Jordan’s King Restricts Prince Hamza’s Communications, Residency, Movements

In this file photo taken on December 17, 2009 Jordan Prince Hamza delivers his speech during the plenary session at the Bella Center in Copenhagen. (AFP)
In this file photo taken on December 17, 2009 Jordan Prince Hamza delivers his speech during the plenary session at the Bella Center in Copenhagen. (AFP)
TT

Jordan’s King Restricts Prince Hamza’s Communications, Residency, Movements

In this file photo taken on December 17, 2009 Jordan Prince Hamza delivers his speech during the plenary session at the Bella Center in Copenhagen. (AFP)
In this file photo taken on December 17, 2009 Jordan Prince Hamza delivers his speech during the plenary session at the Bella Center in Copenhagen. (AFP)

Jordan's King Abdullah II said on Thursday he was restricting the movements of his estranged half-brother Prince Hamza and curtailing his contacts with the outside world to ensure he does not act against his country's interests.

Hamza, a former heir to Jordan's throne who was placed under house arrest last year, was accused in April 2021 of trying to destabilize the monarchy in a foreign-inspired plot, but was spared punishment after pledging allegiance to the King.

A royal court statement said the monarch had approved a recommendation by a royal family council that decreed restrictions on the estranged prince's movements, place of residence and communications.

Hamza, 42, was named Crown Prince when King Hussein died in 1999 and Abdullah became king, but lost that title five years later when Abdullah installed his own son as heir as stipulated under the constitution.

In a letter to the Jordanian people, King Abdullah said: "You are the source of hope and resolve, and with you, we will continue to build our noble nation, which will remain a model of compassion, solidarity, harmony, and resilience, no matter how great the challenges."

"I write to you in the hopes of turning the page on a dark chapter in the history of our country and our family," he continued.

"As you know, when the details of the sedition case were revealed last year, I chose to deal with my brother Prince Hamza within the confines of our family, hopeful that he would realize the error of his ways, repent, and become an engaged member of our Hashemite family.

"But after more than a year during which he exhausted all opportunities to restore himself on the right path, in line with the legacy of our family, I have come to the disappointing conclusion that he will not change.

"This conviction grew deeper with everything my young brother, whom I have always treated as a son, has said and done.

"And now, I am certain that he is living in a state of self-deception, where he sees himself as the sole guardian of our Hashemite legacy, and the target of a systematic campaign by our institutions.

"His frequent letters have reflected the state of denial in which he is living, and his refusal to take any responsibility for his actions. My brother Hamza continues to ignore all facts and undisputable evidence, manipulating events to bolster his false narrative.

"Unfortunately, my brother truly believes what he claims. The delusion he lives in is not new; other members of our Hashemite family and I have long realized that he reneges on his pledges and is persistent in his irresponsible actions that seek to sow unrest, unconcerned with the ramifications of his conduct on our country and our family.

"As is typical of him, not long after vowing to renounce his erroneous ways, he goes back on his promises and returns to the path he chose years ago, putting his interests before the nation instead of taking inspiration from the history and values of his family.

"He continues to live within the confines of his own reality rather than recognizing the great stature, respect, love, and care we have given him. He ignores facts, denies realities, and plays the role of the victim.

"Over the past years, I have exercised the highest degrees of tolerance, self-restraint, and patience with my brother.

"I have excused his behavior, hoping that he would, one day, mature and that I would then find in him a supporting brother in the service of our proud people and in safeguarding our nation and its interests.

"I have been consistently patient and have been disappointed time and again. My family, the sedition case in April of last year was not the beginning of Hamza’s state of denial.

"He chose to stray from the legacy of his family years ago; while he claimed he had accepted my constitutional decision to restore the position of the crown prince to its original constitutional rule, all his actions since have demonstrated otherwise.

"His negative behavior was obvious to all members of our family, as he surrounded himself with individuals who sought to promote opposition to that decision and made no effort to stop them.

"I was hopeful that Hamza would find contentment in the stature and position with which God Almighty had blessed him, so that he could serve our beloved nation and people. However, he continued his offensive behavior against me, the legacy of his family, and our state institutions that extend every support to him and others. I, nonetheless, chose to overlook his actions in the hope that he would overcome this self-imposed state.

"Despite everything, he is my brother. Yet, he consistently chose to treat all those around him with suspicion, and continued to stir up controversy. All the while, he justified his failure to serve our nation or present realistic solutions to the challenges we face by claiming he was being targeted and victimized.

