Algeria, Russia Kick Off Military Exercises Near Border with Morocco  

Former Algerian-Russian maneuvers in the Mediterranean. (Ministry of Defense)
Former Algerian-Russian maneuvers in the Mediterranean. (Ministry of Defense)
TT

Algeria, Russia Kick Off Military Exercises Near Border with Morocco  

Former Algerian-Russian maneuvers in the Mediterranean. (Ministry of Defense)
Former Algerian-Russian maneuvers in the Mediterranean. (Ministry of Defense)

Joint military exercises between the Algerian and Russian armed forces kicked off in Algeria on Wednesday and will continue until Nov. 28. 

The joint anti-terrorist drills dubbed Desert Shield 2022 were launched at the Hammaguir testing ground in Bechar Province near the border with Morocco.

They involve about 200 soldiers from both countries’ counterterrorism forces.  

According to observers, the drills are considered the largest since Algiers and Moscow established military cooperation during the Soviet Union. 

During the exercise, the forces are scheduled to practice search, detection and elimination of terrorist groups in the desert setting. 

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova had previously asserted that the drills are not directed against third parties and were planned beforehand, in implicit reference to Morocco and its tense relations with its eastern neighbor, with which ties have been severed since the summer of 2021. 

The media office of the “Russian Southern Military District” had earlier stated that the maneuvers “are tactical and aimed at searching for, detecting and destroying illegal armed groups,” noting that they are the first on Algerian soil between the armies of the two countries. 

The first joint Russian-Algerian tactical drills, held in Russia’s North Ossetia region in October 2021, involved about 200 Russian and Algerian troops, as well special equipment. 

The Desert Shields exercises confirm the depth of the strategic partnership between Moscow and Algeria, Algerian Parliamentary Vice Speaker Bouteldja Allel told Sputnik on Wednesday. 

He stated that the annually held military exercises are a great chance for both countries to adopt the latest methods of each other’s work. 

“Algeria acquires Russian weapons on a regular basis and in large quantities,” he affirmed, adding that relations between the two countries have been and will continue to be strategic for many decades.  

“The drills are also an extremely important part of the strategic cooperation between the two countries.” 

He underlined the very high level of mutual communications at the level of the presidents of both countries, namely Vladimir Putin and Abdelmadjid Tebboune. 

The Algerian army has a human force of approximately 465,000 soldiers, Sputnik revealed.

Algeria is becoming the world's largest importer of Russian arms. According to the Algerian press, a huge contract valued at over $11 billion is being prepared.

Sputnik described Algeria as a “strategic ally” and “friend partner” to Russia.



How Yemen Has Developed Rules of Engagement That Are Disrupting the Houthis

The Houthi group suffered heavy losses as a result of government deterrence operations (military media).
The Houthi group suffered heavy losses as a result of government deterrence operations (military media).
TT

How Yemen Has Developed Rules of Engagement That Are Disrupting the Houthis

The Houthi group suffered heavy losses as a result of government deterrence operations (military media).
The Houthi group suffered heavy losses as a result of government deterrence operations (military media).

The confrontation between Yemen's internationally recognized government and the Iran-backed Houthi group is no longer unfolding according to the military equation that had prevailed along the front lines since 2022. The latest escalation, initiated by the group, has revealed a notable shift in the performance of government forces, which have begun developing new rules of engagement that have unsettled the militias. They are moving from a position of defense and containment toward a phase of preemptive strikes, making use of drones and improved precision-targeting capabilities.

The pace of attacks over the past six weeks reveals an escalating trajectory, with the strikes coinciding with Houthi use of ballistic missiles and drones to target military positions, facilities, and maritime routes.

According to information from military sources and monitoring centers, the Houthis carried out more than 75 attacks during this period using ballistic missiles and explosive-laden drones. These included missile barrages against the port of Mokha and the city of Al Khawkhah, as well as attacks on military camps in Marib and Al Abr, and others targeting commercial vessels that killed at least four sailors.

On the other side, field reports indicate that the Yemeni armed forces, the National Resistance formations, and the Giants Brigades carried out more than 500 combat, defensive, and offensive operations, focused on Houthi concentrations and command-and-control centers along the fronts in Hodeidah, Marib, Taiz, Al Dhale, and Al Bayda.

The significance of the current development lies not only in the scale of the strikes, but also in the nature of the means the government forces have begun using. The introduction of drones into offensive operations opens a new avenue for anti-Houthi forces to strike high-value targets without having to conduct large-scale ground operations.

Informed Yemeni sources indicate that two specialized drone aviation brigades have been formed within the Yemeni armed forces, marking a shift in the role of these aircraft from reconnaissance and surveillance to direct combat use.

