Security Council to Discuss Israeli Violations Next Week

The UN Security Council meets on April 14, 2018, at the UN Headquarters in New York. (AFP/Hector Retamal)
The UN Security Council meets on April 14, 2018, at the UN Headquarters in New York. (AFP/Hector Retamal)
TT

Security Council to Discuss Israeli Violations Next Week

The UN Security Council meets on April 14, 2018, at the UN Headquarters in New York. (AFP/Hector Retamal)
The UN Security Council meets on April 14, 2018, at the UN Headquarters in New York. (AFP/Hector Retamal)

Ambassador Riyad Mansour, the Permanent Representative of Palestine to the United Nations, said Saturday that the UN Security Council will hold a session next Thursday to follow up the implementation of Resolution 2334 on Israeli settlements.

He told official Voice of Palestine radio that the meeting will follow up on the ongoing Israeli violations, including the demolition of homes and the displacement of citizens in Jerusalem.

Mansour said the meeting comes as part of Palestine’s diplomatic efforts, with a view to achieve permanent ceasefire in Gaza and "provide international protection to our people."

The diplomat revealed that the Council of Arab Ambassadors will hold talks on Monday to implement what was agreed upon at the recent meeting of the Council of Arab Foreign Ministers in Qatar.

Mansour added that another virtual meeting will be held next Monday for the countries of the Non-Aligned Movement, whose final communique will call for an end of the occupation measures in Jerusalem, and will follow up on the repercussions of the recent aggression on the Gaza Strip.

In Resolution 2334 issued in 2016, the Security Council reaffirmed that the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, had no legal validity and constituted a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-state solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace.

Meanwhile, Hamas and the Popular Front criticized a UN report on children and armed conflict for leaving Israel off the annual blacklist of parties responsible for "grave violations" against children.

The report verified more than 1,000 grave violations against children in the occupied West Bank, Gaza and Israel in 2020. But, it failed to put Israel on the blacklist of parties responsible for these violations.

Hamas described the report as lacking an impartial and transparent investigation into these crimes, citing that the Israeli occupation forces have killed 66 children during the latest aggression on Gaza.

The Palestinian movement demanded UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres to correct this mistake and add the name of “the occupation state” to the list of shame and to punish Israel for the crimes committed against Palestinian children.



Israel Attacks Southern Lebanon after New Evacuation Warning

This photograph taken from the southern Lebanese area of Marjayoun shows smoke rising from the site of Israeli airstrikes that targeted the village of Zawtar al-Sharqiyah, on May 3, 2026. I(Photo by AFP)
This photograph taken from the southern Lebanese area of Marjayoun shows smoke rising from the site of Israeli airstrikes that targeted the village of Zawtar al-Sharqiyah, on May 3, 2026. I(Photo by AFP)
TT

Israel Attacks Southern Lebanon after New Evacuation Warning

This photograph taken from the southern Lebanese area of Marjayoun shows smoke rising from the site of Israeli airstrikes that targeted the village of Zawtar al-Sharqiyah, on May 3, 2026. I(Photo by AFP)
This photograph taken from the southern Lebanese area of Marjayoun shows smoke rising from the site of Israeli airstrikes that targeted the village of Zawtar al-Sharqiyah, on May 3, 2026. I(Photo by AFP)

Israel carried out heavy airstrikes in south Lebanon on Sunday after issuing new evacuation warnings for villages beyond the area it occupies, despite a truce with Lebanon intended to halt fighting with Hezbollah.

"For your safety, you must evacuate your homes immediately and move away from the villages and towns by at least 1,000 meters into open areas," the military's Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee posted on X.

The warning covers more than 10 villages and towns including several in the district of Nabatieh, which lies north of the Litani River, south of which Israel has stationed troops.

Israeli military chief of staff Eyal Zamir has threatened to strike Hezbollah "beyond the yellow line.”

"Any threat, anywhere, against our communities or our forces -- including beyond the yellow line and north of the Litani -- will be eliminated," he said during a visit to Israeli troops this week.

The Israeli military said Sunday it was conducting operations against Hezbollah following what it described ⁠as a violation of their April 17 ceasefire agreement, warning that anyone near Hezbollah fighters or facilities could be at risk.

Lebanon's state-run National News Agency later reported a series of Israeli strikes across southern Lebanon, including on towns not mentioned in the evacuation warning.

Hezbollah, has kept up its drone and rocket attacks against Israeli troops in Lebanon and on northern Israel.

It has recently begun using cheap drones controlled by fiber-optic cable, making them largely immune to electronic jamming, to conduct daily attacks.

These drones have a range of several dozen kilometers, which puts Israeli troops in Lebanon and communities in northern Israel under threat.


