Hezbollah Refuses to Extend Lebanon Ceasefire with Israel

People gather in front of army soldiers after being barred from returning to the village of Aitaroun, Bint Jbeil District, southern Lebanon, 27 January 2025. (EPA)
People gather in front of army soldiers after being barred from returning to the village of Aitaroun, Bint Jbeil District, southern Lebanon, 27 January 2025. (EPA)
TT

Hezbollah Refuses to Extend Lebanon Ceasefire with Israel

People gather in front of army soldiers after being barred from returning to the village of Aitaroun, Bint Jbeil District, southern Lebanon, 27 January 2025. (EPA)
People gather in front of army soldiers after being barred from returning to the village of Aitaroun, Bint Jbeil District, southern Lebanon, 27 January 2025. (EPA)

Hezbollah used the return of residents of southern Lebanon to their homes and their confrontations with Israeli forces to portray itself as still in control of the security situation on the ground.

Twenty-four people were killed and over 120 wounded in the clashes as residents tried to make their way back to their homes in the South at the end of the deadline in the ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel.

Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem declared on Monday that the developments over the past two days are a “violation of the ceasefire and underscore Lebanon’s need for the resistance (Hezbollah).”

He stressed that his Iran-backed party rejects the extension of the ceasefire, adding that Israel must withdraw from areas it is still occupying in southern Lebanon. “We will not accept any justification for the extension of the 60-day ceasefire,” he stated.

The ceasefire has been extended to February 18.

The United States and France - countries sponsoring the ceasefire - as well as the United Nations, will be held responsible for the consequences of the delay in the withdrawal, Qassem went on to say.

Meanwhile, Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah declared that “the resistance alone protects the land and can help the people return to their homes.”

In a statement on Sunday, he stressed: “No one can eliminate the ‘army, people, resistance’ term from the ministerial statement.”

Lebanon is in the process of forming a new government and the term has often been a point of contention between rival political blocs, with opponents now demanding that it be omitted from the new cabinet’s statement.

As residents of the South made their way home on Sunday, later that day, Hezbollah supporters riding on motorcycles roamed the Beirut neighborhoods that are known for their opposition to the party.

Riding through the Christian neighborhood of Ain al-Rummaneh and Sunni Sakiet al-Janzeer, the supporters flew Hezbollah flags and chanted party and sectarian slogans to incite the residents in scenes that were shared on social media and widely condemned in the country.

Lebanese citizens return to their destruction homes caused by the Israeli air and ground offensive, in Aita al-Shaab, a Lebanese border village with Israel, south Lebanon, Sunday, Jan. 26, 2025. (AP)

Domineering mentality

Observers said the provocations were a direct message to newly elected President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam in that “no one can eliminate Hezbollah’s popular support and that the party can reshuffle the political and security cards if it does not get what it wants in the new government and ministerial statement.”

Leading member of the Lebanese Forces and former MP Antoine Zahra said: “Hezbollah is once again using its domineering approach against the Lebanese people given its military and political losses.”

“It is trying to compensate for these losses through politics” after it had been controlling the country for years, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He wondered at the “state of denial Hezbollah is experiencing and its provocations of neighborhoods that had taken in its supporters during the war.”

He said Sunday’s provocations in Beirut were an attempt by Hezbollah to demonstrate its domineering approach and hegemony over the majority of the Lebanese people.

Return to South

In a statement on Sunday, Hezbollah said the return of the residents of the South to their homes was a new demonstration of “dignity written by the people of the resistance. These people are the resistance’s most powerful weapon.”

“We bow before the might of the people of the resistance and underscore that the ‘army, people and resistance’ equation protects Lebanon from enemies, and it is not just empty words. It is a reality experienced by the Lebanese people every day. They embody it with their perseverance and sacrifices,” continued the statement.

It called on “all Lebanese people to stand by the residents of the south to demonstrate national solidarity and build a new meaning for sovereignty that is based on liberation and victory.”

The images of people returning to their homes in the South in defiance of Israel and the Hezbollah convoys in Beirut gave the party a morale boost and it has been using it to impose its conditions on the formation of the new government, including the “army, people and resistance” equation.

