UN Monitoring Lebanon’s Efforts to Form Cabinet Headed by Nawaf Salam

File photo: Secretary-General Antonio Guterres (right) joined Nawaf Salam, Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the United Nations, and others, in a tree-planting ceremony on the grounds of UN Headquarters in New York. (UN)
File photo: Secretary-General Antonio Guterres (right) joined Nawaf Salam, Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the United Nations, and others, in a tree-planting ceremony on the grounds of UN Headquarters in New York. (UN)
TT

UN Monitoring Lebanon’s Efforts to Form Cabinet Headed by Nawaf Salam

File photo: Secretary-General Antonio Guterres (right) joined Nawaf Salam, Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the United Nations, and others, in a tree-planting ceremony on the grounds of UN Headquarters in New York. (UN)
File photo: Secretary-General Antonio Guterres (right) joined Nawaf Salam, Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the United Nations, and others, in a tree-planting ceremony on the grounds of UN Headquarters in New York. (UN)

UN Security Council members held Monday closed consultations on Lebanon and received an update on the implementation of the cessation of hostilities agreement between Israel and Hezbollah.

The meeting welcomed the January 9 election of former Lebanese Army Commander Joseph Aoun as President and the appointment of a new Prime Minister, Nawaf Salam.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will travel to Lebanon on Friday for a solidarity visit with the country and its people, his spokesperson announced on Monday during his daily briefing from New York.

Monday’s closed consultations at the Security Council were proposed by France, the penholder on Lebanon.

Special Coordinator for Lebanon Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert and Under-Secretary-General for Peace Operations Jean-Pierre Lacroix briefed the meeting on the implementation of the November 27 cessation of hostilities agreement between Israel and Lebanon ahead of the expiry of the 60-day deadline outlined in the agreement for the Israeli army to withdraw south of the Blue Line and, in parallel, for the Lebanese army to deploy to positions south of the Litani river.

The announcement of the cessation of hostilities frames the agreement as a set of “understandings” that reflect “steps to which Israel and Lebanon are committed” in order to fully implement Resolution 1701.

Adopted in 2006, Resolution 1701 called for a cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah based on a series of principles, including the establishment between the Blue Line and the Litani river in Lebanon of “an area free of any armed personnel, assets and weapons” other than those of the government of Lebanon and the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), as well as “no foreign forces” in Lebanon without its government’s consent.

It also notes that the Lebanese army will begin carrying out several tasks, including dismantling unauthorized infrastructure and confiscating unauthorized arms and related materiel in the UNIFIL area of operations.

According to a 4 January AP article, Israel has “stopped attacking Hezbollah in most areas of Lebanon,” while launching “regular airstrikes” on what it says are Hezbollah sites in southern Lebanon and in the Bekaa Valley.

In a 26 December 2024 statement, UNIFIL expressed “concern at continuing destruction by the Israeli army in residential areas, agricultural land, and road networks in south Lebanon.”

According to media reports, the US is apparently seeking an extension of the 60-day deadline stipulated in the agreement for the respective withdrawal and deployment.

In its statement, UNIFIL urged Israel and Lebanon to utilize the mechanism outlined in the cessation of hostilities agreement to address any outstanding issues.

This refers to a reformulated version of the tripartite mechanism established following the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah and then turned into a five-member mechanism that includes France and the US—which chairs the mechanism—and is hosted by UNIFIL.

The revised mechanism is tasked with monitoring, verifying, and assisting in “ensuring enforcement” of the commitments outlined in the cessation of hostilities and Resolution 1701.

UNIFIL’s statement further said that the mission is working closely with the Lebanese army “as they accelerate recruitment efforts and redeploy troops to the south” and that it stands ready to support Israel and Lebanon to meet their obligations, including regarding the absence of any armed personnel, assets or weapons other than those of the government of Lebanon and UNIFIL south of the Litani river, as well as respect for the Blue Line.

During Monday’s closed-door meetings, Hennis-Plasschaert briefed the Security Council on positive developments seen in recent weeks in Lebanon, welcoming the January 9 election of the new President and the nomination of Salam to form the country’s new government.

She said the two developments offer “an opportunity to pave the way for progress towards consolidating the cessation of hostilities and preserving the country’s security and stability.”

Hennis-Plasschaert also urged the formation of a government as soon as possible to follow the caretaker cabinet headed by Najib Mikati.

Presidential Statement

At the time of the closed-door meeting, Council members were negotiating a draft presidential statement circulated by France on January 9.

The draft statement welcomes Aoun’s election and stresses the importance of the formation of a government.

Diplomats told Asharq Al-Awsat the statement also apparently welcomes the cessation of hostilities between Israel and Lebanon and calls for the full implementation of the ceasefire agreement and the respect of Resolutions 1701, 1559 and 1860.

