House Passes a Bill That Could Lead to a TikTok Ban If Chinese Owner Refuses to Sell

Members of the news media gather outside the House of Representatives following the passage of H.R. 7521 - Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, USA, 13 March 2024. (EPA)
Members of the news media gather outside the House of Representatives following the passage of H.R. 7521 - Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, USA, 13 March 2024. (EPA)
TT

House Passes a Bill That Could Lead to a TikTok Ban If Chinese Owner Refuses to Sell

Members of the news media gather outside the House of Representatives following the passage of H.R. 7521 - Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, USA, 13 March 2024. (EPA)
Members of the news media gather outside the House of Representatives following the passage of H.R. 7521 - Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, USA, 13 March 2024. (EPA)

The House on Wednesday passed a bill that would lead to a nationwide ban of the popular video app TikTok if its China-based owner doesn't sell its stake, as lawmakers acted on concerns that the company's current ownership structure is a national security threat.

The bill, passed by a vote of 352-65, now goes to the Senate, where its prospects are unclear.

TikTok, which has more than 150 million American users, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Chinese technology firm ByteDance Ltd.

The lawmakers contend that ByteDance is beholden to the Chinese government, which could demand access to the data of TikTok’s consumers in the US any time it wants. The worry stems from a set of Chinese national security laws that compel organizations to assist with intelligence gathering.

“We have given TikTok a clear choice,” said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash. “Separate from your parent company ByteDance, which is beholden to the CCP (the Chinese Communist Party), and remain operational in the United States, or side with the CCP and face the consequences. The choice is TikTok's.”

House passage of the bill is only the first step. The Senate would also need to pass the measure for it to become law, and lawmakers in that chamber indicated it would undergo a thorough review. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said he'll have to consult with relevant committee chairs to determine the bill's path.

President Joe Biden has said if Congress passes the measure, he will sign it.

The House vote is the latest example of increased tensions between China and the US. By targeting TikTok, lawmakers are tackling what they see as a grave threat to America's national security — but also singling out a platform popular with millions of people, many of whom skew younger, just months before an election.

A TikTok spokesperson, Alex Haurek, said in a statement after the vote that the bill was jammed through as part of a secretive process.

"We are hopeful that the Senate will consider the facts, listen to their constituents, and realize the impact on the economy, 7 million small businesses, and the 170 million Americans who use our service,” Haurek said.

In anticipation of the vote, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, Wang Wenbin, accused Washington of resorting to political tools when US businesses fail to compete. He said the effort would disrupt normal business operations and undermine investor confidence "and will eventually backfire on the US itself.”

Overall, 197 Republican lawmakers voted for the measure and 15 against. On the Democratic side, 155 voted for the bill and 50 against.

Some Republican opponents of the bill said the US should warn consumers if there are data privacy and propaganda concerns, but the final choice should be left with consumers.

“The answer to authoritarianism is not more authoritarianism,” said Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif. “The answer to CCP-style propaganda is not CCP-style oppression. Let us slow down before we blunder down this very steep and slippery slope.”

Democrats also warned of the impact a ban would have on users in the US, including entrepreneurs and business owners. One of the no votes came from Rep. Jim Himes, the ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee.

“One of the key differences between us and those adversaries is the fact that they shut down newspapers, broadcast stations, and social media platforms. We do not,” Himes said. “We trust our citizens to be worthy of their democracy. We do not trust our government to decide what information they may or may not see.”

The day before the House vote, top national security officials in the Biden administration held a closed-door briefing with lawmakers to discuss TikTok and the national security implications. Lawmakers are balancing those security concerns against a desire not to limit free speech online.

“What we've tried to do here is be very thoughtful and deliberate about the need to force a divestiture of TikTok without granting any authority to the executive branch to regulate content or go after any American company,” said Rep. Mike Gallagher, the bill's author, as he emerged from the briefing.

TikTok has long denied that it could be used as a tool of the Chinese government. The company has said it has never shared US user data with Chinese authorities and won’t do so if it is asked. To date, the US government also has not provided evidence that shows TikTok shared such information with Chinese authorities.