The majority of the Lebanese people believe that the equation no longer stands given Hezbollah’s defeat by Israel and its ensuing political defeat with Aoun’s election and Salam’s designation as PM.

“This equation will never again see the light of day,” stressed Zahra.

“They can do whatever they like if they take control of parliament and the government through democratic means,” he stated.

“The country must be ruled by the constitution and laws,” he demanded.

“No one can rule Lebanon alone. We must either be partners or look for some other way of running the country,” Zahra remarked. Asked to elaborate, he replied: “It could be a federation as this may offer the people a way of liberating themselves from the hegemony of Hezbollah’s weapons.”

Loyal base

The developments in the South and the provocations in Beirut gave the impression that Hezbollah may still be capable of imposing its conditions through street pressure the way it has been doing since 2005.

However, political researcher and Hezbollah expert Kassem Kassir said: “The party doesn’t need such incidents to promote its image. It was still very present politically before the developments in the South unfolded.”

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the developments were a “message to everyone who questioned Hezbollah’s presence in the region and who believed that its popularity had waned.”

Moreover, they proved that Hezbollah’s supporters are still loyal to it and its choices, he said.

Lebanese troops are deployed to prevent people from returning to Mais al-Jabal, Marjeyoun District, southern Lebanon, 27 January 2025. (EPA)

Threat to civil peace

On the convoys in Beirut, Kassir said they were “spontaneous and had nothing to do with Hezbollah.”

The army has since arrested several people involved in the provocations.

In statement, it said that it carried out the arrests after “some citizens, riding on motorcycles, rode around several Lebanese regions while carrying party flags, firing gunshots and chanting provocative slogans.”

It added that it deployed patrols to “prevent the undermining of security and stability”, calling on the people to “act responsibly to protect national unity and coexistence.”

Head of the Free Patriotic Movement MP Gebran Bassil – a former Hezbollah ally – condemned the provocations. The residents of the South were “heroic” as they returned to their homes on Sunday, while “sectarian provocations that night only served to tarnish this heroism,” he said in a post on the X platform.

He added that the sectarian provocations only serve to “deepen the divisions and advocates of this division. Extremism only leads to extremism and Lebanon will be the loser in the end.”

After meeting Aoun on Monday, head of the Kataeb Party MP Sami Gemayel remarked: “Our positive statements and openness are met with scenes we saw in Beirut on Sunday night.”

Asked if he believed the provocations were aimed at pressuring the government to include the “army, people and resistance” term in its statement, he responded: “I don’t think anyone in Lebanon can still be affected by this form of pressure.”

“We have faith in the army and state that are doing their duties” in ensuring the residents of the South return to their homes, he added. “This issue should not be exploited for political gain.”

The Kataeb later issued a statement to condemn Hezbollah’s “flagrant sectarian” provocations in Beirut. “Once again, it returns to its old domineering practices against the people, spreading chaos and stirring instability after all of its political and military goals failed and after the slogans it had long promoted turned out to be empty.”

The Lebanese Forces also slammed the provocations, saying they are part of a “wide Hezbollah campaign aimed at demonstrating that the developments in the South were a major victory for the so-called resistance, completely overlooking the 22 martyrs who were the victims of its ongoing adventures.”



US Response Muted on New Israeli West Bank Measures

Israeli machinery levels land ahead of settlement construction near Jenin in the occupied West Bank, Dec. 23, 2025 (EPA)
Israeli machinery levels land ahead of settlement construction near Jenin in the occupied West Bank, Dec. 23, 2025 (EPA)
TT

US Response Muted on New Israeli West Bank Measures

Israeli machinery levels land ahead of settlement construction near Jenin in the occupied West Bank, Dec. 23, 2025 (EPA)
Israeli machinery levels land ahead of settlement construction near Jenin in the occupied West Bank, Dec. 23, 2025 (EPA)

Days ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Washington, his government moved on measures framed as procedural but laden with far-reaching sovereign implications.

Decisions by Israel’s security cabinet have made it easier for Israelis to purchase land in the West Bank and expanded Israeli enforcement tools in areas formally administered by the Palestinian Authority under the Oslo Accords.