Iran-Linked Cells Accused of Exploiting Chaos in Syria

Motorcyclists pass destruction in the al-Qadam area on the outskirts of Damascus, Syria, Wednesday, April 29, 2026 in a area that was heavily bombed by forces loyal to former Syrian president Bashar Assad during the Syrian war. (AP Photo/Omar Sanadiki)
Motorcyclists pass destruction in the al-Qadam area on the outskirts of Damascus, Syria, Wednesday, April 29, 2026 in a area that was heavily bombed by forces loyal to former Syrian president Bashar Assad during the Syrian war. (AP Photo/Omar Sanadiki)
TT

Iran-Linked Cells Accused of Exploiting Chaos in Syria

Motorcyclists pass destruction in the al-Qadam area on the outskirts of Damascus, Syria, Wednesday, April 29, 2026 in a area that was heavily bombed by forces loyal to former Syrian president Bashar Assad during the Syrian war. (AP Photo/Omar Sanadiki)
Motorcyclists pass destruction in the al-Qadam area on the outskirts of Damascus, Syria, Wednesday, April 29, 2026 in a area that was heavily bombed by forces loyal to former Syrian president Bashar Assad during the Syrian war. (AP Photo/Omar Sanadiki)

The Syrian Interior Ministry has said the assassination of a Shiite cleric, seen as close to the government, marks a “dangerous escalation,” adding it is following with “great concern” what it described as “systematic” attempts in recent days to create instability, spread chaos, and undermine civil peace.

A source in Damascus said the cleric killed on Friday was considered a partner of the government in reshaping “the landscape of stability within the Shiite community” in Syria.

That role could have made him a target for cells linked to the “Iran axis,” which, according to circles close to the Syrian government, seek to exploit instability by recruiting local agents.

However, no official Syrian statement has confirmed this scenario, and the attack could also have been carried out by ISIS cells or other parties.

Farhan al-Mansour, imam at the Sayyida Zainab shrine south of Damascus, was killed in a car bomb on Friday, Syrian state television reported.

The Interior Ministry said the assassination fits into a “dangerous escalation” targeting religious and social figures in an attempt to incite sectarian strife.

In a statement issued late Friday, the Ministry said the “crime will not go unpunished,” adding that authorities have launched investigations to uncover the circumstances, identify those responsible, and take the necessary legal measures.

It reaffirmed its commitment to protecting citizens, preserving public security, and confronting any attempts to undermine stability.

A Damascus-based source said the Ministry’s statement appears to link the attack to recent operations dismantling “terrorist” cells.

Wael Alwan, executive director of the Jusoor for Studies in Damascus, told Asharq Al-Awsat that most cells dismantled in recent months are linked to an axis connected to Iran, which “seeks to exploit chaos and recruit local agents, whether from former regime elements or newly recruited individuals.”

Alwan said many of these cells are tied to Hezbollah or Iraqi groups with local members, most of whom had links to the former regime. “They are trying to exploit chaos, because stability in Syria runs counter to Iran’s interests,” he said.

According to Alwan, al-Mansour was “fully aligned with the process of stability and social peace pursued by the Syrian government,” and had played a role in reshaping a “highly sensitive” aspect of stability concerning the Shiite community.

For that reason, he could have been targeted by cells linked to Iran or Hezbollah, although there is no confirmed information.

He added that the Interior Ministry’s framing of the incident may point to an axis in which Hezbollah remains the most influential actor in Syria.

Sheikh Hassan al-Mansour, from the village of al-Kubar in Deir Ezzor, had recently met Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa and played a prominent role in promoting civil peace in the Sayyida Zainab area.

He had also rejected any Iranian or Iran-backed militia influence over the shrine or the Shiite religious establishment in Syria.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei strongly condemned the assassination.

Baghaei said on Saturday that such “terrorist acts” are part of “malicious conspiracies by the Zionist entity and the United States to fuel divisions and sow discord in regional countries,” according to Iran’s IRNA news agency.

He called on all parties to remain vigilant and act responsibly in confronting terrorism and extremism, while urging efforts to identify those responsible and strengthen regional cooperation to eradicate the roots of terrorism.

Since the fall of the Iran-backed government of Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, Syria’s Shiite minority, estimated at around 300,000 people and mainly concentrated in Damascus and parts of Homs, Aleppo, and Idlib provinces, has been living in a state of concern.

While the community has not faced retaliatory attacks like those targeting some Alawites on the Syrian coast or Druze in Sweida, a cleric, Rasoul Shahoud, was shot dead near Homs in July 2025.

The Sayyida Zainab area was also targeted by ISIS cells on Jan. 11, 2025, according to the Interior Ministry, which said at the time it had foiled a bombing attempt at the shrine and arrested those involved.

