Iraqi President to Asharq Al-Awsat: Iran’s Influence Is Exaggerated, Factions Are Under Control

Rashid speaks of ‘security concerns’ over the new situation in Syria

Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid in Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid in Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Iraqi President to Asharq Al-Awsat: Iran’s Influence Is Exaggerated, Factions Are Under Control

Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid in Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid in Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid described as “positive” US President Donald Trump’s commitment to peace, saying it was a step forward “in resolving conflicts in the world and Middle East.”

Al-Rashid sat down for an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos to discuss the Iran’s “very exaggerated” impact on the armed factions in Iraq, the developments in Syria and the need for the international community to find radical solutions to detention camps in Iraq that are holding terrorists from different nationalities.

Trump’s return

Rashid welcomed Trump’ reelection as president, saying Iraq enjoys “good ties with the US.”

“We thank the Americans for standing by our side in fighting the ISIS terrorist group. Their forces are still deployed in Iraq,” he went on to say.

Rashid, who had sent a message of congratulations to Trump on his return to office, said the latter has repeatedly said that he wanted to help in ending wars in the region and the world and for security and peace to prevail across the globe.

“This is a positive step for everyone,” he remarked.

On the Iraqi army’s readiness in facing terrorist threats after the US troop withdrawal in 2026, Rashid said the threats in his country had dropped.

“Iraq is now free of terrorist activity. Some ISIS pockets and other terrorist elements remain, but this is the case in nearly all countries in the world,” he explained.

As for the American troops, he said they remain in Iraq in line with bilateral agreements, the request of the Iraqi government and in coordination and consultation with political forces that are the foundations of parliament.

The forces take part in the formation of the executive authority and in choosing a president and members of parliament, he continued.

‘Exaggerated’ Iranian influence

Turning to Iran, Rashid said that talk of Iran’s influence on the Iraqi armed factions is “very exaggerated.”

“These factions are under the control of the Iraqi government. With the war on Gaza over, I believe the factions realized that there is no need to turn to their weapons or join the fight, especially now that the ceasefire has taken effect,” he added.

“The government now wants to impose its control over the armed factions according to measures and mechanisms that are being devised by the relevant authorities with the goal of putting an end to any combat activity,” he revealed.

On Iran, he described it as an “important country.”

“We enjoy good ties with it, but we are the ones who decide things in Iraq. We are not under the control of any country,” Rashid stressed.

“This is the culmination of a long struggle that was led by the Iraqi people. We fought against dictatorship for a long time, perhaps more than any other country in the region. We have also long suffered from terrorism. Before that, we suffered from the economic siege,” he stated.

“Today, however, security and stability have been restored to Iraq. We are not only trying to improve our relations with our neighbors, but we are also strengthening them. We are also trying to bridge gaps between countries in the region to serve the interests of all parties,” he continued.

“We live in a historic region. It boasts more resources than any other region in neighboring countries, so we must take advantage of what we have been blessed with. We must enjoy peace and security and concern ourselves in resolving problems of neighboring countries,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat from Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Security concerns

Rashid confirmed that Iraq has security concerns over the developments in neighboring Syria.

Before elaborating on what they are, Rashid recalled Iraq’s attempts to support stability in Syria.

“We tried several times during Bashar al-Assad's time in power to help in coming up with solutions to reach a settlement in Syria. Syria is important to the Middle East and it shares borders with several regional countries,” he noted.

“Bashar’s regime, unfortunately, did not invest in our efforts,” he lamented. “We had backed Syria’s return to the Arab League and tried to bridge differences between the regime and various factions.”

Rashid reminded that Iraq never severed its ties with Syria and continued to support it. “This does not mean, however, that we approved of the regime’s actions and the Syrian government’s behavior. On the contrary, we constantly criticized the regime and encouraged it to improve the situation in Syria.”

Today, “we wish the new Syrian administration success in improving the situation, but the scene isn’t very clear at the moment,” he said, while welcoming the positive statements made by leader of the transitional authority Ahmed al-Sharaa about his determination to improve the situation in Syria.

On the security level, Rashid said Iraq and Syria share a long border, “and the reality is that several terrorist groups are active there. This worries us.”

“The international community must work on finding radical solutions to the crisis of terrorists from different nationalities who are held in detention camps,” he urged.

Water crisis

The persistent water crisis in Iraq has deepened in recent years, impacting its economy and food security.

