US Appoints New Envoy to Sudan Amid Conflicting Responses

Sudanese refugees escaping conflict regions (AFP)
Sudanese refugees escaping conflict regions (AFP)
TT
20

US Appoints New Envoy to Sudan Amid Conflicting Responses

Sudanese refugees escaping conflict regions (AFP)
Sudanese refugees escaping conflict regions (AFP)

The US administration is striving to contain growing criticism of its attempts at controlling the situation in Sudan amid increasing concerns about deteriorating security and humanitarian conditions.

Washington responded to the persistent demands of US lawmakers and appointed Tom Perriello as the seventh envoy to Sudan in 23 years.

US President Joe Biden's allies and the National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, welcomed the new appointment.

Sullivan quickly highlighted the administration's "deep commitment to ending the conflict and addressing the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian situation in Sudan and the region."

Meanwhile, Secretary of State Antony Blinken confirmed that the Special Envoy will coordinate the US policy on Sudan and "advance our efforts to end the hostilities, secure unhindered humanitarian access, and support the Sudanese people as they seek to fulfill their aspirations for freedom, peace, and justice."

- Challenges and obstacles

CISIS analyst and consultant on African peace, security, and governance issues Cameron Hudson believes appointing a special envoy to Sudan may be the right diplomatic step.

However, it would only be effective if his efforts were boosted to lead the track of the US government and diplomatic talks with Sudan and stakeholders there.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Hudson warned that if the appointment was merely an attempt to contain the ongoing criticism of Washington for not working enough to solve the crisis, it would fail and the situation would be much worse.

The former Charge d'Affaires of the US Embassy in Sudan, Alberto Fernandez, voiced Hudson's approach, telling Asharq Al-Awsat that he doubts appointing special envoys in general yields results.

Fernandez explained that appointing envoys embodies Washington's attempt to appear as if it cares about a specific issue without actually achieving much.

Both Hudson and Fernandez's analysis reflects the fears of many officials who have been calling since the outbreak of the crisis to intensify diplomatic efforts and push for Congress-approved sanctions against the parties responsible for the conflict.

Most US legislators demand a presidential envoy with powers to carry out his duties.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ranking Member Jim Risch said the temporary appointment of a special envoy to Sudan, ten months into the war, "shouldn't be viewed as recognition by the Biden Admin of the significance of this crisis. Instead, it demonstrates another failure in its response. Sudan must be a higher priority."

Risch and other Senators released the following statement on the Biden Administration's temporary appointment of Perriello as special envoy for Sudan.

The statement explained the approach of the legislators who called on the administration to appoint a presidential envoy subject to the approval of Congress to give him sufficient powers to deal with the file.

It warned that the war has significant consequences for innocent Sudanese and the entire region.

"As such, Congress began calling for a special envoy who reports directly to the president on a bipartisan basis immediately after the war began. We regret that after all these months, the administration still failed to appoint a more permanent presidential envoy."

They addressed issues of bureaucracy, saying the Department will argue it chose to avoid Senate confirmation due to the urgency of the situation, "it sat on this decision as the interagency argued about resources, reporting lines, and how this position will be used."

Former special envoy to Sudan and South Sudan Donald Booth explained to Asharq Al-Awsat that the special envoy must be the primary person to engage and discuss with the warring parties, those affected by the conflict, and external involved parties.

Regarding Sudan, Booth noted that it would be easier to see the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces agreeing to commit to a political path once their supporters are prepared to pressure them.

- Molly Phee and her "obstructing role"

Sources in Congress, who refused to be named, discussed the "obstructive" role of Assistant Secretary of State Molly Phee in Sudan.

The sources noted that Phee controlled the Sudanese file and refused anyone else assuming the role.

However, Fernandez did not hesitate to criticize Phee publicly, voicing his belief that her role was very harmful to Sudan since the military coup in October 2021.

The expert added that Perriello's appointment begs the question of who will have the final decision in the Sudan file and whether it would be the new envoy or the official who has more influence in the State Department, meaning Phee.

Fernandez feared Perriello will have to spend most of his time facing bureaucratic issues in Washington instead of working to stop the actual war in Sudan.

Hudson believed that the failure of high-level officials, such as the Secretary of State, to resolve the conflict in Sudan and the assignment of people like Phee led to the absence of a solution to the crisis.

He indicated the file should not have been handed to mid-level diplomats, who need to gain experience in managing transitional processes or have weak records in responding to conflicts.

- Consecutive resignations

Critics of Phee's role point to the successive resignations of officials in the Sudan file.

Hudson stated that Washington has shown weakness in commitment in naming the diplomats assigned to Sudan, threatening its efforts for peace in the country.

Fernandez explained that he worked with three special envoys in Sudan, noting that there are many challenges facing the official, such as his knowledge and experience, the time and effort that he will devote to the file, and the administration's support, which is essential.

The expert concluded that there could be good policies and bad envoys, but the truth usually reflects the opposite reality: policies are unclear or unrealistic, and the envoy's qualities do not matter because the problem is politics.

However, Booth pointed out that the special envoy's duties include coordinating Washington's approach to resolving the conflict, adding that he needs to be involved in the talks that formulate policies and enjoy the support of high-ranking officials to ensure a succeeded mission.



