House Passes a Bill That Could Lead to a TikTok Ban If Chinese Owner Refuses to Sell

Members of the news media gather outside the House of Representatives following the passage of H.R. 7521 - Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, USA, 13 March 2024. (EPA)
Members of the news media gather outside the House of Representatives following the passage of H.R. 7521 - Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, USA, 13 March 2024. (EPA)
TT

House Passes a Bill That Could Lead to a TikTok Ban If Chinese Owner Refuses to Sell

Members of the news media gather outside the House of Representatives following the passage of H.R. 7521 - Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, USA, 13 March 2024. (EPA)
Members of the news media gather outside the House of Representatives following the passage of H.R. 7521 - Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, USA, 13 March 2024. (EPA)

The House on Wednesday passed a bill that would lead to a nationwide ban of the popular video app TikTok if its China-based owner doesn't sell its stake, as lawmakers acted on concerns that the company's current ownership structure is a national security threat.

The bill, passed by a vote of 352-65, now goes to the Senate, where its prospects are unclear.

TikTok, which has more than 150 million American users, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Chinese technology firm ByteDance Ltd.

The lawmakers contend that ByteDance is beholden to the Chinese government, which could demand access to the data of TikTok’s consumers in the US any time it wants. The worry stems from a set of Chinese national security laws that compel organizations to assist with intelligence gathering.

“We have given TikTok a clear choice,” said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash. “Separate from your parent company ByteDance, which is beholden to the CCP (the Chinese Communist Party), and remain operational in the United States, or side with the CCP and face the consequences. The choice is TikTok's.”

House passage of the bill is only the first step. The Senate would also need to pass the measure for it to become law, and lawmakers in that chamber indicated it would undergo a thorough review. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said he'll have to consult with relevant committee chairs to determine the bill's path.

President Joe Biden has said if Congress passes the measure, he will sign it.

The House vote is the latest example of increased tensions between China and the US. By targeting TikTok, lawmakers are tackling what they see as a grave threat to America's national security — but also singling out a platform popular with millions of people, many of whom skew younger, just months before an election.

A TikTok spokesperson, Alex Haurek, said in a statement after the vote that the bill was jammed through as part of a secretive process.

"We are hopeful that the Senate will consider the facts, listen to their constituents, and realize the impact on the economy, 7 million small businesses, and the 170 million Americans who use our service,” Haurek said.

In anticipation of the vote, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, Wang Wenbin, accused Washington of resorting to political tools when US businesses fail to compete. He said the effort would disrupt normal business operations and undermine investor confidence "and will eventually backfire on the US itself.”

Overall, 197 Republican lawmakers voted for the measure and 15 against. On the Democratic side, 155 voted for the bill and 50 against.

Some Republican opponents of the bill said the US should warn consumers if there are data privacy and propaganda concerns, but the final choice should be left with consumers.

“The answer to authoritarianism is not more authoritarianism,” said Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif. “The answer to CCP-style propaganda is not CCP-style oppression. Let us slow down before we blunder down this very steep and slippery slope.”

Democrats also warned of the impact a ban would have on users in the US, including entrepreneurs and business owners. One of the no votes came from Rep. Jim Himes, the ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee.

“One of the key differences between us and those adversaries is the fact that they shut down newspapers, broadcast stations, and social media platforms. We do not,” Himes said. “We trust our citizens to be worthy of their democracy. We do not trust our government to decide what information they may or may not see.”

The day before the House vote, top national security officials in the Biden administration held a closed-door briefing with lawmakers to discuss TikTok and the national security implications. Lawmakers are balancing those security concerns against a desire not to limit free speech online.

“What we've tried to do here is be very thoughtful and deliberate about the need to force a divestiture of TikTok without granting any authority to the executive branch to regulate content or go after any American company,” said Rep. Mike Gallagher, the bill's author, as he emerged from the briefing.

TikTok has long denied that it could be used as a tool of the Chinese government. The company has said it has never shared US user data with Chinese authorities and won’t do so if it is asked. To date, the US government also has not provided evidence that shows TikTok shared such information with Chinese authorities.

