African Union, IGAD Propose New Vision to End Sudan’s War

Ethiopia Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Kenyan President William Ruto during a former IGAD meeting (Ethiopian News Agency)
Ethiopia Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Kenyan President William Ruto during a former IGAD meeting (Ethiopian News Agency)
TT

African Union, IGAD Propose New Vision to End Sudan’s War

Ethiopia Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Kenyan President William Ruto during a former IGAD meeting (Ethiopian News Agency)
Ethiopia Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Kenyan President William Ruto during a former IGAD meeting (Ethiopian News Agency)

Sudan’s political parties announced that the African Union (AU) and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) proposed a new vision to stop the war, paving the way for a comprehensive political process with the participation of all parties.

A recent diplomatic issue arose between the AU and Khartoum regarding the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), one of the warring parties in Sudan.

The National Accord Forces (Watan) said in a statement that a meeting was held at the invitation of the Union and IGAD in the presence of political and civil forces.

The statement added that the AU and IGAD proposed a vision for holding a preparatory conference preceding the political process to discuss managing the dialogue.

The vision also addresses the participation rate of each bloc, its location, the timetable for the national dialogue, and the role of the regional and international community.

- Regional and international role

According to the statement, the Union and IGAD confirmed they were in contact with the Arab League and the UN to ensure the dialogue has broader support.

The National Accord Forces stressed that the RSF must adhere to the Jeddah negotiations to ensure a permanent ceasefire and humanitarian aid delivery.

The statement said the national intra-Sudanese dialogue is a political process that includes all components without excluding any party.

The Forces proposed forming the national mechanism for the preparatory conference, holding more meetings and discussions, expanding the participation base, and organizing workshops for the political parties.

Several reports indicated that Egyptian President Abdelfattah al-Sisi discussed with the chairman of the African Union Commission, Moussa Faki, the recent developments in Africa and efforts to end the ongoing war in Sudan.

The AU and IGAD are scheduled to meet other Sudanese political parties, such as the Forces of Freedom and Change.

- Supporting the Jeddah negotiations

The Forces of Freedom and Change and other civil forces are preparing to hold meetings in Addis Ababa to consult on establishing the largest civil anti-war front.

The Forces of Freedom called for unifying all initiatives at regional and international levels to support the Jeddah process, sponsored by Saudi Arabia and the US, to reach a permanent ceasefire, followed by a political process that prepares for the transition to civilian ruling.

In July, the Sudanese army boycotted IGAD meetings, rejecting the Quartet chaired by Kenya to end the crisis in Sudan.

The Sudanese army accused the Kenyan President, William Ruto, of siding with the Rapid Support Forces and providing asylum to its leader.

A severe crisis also erupted between the army and the AU chairperson after he met with the RSF political advisor, Youssef Ezzat, in Addis Ababa.

The AU and IGAD stress that there is no military solution to the crisis in Sudan, urging the warring parties to negotiate to end the war and launch a comprehensive political process, with the participation of political and civil forces to complete the civil transition in the country.



Sudan’s El-Obeid Under Drone Pressure, Fears El Fasher Fate

Damage caused by Rapid Support Forces drones in Sudan’s el-Obeid, North Kordofan state. (Photo circulated on social media)
Damage caused by Rapid Support Forces drones in Sudan’s el-Obeid, North Kordofan state. (Photo circulated on social media)
TT

Sudan’s El-Obeid Under Drone Pressure, Fears El Fasher Fate

Damage caused by Rapid Support Forces drones in Sudan’s el-Obeid, North Kordofan state. (Photo circulated on social media)
Damage caused by Rapid Support Forces drones in Sudan’s el-Obeid, North Kordofan state. (Photo circulated on social media)

Only hours after the United Nations and several Western countries urged the Rapid Support Forces to halt its assault on el-Obeid, the capital of North Kordofan state, it was plunged into darkness.

A drone strike hit the city’s main power station, marking the latest in a wave of attacks that have battered el-Obeid for days.

Local sources said a strategic drone belonging to the RSF struck the electricity substation late on Thursday, cutting power across the city. By Friday morning, strikes had resumed on other sites inside al-Obeid.

For residents of the city, known in Sudan as the “Bride of the Sands,” the blackout was not an isolated blow. It was another episode in a weeks-long buildup of pressure. In recent days, heavy drone attacks have killed more than 40 civilians and wounded dozens, according to local sources.

