was on the way of improvement. What are the obstacles that have prevented Iranian presidents from improving relations with Saudi Arabia over the past 41 years?

Ahmadinejad: As you said, Iran’s relations with Saudi Arabia is of utmost importance and a decisive factor in the affairs of our region. The nature of this relationship greatly influences world affairs as well. There are two issues that have adversely affected the bilateral relationship. The first is the element of rivalry. Wherever we have indulged in rivalry, we both suffered from the brunt of it. And the region has also paid for it. There is no winner in such rivalries; there are only losers. These rivalries should transform into constructive cooperation and friendly and brotherly relations. This would be to the benefit of both countries, the region and the world at large.

The other problem is other countries’ interference in the region. A considerable part of our relations is influenced by others. I think both sides should once and for all decide to transform rivalry to cooperation and friendship and not allow any other player to interfere in our bilateral relations.

We share far more than what we differ. I have visited Saudi Arabia several times, taken part in the Gulf Cooperation Council, travelled to all Gulf countries and extended my hand of friendship to all. We tried to strengthen and develop our brotherly relations, and forged cooperation with them. But mistakes on both sides turned relations cold again.

Entekhabifard: Does it mean that forging relations between Iran and the West would face obstacles until such time that the country improves its relationship with regional governments particularly Saudi Arabia? What strategy do you suggest for Iran to exit its current isolation?

Ahmadinejad: If Iran’s foreign relations are hostage to its relations with regional countries, then this would constitute interference by others in our regional affairs. We are brothers who have lived side by side for thousands of years. We should live with each other now regardless of what others think and what plans other countries have for our region.

Entekhabifard: What concerns does Iran have over its relations with its neighbors?

Ahmadinejad: There are no concerns. We should only set aside our past problems and stand shoulder to shoulder, extend our brotherly hands to each other and resolve problems.

Entekhabifard: What are your views about normalization of relations between the Arab governments of the region and Israel? Could it be due to their frustration over any improvement of relations with Iran? How do you assess recent developments in the region vis-a- vis Israel?

Ahmadinejad: There are two points here. If we intend to attach our problems to others, there would always be such problems.

The fact that these countries have established diplomatic relations with Israel is not of much importance. There were many others before them that did the same including those that have the right of veto in the United Nations Security Council that shape its main components. The problem is not resolved. The problem of Palestine is an internal issue that belongs to Palestinians. After all, it is home to people who want the right of self-rule. There are refugees, too. They want to have their own sovereign government. These problems have to be addressed. It may be that some of our neighbors say that such a step was taken with Iran in mind. This would not help in resolving the situation. We are neighbors whatever the circumstances. You cannot eliminate that or remove it from the geographical map. We have no choice but to live together as brothers and friends. As a result, I think whoever embarks on this important path will go down in history in good light.

Entekhabifard: The hot topic of the day is the US presidential election. Joe Biden – the president-elect - was vice president during the entire period of the Obama administration, had been for years chair of US Senate’s Foreign Committee, knows the region and has personal friendships with some of the Middle East’s kings and leaders. He has clearly said that one of the policies of his administration would be de-escalating tensions in the region. Perhaps we could say that Iran will find opportunities under Biden’s administration.

What advice do you have for Iranian politicians for using this opportunity in order to reduce US sanctions against the Iranian population and the improvement of bilateral relations? Is there a realistic chance for it? What are your views and your advice for Iranian officials?

Ahmadinejad: Who decides US foreign policies is a broad question. I do not think that presidents have a major role in forging such policies, or if they do, it is limited. These policies should change.

Then comes the question of neighborly relations. Nobody welcomes tensions, but expecting a foreign hand from thousands of kilometers away to alleviate the existing tensions is giving the opportunity to the very same external elements that history has shown have never intended to resolve problems. On the contrary, they have constantly attempted to intensify them.