The draft presidential statement was not immediately adopted amid concerns that it would risk complicating de-escalation and compliance with the agreement on the ground.



Iran’s Araqchi to Visit Beirut After Lebanese FM Declines Trip to Tehran

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi looks on during a press conference in Istanbul, Türkiye, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas/File Photo
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi looks on during a press conference in Istanbul, Türkiye, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas/File Photo
TT

Iran’s Araqchi to Visit Beirut After Lebanese FM Declines Trip to Tehran

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi looks on during a press conference in Istanbul, Türkiye, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas/File Photo
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi looks on during a press conference in Istanbul, Türkiye, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas/File Photo

Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araqchi, said on Thursday he would travel to Beirut for talks after receiving a formal invitation from his Lebanese counterpart, who a day earlier had declined to visit Tehran for direct talks.

On Wednesday, Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raji said "current conditions" prevented him from travelling to Tehran, but stressed that the move did not mean rejection of dialogue with Iran.

Raji told Reuters late on Wednesday that he had invited Araqchi "in a formal diplomatic letter to come to Beirut to hold talks."

Araqchi said on X that he would "gladly accept the invitation to come to Beirut," although he said he found Raji's position "bemusing." He said foreign ministers of countries with "full diplomatic relations" did not need a neutral venue to meet.

"Subjected to Israeli occupation and blatant 'ceasefire' violations, I fully understand why my esteemed Lebanese counterpart is not prepared to visit Tehran," Araqchi added.

Raji said on Wednesday that Lebanon was ready to open a new phase of relations with Iran based on mutual respect, sovereignty and non-interference.

He added that no strong state could be built unless the government held the exclusive right to bear arms, in an apparent reference to calls to disarm Hezbollah, the Iran-aligned Lebanese armed group.


Berri Rejects Threats to Lebanese, Stands Firm on ‘Constants’ in Israel Talks

Lebanon Speaker Berri Receives United States Ambassador Michel Issa (Parliament)
Lebanon Speaker Berri Receives United States Ambassador Michel Issa (Parliament)
TT

Berri Rejects Threats to Lebanese, Stands Firm on ‘Constants’ in Israel Talks

Lebanon Speaker Berri Receives United States Ambassador Michel Issa (Parliament)
Lebanon Speaker Berri Receives United States Ambassador Michel Issa (Parliament)

Lebanon’s Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed what he called efforts to intimidate the Lebanese and underscored the "fundamental constants” that he says anchor negotiations with Israel via the Mechanism Committee.

He insisted that the May parliamentary elections will go ahead as scheduled and described his personal relationship with Saudi Arabia as “very good”, adding that ties between Lebanon and the kingdom were “good”.

Berri made the remarks during a meeting with senior Lebanese journalists from the Press Syndicate headed by Aouni Al-Kaaki.

His comments coincided with his second meeting in 24 hours with the United States ambassador to Beirut, Michel Issa.

According to a statement from the Speaker’s office, the talks reviewed “developments in the general situation and the latest events, as well as bilateral relations”.

Barrack’s “mistake”

Responding to a question from the syndicate on “threats voiced by some diplomats, especially repeated remarks by United States envoy Tom Barrack about joining Lebanon to Syria”, Berri said: “No one threatens the Lebanese."

"It is inconceivable to address the Lebanese in such language, especially from diplomats, let alone from someone like Ambassador Tom Barrack. What he said about annexing Lebanon to Syria is a big mistake that is completely unacceptable,” he added.

Berri said the Lebanese have “no alternative and no escape” from facing risks, repercussions and threats from any side except through unity, adding, “With unity we can liberate the land.”

Turning to the ceasefire agreement and negotiations, Berri asked, “Is the Mechanism Committee not a negotiating framework?”

“There are constants we negotiate through this committee, namely Israeli withdrawal, deployment of the Lebanese Army, and limiting weapons in the area south of the Litani to the hands of the Lebanese Army,” he explained, adding that the committee operates under American, French and United Nations sponsorship.

He added, “I have said more than once that there is no objection to bringing in any civilian or technical figure if needed, provided the agreement is implemented.”

Berri said Lebanon has fulfilled all required steps since November 2024. He said the Lebanese Army has deployed more than 9,300 officers and soldiers with the support of UNIFIL, which confirmed in its latest reports Lebanon’s compliance with all its obligations.

He added that Israel has violated the agreement with about 11,000 breaches.

Berri said the Lebanese Army has implemented 90 percent of the ceasefire provisions south of the Litani and will fully complete the remaining steps by the end of the year.

He said this was confirmed by UNIFIL, the Mechanism Committee and Army Commander General Rodolf Haykal.