Abbas Seeks Direct, Intensive Talks with Hamas

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at a cancer center opening in Ramallah on Wednesday (AFP)
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at a cancer center opening in Ramallah on Wednesday (AFP)
TT
20

Abbas Seeks Direct, Intensive Talks with Hamas

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at a cancer center opening in Ramallah on Wednesday (AFP)
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at a cancer center opening in Ramallah on Wednesday (AFP)

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has instructed Fatah and other factions within the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to engage in direct and intensive dialogue with Hamas in a bid to reach a comprehensive agreement that would bring the group into the Palestinian political system, Palestinian sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

According to the sources, Abbas urged Fatah’s leadership to increase pressure on Hamas — directly or through countries with influence over the group — to turn the page on years of division and usher in a new phase in which Hamas would transform into a political party, hand over control of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority (PA), and commit to its decisions, institutions and laws.

Abbas also ordered the formation of a national dialogue committee, comprising members of Fatah’s Central Committee and the PLO’s Executive Committee, to oversee negotiations with Hamas and work toward ending the political split.

The move follows a late April meeting of the Central Council, during which Abbas reiterated the need for Hamas to relinquish its control of Gaza and return the coastal enclave to the authority of the Palestinian government.

Abbas views the recent resolutions of the Council as the foundation for any agreement with Hamas, aimed not only at resolving the Gaza impasse but also at advancing the broader goal of establishing a Palestinian state, sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Sources noted that Abbas considers the Council’s outcomes as binding terms for moving forward, stressing that unity talks must align with the national agenda of statehood.

In its final communiqué, the Council stressed that any political solution must lead to the establishment of an independent, sovereign Palestinian state along the pre-1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.

The Council also underscored the need for territorial and political unity, calling for a single political, legal and administrative system across all Palestinian lands.

It further declared that decisions related to war, peace and negotiations are national matters and cannot be determined unilaterally by any single faction or party.

Reaffirming the role of the PLO, the Council described it as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people and the national umbrella for all Palestinians. It emphasized the importance of adhering to the PLO’s political program and international commitments.

Abbas has also called on Hamas to prioritize the national interest, warning that the current situation poses an existential threat to the Palestinian national project and the dream of statehood.

“The situation is no longer just about Gaza,” one source told Asharq Al-Awsat. “It is dangerous, sensitive and decisive. What happens in Gaza now is directly tied to the fate of the Palestinian state.”

As per sources, there is regional consensus among Arab states that Hamas joining the Palestinian political system and transferring authority in Gaza to the PA offers the best way out of the current crisis, paving the way for renewed political momentum toward statehood.

The United States has also been kept informed of these developments, the sources added.

No Gaza Without a State

Speaking on Wednesday at the opening of a cancer advisory center in Ramallah, Abbas reaffirmed that only the future Palestinian state would be allowed to govern Gaza, expressing the PA’s readiness to assume full responsibility for the coastal enclave.

“If they agree, we are ready to go and take over full responsibility for Gaza, just like before the 2007 coup,” Abbas said, in reference to Hamas’s takeover of the territory. He accused unnamed actors of helping Hamas seize control in order to undermine Palestinian unity.

“We support full national unity — unity in all areas of life, in every institution, and among all factions,” Abbas said.

“But let’s be clear: anyone who truly wants national unity must commit to the Palestine Liberation Organization, the collective home of all Palestinians.”

In recent weeks, the PA has implemented its most extensive internal reforms since its inception.

These include creating the post of vice president, reshuffling top leadership in the security services, placing hundreds of senior officers into early retirement, and launching security campaigns across the West Bank.

Hamas has expressed a willingness to engage in national reconciliation efforts but is calling for a broader national dialogue to reach consensus on all major issues, including governance, arms, and the future of Gaza, sources familiar with the group’s position said.

According to the sources, Hamas has conveyed to the PA and regional mediators that it is prepared to accept a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, discuss the future of its weapons, and relinquish control of the Gaza Strip as part of a comprehensive political agreement.

However, the group has yet to respond positively to other demands and says broader discussions are still needed.

A senior Hamas source confirmed ongoing direct and indirect communication with the PA and the Fatah movement.

“We have been receiving messages through both direct and indirect channels,” the source told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“We made it clear to our brothers in Fatah that we are ready to resolve all contentious issues and are committed to that—on the basis of national principles and previous agreements. Now we are waiting for Fatah’s response.”

Years of Failed Attempts

This is not the first time the rival factions have attempted to heal the divide. Since Hamas seized control of Gaza in 2007, the two sides have met hundreds of times and launched numerous national dialogue initiatives.

While several agreements were signed, none succeeded in ending the long-standing split between the West Bank-based PA and Hamas-ruled Gaza.

Efforts at reconciliation gained renewed urgency following Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel and the ensuing war in Gaza, which has further strained the fragile Palestinian political landscape.

Years of failed reconciliation efforts between Fatah and Hamas have repeatedly stumbled over fundamental disagreements — from the formation and authority of a unified government, to control over security forces, weapons, and Hamas’s integration into the PLO.

Even during the current war in Gaza, when pressure for unity surged, the factions reached a preliminary agreement in Beijing to form a national unity government — but the deal never materialized.

According to a senior PA official, the events of Oct. 7 marked a turning point for the Palestinian cause and reshaped the political landscape.

“October 7 changed everything,” the official told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“The cause now stands at a crossroads, and Hamas must reckon with the new ‘nakba’ it has brought upon the Palestinian people,” they added.