Republican leaders moved quickly to bring up the bill after its introduction last week by Gallagher and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill. A House committee approved the legislation unanimously, on a 50-0 vote, even after their offices were inundated with calls from TikTok users demanding they drop the effort. Some offices even shut off their phones because of the onslaught. Supporters of the bill said the effort backfired.

“(It) provided members a preview of how the platform could be weaponized to inject disinformation into our system,” Gallagher said.

Lawmakers in both parties are anxious to confront China on a range of issues. The House formed a special committee to focus on China-related issues. And Schumer directed committee chairs to begin working with Republicans on a bipartisan China competition bill.

Schumer is likely to feel some pressure from within his own party to move on the TikTok legislation. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Mark Warner announced after the House vote that he will work to “get this bill passed through the Senate and signed into law.”

In a joint statement with Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, the top Republican on the intelligence panel, Warner said that “we are united in our concern about the national security threat posed by TikTok — a platform with enormous power to influence and divide Americans whose parent company ByteDance remains legally required to do the bidding of the Chinese Communist Party”

Roughly 30 TikTok influencers and others who traveled with them spoke out against the bill on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. They chanted phrases like “Keep TikTok” ahead of the vote. They also held signs that read “TikTok changed my life for the better” and “TikTok helped me grow my business.”

Dan Salinger, a Sacramento, California-based TikTok creator in attendance, said he started creating content on the app during the COVID-19 pandemic purely out of boredom. But since then, his account, which features videos about his life and his father, who suffers from dementia, has grown in popularity. Today, he has 2 million followers on the app.

“I’m actually appalled for many reasons,” Salinger said. “The speed with which they’re pushing this bill through does not give enough time for Americans to voice their concerns and opinions.”

Former President Donald Trump has spoken out against the House effort, but his vice president, Mike Pence, is urging Schumer to bring the House bill to a vote.

“There can be no doubt that this app is Chinese spyware and that a sale to a non-foreign adversary company is in the best interests of the American people,” Pence said in a letter to Schumer.



Microsoft Pushes AI Vision with New, Expensive Surface Laptop

Windows laptops powered by Nvidia's RTX Spark chips are displayed at a Windows event on October 07, 2026 at Dogpatch studios in San Francisco, California. (Getty Images/AFP)
Windows laptops powered by Nvidia's RTX Spark chips are displayed at a Windows event on October 07, 2026 at Dogpatch studios in San Francisco, California. (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Microsoft Pushes AI Vision with New, Expensive Surface Laptop

Windows laptops powered by Nvidia's RTX Spark chips are displayed at a Windows event on October 07, 2026 at Dogpatch studios in San Francisco, California. (Getty Images/AFP)
Windows laptops powered by Nvidia's RTX Spark chips are displayed at a Windows event on October 07, 2026 at Dogpatch studios in San Francisco, California. (Getty Images/AFP)

Microsoft is pushing a "hybrid intelligence" future with a new Surface Ultra laptop that runs on Nvidia artificial intelligence (AI) chips and will cost more than $2,500, the company announced Wednesday.

The launch is part of a broader push by tech companies to release hardware that can handle more AI computing on-device and offline, so users don't have to rely solely on remote cloud data centers, where running AI is slower and more expensive.

It also sees Nvidia, whose data center processors power the AI revolution, make a move into personal computing, a sector dominated for decades by chips from Intel and Qualcomm.

"The trajectory for me is so clear. There will never be a moment where we will go and look and say: 'Oh, this runs locally, this runs in the cloud.' You will expect this hybrid intelligence to be everywhere and pervasive," CEO Satya Nadella said during an event in San Francisco.

He was joined onstage by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who echoed the idea that AI will be integrated into all computing going forward and on all devices.

Agentic AI, in particular, will be central to software development, Huang said, referring to systems programmed to be autonomous and perform tasks without supervision.

With all the changes from AI, "the computer has to be revolutionized," Huang said.