Rashid acknowledged the crisis, noting that solutions to it are also available. “They can be easily implemented if there was a real and serious desire to do so,” he said, while referring to two main factors that can move them forward.

The first, Rashid said, is the behavior of neighboring countries. Iraq heavily depends on the Euphrates and Tigris rivers, whose sources are both located outside the country. The majority are located in Türkiye, while some tributaries are in Iran.

“Iran and Türkiye's cooperation is very necessary and important” in resolving this issue, the president explained.

“Historically, there were never dams or artificial barriers on the Euphrates and Tigris rivers in Türkiye. Today, several dams have been built on the rivers, which has been denying us water. This is one of the main reasons for the water problem in Iraq,” he said.

As for Iran, “we are consulting with it over the water issue and working together to resolve this problem,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat, revealing that Iranian officials are “receptive” to Baghdad's demands and stressing that Iraq “has not taken its fair share of the water.”

He hoped the water crisis would be resolved through peaceful means and understanding, not armed conflicts.

The second factor, said Rashid, is climate. “This is something we cannot control. We need to take advantage of the rainfall to help in agriculture and raising cattle,” he added. He also underlined the importance of storing groundwater.

The president acknowledged that Iraq is not adopting modern irrigation methods given the lack of good internal management of the water file.



US Response Muted on New Israeli West Bank Measures

Israeli machinery levels land ahead of settlement construction near Jenin in the occupied West Bank, Dec. 23, 2025 (EPA)
Israeli machinery levels land ahead of settlement construction near Jenin in the occupied West Bank, Dec. 23, 2025 (EPA)
TT

US Response Muted on New Israeli West Bank Measures

Israeli machinery levels land ahead of settlement construction near Jenin in the occupied West Bank, Dec. 23, 2025 (EPA)
Israeli machinery levels land ahead of settlement construction near Jenin in the occupied West Bank, Dec. 23, 2025 (EPA)

Days ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Washington, his government moved on measures framed as procedural but laden with far-reaching sovereign implications.

Decisions by Israel’s security cabinet have made it easier for Israelis to purchase land in the West Bank and expanded Israeli enforcement tools in areas formally administered by the Palestinian Authority under the Oslo Accords.

A White House official reiterated President Donald Trump’s opposition to annexing the West Bank, but Washington’s response stopped short of any concrete measures.

The position, attributed to an unnamed official and unaccompanied by deterrent action, prompted speculation that the US stance amounted to tacit acquiescence rather than active opposition.

On the eve of Netanyahu’s arrival, Reuters cited a White House source as saying Trump continues to oppose Israeli annexation of the West Bank and views “stability” there as consistent with the goals of peace and Israel’s security.

The manner in which the position was conveyed, however, left room for interpretation. The issue, analysts say, is less whether Washington rejects annexation in principle than whether it opposes the cumulative steps that could lead to it.

Israeli officials have framed the measures as administrative, but critics view them as part of a broader pattern aimed at gradually altering conditions in the West Bank. Such steps, they argue, create facts on the ground that are later treated as irreversible.

In this reading, formal opposition to annexation does not preclude policies that effectively advance it without an explicit declaration, a process some observers describe as incremental annexation.

Limited US response

Restricting the US reaction to an unattributed statement suggests an effort to balance competing priorities: signaling continuity in Washington’s stated position while avoiding a confrontation with Netanyahu ahead of his visit.

Diplomats note that this approach indicates US objections are being managed through messaging rather than through policy leverage.

Even when the US language is explicit, its impact is limited unless it is accompanied by political cost. Governments typically adjust behavior in response to incentives or penalties, not statements alone.

In this context, the absence of measures reduces the deterrent effect of US opposition, leaving Israel with room to maneuver.

The timing of the Israeli decisions sends parallel messages. Domestically, they signal continued commitment to policies favored by right-wing constituencies and settler groups. Internationally, they suggest that reversing on-the-ground changes is becoming increasingly complex.

The approach reflects a familiar strategy of establishing new realities ahead of any renewed political process.

The moves also highlight the influence of Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich within the governing coalition and his stated objective of undermining the practical foundations of a Palestinian state, even if the concept remains part of official rhetoric.

Measures described as technical adjustments thus take on broader political significance.

Impact on the two-state framework

The West Bank remains central to any viable Palestinian state. Steps that weaken Palestinian administrative authority or alter control over land are therefore assessed primarily by their effect on the feasibility of statehood.

