Saudi Arabia: A 300-Year Journey From Founding To Modernization

The Palace of the ruler in Riyadh with the beginnings of the third Saudi state.
The Palace of the ruler in Riyadh with the beginnings of the third Saudi state.
TT

Saudi Arabia: A 300-Year Journey From Founding To Modernization

The Palace of the ruler in Riyadh with the beginnings of the third Saudi state.
The Palace of the ruler in Riyadh with the beginnings of the third Saudi state.

On the anniversary of the first founding of the Kingdom, the opinions of historians varied, exploring its depths and the secret of its steadfastness for three centuries until this day.

A small city that arose in the middle of the Arabian Peninsula, Al-Diriyah was not immune to the winds, hurricanes and developments that swept over the cities and towns, which scattered in the same valley of Hanifa (Wadi Hanifah).

Each of those cities formed what could be called an independent political entity that govern its own lands and exercise full sovereignty, and even expand at the expense of others.

However, it was not only through force that states were established and political, social and economic stability was achieved. Many other factors contributed to the consolidation of the state and its longevity.

Those included the charisma of governance, the strong attachment to the homeland, complete independence from the other, and finally, the presence of the constitution, which consolidated the idea of the state away from the tribal or sectarian cover.

The State of Al-Diriyah was founded by the twelfth grandfather of King Abdulaziz, Prince Mani’ Al-Muraydi in the year 850 AH - 1446 AD, nearly 600 years ago.

Prince Mani’ returned from the east of the Arabian Peninsula to the center of Najd, where the ancestors of the famous Bani Hanifa tribe lived. He carried with him the idea of establishing a central state.

The city-state had a long history in the peninsula region, and the founding of Al-Diriyah constituted a political shift.

In addition to its ideal location on Wadi Hanifa, where water flows, making it a suitable environment for agriculture and stability, the city sat on the crossroads of trade routes between the north and south of the Arabian Peninsula, which contributed to the promotion of trade movement in and out of the neighboring regions.

Prominent historian Rashid bin Ali bin Jerais, who lived in the 19th century AD and died in 1880 AD, recounted the establishment of Al-Diriyah with these words: “The idea of establishing an Arab state in the Arabian Peninsula is clear to Emir Mani’ Al-Muraydi, his son Rabi’ah, his grandson Musa bin Rabi’ah, and the grandson’s son Ibrahim bin Musa bin Rabi’ah, who was called the Emir of Najd... It is mentioned that they are independent princes, that is, they do not follow anyone…”

Those who followed the developments in the city-state of Al-Diriyah noted that its expansion depended on political stability. Imam Muhammad bin Saud bin Muhammad bin Muqrin, who was born in Al-Diriyah in 1090 AH - 1679 AD, and died there in 1179 AH - 1765 AD, witnessed the development of the city and understood the factors of its growth.

Imam Muhammad bin Saud never abandoned the struggle of leading the city. Thanks to his genius, he developed Al-Diriyah into the “first Saudi state”, the establishment of which constituted a major turning point in the Najd region.

The city extended its influence over most areas of the Arabian Peninsula. In fact, loyalty to the state reached areas in both Iraq and the Levant, where some tribes paid zakat to the new authority.

While the rulers succeeded in founding the pillars of the state and maintaining its stability, the city was threatened and opposed by foreign and local forces, up to the assassination of one of its spiritual leaders, Imam Abdulaziz bin Muhammad bin Saud.

He is considered one of the greatest rulers of the Arabian Peninsula in terms of military and administrative skill. His state’s influence extended to the regions of Najd, Al-Ahsa, Asir, parts of the Hijaz, and the coast of the Arabian Gulf, and his armies were able to repel the campaigns of the Ottoman Empire.

His son, Imam Saud bin Abdulaziz bin Mohammad, who was known as Saud the Great, continued his father’s efforts to expand the influence of the state and consolidate reforms.

Imam Saud bin Abdulaziz bin Mohammad died in 1229 AH - 1814 AD. He was succeeded by his son Abdullah, who fought against the Ottomans for seven consecutive years, during which the Saudis showed steadfastness and great courage.

After the arrival of Ottoman Leader Ibrahim Pasha to the capital of Al-Diriyah, he imposed a siege on the city that lasted more than six months, during which violent battles took place between the two sides, and ended with the surrender of Imam Abdullah bin Saud in 1233 AH - 1818 AD. The heroic imam was taken to Egypt, and then sent to the capital of the Ottoman Empire, Astana, where he was executed in the ugliest means that reflected hatred and inhumanity.