In recent days, drones have been used to strike Houthi barracks, concentrations, supply vehicles, and trenches. These operations have been documented by drone cameras across various fronts, particularly in Marib, Al Jawf, Al Bayda, the western coast, and Al Dhale, as well as in areas of Hajjah governorate in the northwest of the country that have been retaken.

This shift is particularly significant along the western coast, where the ground confrontation intersects with the maritime threat. The downing of Houthi reconnaissance drones that, according to the available information, were preparing the way for maritime attacks using explosive-laden boats reflects an attempt by the government to deprive the group of one of its most important tools for monitoring the waters and preparing attacks on maritime traffic.

Here, drones are moving beyond their traditional military function to become part of a broader deterrence system aimed at preventing the Houthis from creating a new reality along Yemen's coasts and the Bab al-Mandab Strait.

Testing the Unification of Forces

But possessing more advanced military tools does not necessarily mean possessing the ability to wage an all-out war. The most complex challenge facing the Yemeni government remains the existence of multiple centers of military power and disparities in command-and-control structures.

Over the past two years, Yemen's Presidential Leadership Council has worked to address part of this fragmentation, with signs emerging of a more interconnected military structure, although it remains composed of multiple elements.

This structure includes the regular forces commanded by Lieutenant General Sagheer bin Aziz; the forces deployed along the western coast and in Mokha, commanded by Presidential Leadership Council member Tareq Saleh; the Emergency Forces and Nation's Shield formations, which are directly commanded by Presidential Leadership Council Chairman Rashad Al Alimi; the forces operating along the Taiz fronts under the Fourth Military Region, headquartered in Aden; as well as the Giants Brigades and other southern formations deployed along the fronts in Lahj, Al Dhale, and Shabwa, commanded by Presidential Leadership Council member Abdul Rahman Al Mahrami.

According to military assessments, these formations give the Yemeni government the ability to distribute military pressure across more than one front. At the same time, however, they place the joint operations room before a difficult test: Can it turn these multiple capabilities into a unified battle plan if the limited confrontation develops into an open war?

This question becomes increasingly important as the level of Houthi escalation rises, because moving from localized strikes to large-scale ground operations requires a higher level of coordination and political and military decision-making, as well as substantial logistical and economic capacity.

The Priority of Calculated Deterrence

In the current calculations of Yemen's legitimate government, a full-scale ground war appears less likely than continued calibrated escalation. The government does not appear willing to be drawn into the battle that the Houthis may be seeking to impose.

This is where the scenario of measured escalation repeatedly referenced by Al Alimi comes into focus. It is based on targeting sources of threat with missiles, artillery, and drones, ensuring that Houthi attacks do not go unanswered while avoiding large-scale ground operations to seize new territory.

This strategy allows the Yemeni government to raise the cost of Houthi attacks without opening a front that could later prove difficult to contain. It also gives the government room to maneuver between military retaliation and political and diplomatic options.

But continued Houthi attacks on maritime traffic and vital facilities could change the calculations. If maritime pressure develops into a sustained threat to shipping in the southern Red Sea, and attacks on ports and facilities continue, the western coast, particularly Hodeidah, could become the focus of a larger battle. This is what was understood from Tareq Saleh's recent statements.

The government could then find itself facing the option of launching a military operation aimed at ending the group's ability to use the coast as a platform for maritime threats, a choice that would carry significant military, humanitarian, and economic consequences.

The recent attacks on the port of Mokha reveal the scale of the economic risks associated with this course. According to the available information, the shelling brought the port's strategic activity to a halt and caused extensive damage to its infrastructure, with preliminary estimates putting the losses at billions of Yemeni riyals.

The consequences do not stop at civilian facilities. Yemen, which is facing a deep humanitarian and economic crisis, has little room to maneuver, given that the United Nations humanitarian response plan continues to face a funding gap of more than 80 percent, while the limited escalation of recent weeks has led to new waves of displacement in Marib and along the western coast.

If a full-scale confrontation erupts, the closure of vital roads and corridors and damage to ports and commercial facilities could multiply the cost of the war for the population and place additional pressure on the fragile economy of the governorates held by the government.

Between Houthi escalation and the government's calibrated deterrence, the coming days and weeks will determine whether the drones and precision strikes used by Yemeni government forces succeed in establishing a new balance with the Houthis, or whether they prove to be the prelude to the broadest military round since the 2022 truce and the fragile de-escalation that followed.


Banque Misr in UAE Targeted by US Sanctions

Banque Misr’s main branch in the UAE. (Banque Misr on Instagram)
Banque Misr’s main branch in the UAE. (Banque Misr on Instagram)
TT

Banque Misr in UAE Targeted by US Sanctions

Banque Misr’s main branch in the UAE. (Banque Misr on Instagram)
Banque Misr’s main branch in the UAE. (Banque Misr on Instagram)

An Egyptian banking source and an economic expert downplayed the impact of the US sanctions against Banque Misr’s UAE branch on the Egyptian banking sector and the broader economy, stressing that its fallout remains limited.