The partnership between the two US-based tech titans helps them compete with Apple, Intel and AMD in the personal computing market.

Apple unveiled two desktop computers in September, the Mac mini and Mac Studio, which it touted as powerful new options capable of processing AI software locally.

Microsoft has been working on building "AI PCs" since at least 2024, when its laptops were powered by Qualcomm chips.

The new Surface Ultra will use Nvidia's state-of-the-art AI chip, RTX Spark, which the semiconductor giant announced earlier this year.

It will cost $2,599 and begins shipping on October 16.

Some AI computing power and data will be processed locally, or on the device, while other applications are still handled remotely via Microsoft's cloud computing services.

"We built it for developers and creators pushing the limits of performance," Microsoft Executive Vice President of Windows and Device Pavan Davuluri said on Wednesday.

The news comes just a couple of weeks after Microsoft announced it would integrate Word, Excel and Powerpoint into its AI-powered assistant Copilot, in an effort to make AI the entry point for its famous suite of productivity software.

OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, and Claude-maker Anthropic each launched their own document creation tools in recent months.

The two San Francisco-based AI labs are also key suppliers for Microsoft, since Copilot runs primarily on their models.

Microsoft's in-house models currently only power a few products, such as GitHub's Copilot coding tool.

In June, Microsoft also unveiled its own cutting-edge artificial intelligence models -- a crucial step toward reducing its dependence on OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT.


Trump to Give Musk Top US Science Medal

US President Donald Trump and SpacexAI Founder and CEO Elon Musk speak to the media at the White House driveway following a luncheon for tech leaders in the East Room, in Washington, DC, US, September 29, 2026. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump and SpacexAI Founder and CEO Elon Musk speak to the media at the White House driveway following a luncheon for tech leaders in the East Room, in Washington, DC, US, September 29, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Trump to Give Musk Top US Science Medal

US President Donald Trump and SpacexAI Founder and CEO Elon Musk speak to the media at the White House driveway following a luncheon for tech leaders in the East Room, in Washington, DC, US, September 29, 2026. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump and SpacexAI Founder and CEO Elon Musk speak to the media at the White House driveway following a luncheon for tech leaders in the East Room, in Washington, DC, US, September 29, 2026. (Reuters)

President Donald Trump will present close ally Elon Musk and other tech bosses with the top US scientific award at a ceremony on Thursday, the White House said.

Google co-founder Sergei Brin, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and AMD chief Lisa Su will also receive the National Medal of Science at the "Science: A New Golden Age" summit.

Computer mogul Michael Dell and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella will get the National Medal of Technology and Innovation, the top award in its field.

"The Trump Administration is grateful for the contributions of these incredible leaders in science and technology. These recipients are helping ensure America keeps leading the world in innovation," White House spokeswoman Liz Huston said in a statement to AFP on Wednesday.

Space X and Tesla tycoon Musk has returned to Trump's good graces after they fell out last year over his role heading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency.

He was also the biggest donor to Trump's 2024 presidential campaign.

Musk and Huang were both at Trump's state dinner for Chinese President Xi Jinping last month.

Along with other tech bosses they were also at the White House last week for talks in which tech chiefs promised to self-regulate against possible threats from artificial intelligence.

Trump has dismissed warnings that AI could wipe out humanity, insisting it is crucial for what he calls the "Golden Age" of the US economy in his second term.

But Trump's Republican Party could lose control of Congress in midterm elections next month amid voter concerns over the Iran war and the cost of living.


EU Vows AI Rules Will Protect Europeans. Will They?

Humanoid and quadruped robots attend a demonstration calling for the regulation of AI development in Warsaw in September. Sergei GAPON / AFP/File
Humanoid and quadruped robots attend a demonstration calling for the regulation of AI development in Warsaw in September. Sergei GAPON / AFP/File
TT

EU Vows AI Rules Will Protect Europeans. Will They?