Regardless of who resides (in the White House), we are neighbors and should resolve our differences among ourselves. Should we expect someone else to come around (to solve our problems)? That other person would most certainly act on its own interest. After all, one of the main markets for American arms is our region. What are arms and armament for? Arms are not intended for détente. To sell arms, there must be tensions. If they really seek peace, they should first, not sell arms and second, not interfere in our affairs. We resolve our differences among ourselves. We are brothers, friends, share the same culture, live in the same region and are neighbors.

Entekhabifard: What solution do you propose?

Ahmadinejad: Iran and Saudi Arabia should put their rivalries aside and not give external elements the opportunity to interfere. Whatever side takes the initiative for solving the existing problems has done the people of the region and the world great service.

Entekhabifard: So along with resolving issues regarding Iran’s nuclear and missile programs, do you believe Tehran’s foreign policy’s priority should be set on removing differences between Iran and Saudi Arabia?

Ahmadinejad: Do not attach it to international issues. We should keep friendly relations with Saudi Arabia under all circumstances. Our differences work against both countries. Neither Saudi nor Iran has benefitted from the present stand-off. If current problems with Saudi Arabia are resolved, other outstanding issues with other Gulf countries will be resolved as well.

Entekhabifard: What solution do you offer for Iran’s exit from the current US sanctions? The US presidential administration will change on January 20, but Trump has announced new sanctions against Iran in the 70 days that have remained of his presidency. What suggestions do you have for the Iranian government to ease the pressure of sanctions on the people?

Ahmadinejad:I have suggestions that I shall produce in time.

Entekhabifard: Can’t you tell us now?

Ahmadinejad: I believe it is still too soon (to reveal them).

Entekhabifard: Would Rouhani be able to revive the nuclear deal in the months left to his administration?

Ahmadinejad: You should put this to the people.

Entekhabifard: How do you see problems that Iranians are facing today? Are they the outcome of US sanctions or performance of Rouhani’s government?

Ahmadinejad: I think they move together and are part of the same package.

Entekhabifard: What shortcomings do you see on the part of the government that you believe have moved along with the sanctions?

Ahmadinejad: One unified project is being executed. There are no two separate projects.

Entekhabifard: A few months into the new US administration, Iran will have its own presidential election. Are you going to nominate yourself?

Ahmadinejad: I have so far not expressed an opinion about it.

Entekhabifard: …And you do not wish to express an opinion now?

Ahmadinejad: I have always been at the service of my country and my people.

Entekhabifard: Should you wish not to take part in the election, would you support a certain candidate?

Ahmadinejad: I have no views over it yet. I think we have more important national and international issues to consider before the election.

Entekhabifard: What issues?

Ahmadinejad: The world is moving fast and Iran with it, too. We have to be patient.

Entekhabifard: It seems that you have changed greatly in your attitude between the two presidential periods, is that right? And if so, how should it be interpreted?

Ahmadinejad: People should change. Could anybody stay the same throughout their life? People grow, the amplitude of their knowledge, understanding, depth and values change. People should grow and move towards perfection. I reserve the right for myself to move in that direction.

Entekhabifard: You wrote a letter to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman and asked for a meeting in Saudi Arabia in order to resolve current differences between the two countries. Has he received the letter? Have you had any other correspondence with him? What steps have the United Nations taken in order to relay your message to the Crown Prince?

Ahmadinejad: The letters that I have written have all been published in full. My letter was about Yemen and not a meeting in Saudi Arabia, but I am still waiting to hear from them. The topic (of the letter) was Yemen. The country is in the grip of a difficult situation; people are under pressure, women and children get killed, there is no medical facility, there is poverty and the country’s infrastructure is being destroyed. In my letter to Crown Prince and Mr. Badreddin (leader of Yemen’s Houthi militias), I have invited them to reconciliation and understanding.

Entekhabifard: Have you received a particular answer?

Ahmadinejad: Some have replied and we are still waiting for others.

Entekhabifard: What are your views about the US presidential election and the current conflicts there? Do you see similarities between this election and protests following Iran’s presidential election of 2009?

Ahmadinejad: I have no opinion about the US election because it is a matter for Americans. They have to pursue the matter and the will of the people should prevail. But from watching US developments, I can tell that there are behind the scene differences within the main administration. What we see is the result of conflict within the ruling class.