The strikes have also hit fuel stations, supply trucks and civilian and military sites, spreading fear through the city.

Local witnesses said drones still fly regularly over el-Obeid, turning anticipation into part of daily life.

Residents said they now track the movement and sound of drones more closely than they follow the news on television or smartphones.

Some have cut back their movements or stayed indoors, fearing sudden attacks after repeated strikes on civilian and service facilities in recent days.

Fears of an El Fasher scenario

Those fears have deepened because of what happened in El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur state, which fell to the RSF last year after months of siege and military attrition.

Since then, El Fasher has become the reference point in every discussion about the fate of el-Obeid, especially as attacks intensify and pressure on the city grows.

El-Obeid lies about 411 km from Khartoum and forms the main link between Darfur and central Sudan. It is also home to the headquarters of the 5th Infantry Division, known as the Haggana, a name derived from the use of camels in military operations.

The division is one of the Sudanese army’s most important units.

But el-Obeid’s importance is not only military. It is also economic, political and logistical. The city lies near the center of Sudan, at the meeting point of Darfur, Kordofan and the country’s central regions. For decades, that position has made it a major hub for trade, transport and the movement of goods.

El-Obeid is connected to roads, railway lines and vital supply routes linking western Sudan to the east, making it an important center for trade, supplies and transport.

It is also a major administrative and political center in Kordofan, with a historical symbolism that has made it one of the most influential cities in western Sudan.

That importance helps explain why el-Obeid has become a key target in the battles between the army and the RSF. For the army, the city is a major base for current or future military operations in Kordofan and Darfur. It is also the most important line of defense for central Sudan.

‘El-Obeid will not fall’

Former Sudanese army chief of staff General Hashem Abdel Muttalib told Asharq Al-Awsat that the RSF is using its attacks to disrupt the army and prevent it from advancing towards Darfur. But he ruled out the possibility that drones could achieve that goal.

“El-Obeid will not fall,” he said.

The army goes further in dismissing any direct threat to the city. Colonel al-Basha Hakim, commander of the armored corps in the 5th Infantry Division, the Haggana, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Rapid Support Forces are far from the outskirts of al-Obeid and that talk of a siege is only a rumor.

He said military plans are moving as intended and that the attacking forces have suffered heavy losses. He added that the army, joint forces and supporting forces are working in full coordination, and that residents will soon hear “good news.”

But the reassurances have not erased the fears. Military expert Saleh Abdullah told Asharq Al-Awsat that what is happening in el-Obeid resembles tactics used by the RSF in El Fasher: sustained pressure, attrition, weakening services and opening routes for those who want to leave the city.

The targeting of infrastructure has sharpened those concerns. Fuel stations have repeatedly come under attack, and fuel trucks on roads leading to the city have also been hit. The result has been a severe transport crisis in recent days, directly affecting residents’ movement and public services.

Residents said fuel has become part of the battle around el-Obeid. Repeated attacks on supplies have disrupted transport and pushed up the cost of moving around the city.

Still, the picture inside al-Obeid is not entirely bleak. Journalist Zuhair Hashem, who lives in the city, told Asharq Al-Awsat that life continues normally in most neighborhoods.

He said the recent transport crisis was linked mainly to the targeting of five fuel stations in one day, which knocked some of them out of service, rather than to a wider collapse of services or daily life.

Political analyst Osman Mirghani told Asharq Al-Awsat that el-Obeid’s military position makes capturing it harder than many assume.

He said the presence of the 5th Infantry Division, with its equipment and forces, gives the city a strong defensive capacity. He ruled out its fall, or even the approach of such a threat, for now.

According to Mirghani, the Rapid Support Forces understand el-Obeid’s importance as the army’s strongest defensive line west of Omdurman. That is why, he said, they are using drones to put psychological pressure on residents and push some of them to flee, rather than trying at this stage to settle the battle militarily.

Even so, concern is no longer confined to the city. The latest developments have prompted the United Nations and several Western countries to warn against military escalation around el-Obeid and call for an end to the attack, in a sign of growing fears that the humanitarian situation could deteriorate if operations continue at the current pace.

Between the army’s reassurances, international warnings and the fears of residents living under the sound of drones and disrupted services, el-Obeid has become one of Sudan’s most sensitive cities at this stage of the war.