"I sought to support his career in the Armed Forces, in the hope that the dedication, patience, and sacrifices of our brothers in arms would invigorate his resolve and help him move past his overwhelming negativity. But I was disappointed.

"During the years he spent in our valiant Armed Forces, a school in honor and fortitude, I would receive complaints from the Arab Army’s leadership and his colleagues about his arrogant conduct towards his superiors, and his attempts to sow doubt in the professionalism and capabilities of our Armed Forces.

"I have tried, as have members of our family, to free Hamza from his self-induced illusions so that he could become an active member of our family in our service to Jordan and Jordanians. I have presented him with many assignments and roles in service of the country, which were only ever met with suspicion and skepticism.

"He has never offered anything of substance beyond complaints and populist slogans, and he has not once come to me with a solution or a practical proposal to deal with any of the problems facing our beloved nation.

"The only proposal that Prince Hamza ever presented was to unify the intelligence arms of our Armed Forces under his command, despite the irrationality of this suggestion and the fact that it completely contradicts with the way our Armed Forces operate.

"I am fully aware of the challenges facing our nation and the constant need to address shortcomings and gaps. I welcome and seek constructive criticism and dialogue from everyone. But, at the same time, I recognize that these challenges cannot be addressed or overcome through showmanship that aims to exploit our economic woes to spread despair and defeatist discourse.

"For years, it pained me every time I noted Hamza’s absence at national and family occasions, and I prayed that he would stop isolating himself this way. However, he favored creating controversy around his absence - hoping that it would bolster the image of victimhood he had created, over upholding his national and family obligations.

"He even refused to participate in the funeral of our eldest uncle, Prince Mohammad bin Talal, to publicly take a personal stance during a family moment that called for solidarity and compassion.

"My family, after the attempt to sow sedition was nipped in the bud last year, and as part of efforts to deal with Prince Hamza within the confines of the family, our uncle, Prince El Hassan bin Talal, has since met with him several times to offer him advice and guidance. Our brothers and cousins also exerted tremendous efforts to bring him back to the fold.

"But today, after all the time he has had for self-reflection and self-reconciliation, he remains on the same misguided course. I have seen nothing from him but disregard for the facts and denial of all of his mistakes and errors, which have impacted an entire nation.

"This was evident in a private letter he sent to me on the 15th of January, in which he distorted the facts and ignored whichever details did not fit into his narrative. He even went as far as to put words in my mouth, attributing to me statements I never made.

"He intentionally distorted the truth of what took place between him and the Chairman of the Army’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, claiming that the chairman’s visit to his house was a surprise, when in fact, it came at the time and place he himself had set.

"He presented a false narrative of his role in the sedition case, disregarding facts that the public became aware of regarding his suspicious relationship and communications with the traitor Bassem Awadallah, and Hassan bin Zeid, whom my brother knew had approached two foreign embassies to ask about the possibility of their countries supporting what he had described as regime change.

"Hamza claimed that he and his family have long been targeted and persecuted, when, in fact, they have always been afforded every means of comfort and luxury across all aspects of their lives and at his palace. This continued even after the sedition events; at no point were any restraints imposed on his family or on their access to his own personal accounts.

"My brother violated every tradition of our family, as well as our Jordanian values. He demeaned his stature as a Hashemite Prince when he violated the most basic principles of moral conduct by secretly recording his meeting with the Chairman of the Army’s Joint Chiefs of Staff and, immediately after, sending the recording to Bassem Awadallah.

"He was also quick to send a recorded video to foreign media, in an act ill-befitting of our nation and our family. Not for a moment did he consider the consequences of such an action on our country and people.

"He could have reached out to me or whomever he wanted from our family to discuss what had taken place without jeopardizing his reputation or that of the family, but he chose instead to vilify and defame Jordan as a means to win popularity and manipulate emotions.

"These actions represent a blatant violation of his stature as a Hashemite Prince, and a contravention of the norms and traditions that every member of our family has honored since Abdullah I assumed his duties.

"My brother Hamza preaches morality, disingenuously invoking our Hashemite values while violating them with his actions and behavior.

"It has become evident that the Prince is living in the fantasy created by those around him that he alone has inherited this great legacy, despite his young age and limited experience.

"After all this, I realized that my young brother will remain captive to his own misguided mind-set, which has rendered him incapable of distinguishing fact from falsehood.