Entekhabifard: What do you think of Iran’s involvement in Syria? There are 12 million Syrian refugees throughout the world and some 10 million others oppose Assad’s rule. Do you vouch for Iran’s interference in the affairs of the region or do you think that Iran could have spent its resources for its people within the country?

Ahmadinejad: I have repeatedly explained this point. You can refer to them… I fundamentally believe that nations have the right to decide their destiny, and that wherever there is a difference of opinion, it should be put to the majority decision. War and skirmishes are not a solution. They can only deepen and complicate problems further. This is the right of all peoples of the world. Whether in America, in Syria, in Iran, in Africa or Asia, the right of deciding on the destiny (of a region or a country) belongs to the people of that country and there should be no reason for war and conflict. It is true in Syria as well. I fundamentally oppose to interference.

Entekhabifard: Are you banned from traveling?

Ahmadinejad: Where to?

Entekhabifard: Out of Iran?

Ahmadinejad: No, there is no such ban. Why should there be one?

Entekhabifard: What I mean is that should you wish to travel to foreign countries, would you face any restriction or obstacles?

Ahmadinejad: No, so far I have not faced any restrictions.

Entekhabifard: How do you assess the current situation with regard to the coronavirus pandemic in Iran and Rouhani’s inability to combat the disease? Iran is among a handful countries in the world that have failed to keep the first wave of the pandemic under check. What advice do you have for the people and the government?

Ahmadinejad: It is obvious that the coronavirus was developed in a laboratory and spread in the world with political goals. I believe that those who ran the world over the past 100 years, came to the conclusion that their strategies do not work anymore. They have to make fundamental changes. One of the goals for the spread of the virus is preparing the scene for these changes. The instruction they issue in the world are vague and contradictory. Countries that follow these instructions face problems. I think the main problem in Iran is that the management of the pandemic is done according to policies issued by the World Health Organization and that is the reason for the serious problems Iran is facing in reining in the pandemic.

Entekhabifard: What advice do you have for it?

Ahmadinejad: We have scientists and experts who can speedily produce drugs to treat the coronavirus. They can also provide people and organizations with simple health guidance through which we can overcome the pandemic.

Camelia Entekhabifard is Chief Editor of the Independent Persian.

This article has been syndicated from the Independent Persian.



Al-Sharaa to Asharq Al-Awsat: Revolution Ended with Regime’s Fall, Will Not Be Exported

Ahmed Al-Sharaa in the interview with Bissane El-Cheikh in Damascus on Thursday
Ahmed Al-Sharaa in the interview with Bissane El-Cheikh in Damascus on Thursday
TT

Al-Sharaa to Asharq Al-Awsat: Revolution Ended with Regime’s Fall, Will Not Be Exported

Ahmed Al-Sharaa in the interview with Bissane El-Cheikh in Damascus on Thursday
Ahmed Al-Sharaa in the interview with Bissane El-Cheikh in Damascus on Thursday

Ahmed Al-Sharaa, the head of the new Syrian administration, told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the Syrian revolution ended with the regime's fall, and we will not allow it to spread elsewhere.”

He stressed that Syria “will not be used to attack or destabilize any Arab or Gulf country.”

Speaking from the Presidential Palace in Damascus on Thursday, Al-Sharaa said the Syrian opposition’s actions had “set the Iranian project in the region back by 40 years.”

Asked why Syria has yet to send a direct message to the Gulf and major Arab nations, Al-Sharaa responded by saying that his country has much to say to its Arab neighbors.

“Syria had become a platform for Iran to control key Arab capitals, spread wars, and destabilize the Gulf with drugs like Captagon,” he said.

He added: “By removing Iranian militias and closing Syria to Iranian influence, we’ve served the region’s interests—achieving what diplomacy and external pressure could not, with minimal losses.”

Al-Sharaa also criticized efforts to restore ties with the former Syrian regime, including its return to the Arab League in exchange for concessions.

“We were confident this would fail because we knew the regime would not make any genuine concessions or approach these overtures in good faith,” he said.