If El Fasher has become the example everyone invokes when speaking of siege and collapse, the question now confronting the “Bride of the Sands” is whether it can avoid the same fate, or whether the war is gradually pushing it towards that scenario, even if the tools and circumstances differ.


At Least 5 Dead in Fresh Israeli Strikes on South Lebanon Despite Ceasefire

19 June 2026, Lebanon, Sojoud: Smoke billows frorm an Israeli air strike on alleged Hezbollah positions in the southern Lebanese village of Sojoud. Photo: Marwan Naamani/ZUMA Press Wire/dpa
19 June 2026, Lebanon, Sojoud: Smoke billows frorm an Israeli air strike on alleged Hezbollah positions in the southern Lebanese village of Sojoud. Photo: Marwan Naamani/ZUMA Press Wire/dpa
TT

At Least 5 Dead in Fresh Israeli Strikes on South Lebanon Despite Ceasefire

19 June 2026, Lebanon, Sojoud: Smoke billows frorm an Israeli air strike on alleged Hezbollah positions in the southern Lebanese village of Sojoud. Photo: Marwan Naamani/ZUMA Press Wire/dpa
19 June 2026, Lebanon, Sojoud: Smoke billows frorm an Israeli air strike on alleged Hezbollah positions in the southern Lebanese village of Sojoud. Photo: Marwan Naamani/ZUMA Press Wire/dpa

At least five people were killed in Israeli air strikes and drone attacks in southern Lebanon on Saturday, Lebanese state media reported, just hours after a ceasefire between Israel ⁠and Hezbollah took effect.

State news agency NNA said Israeli warplanes and drones carried out a series of strikes across ⁠the Nabatieh area overnight and into Saturday morning, destroying residential buildings and homes, while Israeli artillery shelled Nabatieh and its outskirts before dawn.

Three people were killed in strikes on the town of Arab Salim, while one person was killed in Deir Zahrani, and another after "an enemy drone launched a strike on a motorbike" at the entrance of the town of Dweir, NNA said.

Israel and Hezbollah agreed to the ceasefire on Friday following an escalation in hostilities ⁠in ⁠Lebanon, according to a US official.

A senior Israeli official and two Hezbollah sources confirmed the agreement to Reuters. The US official said the truce was to begin at 4 p.m. (1300 GMT) on Friday.


Lebanese, Int’l Contacts Contain South Lebanon Security Deterioration

A giant portrait of Lebanese President Joseph Aoun hangs at the northern entrance to Sidon, as cars carrying displaced people from southern Lebanon head toward Beirut. (EPA)
A giant portrait of Lebanese President Joseph Aoun hangs at the northern entrance to Sidon, as cars carrying displaced people from southern Lebanon head toward Beirut. (EPA)
TT

Lebanese, Int’l Contacts Contain South Lebanon Security Deterioration

A giant portrait of Lebanese President Joseph Aoun hangs at the northern entrance to Sidon, as cars carrying displaced people from southern Lebanon head toward Beirut. (EPA)
A giant portrait of Lebanese President Joseph Aoun hangs at the northern entrance to Sidon, as cars carrying displaced people from southern Lebanon head toward Beirut. (EPA)

Lebanese and regional contacts contained a sharp deterioration in Lebanon’s security situation after a major military escalation between Israel and Hezbollah, and threats by Tel Aviv to escalate further.

Lebanese sources said Israel was seeking to undermine the ceasefire agreement, pressure Lebanese negotiators ahead of a fifth round of talks with Lebanon in Washington, and secure gains on the ground.

Reuters quoted a US official as saying Israel and Hezbollah had agreed to a ceasefire starting at 4 p.m. local time, after a major escalation that killed 47 Lebanese, including children and civilians, and four Israeli soldiers in clashes with Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. The Israeli air force carried out more than 150 strikes in southern and eastern Lebanon.

“Hezbollah and Israel agreed to a ceasefire,” the US official said, adding that US and Qatari negotiators reached the agreement with help from Iran.

“We understand that after the exchange of fire earlier today, Israel and Hezbollah are now in a ceasefire,” the official said.

Israel and Hezbollah both said they were ready to respect the ceasefire and respond to violations.

Lebanese and international contacts

The security deterioration triggered a flurry of regional, international and local contacts.