"At his request, I met him, in the presence of our brothers Prince Feisal bin Al Hussein and Prince Ali bin Al Hussein, hoping that he would return to the light. And I presented to him, at the meeting, a way forward to rebuild trust, including realistic steps that, if he so chose, would enable him to restore his role as an active member of the Hashemite family.

"I gave him full freedom of choice, and I was optimistic when Hamza decided to admit to what he had done and he sent me a letter apologizing to the nation, the people, and to me for his actions.

"Unfortunately, it was only a matter of a few weeks before Hamza confirmed his real intentions, and returned to his familiar showmanship and victimhood. He refrained from leaving his palace for a whole month, and refused to make use of the privileges offered to him.

"Instead, he released a statement on social media relinquishing his title, knowing full well that the granting and stripping of titles is an exclusive prerogative of the King, in accordance with Article 37 of the Constitution and the Royal Family Law.

"And, at the same time that Prince Hamza announced to the public that he had renounced his title, he sent me a private letter asking to maintain the financial and logistical privileges that come with his title throughout the coming period.

"And he, as always, resorted to the media in order to create a commotion and gain sympathy and attention. In the same vein, Hamzah attempted to instigate a confrontation with the honorable members of our Royal Guard on the morning of Eid al-Fitr in a stark signal of his determination to continue manufacturing crises, as he had done with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff last year.

"Hamza knew that the arrangements for Eid prayer had been set, in line with the established security measures pertaining to his movements. However, he provoked the Royal Guard with his aggravating behavior, resorting to the use of religious speech in order to gain sympathy, and he filmed the incident he incited.

"Thankfully, Royal Guard personnel carried out their duties professionally and respectfully, preventing Hamza from making a scene that is neither befitting of his stature nor that of our Armed Forces.

"After exhausting all options to deal with Hamza within the family through brotherly advice and dialogue, I see no alternative but to act on my obligation and responsibility towards my larger Jordanian family and its interests, which far outweigh my duty towards my small family.

"I will not allow anyone, no matter who, to put their interests above the nation’s interest, and I will not allow even my brother to disturb the peace of our proud nation. We do not have the luxury of time to deal with Hamza’s erratic behavior and aspirations. We have many challenges and difficulties before us, and we must all work to overcome them and meet the aspirations of our people and their right to a dignified, stable life.

"Therefore, I have decided to approve a recommendation of the council formed in accordance with the Royal Family Law, to restrict the communications, place of residence, and movements of Prince Hamza.

"We will provide Hamza with all that he requires to live a comfortable life, but he will not have the space he once abused to offend the nation, its institutions, and his family, nor to undermine Jordan’s stability.

"Jordan is greater than all of us, and its people’s interests come above those of any individual. I will never allow our country to be held hostage to the whims of someone who has done nothing to serve his country.

"As such, Hamza will remain at his palace, in line with the decision of the Ruling Family Council, and in order to prevent a repeat of any of his irresponsible actions, which would be dealt with accordingly. As for Prince Hamza’s family, they do not bear the burden of his actions.

"My family and our country will remain resilient, secure, and stable. Its strength lies in your unity, our proud people, and your solidarity. This is Jordan, the homeland of wisdom and tolerance, the nation of determination and fortitude, which stands strong in the face of sedition and challenges."



What Is Behind Claims of RSF Training Camps in Libya?

Military vehicles belonging to the Libyan “National Army” in the south last March. (General Staff)
Military vehicles belonging to the Libyan “National Army” in the south last March. (General Staff)
TT

What Is Behind Claims of RSF Training Camps in Libya?

Military vehicles belonging to the Libyan “National Army” in the south last March. (General Staff)
Military vehicles belonging to the Libyan “National Army” in the south last March. (General Staff)

Talk of ties between Libya's "National Army," led by Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, and Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has resurfaced following fresh allegations that RSF fighters are being trained at camps inside Libya.

The army's General Command rejected the allegations, describing them as "part of a campaign aimed at tarnishing its image."

A senior Libyan military source on Thursday also denied foreign media reports of RSF training camps in Libya, telling Asharq Al-Awsat that the claims were "baseless."

The source, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of his position, said the report was “an attempt to cloud the security stability achieved in eastern and southern Libya ... This is false propaganda the General Command has faced for years, especially since the outbreak of the war in Sudan.”

Libyan lawmaker Ali al-Soul, a member of parliament’s National Security Committee, echoed the denial, saying reports of RSF camps on Libyan territory were “nothing more than media lies unsupported by any facts on the ground.”