Republican leaders moved quickly to bring up the bill after its introduction last week by Gallagher and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill. A House committee approved the legislation unanimously, on a 50-0 vote, even after their offices were inundated with calls from TikTok users demanding they drop the effort. Some offices even shut off their phones because of the onslaught. Supporters of the bill said the effort backfired.

“(It) provided members a preview of how the platform could be weaponized to inject disinformation into our system,” Gallagher said.

Lawmakers in both parties are anxious to confront China on a range of issues. The House formed a special committee to focus on China-related issues. And Schumer directed committee chairs to begin working with Republicans on a bipartisan China competition bill.

Schumer is likely to feel some pressure from within his own party to move on the TikTok legislation. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Mark Warner announced after the House vote that he will work to “get this bill passed through the Senate and signed into law.”

In a joint statement with Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, the top Republican on the intelligence panel, Warner said that “we are united in our concern about the national security threat posed by TikTok — a platform with enormous power to influence and divide Americans whose parent company ByteDance remains legally required to do the bidding of the Chinese Communist Party”

Roughly 30 TikTok influencers and others who traveled with them spoke out against the bill on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. They chanted phrases like “Keep TikTok” ahead of the vote. They also held signs that read “TikTok changed my life for the better” and “TikTok helped me grow my business.”

Dan Salinger, a Sacramento, California-based TikTok creator in attendance, said he started creating content on the app during the COVID-19 pandemic purely out of boredom. But since then, his account, which features videos about his life and his father, who suffers from dementia, has grown in popularity. Today, he has 2 million followers on the app.

“I’m actually appalled for many reasons,” Salinger said. “The speed with which they’re pushing this bill through does not give enough time for Americans to voice their concerns and opinions.”

Former President Donald Trump has spoken out against the House effort, but his vice president, Mike Pence, is urging Schumer to bring the House bill to a vote.

“There can be no doubt that this app is Chinese spyware and that a sale to a non-foreign adversary company is in the best interests of the American people,” Pence said in a letter to Schumer.



Governments Worldwide Are Way Behind on AI, Says Bill Gates

Microsoft's Bill Gates attends a dinner with President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House, Sept. 4, 2025, in Washington. (AP)
Microsoft's Bill Gates attends a dinner with President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House, Sept. 4, 2025, in Washington. (AP)
TT

Governments Worldwide Are Way Behind on AI, Says Bill Gates

Microsoft's Bill Gates attends a dinner with President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House, Sept. 4, 2025, in Washington. (AP)
Microsoft's Bill Gates attends a dinner with President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House, Sept. 4, 2025, in Washington. (AP)

No government in the world is ready for the changes artificial intelligence will bring to society, Bill Gates said in an interview with Reuters, as he warned of the risks ahead.

The Microsoft co-founder and billionaire philanthropist had until recently been optimistic about AI, but has changed his position, warning of the threats to jobs, concerns about attacks and the dangers of addiction to AI companions.

“I don't think any government is nearly as deep on this as they have to be,” he said. However, he added that the technology has great ‌potential to ‌help the world's poorest if managed properly and accessed equally — and ‌his ⁠namesake foundation said on ⁠Tuesday that it plans to spend at least $1 billion in the next two years on expanding access to AI.

Gates said he has been talking to world leaders about his concerns, including President Donald Trump and his team in the US, and said he aims to meet China’s President Xi Jinping later this year.

“Governments are way behind on this one,” he added.

HEALTH POTENTIAL

But despite his concerns, Gates and his foundation hope AI can help narrow gaps between the ⁠richest and poorest, rather than widening them.

The foundation's $1 billion spending plan, ‌part of its previously announced plans to spend $9 billion ‌annually, will go to partners working in education, healthcare and agriculture, the foundation said. It also aims ‌to help build the data foundations AI is built on, such as ensuring that ‌large language models work in every language people speak.