Official sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Lebanese President Joseph Aoun “began a series of international contacts in the morning with influential countries to lower the escalation, prevent further deterioration and ensure commitment to the ceasefire.”

The contacts focused mainly on the United States and Qatar.

Aoun also condemned “the continuing Israeli escalation.”

“What we are witnessing today in the south and the Bekaa, with the expansion of Israeli attacks and further killing and destruction, is a dangerous and condemnable escalation, especially as it has affected dozens of innocent people, including women and children,” Aoun said.

He said the escalation “effectively targets all ongoing efforts to consolidate the ceasefire and end the war, especially after the latest developments between the US and Iran.”

“But this will not prevent work to achieve a comprehensive ceasefire as quickly as possible. This is what I instructed the Lebanese negotiating delegation to pursue in the next round in Washington,” he said.

“There can be no leniency on this issue because a comprehensive ceasefire is the entry point for discussing other issues, most importantly the Israeli withdrawal, the deployment of the army and the return of prisoners.”

On the international level, Hezbollah parliamentary bloc member MP Hassan Fadlallah said Iran had informed the group that negotiations with the United States could not continue without the implementation of a comprehensive ceasefire.

Fadlallah urged the Lebanese government to reject any direct negotiations with Israel while Israeli attacks on Lebanon continue. He said Washington was responsible for ensuring Israel stops its attacks and implements the terms of the agreement.

Geographic expansion and pressure on Lebanon

The sudden deterioration appeared to signal an Israeli attempt to bypass the agreement that took effect last Monday.

Sources in the Shi’ite duo told Asharq Al-Awsat that Israel was “pressuring to strike the agreement directly and target it.” They said Tel Aviv was also trying to pressure the Lebanese negotiator before the fifth round of direct negotiations with Israel opens in Washington next Tuesday. The talks are due to run for three days.

The sources said Israel was trying to “seize additional cards with which to pressure Lebanon.”

They cited “an Israeli desire for geographic expansion after its failure to achieve a major expansion during 110 days of war.” The area where Israel made significant advances in the first weeks of the war, they said, was the same area Hezbollah evacuated and where it committed to restricting weapons to the Lebanese state.

But attempts to expand beyond that area “met fierce resistance that slowed the push,” the sources said.

The source said a fourth reason was “an internal crisis linked to the rising far-right mood in Israel,” adding that “military failure is driving it to target civilians in Lebanon.”

Ceasefire before any arrangements

Lebanese observers say Israel’s failure to abide by the ceasefire agreement is not driven only by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s sense of being “sidelined” after the agreement was signed.

They say Israel is also trying to reach an agreement with the Lebanese state in exchange for withdrawal from occupied territory, and to begin disarming Hezbollah in exchange for halting the escalation.

Hezbollah rejects this. The group is relying on US-Iranian understandings and continues to criticize the Lebanese state’s negotiating track.

Still, Lebanese authorities are proceeding with the sessions scheduled to begin Tuesday.

Lebanese ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the instructions to the negotiating delegation are clear: demand a full and comprehensive ceasefire before discussing any other arrangements.

The sources said Beirut “is holding to its demands.”

Singling out Lebanon

Hezbollah, however, rejects the direct negotiating track.

Sources following Hezbollah’s escalation against the track said the group “believes there is an overlap of interests between Tel Aviv and the state within the framework of the track on which the state is relying to achieve withdrawal and a ceasefire.”

The sources said Hezbollah believes the direct negotiating track rests on the view that Israel is uncomfortable with US performance in the agreement with Iran, while Lebanon is uncomfortable with Iran’s performance.

They said Hezbollah had “sensed that Lebanon was being singled out” through the US statement issued after the first negotiating session. This, they said, was reinforced in the declaration of intent paper in the fourth round, which appeared to show bias toward Israel in the negotiations.

Hezbollah MP Hussein Hajj Hassan said: “The authorities agreed to a joint statement with the Americans and Israelis containing language to the effect that Hezbollah is a common enemy of Israel, America and Lebanon. This was stated by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, while the Lebanese delegation did not utter a word. No Lebanese official in power objected to this language. Therefore, what is required from them is a position clarifying whether they agree with this language or not.”

He called on Lebanese officials “to bridge the gap they created with the resistance and its public, and to bridge the gap they created with the Islamic Republic of Iran, for Lebanon’s interest and not for Iran’s interest.”