Iran: Scenarios for Nuclear Negotiations after Shamkhani’s Dismissal

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Ali Shamkhani during a government meeting (Mehr News Agency)
Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Ali Shamkhani during a government meeting (Mehr News Agency)
TT

Iran: Scenarios for Nuclear Negotiations after Shamkhani’s Dismissal

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Ali Shamkhani during a government meeting (Mehr News Agency)
Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Ali Shamkhani during a government meeting (Mehr News Agency)

Ali Shamkhani took on the role of Iran’s Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council on September 10, 2013, coinciding with the delegation of nuclear negotiation responsibilities to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

While not directly involved in the nuclear negotiations, Shamkhani served as a crucial link between the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the nuclear negotiating team, playing a pivotal role in advancing the progress of the talks.

Due to his role in the negotiations that resulted in the 2015 nuclear agreement, Shamkhani faced pressure from opponents of the deal, particularly after the talks stalled in September 2022.

In recent days, Iranian officials have discussed the possibility of resuming nuclear negotiations with the US, given the exchange of messages between the two sides.

Iranian news websites have been reporting on potential alterations to the Iranian negotiators’ team, with speculation surrounding the potential comeback of former chief negotiator Abbas Araqchi.

However, the likelihood of a replacement for Shamkhani remains uncertain, although not entirely ruled out.

Shamkhani’s involvement in foreign policy has intensified during the final months of his tenure, fueling speculation about the potential restoration of direct negotiation authority to the Supreme National Security Council.

This remains one of the scenarios under consideration even after Shamkhani's potential replacement.

With Iran’s growing stockpile of 60% enriched uranium, reviving the negotiations remains a strongly considered scenario. This is due to growing Western concerns about the shift in the trajectory of Iran’s nuclear program.

In recent weeks, the risks of a potential military confrontation between Iran and Israel have increased. Israel has informed Western powers that it may launch a unilateral strike on Iranian facilities if Tehran continues enriching uranium at a 60% level.

After US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan hinted at giving Israel the green light in the event of Iran’s proximity to nuclear weapons, Iranian officials have indirectly warned of potential withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

This possibility is also on the table if nuclear negotiations are officially declared unsuccessful, prompting Western powers to trigger the mechanism for the reinstatement of UN sanctions.

Shamkhani’s departure from the Supreme National Security Council is expected to influence nuclear negotiations, particularly with the arrival of influential leader Ali Akbar Ahmadian.

This shift may favor proponents of enhanced Iranian “deterrence,” including the possibility of nuclear weapon production, despite the Iranian Supreme Leader's fatwa against weapons of mass destruction.

 



G7 Statement will Not Mention ICC Warrant for Netanyahu

Protesters wave an Israeli flag and hold placards as they stand behind a banner reading, "Crime Minister" and demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just before his corruption trial opens, outside his residence in Jerusalem May 24, 2020. The placard in Hebrew reads, " Indictment: favorable coverage = lying to the public" REUTERS/Amir Cohen/File Photo
Protesters wave an Israeli flag and hold placards as they stand behind a banner reading, "Crime Minister" and demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just before his corruption trial opens, outside his residence in Jerusalem May 24, 2020. The placard in Hebrew reads, " Indictment: favorable coverage = lying to the public" REUTERS/Amir Cohen/File Photo
TT

G7 Statement will Not Mention ICC Warrant for Netanyahu

Protesters wave an Israeli flag and hold placards as they stand behind a banner reading, "Crime Minister" and demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just before his corruption trial opens, outside his residence in Jerusalem May 24, 2020. The placard in Hebrew reads, " Indictment: favorable coverage = lying to the public" REUTERS/Amir Cohen/File Photo
Protesters wave an Israeli flag and hold placards as they stand behind a banner reading, "Crime Minister" and demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just before his corruption trial opens, outside his residence in Jerusalem May 24, 2020. The placard in Hebrew reads, " Indictment: favorable coverage = lying to the public" REUTERS/Amir Cohen/File Photo

A joint statement of Group of Seven foreign ministers is set to avoid mentioning the International Criminal Court's (ICC) arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, despite an effort by the Italian hosts to find a common position on it.

Italy, which currently chairs the G7, said on Monday it wanted to try to forge a common position about the ICC arrest warrant at a two-day meeting it hosted in the spa town of Fiuggi and which ended on Tuesday.

A draft of the final statement due to emerge from the discussions, reviewed by Reuters, did not directly name the ICC and its decisions.

"In exercising its right to defend itself, Israel must fully comply with its obligations under international law in all circumstances, including International Humanitarian Law," it said.

"We reiterate our commitment to International Humanitarian Law and will comply with our respective obligations," the statement added, stressing "that there can be no equivalence between the terrorist group Hamas and the State of Israel".

Last week, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defence chief Yoav Gallant, as well as a Hamas leader, Ibrahim Al-Masri, for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza conflict.

The move was strongly criticized by the United States but other states including Britain and Italy did not rule out that they could make an arrest if Netanyahu visited their countries.

Israel condemned the ICC decision as shameful and absurd. Hamas praised it as a step towards justice.