“It is unfortunate that no one is asking whether Israel has complied with even a single clause of the ceasefire agreement. Instead, it has expanded its occupation of Lebanese territory,” he said.

No cancellation of parliamentary elections

On calls by some parliamentary blocs to amend the electoral law regarding expatriate voting, Berri said the existing law is in force and the elections will be held according to it.

“There will be no cancellation and no postponement. Everyone wants elections,” he said.

He added that he remains open to any formula leading to consensus on outstanding issues that divide political forces, especially the question of expatriates.

“No one wants to exclude expatriates. Even so, I have said and will repeat that we should implement the Taif Agreement in its provisions related to the electoral law and the establishment of a Senate. But are they willing?” he asked.

Berri reiterated that Lebanese bank deposits are “sacred rights” and warned that these rights must not be compromised, surrendered or accepted as lost.

 


Talks Fail on Transfer Mechanism for Syrian Prisoners in Lebanon

Prisoners stroll through a yard inside Roumieh prison, northeast of Beirut, on April 7, 2006. AFP
Prisoners stroll through a yard inside Roumieh prison, northeast of Beirut, on April 7, 2006. AFP
TT

Talks Fail on Transfer Mechanism for Syrian Prisoners in Lebanon

Prisoners stroll through a yard inside Roumieh prison, northeast of Beirut, on April 7, 2006. AFP
Prisoners stroll through a yard inside Roumieh prison, northeast of Beirut, on April 7, 2006. AFP

A Lebanese judicial delegation has returned from Damascus empty-handed, failing to secure the breakthrough it sought on a new treaty governing the transfer of Syrian prisoners held in Lebanon.

The talks instead laid bare deep rifts between the two sides, with Syria rejecting most of the proposed text and arguing that it fell short of even the minimum required to ensure the return of its nationals.

No agreement on all points

Even so, the Lebanese delegation sought to play down the gaps. A source close to the team said the atmosphere was positive but that there was no agreement on all points.

The source told Asharq Al-Awsat that Lebanon was cooperating with Damascus on the Syrian detainee file and appreciated Syria’s desire to complete the trials of those held in Lebanon or allow convicts to serve their sentences on Syrian territory.

The source acknowledged that the draft treaty applied only to convicts and did not include those still on trial, since handing over detainees requires a law issued by the Lebanese parliament, which is not currently possible.

Lebanon’s efforts to show flexibility did not receive a similar response in Damascus. Sources familiar with the meeting held in the Syrian capital described the draft agreement as loaded with problematic provisions and said it was unacceptable.

They said the two sides remained locked in disputes over two articles that Damascus viewed as attempts by Lebanon to sidestep understandings reached during talks in Damascus last month.

One article states that the transferring state, Lebanon, may refuse to hand over any convict or detainee without providing justification, based on considerations specific to it.

The sources said this effectively gave Lebanon the right to refuse the transfer of any Syrian prisoner without being required to present legal grounds.

The second, more sensitive, provision for the Syrians concerned what they saw as interference in the powers of Syrian authorities.

The sources said Article 10 of the treaty, which Lebanon intended to model after its agreement with Pakistan, stipulated that Syria, as the receiving state, may not grant amnesty to any convict or detainee handed over by Lebanon.

The agreement with Pakistan does not prohibit Islamabad from granting amnesty to its nationals returned from Lebanon.

The sources said Syria had already discussed all aspects of the agreement during its delegation’s visit to Beirut and had expressed a desire for Lebanon to facilitate the transfer of convicts and detainees under a clear mechanism that respects Lebanese sovereignty and applicable laws.

This mechanism would ban any Syrian who had been detained or convicted in Lebanon from reentering the country, and would allow Lebanese authorities to arrest and prosecute anyone who violates the ban.

Syrian dissatisfaction

Sources who followed Wednesday’s meeting in Damascus said the Syrian side was deeply dissatisfied with what it saw as Lebanese intransigence and a lack of flexibility, particularly since some of the convicts covered by the treaty have spent more than 11 years in Lebanese prisons.

Others remained in pretrial detention for years before their sentences were issued.

Damascus also informed the Lebanese delegation that it would not request the return of anyone proven to have killed Lebanese soldiers or carried out bombings that caused civilian casualties.

Tensions around the file heightened after the Lebanese delegation left Damascus without setting a date for another round of negotiations.

The sources expressed concern that Syria’s rejection of the draft could halt the dialogue altogether and strain bilateral relations.

Damascus has repeatedly said that establishing stable and strong ties requires a final resolution to the Syrian prisoners’ file in Lebanon, especially since most Syrians detained or convicted on terrorism charges had been part of the Syrian uprising, and their arrest and prosecution in Lebanon stemmed from their political choices.