Following a period of chaos, Imam Turki bin Abdullah bin Mohammad bin Saud succeeded in retaking control over Riyadh after expelling the Ottoman forces in 1240 AH - 1824 AD. He established the second Saudi state, which ended with the departure of Imam Abdul Rahman bin Faisal, from Riyadh in 1309 AH - 1891 AD.

In the year 1319 AH - 1902 AD, King Abdulaziz bin Abdul Rahman was able to restore Riyadh and announce the establishment of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The third founder has set the pillars of a modern state, which witnessed gradual development in various fields.

After King Salman bin Abdulaziz took over the reins of power as the seventh king of the state, and Prince Mohammad bin Salman becoming the Kingdom’s Crown Prince, the country witnessed rapid and remarkable changes that affected all political, economic and social fields. The progress was applauded at home and abroad.

Organizations flourished and major development projects were launched. Saudi Vision 2030 marked the beginning of the state of the future and made the Kingdom a key member in the international equation.



How Saudi Arabia Protects Whistleblowers, Witnesses, Experts and Victims

The Witnesses, Experts, and Victims Protection Program takes the necessary measures to keep their data confidential. (SPA)
The Witnesses, Experts, and Victims Protection Program takes the necessary measures to keep their data confidential. (SPA)
TT

How Saudi Arabia Protects Whistleblowers, Witnesses, Experts and Victims

The Witnesses, Experts, and Victims Protection Program takes the necessary measures to keep their data confidential. (SPA)
The Witnesses, Experts, and Victims Protection Program takes the necessary measures to keep their data confidential. (SPA)

Saudi Arabia has launched a program to protect whistleblowers, witnesses, experts and victims, with the aim of ensuring their security and safety.

The forms of protection include monitoring their means of communication through the security department, after obtaining their written consent.

The program, established under Article 4 of the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers, Witnesses, Experts and Victims, is linked to the Public Prosecutor.

Its administration is made up of a president, a deputy and two members of the Public Prosecution, as well as representatives from the Interior Ministry, the Presidency of State Security and the Oversight and Anti-Corruption Authority.

The regulations, published by the official Umm al-Qura newspaper, require courts to hear witness testimony and question experts away from the defendant and their lawyer in certain cases.

These include cases where the defendant’s criminal record shows they have previously harmed witnesses or experts, where they may pose a danger to others, or where the testimony or expert evidence is linked to a crime covered by the law and connected to an organized criminal group whose members have not all been arrested.

In such cases, the regulations also require courts to conceal the names of witnesses in judicial rulings.

According to the regulations, which came into force on Friday, the program’s administration will receive protection requests and refer them to the competent authorities to complete the requirements needed for review.

It will also submit recommendations to the Public Prosecutor on incomplete requests in cases where there are grounds to believe the person may face imminent danger.

The administration will study recommendations for protection from the competent authorities, determine the type of protection in detail when needed, and ensure it matches the risks, circumstances and facts of each case. It will then decide whether to approve or reject protection, continue it or amend its type.

Under the law, the administration will also submit recommendations to the Public Prosecutor on legal assistance requests from competent foreign authorities concerning protection.

It will support courts in implementing any measures they deem necessary and coordinate with relevant authorities to manage the affairs of the protected person and provide protection, including through electronic means.

It will notify the protected person if a decision is made to disclose their identity, take measures to protect them from physical harm, and ensure their health, safety and social adjustment throughout the protection period, while taking into account their rights and freedoms.

The administration must also preserve the confidentiality of the protected person’s data, determine their obligations and prepare a classification of the risks they may face.

The program’s duties include following up on the implementation of protection with the competent authorities, periodically reassessing the danger faced by the protected person and making any necessary adjustments.

It will also create a special register for protected persons and take measures to remedy any employment-related action referred to in the law.

The administration may interview the applicant or protected person when necessary, take legal action to recover from those responsible the costs borne by the state for their treatment, issue a decision ending protection under the law, and notify the protected person and relevant authorities.

The regulations allow protection requests to be submitted by the whistleblower, witness, expert or victim, or by a guardian, custodian, agent or lawyer acting on behalf of any of them.

Requests may be submitted to oversight bodies, law enforcement, evidence-gathering or investigation authorities, or the court, depending on the case.

The recommendation must include all necessary data and information, the measures taken, the factors affecting the case under the law, and the proposed type and duration of protection.