Al-Soul told Asharq Al-Awsat that “Libya does not interfere in the internal affairs of neighboring countries, and has not and will not fuel any conflicts there.”

“There are no foreign forces from neighboring countries witnessing conflicts, especially Sudan, inside Libyan territory,” adding that Libya acts only through “good offices to calm tensions and protect its national security,” he said.

The Libyan lawmaker said the “National Army” was “doing its duty to protect the country’s sovereignty, borders and resources, fighting smuggling gangs with the available means, and respecting the sovereignty of other states by not backing one side against another.”

Recent reports said southern and eastern Libya host a logistical hub for training RSF fighters, identifying four training camps in areas under the control of the “National Army.”

They include “Camp 17” near Benghazi, where fighters are trained to operate drones and heavy weapons, according to analysis of satellite images and open-source videos.

The reports drew on an investigation by the Dutch organization Lighthouse Reports, in cooperation with Sudan War Monitor and Evident Media, a group specializing in visual investigations.

People close to the “National Army” see the accusations through a different lens, linking them to Libya’s political situation and active international efforts to resolve the crisis, as the country remains divided politically and militarily more than a decade on.

Libyan political analyst Ayoub al-Awjali said the timing of the accusations was “not innocent.”

He told Asharq Al-Awsat they “coincide with the US initiative led by US presidential adviser Massad Boulos on the Libya file,” suggesting they may be part of attempts to “shuffle the political cards and influence the course of ongoing understandings.”

Libya’s political scene is currently focused on an initiative attributed to Boulos that would see Saddam Haftar, deputy commander of the “National Army,” take over the Presidential Council, while the interim Government of National Unity's Prime Minister, Abdulhamid Dbeibah, would remain in a senior role at the head of a unified government.

Al-Awjali did not rule out “efforts by some international parties involved in the Libyan crisis to use such accusations to achieve political gains or reshape the scene in ways that serve their interests, given the advanced steps made by the Boulos initiative.”

He expected “new accusations and attempts” to use various crisis cards in the next phase.

The “National Army” maintains that it has no involvement in Sudan’s conflict, saying its mission is limited to protecting the southern border and preventing threats to Libyan security.

Chief of the General Staff Lieutenant General Khaled Haftar previously made the same point in a televised interview, saying: “The conflict in Sudan is an internal matter in which we do not interfere. Our role is limited to securing Libya’s borders with neighboring countries.”

The parliament-appointed government and Libya’s House of Representatives have also said the same.

Sudan’s representative to the UN Security Council, Al-Harith Idris, had accused Libya’s “National Army” of providing logistical support to the RSF.

In a briefing to the Security Council last month, he said the Subul al-Salam Battalion, based in Kufra, was transferring ammunition and mortar rounds from the warehouses of the 106th Brigade to the RSF.

In December, Reuters reported that an airstrip at Kufra airport in southeastern Libya had been used as a logistical platform to support military operations linked to El Fasher, an allegation the “National Army” denied.


Syrian FM in Beirut to Reassure Lebanon Over Military Intervention Fears

 Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani arrives at the government palace in Beirut. (AP)
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani arrives at the government palace in Beirut. (AP)
TT

Syrian FM in Beirut to Reassure Lebanon Over Military Intervention Fears

 Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani arrives at the government palace in Beirut. (AP)
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani arrives at the government palace in Beirut. (AP)

Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani sought on Thursday to allay Lebanese fears of possible Syrian military intervention, assuring that Damascus had “no intention of taking any military step.”

The assurance came during his visit to Beirut, whose meetings extended beyond Lebanese officials, including his first meeting with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, to a broad spectrum of political forces. During the visit, Shibani also expressed Damascus's openness to meeting Hezbollah “if the interest requires it.”

The broad meetings in Beirut conveyed a message of Syrian openness toward Lebanon's political forces. They were the first of their kind between a senior Syrian official and representatives of Lebanese parties, underscoring Damascus' desire to open a new chapter with all Lebanese, across the political spectrum.

The most striking stop was Shibani’s first meeting with Berri, one of Hezbollah’s most prominent allies inside Lebanon.

Afterward, Shibani described the meeting as excellent. He also said a future meeting with Hezbollah was possible “if the interest requires it,” while stressing that no such meeting was scheduled during his current visit to Beirut.

Military intervention confusion

Shibani arrived in Lebanon on Thursday morning on his second visit to the neighboring country. He began his meetings with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, during which the Syrian delegation sought to “clarify the confusion” surrounding talk of a Syrian military intervention in Lebanon.