A White House official reiterated President Donald Trump’s opposition to annexing the West Bank, but Washington’s response stopped short of any concrete measures.

The position, attributed to an unnamed official and unaccompanied by deterrent action, prompted speculation that the US stance amounted to tacit acquiescence rather than active opposition.

On the eve of Netanyahu’s arrival, Reuters cited a White House source as saying Trump continues to oppose Israeli annexation of the West Bank and views “stability” there as consistent with the goals of peace and Israel’s security.

The manner in which the position was conveyed, however, left room for interpretation. The issue, analysts say, is less whether Washington rejects annexation in principle than whether it opposes the cumulative steps that could lead to it.

Israeli officials have framed the measures as administrative, but critics view them as part of a broader pattern aimed at gradually altering conditions in the West Bank. Such steps, they argue, create facts on the ground that are later treated as irreversible.

In this reading, formal opposition to annexation does not preclude policies that effectively advance it without an explicit declaration, a process some observers describe as incremental annexation.

Limited US response

Restricting the US reaction to an unattributed statement suggests an effort to balance competing priorities: signaling continuity in Washington’s stated position while avoiding a confrontation with Netanyahu ahead of his visit.

Diplomats note that this approach indicates US objections are being managed through messaging rather than through policy leverage.

Even when the US language is explicit, its impact is limited unless it is accompanied by political cost. Governments typically adjust behavior in response to incentives or penalties, not statements alone.

In this context, the absence of measures reduces the deterrent effect of US opposition, leaving Israel with room to maneuver.

The timing of the Israeli decisions sends parallel messages. Domestically, they signal continued commitment to policies favored by right-wing constituencies and settler groups. Internationally, they suggest that reversing on-the-ground changes is becoming increasingly complex.

The approach reflects a familiar strategy of establishing new realities ahead of any renewed political process.

The moves also highlight the influence of Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich within the governing coalition and his stated objective of undermining the practical foundations of a Palestinian state, even if the concept remains part of official rhetoric.

Measures described as technical adjustments thus take on broader political significance.

Impact on the two-state framework

The West Bank remains central to any viable Palestinian state. Steps that weaken Palestinian administrative authority or alter control over land are therefore assessed primarily by their effect on the feasibility of statehood.

Critics argue the latest measures move in the opposite direction, further blurring the distinction between Israeli control and Palestinian self-governance.

From Washington’s perspective, the situation underscores a broader contradiction. An administration that has shown limited engagement with the international consensus on a two-state solution is, in practice, also narrowing the range of alternative outcomes.

As prospects for two states diminish, analysts warn that other scenarios become more likely, including prolonged security control or recurring instability, complicating the US's assertions that current policies promote stability.

Reports in the US press citing Arab and Islamic condemnation, as well as concern at the United Nations, indicate that the West Bank remains a sensitive issue for many governments, including those maintaining ties with Israel.

Any perception of US leniency risks weakening those partners’ positions domestically.

At the United Nations, repeated warnings from international bodies have reaffirmed legal frameworks that Israel views as restrictive, but which others consider essential to any settlement.

While this divide is longstanding, critics note that developments on the ground are advancing faster than diplomatic efforts to address them.

As Washington emphasizes the importance of stability in the West Bank, the debate increasingly centers on what that stability entails: a temporary calm sustained by existing realities, or one underpinned by a credible political horizon.

For now, analysts say, each new Israeli step is being viewed less as an isolated decision than as a test of the credibility of the US's stated opposition.


Israel Steps Up Targeted Killings of Senior Hamas, Islamic Jihad Figures

Palestinians mourn victims of Israeli strikes in Gaza City, Tuesday (Reuters)
Palestinians mourn victims of Israeli strikes in Gaza City, Tuesday (Reuters)
TT

Israel Steps Up Targeted Killings of Senior Hamas, Islamic Jihad Figures

Palestinians mourn victims of Israeli strikes in Gaza City, Tuesday (Reuters)
Palestinians mourn victims of Israeli strikes in Gaza City, Tuesday (Reuters)

Israel has intensified a targeted military campaign in the Gaza Strip, pressing ahead with airstrikes aimed at senior operatives from Hamas and Islamic Jihad, citing what it describes as repeated ceasefire violations linked to armed fighters emerging from tunnels in Rafah.

