Lebanese Political Forces Stand Their Ground as French Envoy Arrives in Beirut

Lebanon's caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati meets with former French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian in Beirut, Lebanon June 22, 2023. (Reuters)
Lebanon's caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati meets with former French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian in Beirut, Lebanon June 22, 2023. (Reuters)
TT

Lebanese Political Forces Stand Their Ground as French Envoy Arrives in Beirut

Lebanon's caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati meets with former French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian in Beirut, Lebanon June 22, 2023. (Reuters)
Lebanon's caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati meets with former French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian in Beirut, Lebanon June 22, 2023. (Reuters)

French presidential to Lebanon Jean-Yves Le Drian arrived in Beirut on Wednesday for talks with leaders as bitter divisions continue to plague the crisis-hit country.

Le Drian's three-day visit comes a week after lawmakers failed for a 12th time to elect a new president, drawing condemnation from the international community.

Bitter divisions between the Iran-backed Hezbollah party and its opponents now risk miring Lebanon further in a protracted power vacuum.

The latest vote pitted Hezbollah's candidate Suleiman Franjieh against former minister Jihad Azour, who has mainly been endorsed by the opposition and Free Patriotic Movement.

The French embassy did not disclose the agenda of Le Drian’s trip, adding that he would not hold a press conference.

The envoy kicked off his trip with separate meetings with influential parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati and Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi.

Media sources said Le Drian is also scheduled to hold talks with officials from the FPM, Lebanese Forces, Progressive Socialist Party and independent and Change MPs.

Sources following the visit said Le Drian has not come with a complete initiative, but he will listen to stances and proposals from political powers on how to resolve the crisis and that he will relay to Paris.

The sources added that the envoy is not facing an easy task and the impasse still stands.

They told Asharq Al-Awsat that the political forces have not changed their positions, citing the support of the Shiite duo of Hezbollah and Berri’s Amal for Franjieh’s run for president.

The duo had called for dialogue to discuss the candidacy. The political forces on the other side of the divide – including the LF and FPM - have rejected the call.

The sources stressed that dialogue remains the only way to end the crisis, but it is still out of reach given the intransigence of the rivals.

After a regular meeting headed by MP Gebran Bassil, the FPM said the latest presidential elections session showed that sticking to Franjieh’s nomination “will lead to a dead end”.

The parliamentary forces must move on to a new phase to choose a candidate through consensus and agree on the broad strokes of his presidential agenda.

Hezbollah, however, remains insistent on backing Franjieh, while not dismissing other candidates.

Deputy party leader Sheikh Naim Qassem said dialogue was the best option, adding that no presidential nominee should be eliminated from the talks.

“All concerns should be on the table so that we can reach the desired result,” he stressed.

Democratic Gathering MP Marwan Hamadeh said Le Drian may visit declared and un-declared presidential candidates.

In remarks to local radio, he hoped the visit would kick off a new Arab, western and perhaps even Iranian-backed effort to resolve the presidential deadlock.

The Shiite duo’s unyielding stance to abandon support to Franjieh will “lead us on the same path that led to Aoun’s election in 2016,” he warned.

The last impasse over the presidency kept Lebanon without a head of state for two-and-half years. Aoun, who was backed by Hezbollah, was eventually elected after much political wrangling.



US Vetoes UN Security Council Resolution on Gaza Ceasefire

Members of the United Nations Security Council listen as Ambassador Majed Bamya, Deputy Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the UN, speaks meeting on the situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question at the UN headquarters on November 20, 2024 in New York City. (Getty Images via AFP)
Members of the United Nations Security Council listen as Ambassador Majed Bamya, Deputy Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the UN, speaks meeting on the situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question at the UN headquarters on November 20, 2024 in New York City. (Getty Images via AFP)
TT

US Vetoes UN Security Council Resolution on Gaza Ceasefire

Members of the United Nations Security Council listen as Ambassador Majed Bamya, Deputy Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the UN, speaks meeting on the situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question at the UN headquarters on November 20, 2024 in New York City. (Getty Images via AFP)
Members of the United Nations Security Council listen as Ambassador Majed Bamya, Deputy Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the UN, speaks meeting on the situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question at the UN headquarters on November 20, 2024 in New York City. (Getty Images via AFP)

The United States on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza, drawing criticism of the Biden administration for once again blocking international action aimed at halting Israel's war with Hamas.

The 15-member council voted on a resolution put forward by 10 non-permanent members that called for an "immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire" in the 13-month conflict and separately demanded the release of hostages.

Only the US voted against, using its veto as a permanent council member to block the resolution.

Robert Wood, deputy US ambassador to the UN, said Washington had made clear it would only support a resolution that explicitly calls for the immediate release of hostages as part of a ceasefire.

"A durable end to the war must come with the release of the hostages. These two urgent goals are inextricably linked. This resolution abandoned that necessity, and for that reason, the United States could not support it," he said.

Wood said the US had sought compromise, but the text of the proposed resolution would have sent a "dangerous message" to Palestinian group Hamas that "there's no need to come back to the negotiating table."

Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed nearly 44,000 people and displaced nearly all the enclave's population at least once. It was launched in response to an attack by Hamas-led fighters who killed 1,200 people and captured more than 250 hostages in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

Members roundly criticized the US for blocking the resolution put forward by the council's 10 elected members: Algeria, Ecuador, Guyana, Japan, Malta, Mozambique, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and Switzerland.

"It is deeply regretted that due to the use of the veto this council has once again failed to uphold its responsibility to maintain international peace and security," Malta's UN Ambassador Vanessa Frazier said after the vote failed, adding that the text of the resolution "was by no means a maximalist one."

"It represented the bare minimum of what is needed to begin to address the desperate situation on the ground," she said.

Food security experts have warned that famine is imminent among Gaza's 2.3 million people.

US President Joe Biden, who leaves office on Jan. 20, has offered Israel strong diplomatic backing and continued to provide arms for the war, while trying unsuccessfully to broker a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas that would see hostages released in exchange for Palestinians held by Israel.

After blocking earlier resolutions on Gaza, Washington in March abstained from a vote that allowed a resolution to pass demanding an immediate ceasefire.

A senior US official, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity ahead of Wednesday's vote, said Britain had put forward new language that the US would have supported as a compromise, but that was rejected by the elected members.

Some members were more interested in bringing about a US veto than compromising on the resolution, the official said, accusing US adversaries Russia and China of encouraging those members.

'GREEN LIGHT'

France's ambassador Nicolas de Riviere said the resolution rejected by the US "very firmly" required the release of hostages.

"France still has two hostages in Gaza, and we deeply regret that the Security Council was not able to formulate this demand," he said.

China's UN ambassador, Fu Cong, said each time the United States had exercised its veto to protect Israel, the number of people killed in Gaza had steadily risen.

"How many more people have to die before they wake up from their pretend slumber?" he asked.

"Insistence on setting a precondition for ceasefire is tantamount to giving the green light to continue the war and condoning the continued killing."

Israel's UN ambassador Danny Danon said ahead of the vote the text was not a resolution for peace but was "a resolution for appeasement" of Hamas.

"History will remember who stood with the hostages and who abandoned them," Danon said.