The delegation said “Syria has no intention of taking such a step,” stressing that Damascus wanted to deal with Lebanon “from state to state.”

It said Syria stood by the Lebanese state in its decisions and choices, and wanted to develop bilateral and economic ties while contributing to Lebanon’s security and stability, which it said would also benefit Syria.

Shibani said the visit aimed to strengthen and steadily develop relations between the two countries, praising existing coordination.

He said Syria’s current authorities were working to close the chapter on the mutual interference that had marked relations in the past, and wanted to expand cooperation at all levels while engaging with all Lebanese parties.

Shibani called for continued and stronger coordination between Lebanon and Syria, and for a shared vision for solutions in the region and in both countries.

He pointed to efforts to build a Lebanese-Syrian economic partnership with Gulf states open to the idea, and said coordination through the committee formed by the two countries was important to advance work on the economy, energy and other fields.

Shibani also invited Aoun to visit Damascus and hold a summit with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa.

Aoun

The Lebanese presidency said Aoun “affirmed Lebanon’s commitment to brotherly relations with Syria based on cooperation, coordination and non-interference in the internal affairs of both countries,” and to developing those ties across all fields.

Aoun said such relations were especially important after a previous period of mutual interference that created tension and caution.

He said that the chapter should end through state-to-state relations, respect for each country’s particularity and good neighborly ties, because what affects Syria, positively or negatively, also affects Lebanon, and vice versa.

Aoun welcomed security coordination between the two countries, “particularly in controlling the border and preventing all forms of smuggling, including weapons, drugs and people, in both directions, in the interest of both Lebanon and Syria.”

He also welcomed the formation of a higher committee to safeguard their shared interests.

Aoun said Lebanon was following events in Syria, especially in the south. He said he always calls, in regional and international meetings and contacts, for Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and Syria so the region can enjoy stability and security.

He said he was keen on Syria’s stability, just as Syria was keen on Lebanon’s stability.

Economic cooperation

Shibani also met Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. At a joint news conference, the two sides announced the formation of a joint higher committee that Shibani said would serve as “a platform for all relevant ministries to develop economic, investment and trade partnerships, as well as security understandings, and expand cooperation between the two countries.”

Salam said the two sides also discussed electricity interconnection between Lebanon and Syria, transport, the exchange of goods and easier movement across their border, which stretches for more than 300 km.

He said he had discussed those issues with Sharaa during his last visit to Damascus in May.

Dar al-Fatwa

Shibani visited Lebanon’s Grand Mufti, Sheikh Abdul Latif Derian. Dar al-Fatwa said the meeting covered Islamic and national affairs, strengthening ties between the two countries, and the importance of consultation, communication, cooperation and coordination between the Lebanese and Syrian states.

Derian praised “the efforts and endeavors of Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and his keenness on Lebanon’s sovereignty, unity, Arab identity and the extension of its authority over all Lebanese territory.”

Derian placed great importance on the Syrian foreign minister’s visit to Lebanon at a difficult time for the country.

“Lebanon will remain in solidarity and cooperation with Syria and with all brotherly Arab states, away from axes and conflicts that threaten the security of Lebanon and the Arab region,” he said.

Shibani also visited Maronite Patriarch Bechara al-Rai.

Jumblatt

Former Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblatt received Shibani.

“Between a balanced and objective relationship with Syria, and an agreement that could lead to worse than the May 17 Agreement, I prefer a balanced relationship with Syria,” Jumblatt said after the meeting.

“A good relationship between Lebanon and Syria is a historical destiny,” he added.


Sources Reveal to Asharq Al-Awsat How Hamas Identified Suspects in the Assassinations of Haddad and Ouda

 Palestinians inspect the site of a destroyed building as smoke billows following an Israeli airstrike in the Al Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City, Gaza Strip, 15 May 2026 EPA/MOHAMMED SABER
Palestinians inspect the site of a destroyed building as smoke billows following an Israeli airstrike in the Al Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City, Gaza Strip, 15 May 2026 EPA/MOHAMMED SABER
TT

Sources Reveal to Asharq Al-Awsat How Hamas Identified Suspects in the Assassinations of Haddad and Ouda

 Palestinians inspect the site of a destroyed building as smoke billows following an Israeli airstrike in the Al Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City, Gaza Strip, 15 May 2026 EPA/MOHAMMED SABER
Palestinians inspect the site of a destroyed building as smoke billows following an Israeli airstrike in the Al Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City, Gaza Strip, 15 May 2026 EPA/MOHAMMED SABER

The announcement by security bodies affiliated with Hamas in Gaza that they had executed a Palestinian convicted of "collaborating" in the killing of the late Izz al-Din Haddad, former commander of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the movement's armed wing, drew attention inside and outside Gaza. The announcement came nearly two months after Israel killed Haddad and his successor, Mohammed Ouda, in separate strikes less than two weeks apart.