The authority that receives the request must submit its recommendation to approve or reject it to the program within five days.

Applicants may also submit requests directly to the administration. If the request meets the requirements set out in the regulations, the administration must refer it to the competent authority to review the recommendation.

Other factors the program’s administration must consider when reviewing a protection request include the public interest linked to criminal proceedings, the importance of the information and evidence provided by the person seeking protection, and that person’s health, social and financial condition.

The administration must also consider whether the danger or threat extends to the person’s spouse, relatives or others closely connected to them, as well as information from previous requests and the resources available to the security department.

When the administration approves a protection request under the law, the regulations require it to sign a protection document with the protected person. The document sets out the rights and obligations of both parties, as well as the relevant terms and conditions.

The security department is responsible for providing what is needed to implement protection or security escort for protected persons and for taking measures to ensure their safety, in line with the procedures, mechanisms and duration set by the program.

It must prepare periodic reports on protected persons, their compliance with the protection document, the risks they have faced, and continuing assessments of the risks they may face. It must also recommend whether protection should continue, be amended or be ended.

The program’s administration may apply any other form of protection it deems appropriate, based on the nature of the risk and harm, the seriousness of the criminal conduct and the circumstances of the person requiring protection.

These measures include monitoring the protected person’s means of communication through the security department after obtaining their written consent.

They also include transferring them, if they are detained, imprisoned or placed in custody, from their place of detention, imprisonment or custody to another location in coordination with the competent authorities.

The measures may also include issuing them a temporary protection identity document, within the narrowest limits and only in cases of urgent need.

The identity document may be used only for protection purposes and under controls agreed with the Interior Ministry to prevent its misuse. Any use for another purpose is invalid.

Other measures include placing protective technical devices in the protected person’s home or means of transport and assigning them an alternative residential address through the program’s administration.

Under the regulations, when the program’s administration ends protection for a protected person, it may continue protection for people who remain exposed to danger or harm because of their close connection to that person whenever there are grounds requiring continued protection.

The administration may issue a warning to the protected person if they fail to comply with protection instructions communicated to them, and may cancel the warning if they provide valid reasons. It must also verify whether they deliberately provided false information.

Any authority with which the protected person refuses to cooperate must immediately inform the program. Before ending protection, the program may request recommendations from the authority that sought protection, the security department and the competent authorities.

The person concerned must be notified of the decision through a legally recognized method. Protection does not end until the decision becomes final.


Saudi Crown Prince, Lebanese President Discuss Latest Developments

Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister, and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. (Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister, and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. (Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
TT

Saudi Crown Prince, Lebanese President Discuss Latest Developments

Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister, and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. (Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister, and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. (Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister, held telephone talks on Friday with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on the latest developments in Lebanon and the region.

The leaders discussed efforts to consolidate security and stability.

Aoun expressed Lebanon’s appreciation for Saudi Arabia’s stances towards Lebanon and its support to achieve stability and peace in the region.


Saudi Arabia, Russia Sign MoU for Environmental Protection

The Saudi flag. Asharq Al-Awsat
The Saudi flag. Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Saudi Arabia, Russia Sign MoU for Environmental Protection

The Saudi flag. Asharq Al-Awsat
The Saudi flag. Asharq Al-Awsat

The Saudi Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture signed a memorandum of understanding with the Russian Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment to cooperate in environmental protection, aiming to strengthen the bilateral partnership and develop collaboration on environmental issues of mutual interest.

Signed by Saudi Vice Minister of Environment, Water and Agriculture Mansour Al Mushaiti during his visit to Russia and Russian Minister of Natural Resources and Environment Alexander Kozlov, the memorandum will contribute to strengthening joint efforts to preserve natural resources and achieve environmental sustainability in accordance with the legislation of both nations.

Key areas of cooperation include developing vegetation cover, mitigating land degradation, sustainable forest management, and developing management systems for protected and natural areas.

Additionally, the partnership will focus on enhancing environmental monitoring and waste management, supporting scientific research to protect and rehabilitate rare and endangered species, combating the illegal trade of endangered flora and fauna, and protecting migratory bird routes and stopover areas.

The agreement also targets the conservation of ecosystems and biodiversity alongside the exchange of technical expertise and successful environmental initiatives.

This cooperation will be implemented through the exchange of information, expert visits, and the organization of joint conferences, seminars, and training courses, supervised by a newly formed joint working group to follow up on future environmental opportunities.