Humanoid and quadruped robots attend a demonstration calling for the regulation of AI development in Warsaw in September. Sergei GAPON / AFP/File
Humanoid and quadruped robots attend a demonstration calling for the regulation of AI development in Warsaw in September. Sergei GAPON / AFP/File

AI agents going rogue and ever-louder doomsday warnings have led many in Europe to wonder: are the EU's artificial intelligence rules enough to protect against the potential dangers?

The European Union insists that, yes, its law known as the AI Act is powerful enough since it forces companies to assess and mitigate risks, under threat of massive fines or even bans, AFP said.

EU lawmakers, officials and experts appear more skeptical, pointing to gaps in the rules and questioning whether Brussels has the stomach for a fight with AI labs.

The EU agreed its sweeping AI legislation in 2024 but delayed part of its implementation, and enforcement has only been possible since August this year.

Nonetheless, EU spokesman Thomas Regnier says the rules are "fully fit for purpose".

"You can feel safe at home in Europe, precisely because we have put all these safeguards in place," he said.

So far the EU has sent over 30 requests for information -- a preliminary step that can lead to investigations -- to companies on issues from copyright to cybersecurity and safety.

Brussels says its rules are working since they have already forced AI providers to cough up information to regulators, though Regnier declined to give details.

There are, however, questions about Europe getting access to the latest models: it took months for the EU to test Anthropic's Mythos following US export control orders.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, an EU official admitted such an issue could arise again.

- 'Dangerous experiments' -

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen has proposed talks with the main frontier labs to "pace" the technology's growth, arguing the AI Act puts Europe "in the position to shape global efforts" at regulation.

But that is a tall order without buy-in from the United States -- where President Donald Trump firmly opposes regulating the sector.

And not everyone is convinced the EU law has what it takes.

Four EU lawmakers including lead AI Act negotiator Brando Benifei warn of "legislative gaps" after the EU shelved plans for AI liability rules.

Such rules would have made it easier to hold AI providers accountable for harm caused by their tools.

The lawmakers argue current rules do "not apply to the research, testing or development phase" leaving Europeans "unprotected".

The European Commission rejects the claim.

The law can be "enforced against any provider, starting from the testing phase, if they experience a loss of control that affects the EU's internal market," including cyberattacks and biological or chemical misuse, Regnier said.

Researcher Harshvardhan Pandit echoed lawmaker concerns about liability in the bloc.

"We are missing these pieces of accountability, and if we don't fix this now and we get more of these incidents, this is only going to get worse," said Pandit, of AI Accountability Lab in Trinity College Dublin.

If a model ends up hacking a website, once AI providers have sold their tools, Pandit said "we don't know" who is ultimately responsible.

But he also said the AI Act requires developers "to have addressed" safety risks by the time a model reaches the market, noting that recent incidents including with OpenAI agents happened during testing.

And he noted the EU has other laws to counter risks, including on cybersecurity and data protection.

- US influence -

EU lawmaker Benifei said the AI Act correctly anticipated the threat of agents going rogue, but raised concerns about enforcement -- including that staffing levels at the EU's AI Office are nowhere near enough to match the risks.

"The European Commission must guarantee the office political backing, operational independence, resources, and technical staff to quickly deliver decisive enforcement," Benifei told AFP.

Analyst Pandit agreed the AI office needed "far more people and technical expertise".

The office currently employs around 125 staff.

And there is the question of whether the EU has the appetite for taking on AI providers, most of which are US-based.

Brussels has already drawn Washington's ire with probes under different laws, culminating in fines worth billions of dollars.

The EU official admitted the bloc may think twice before enforcing its full powers against American firms, considering Europe's dependence on US tech.

One way to have greater influence over AI safety, the official said, was to build its own technology.

"Europe must also build capabilities, from chips and cloud to a publicly funded CERN for AI," Benifei echoed, referring to the European physics lab in Switzerland that seeks to unravel the universe's composition.

He also said the EU, as von der Leyen pledged last month, should "work more closely with middle powers like Canada, which share an interest in rules that no power or company can dictate".