“For health it’s hard to overstate what the potential is,” Gates said, from supporting frontline health care workers to discovering new drugs and vaccines.

But he said governments must work together to avoid problems, likening the arrival of AI to a disaster movie.

“There’s ‌all sorts of movies where some aliens are coming, and magically the US and China and everybody comes together to solve the ⁠problem,” he said. “AI ⁠is kind of like this alien intelligence. It’s here, and we better do like it shows in those movies.”

REPUTATIONAL HIT?

In June, Gates appeared in front of Congress to testify about his relationship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Gates, who is not accused of any crimes, has repeatedly said he regrets his association with Epstein, who he hoped would donate to global health causes. Instead, the financier attempted to blackmail Gates over his extramarital affairs.

However, despite prompting an external review at his foundation, which found no payments to Epstein or participation in criminal activities, Gates said the links had not caused him or the foundation a significant reputational hit.

“In terms of having access to government leaders, or you know, journalists being willing to interview me, I don't see any diminishment,” he said, adding that the desire to draw on the foundation’s expertise to cut child deaths and end malaria had also not reduced “even one iota”.


Ex-Google DeepMind Researcher Adds to Warnings That AI Could ‘Kill All Humans’

An AI (artificial intelligence) logo is pictured at the Mobile World Congress (MWC), the telecom industry's biggest annual gathering, in Barcelona on February 27, 2024. (AFP)
An AI (artificial intelligence) logo is pictured at the Mobile World Congress (MWC), the telecom industry's biggest annual gathering, in Barcelona on February 27, 2024. (AFP)
TT

Ex-Google DeepMind Researcher Adds to Warnings That AI Could ‘Kill All Humans’

An AI (artificial intelligence) logo is pictured at the Mobile World Congress (MWC), the telecom industry's biggest annual gathering, in Barcelona on February 27, 2024. (AFP)
An AI (artificial intelligence) logo is pictured at the Mobile World Congress (MWC), the telecom industry's biggest annual gathering, in Barcelona on February 27, 2024. (AFP)

A former Google DeepMind ‌employee on Monday became the latest AI researcher to warn that the technology could "kill all humans", saying time could be running out to avoid the outcome.

Public alarm about the potential danger posed by AI is growing, after Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon said last week he had resigned, in part because the "people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade."

Anthropic scientist Evan Hubinger then responded ‌to Coxon's comments, ‌saying he was correct and that ‌he ⁠believed there was ⁠a greater than 10% chance that AI could kill all humans within the next decade.

"I recently resigned from Google DeepMind, where I worked on AGI safety and alignment research," Bilal Chughtai wrote on X. "I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill ⁠us all, and that we might be ‌running out of time ‌to avoid this outcome."

Chughtai, who co-authored research papers while ‌at Google DeepMind, worked there as a research engineer ‌and left the company in July 2026, according to his LinkedIn profile.

Google did not respond to a request for comment outside regular business hours.

Following recent concerns, Anthropic CEO ‌Dario Amodei called for a slowdown in the pace of advanced AI development over ⁠the weekend, winning ⁠rare backing from SpaceXAI's Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and sparking a debate over AI "doomerism."

Chughtai also said that navigating AI safely was possible but would require coordination "to avoid this manic race between AI companies."

"We need to pace AI development to a speed that society can handle, where emerging risks can be addressed before extreme harm is realized," he added.

President Donald Trump, however, has dismissed the warnings, saying on social media the AI industry's call for regulation is a "hoax."


How China Is Preparing for the Risk of AI Escaping Human Control

An AI logo is seen during the opening day of the IFA trade fair in Berlin, Germany, 04 September 2026. (EPA)
An AI logo is seen during the opening day of the IFA trade fair in Berlin, Germany, 04 September 2026. (EPA)
TT

How China Is Preparing for the Risk of AI Escaping Human Control

An AI logo is seen during the opening day of the IFA trade fair in Berlin, Germany, 04 September 2026. (EPA)
An AI logo is seen during the opening day of the IFA trade fair in Berlin, Germany, 04 September 2026. (EPA)

Warnings from researchers at leading US artificial intelligence developer Anthropic that increasingly powerful models could escape human control and even lead to the extinction of the human race have drawn attention in China, where policymakers have been preparing for some of the same risks.