Hamas sources told Asharq Al-Awsat some details of how suspects in the killings of Haddad and Ouda were identified, revealing that the movement's security services are preparing to announce another execution involving a second individual accused of providing information that helped facilitate Ouda's assassination.

Although a ceasefire was supposed to have taken effect in Gaza last October, Israel has continued to kill members and senior figures of Hamas and the Qassam Brigades.

A statement issued Wednesday evening by the so-called "Resistance Security" in Gaza said it had executed an individual identified only by the initials "M.M." after completing what it described as all "revolutionary procedures." The statement said the man had been convicted of collaborating with Israeli intelligence and providing information that led to several attacks resulting in the deaths of Palestinians, including leaders of armed factions, most recently Haddad.

Two Hamas sources, one with field knowledge and the other from the movement's security apparatus, separately described to Asharq Al-Awsat how the suspect was apprehended.

Went to the Hospital to Confirm Victims' Identities

The field source said the suspect was arrested immediately after Haddad's assassination on May 15, 2026, at the scene of the attack after being observed communicating with an Israeli intelligence officer.

The security source, however, said the suspect was arrested the following day after he was spotted at the attack site. The source said he was also seen at Al-Shifa Hospital on the day of the strike to verify the identities of those killed and wounded. He allegedly returned to the hospital the next day, searching the buildings for resistance members who had been injured in earlier airstrikes.

Both sources claimed the suspect confessed immediately after his arrest to collaborating with Israeli intelligence, which they said had recruited him to monitor several locations linked to the Haddad family. They said he admitted moving between those locations and being present at the scene after Haddad, his wife and his daughter were targeted while traveling in a vehicle on Al-Wahda Street east of Gaza City.

According to the security source, the 47-year-old suspect also confessed to providing information that contributed to the killings of around 30 fighters from the Qassam Brigades and other armed factions, most of them from the Sheikh Radwan Battalion. The source added that surveillance equipment and devices used to track entry and exit routes were found in his possession when he was arrested at Al-Shifa Hospital.

Smoke billows from a residential building that was hit by an Israeli strike the previous day in the Rimal neighbourhood of Gaza City on May 16, 2026.(Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP)

Intensive Surveillance of Mohammed Ouda's Wife

The two sources said Hamas is continuing efforts to track down and arrest individuals it describes as collaborators.

The security source said another suspect was arrested two days after the killing of Mohammed Ouda, who had assumed command of the Qassam Brigades' General Staff following Haddad's death before being killed by Israel on May 26.

The source said the detainee in the Ouda case was not a Hamas member and would also be executed after all "revolutionary procedures" had been completed.

According to sources in Gaza, the term "revolutionary procedures" refers to informing the suspect's family, the families of those allegedly killed as a result of information he provided, and the armed factions of the investigation's findings.

The Hamas security source said the suspect in Ouda's assassination admitted collaborating with Israeli intelligence and contributing to the killing of several prominent field operatives, in addition to his alleged role in Ouda's assassination. According to the source, the suspect's Shin Bet handler provided him with information related to the Haddad family's identity and whereabouts and specifically instructed him to monitor Ouda's wife.

The field source added that on the day Ouda was killed, his wife was under close surveillance by the alleged collaborator as she prepared the evening meal for the Day of Arafah fast. She reportedly left the family's newly rented apartment to prepare the meal while Ouda was on his way to join them. He later arrived and ate with his family before the apartment was struck, after the detained suspect allegedly confirmed to his handlers that they were all inside.

The source said Hamas security personnel had become suspicious of several individuals in the vicinity of the apartment targeted in the strike on Ouda and monitored the suspect for some time before arresting him.

According to the two sources, modern communication devices were seized from both suspects accused in the assassinations of Haddad and Ouda.

During the war and after the ceasefire, Hamas security services have executed several people convicted of collaborating with Israel in connection with a series of assassinations targeting senior leaders, including the late Qassam Brigades commander Mohammed Deif. According to the sources, some of those executed were Hamas members, although most were not affiliated with the movement.