The source confirmed that the impact is confined to certain transactions of the UAE branch and does not extend to Banque Misr's operations within Egypt or its other international branches.

The US Treasury Department had on Friday said that “under Operation Economic Outcast, the US Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) proposed a rule that would revoke Banque Misr UAE’s correspondent banking access to US financial institutions.”

“We are taking the first step in holding it accountable for its continued, egregious support of the Iranian regime,” said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

An official Egyptian banking source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the decision will prevent the bank's branch from making any US dollar transfers outside the UAE without undergoing financial monitoring in Washington and obtaining its prior approval.

This measure is designed to ensure that funds do not reach individuals or institutions subject to US sanctions or ban orders, he explained.

The source noted that the decision applies strictly to the US dollar and no other currencies, as intercountry dollar transfers between banks are routed through a US intermediary bank or US intermediary transfer companies known as correspondents, allowing US authorities to track the movement of their currency.

He continued: "Previously, these transfers were carried out routinely under the supervision of the US banking sector alone. However, following this decision, they are now subject to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) - a department of the US Department of the Treasury, which is the primary US institution that monitors and blocks dollar transfers to entities and individuals listed on sanctions schedules."

The same source stressed that Banque Misr’s UAE branch is an entity independent of the Egyptian banking sector and falls within the scope of the UAE banking sector, though it is fully owned by the state-owned Banque Misr of Egypt.

He noted that "the US decision will not affect any bank inside Egypt in any way," adding that it is a reviewable measure that is highly likely to be canceled following coordination with the US.

Economic expert Abdel Nabi Abdel Muttalib said the US measure will not affect the rating of Banque Misr or the Egyptian banking sector, as the decision was not directed against Banque Misr or its UAE branch directly.

Instead, he explained that the measure targets the "correspondent" service, which is typically provided by US companies or banks to Banque Misr, particularly in countries where the bank does not have direct access to the banking system.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Abdel Muttalib said that the ban does not apply to all currencies, but rather strictly to the US dollar.

He added that even dollar transfers cannot be completely halted, as some transactions are carried out, for instance, in UAE dirhams and received on the other end in dollars.

Furthermore, he noted that many transfers are executed in various other currencies but are delivered in other countries in US dollars, given its status as the most widely used and globally available international currency.

He continued: "US authorities frequently implement broad precautionary measures and include institutions as a safeguard; subsequent reviews and audits then prove that certain entities were wrongfully targeted, leading to the cancellation of measures against them."

In a statement on Saturday, Banque Misr said was reviewing the US Treasury notice, adding that its branch in the UAE continued to provide banking services to its customers in line with applicable rules and ⁠procedures.

The bank stressed that the measure is strictly limited to Banque Misr’s UAE branch and does not extend to its operations in Egypt or any other country where it operates.


Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: UNIFIL Alternative Is Another Force Operating under UN Banner

Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri during a parliamentary session on August 11, 2026. (EPA)
Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri during a parliamentary session on August 11, 2026. (EPA)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: UNIFIL Alternative Is Another Force Operating under UN Banner

Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri during a parliamentary session on August 11, 2026. (EPA)
Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri during a parliamentary session on August 11, 2026. (EPA)

The United States' persistent refusal to renew the mandate of the United Nations Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL) demands a search for an alternative UN peacekeeping force that has both European and American backing to operate in southern Lebanon, Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Berri warned that without such a force, there would be no legal basis to maintain an international presence.

This international role remains essential as the sole framework supporting the Lebanese Army's efforts to deploy and extend state sovereignty over all its territory, which is conditioned on a full Israeli withdrawal to the international borders, he went on to say.

Berri stressed that bilateral agreements between Lebanon and Israel are not an alternative to an international presence in the south, so long as Tel Aviv refuses to implement what the two countries reached under the US-sponsored "Framework Agreement."

This agreement committed to implementing the first "pilot phase" and establishing a mechanism to verify the army's deployment in the covered towns.

Berri noted that despite his rejection of the agreement, he had proposed expanding it by applying it on the district level, based on the administrative divisions of the south, rather than restricting it to the occupied town of Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh and incorporating liberated towns into it.

The December 31 expiration of the UNIFIL mandate in southern Lebanon, driven by Washington's insistence, has raised deep concerns among the Lebanese public regarding the loss of an international presence that can monitor the Israeli withdrawal.

While Israel pushes for bilateral agreements in place of the UN force, an approach broadly rejected in Lebanon, alternative proposals include forming a European force under a UN mandate if the Security Council extension is blocked.

This shifts the responsibility to the United States to consider Lebanon's position, especially since President General Joseph Aoun has called for a UN-backed European force as an alternative if Washington blocks Lebanon's official request to temporarily extend UNIFIL’s mandate.