The US and China are the two major driving forces of frontier AI development and the technology's global adoption. Both superpowers have been increasingly at loggerheads over each other's AI policies and industry practices, with these issues slated to feature prominently in bilateral talks later this month.

Despite the race to develop increasingly powerful AI systems, regulatory frameworks and public statements from Beijing underscore how Chinese authorities regard the possibility of advanced AI escaping effective human oversight as serious enough to plan for.

CHINA SEES RISKS IN LEADING CLOSED-SOURCE US MODELS

China's state ‌security minister Chen ‌Yixin wrote in a government outlet on Sunday that advanced US models such as Anthropic's ‌Mythos and ⁠OpenAI's GPT-5.5-Cyber ⁠could pose serious risks to China's critical information infrastructure and called for a comprehensive strengthening of AI security.

Anthropic and OpenAI did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment.

Chinese AI developers have promoted open-weight models partly on the grounds that cybersecurity teams can inspect, modify and deploy them for defensive work.

Model repository platform Hugging Face said it used GLM-5.2, an open-weight model developed by China's Z.AI, to analyze a July intrusion by escaped OpenAI agents after more tightly restricted US models proved less useful for the forensic work.

But experts also highlight the risks posed by open-weight models, which can be modified and redistributed with little oversight.

Moonshot's Kimi K3 last month bypassed a UK AI ⁠Security Institute testing sandbox, highlighting the risk that Chinese AI models could, like their US counterparts, ‌evade controls designed to restrict their access and actions.

REGULATORS HAVE FLAGGED AI 'LOSS OF ‌CONTROL' RISK

China first included an explicit future loss-of-control scenario in an AI safety framework released in September 2024 under the guidance of the ‌Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC).

The document said it could not be ruled out that future AI might autonomously obtain external ‌resources, replicate itself, develop self-awareness and seek external power, creating a risk of competing with humans for control.

The CAC released an expanded version in September 2025. The newer framework sharpened the scenario, saying AI could undergo a sudden and unexpectedly large "leap" in intelligence before acquiring resources, replicating itself and seeking power. It also added a governance principle of "trusted application, preventing loss of control".

A later expert interpretation published on the cyberspace regulator's website said ‌the new principle was intended to guard against loss-of-control risks threatening human survival and development and referred to a possible "AI breaking loose" scenario.

CHINESE LEADER XI PUTS HUMAN CONTROL AT CENTRE

The ⁠concern has since appeared in ⁠China's highest-level political messaging.

At the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai in July, Chinese President Xi Jinping said authorities should pay close attention to both intrinsic and derivative risks arising from AI.

He said AI should "always remain under human control".

China's senior Foreign Ministry official responsible for AI affairs, Sun Xiaobo, said at a United Nations meeting last month that China was accelerating research into broader AI legislation.

China's deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, Sun Lei, urged governments this month to approach military AI cautiously to avoid strategic miscalculation and an arms race.

BEIJING WARNS OF NEW RISKS POSED BY AI AGENTS

China has, meanwhile, begun turning those principles into more specific rules for AI agents, which act much more autonomously and carry out more complex tasks than an ordinary chatbot.

In May, China's cyberspace regulator issued joint guidelines specifically covering such systems.

They require developers to improve their ability to discover, intervene in, block and recover from improper agent behavior.

The guidelines specifically identify data poisoning, algorithm manipulation, system vulnerabilities and "operational loss of control" as security risks. They also say users should retain final decision-making authority over an agent's autonomous decisions.

While China has not proposed independent monitors embedded inside AI companies in the manner advocated by Anthropic, its standards allow developers to commission third-party safety assessments, as well as envisaging outside evaluation bodies and security researchers testing and auditing open models.