Critics argue the latest measures move in the opposite direction, further blurring the distinction between Israeli control and Palestinian self-governance.

From Washington’s perspective, the situation underscores a broader contradiction. An administration that has shown limited engagement with the international consensus on a two-state solution is, in practice, also narrowing the range of alternative outcomes.

As prospects for two states diminish, analysts warn that other scenarios become more likely, including prolonged security control or recurring instability, complicating the US's assertions that current policies promote stability.

Reports in the US press citing Arab and Islamic condemnation, as well as concern at the United Nations, indicate that the West Bank remains a sensitive issue for many governments, including those maintaining ties with Israel.

Any perception of US leniency risks weakening those partners’ positions domestically.

At the United Nations, repeated warnings from international bodies have reaffirmed legal frameworks that Israel views as restrictive, but which others consider essential to any settlement.

While this divide is longstanding, critics note that developments on the ground are advancing faster than diplomatic efforts to address them.

As Washington emphasizes the importance of stability in the West Bank, the debate increasingly centers on what that stability entails: a temporary calm sustained by existing realities, or one underpinned by a credible political horizon.

For now, analysts say, each new Israeli step is being viewed less as an isolated decision than as a test of the credibility of the US's stated opposition.


Israel Steps Up Targeted Killings of Senior Hamas, Islamic Jihad Figures

Palestinians mourn victims of Israeli strikes in Gaza City, Tuesday (Reuters)
Palestinians mourn victims of Israeli strikes in Gaza City, Tuesday (Reuters)
TT

Israel Steps Up Targeted Killings of Senior Hamas, Islamic Jihad Figures

Palestinians mourn victims of Israeli strikes in Gaza City, Tuesday (Reuters)
Palestinians mourn victims of Israeli strikes in Gaza City, Tuesday (Reuters)

Israel has intensified a targeted military campaign in the Gaza Strip, pressing ahead with airstrikes aimed at senior operatives from Hamas and Islamic Jihad, citing what it describes as repeated ceasefire violations linked to armed fighters emerging from tunnels in Rafah.

The strikes have focused on areas west of the so-called “yellow line,” Israeli-designated restricted zones, with Israel again using the Rafah tunnel incident as a security pretext to hit targets it says were previously identified.

Israel says it considers such incidents breaches of the ceasefire agreement and has used them to justify continued attacks on militant targets inside the enclave.

Moreover, Israeli forces are conducting round-the-clock intelligence operations inside Gaza, relying heavily on unmanned aerial vehicles that continuously patrol the enclave and use advanced technology to identify targets.

These efforts are supported by electronic surveillance, including phone monitoring, as well as human intelligence, according to sources.

In the latest strike, carried out around midday on Tuesday, two Palestinians were killed when an Israeli airstrike hit an electric bicycle traveling along Salah al-Din Road near the entrance to the village of al-Masdar in central Gaza.

The two were taken to Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, while a third person at the scene was wounded.

Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that one of those killed was Asim Abu Holi, commander of the elite unit of Saraya al-Quds, the armed wing of Islamic Jihad, in central Gaza. Another militant accompanying him was critically wounded.

The second fatality was an elderly civilian who happened to be passing through the area.

The developments coincided with the killing of Palestinian woman Abeer Hamdan, who was shot dead by Israeli forces north of Khan Younis in southern Gaza. Later, another young man was killed in the south of the city.

At least seven Palestinians were also wounded in separate shooting incidents involving Israeli vehicles and drones near yellow-line areas in Gaza City and the town of Beit Lahiya in the north.

By midday Tuesday, more than 589 Palestinians had been killed since the ceasefire took effect on October 10, 2025. The total death toll since Oct. 7, 2023, has exceeded 72,000, according to local figures.

On Monday evening, hours after the Rafah incident, an Israeli helicopter struck a residential apartment in the al-Nasr neighborhood of Gaza City, killing three Palestinians, including a child.

Sources said the strike targeted three senior militants from the Beit Hanoun Battalion of Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the armed wing of Hamas.

Two of them were killed, while a third, the child’s father, was critically wounded.

The sources said the targeted militants had led months-long field operations against Israeli forces in Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza, including bombings and sniper attacks. Al-Qassam Brigades had previously released videos documenting those operations, which it said resulted in Israeli casualties.

Elsewhere on Monday, a Palestinian farmer was shot dead by Israeli forces in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza. At the same time, an older man was killed by Israeli fire near the yellow line northwest of Beit Lahiya.

Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem said Israel was “escalating its violations of the Gaza ceasefire under false pretexts, disregarding the efforts of mediators and guarantor states seeking to maintain calm,” adding that those parties must act to compel Israel to halt the breaches.

Rafah tunnels

The Israeli military said on Tuesday that its attacks on Hamas operatives were in response to a ceasefire violation in Rafah. It claimed on Monday morning that it had detected an armed group emerging from Rafah tunnels and firing at Israeli troops, prompting forces to kill them.

Some images published later showed that among the dead was Anas Issa al-Nashar, the son of a veteran Hamas leader and one of the movement’s early founders and former political bureau members.

However, videos circulated on social media by unidentified accounts appeared to show armed members of the Yasser Abu Shabab gang killing some of the militants, rather than Israeli forces.

Similar incidents have occurred repeatedly, in which the gang has abducted and killed Palestinians before handing them over to Israeli forces, according to local accounts.

Abu Obeida, spokesman for the Qassam Brigades, said the actions of such gangs reflected “complete alignment with the occupation” and the execution of its agenda, describing them as “a desperate attempt to assert themselves.”

He added that Israel would not be able to protect them, asserting that the fighters killed in the Rafah tunnels were slain by the gang, not by Israeli troops.

Rafah crossing

In a related development, Israeli authorities have kept the Rafah crossing partially open for more than a week, allowing limited passenger movement in both directions.

The Palestinian Red Crescent Society said it facilitated the departure of 50 travelers on Tuesday, including 19 patients, most of the remainder being their companions, as part of ongoing humanitarian efforts to evacuate medical cases for treatment abroad.

Another 50 travelers returned late Monday.

As of Monday evening, a total of 397 travelers had crossed Rafah, out of 1,600 scheduled to travel in both directions, representing a compliance rate of about 25%, according to the government media office.


Lebanon, Jordan Seek Solutions After Damascus Bans Non-Syrian Trucks

Lebanese truck drivers block the road on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing in protest against Syria's decision to ban non-Syrian trucks from entering its territory, on February 10, 2025. (AFP)
Lebanese truck drivers block the road on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing in protest against Syria's decision to ban non-Syrian trucks from entering its territory, on February 10, 2025. (AFP)
TT

Lebanon, Jordan Seek Solutions After Damascus Bans Non-Syrian Trucks

Lebanese truck drivers block the road on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing in protest against Syria's decision to ban non-Syrian trucks from entering its territory, on February 10, 2025. (AFP)
Lebanese truck drivers block the road on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing in protest against Syria's decision to ban non-Syrian trucks from entering its territory, on February 10, 2025. (AFP)

Lebanon and Jordan are seeking a solution with Syria after the latter barred foreign trucks from entering its territory, officials from both countries told AFP on Tuesday.

Damascus had issued a decision on Saturday stipulating that "non-Syrian trucks will not be allowed to enter" the country, and that goods being imported by road must be unloaded at specific points at border crossings.

The decision exempts trucks that are only passing through Syria to other countries.

Dozens of trucks unable to enter the country were lined up on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing on Tuesday, an AFP photographer saw.

Ahmad Tamer, head of land and maritime transportation at the Lebanese transport ministry told AFP that discussions were underway with Damascus over the decision.

He said the issue was not specifically targeting Lebanon -- which is trying to reset ties with Damascus after the fall of Bashar al-Assad -- adding that he hoped to hold a meeting with the Syrian side soon.

Lebanon sends around 500 trucks to Syria per day, according to Tamer.

In Jordan, also affected by the decision, transport ministry spokesperson Mohammed al-Dweiri told AFP that "discussions are currently underway, and we are awaiting a response from the Syrian side regarding allowing foreign trucks to enter and cross".

Dweiri said that Jordanian trucks were continuing to unload their cargo at the free zone at the Nassib border crossing with Syria despite some "confusion".

Around 250 Jordanian trucks travel to Syria daily, according to him.

A source in the Syrian General Authority for Ports and Customs told AFP that the decision aimed to "regulate the movement of cargo through the ports".

Representatives of unions and associations in Lebanon's transport sector denounced the decision on Tuesday and warning of "negative repercussions", according to the state-run National News Agency.

Syria is the only land route Lebanon can use to export merchandise to wealthy Gulf markets.

As part of continued attempts to rekindle ties, the two countries signed an agreement on Friday to hand around 300 Syrian convicts over to Damascus.