He claimed that during a meeting with Jordanian officials, the former regime was asked why it insisted on exporting Captagon to Jordan.

“The response was that it would not stop unless sanctions were lifted," Al-Sharaa said, adding “this is not how the regime operates.”

He emphasized that Gulf strategic security has since improved. “Today, the Iranian project in the region has been pushed back 40 years, making the Gulf more secure and stable.”

When asked if he would give reassurances on Syria not becoming a refuge for certain figures, Al-Sharaa dismissed concerns about hosting figures who cause concern for some Arab nations, saying Syria will not become a haven for controversial individuals.

“We are now focused on state-building. The revolution ended with the regime's fall, and we will not allow it to spread elsewhere. Syria will not be a platform to threaten or unsettle any Arab or Gulf country,” he said.

Al-Sharaa stressed that Syria seeks to rebuild and strengthen ties with Arab nations. “Syria is tired of wars and being used for others’ agendas. We want to restore trust and rebuild our country as part of the Arab world.”

He praised the Gulf’s progress, saying: “We admire the development in Gulf countries, particularly Saudi Arabia’s bold plans and vision, and we aspire to achieve similar progress for Syria.”

He added: “There are many opportunities for cooperation, especially in economic and developmental areas, where we can align our goals.”

On Syria’s relationship with its neighbor Lebanon, Al-Sharaa acknowledged concerns raised by Lebanese counterparts about him reaching Damascus, fearing it could strengthen one faction over another in Lebanon.

“We are not seeking any form of dominance over Lebanon,” he said. “We want a relationship based on mutual respect and exchange, without interfering in Lebanon’s internal affairs. We have enough work to do in our own country.”

Al-Sharaa emphasized Syria’s intention to maintain balanced relations, saying he aims “to stand equally with all Lebanese groups, and what pleases them, pleases us.”

Al-Sharaa was asked about a national dialogue conference and a new constitution to guide Syria’s future, and the mechanism that he plans to ensure inclusivity for all Syrians in the process, especially among the base of supporters and fighters who do not necessarily agree with his current moderate speech.

Al-Sharaa acknowledged differing opinions but emphasized he does not want to impose his personal views on Syrians.

“I believe in letting legal experts shape the relationship between citizens, with the law as the guide,” he said.

“Syria is diverse, and it's natural for there to be different opinions. This difference is healthy.”

Al-Sharaa stressed that the recent victory is for all Syrians, not one group over another.

“Even those we thought were loyal to the old regime expressed joy, as they had not been able to openly express their feelings before,” he noted.

He expressed confidence that Syrians, regardless of their background, are aware enough to protect their country.

“My aim is to reach a broad agreement and build a country where the rule of law helps resolve our differences,” Al-Sharaa concluded.

On the complex issue of forced disappearances and individuals missing in prisons and mass graves, Al-Sharaa said the previous regime was a criminal gang, not a political system.

“We fought a brutal group that committed crimes like arrests, forced disappearances, killings, displacement, starvation, chemical attacks, and torture,” he said.

He stressed that while the regime is gone, the focus should be on justice, not revenge.

“We must not approach this with a desire for vengeance,” he said.

Al-Sharaa stated that those responsible for crimes like the Saydnaya prison and chemical attacks must be held accountable.

“Their names are known and they must be pursued,” he said. He also affirmed that families have the right to file complaints against unknown perpetrators.

Al-Sharaa outlined efforts to address the issue of missing persons. “We’ve broken the barriers, and specialized organizations are now helping with this task,” he said.

A new ministry will be set up to track the fate of the missing, both the deceased and the living.

“This will also assist families with documents like death certificates and inheritance,” he added.

He acknowledged the challenge ahead but emphasized the need to uncover the truth. “This is a big task, but we must find the truth,” Al-Sharaa said.

When asked about hosting the interview at the People’s Palace, the same location where Bashar al-Assad once sat, Al-Sharaa responded with a light-hearted laugh.

“To be honest, I don’t feel comfortable at all,” he said. “But this is a place that should be open to the people, a site where they can visit and where children can play in these courtyards.”