In April, the Ministry said it had dismantled several cells linked to Hezbollah in Damascus and Quneitra that were planning “sabotage” operations and rocket attacks.

It also announced it had thwarted an attempt to assassinate Syrian Jewish rabbi Michael Houri through an explosive device planted outside his home near the Mariamite Cathedral in Bab Touma, Damascus. It said it arrested five suspects, including a woman.

On April 27, Syrian authorities said they had dismantled a “terrorist cell” in Homs province and foiled a plot aimed at “targeting security and stability in the region.”

Two members of the cell were killed and a cache of weapons was seized.


Israeli Statements Signal Prolonged Conflict in South Lebanon

Smoke rises following Israeli strikes, as seen from Nabatieh, Lebanon, May 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer
Smoke rises following Israeli strikes, as seen from Nabatieh, Lebanon, May 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer
TT

Israeli Statements Signal Prolonged Conflict in South Lebanon

Smoke rises following Israeli strikes, as seen from Nabatieh, Lebanon, May 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer
Smoke rises following Israeli strikes, as seen from Nabatieh, Lebanon, May 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer

Statements made by the Israeli military on war objectives in southern Lebanon, along with battlefield developments, point to a prolonged conflict, as Israel seeks demographic change and the removal of villages to pave the way for a future occupation, while Hezbollah shows signs of preparing for a long fight by upgrading its combat tools, experts say.

Strikes have reached villages in the Nabatieh and Tyre districts, more than 30 km from the border, a move seen in Beirut as pressure on the Lebanese state and Hezbollah.

‘Yellow Line’, long-term withdrawal

Retired brigadier general Saeed Qazah told Asharq Al-Awsat that an Israeli withdrawal from the buffer zone defined by the “Yellow Line” in southern Lebanon would not come easily or unilaterally.

He said it would likely hinge on clear security arrangements similar to past agreements that set understandings between the two sides.

Israel will not give up the area without a price, he said, but will seek to use it as leverage on the Lebanese government, aiming to reach a final agreement with the Lebanese state and pressure Hezbollah to hand over its weapons.

Qazah said the situation is likely to escalate. The relative calm in some areas will not hold, he added, as any direct negotiation track between Lebanon and Israel could trigger escalation and lead to its collapse, while even a limited security incident could reignite the front.

New tools

Technological developments on the battlefield, particularly drones, are adding complexity, Qazah said. Even a limited operation could trigger wider escalation, especially if it causes heavy casualties, prompting a large-scale Israeli response.

He added that the conflict’s expansion is tied not only to developments in Lebanon but also to the regional situation. Any confrontation between Iran and the United States could directly affect the southern front and further complicate it.

He said the duration of Israeli troop presence in the buffer zone will remain subject to political and security understandings.

Without a clear agreement that ensures security in northern Israel, there will be no quick withdrawal, opening the door to a phase that may resemble, in some respects, the period before 2000.

Beyond destruction to reshaping realities

Retired brigadier general Naji Malaeb said Israeli intentions are evident despite multiple and sometimes ambiguous statements, pointing to the positions of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, especially with open US backing that allows him to use force under political cover.

“We are facing a situation that goes beyond destruction itself,” Malaeb said, adding that what is happening inside the “Yellow Line” is a process of erasing landmarks, settling scores with Hezbollah and exhausting it.

He said the main objectives are threefold. First, consolidating the “zero zone,” extending not only on land but into the sea off Naqoura, effectively stripping Lebanon of rights to the Qana field and cancelling the 2022 maritime demarcation deal, placing the area under Israeli control and allowing exploration without adhering to the agreement.

Second, there is intent to annex areas extending toward the Litani River, particularly zones within two to three kilometers of the border, as reflected by blasts hitting villages beyond the river within the Yellow Line, opening the way for a long-standing Israeli goal of controlling Litani waters.

Third, when Netanyahu speaks of an area stretching from the sea to Mount Hermon, he is referring to expanding control across that space, including areas not considered part of Hezbollah’s base and that have not seen direct fighting, within a security project placing the zone from the occupied Golan Heights to the sea under Israeli control.

Demographic concerns

Malaeb said the destruction serves no real military purpose. Destroying a few kilometers does not secure northern Israel, given the range of rockets and drones, making that logic invalid.

“What is happening is an attempt to engineer demographic change and remove villages in preparation for imposing a future occupation reality, if Israel is able to expand and entrench its presence,” he said.

Regarding the US role, he said that statements by the US embassy on restoring Lebanon’s sovereignty and on reconstruction remain conditional.

Washington links any negotiation outcomes to ending the war with Iran and halting its involvement in Lebanon through Hezbollah, meaning all promises remain tied to that track.