The strikes have focused on areas west of the so-called “yellow line,” Israeli-designated restricted zones, with Israel again using the Rafah tunnel incident as a security pretext to hit targets it says were previously identified.

Israel says it considers such incidents breaches of the ceasefire agreement and has used them to justify continued attacks on militant targets inside the enclave.

Moreover, Israeli forces are conducting round-the-clock intelligence operations inside Gaza, relying heavily on unmanned aerial vehicles that continuously patrol the enclave and use advanced technology to identify targets.

These efforts are supported by electronic surveillance, including phone monitoring, as well as human intelligence, according to sources.

In the latest strike, carried out around midday on Tuesday, two Palestinians were killed when an Israeli airstrike hit an electric bicycle traveling along Salah al-Din Road near the entrance to the village of al-Masdar in central Gaza.

The two were taken to Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, while a third person at the scene was wounded.

Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that one of those killed was Asim Abu Holi, commander of the elite unit of Saraya al-Quds, the armed wing of Islamic Jihad, in central Gaza. Another militant accompanying him was critically wounded.

The second fatality was an elderly civilian who happened to be passing through the area.

The developments coincided with the killing of Palestinian woman Abeer Hamdan, who was shot dead by Israeli forces north of Khan Younis in southern Gaza. Later, another young man was killed in the south of the city.

At least seven Palestinians were also wounded in separate shooting incidents involving Israeli vehicles and drones near yellow-line areas in Gaza City and the town of Beit Lahiya in the north.

By midday Tuesday, more than 589 Palestinians had been killed since the ceasefire took effect on October 10, 2025. The total death toll since Oct. 7, 2023, has exceeded 72,000, according to local figures.

On Monday evening, hours after the Rafah incident, an Israeli helicopter struck a residential apartment in the al-Nasr neighborhood of Gaza City, killing three Palestinians, including a child.

Sources said the strike targeted three senior militants from the Beit Hanoun Battalion of Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the armed wing of Hamas.

Two of them were killed, while a third, the child’s father, was critically wounded.

The sources said the targeted militants had led months-long field operations against Israeli forces in Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza, including bombings and sniper attacks. Al-Qassam Brigades had previously released videos documenting those operations, which it said resulted in Israeli casualties.

Elsewhere on Monday, a Palestinian farmer was shot dead by Israeli forces in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza. At the same time, an older man was killed by Israeli fire near the yellow line northwest of Beit Lahiya.

Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem said Israel was “escalating its violations of the Gaza ceasefire under false pretexts, disregarding the efforts of mediators and guarantor states seeking to maintain calm,” adding that those parties must act to compel Israel to halt the breaches.

Rafah tunnels

The Israeli military said on Tuesday that its attacks on Hamas operatives were in response to a ceasefire violation in Rafah. It claimed on Monday morning that it had detected an armed group emerging from Rafah tunnels and firing at Israeli troops, prompting forces to kill them.

Some images published later showed that among the dead was Anas Issa al-Nashar, the son of a veteran Hamas leader and one of the movement’s early founders and former political bureau members.

However, videos circulated on social media by unidentified accounts appeared to show armed members of the Yasser Abu Shabab gang killing some of the militants, rather than Israeli forces.

Similar incidents have occurred repeatedly, in which the gang has abducted and killed Palestinians before handing them over to Israeli forces, according to local accounts.

Abu Obeida, spokesman for the Qassam Brigades, said the actions of such gangs reflected “complete alignment with the occupation” and the execution of its agenda, describing them as “a desperate attempt to assert themselves.”

He added that Israel would not be able to protect them, asserting that the fighters killed in the Rafah tunnels were slain by the gang, not by Israeli troops.

Rafah crossing

In a related development, Israeli authorities have kept the Rafah crossing partially open for more than a week, allowing limited passenger movement in both directions.

The Palestinian Red Crescent Society said it facilitated the departure of 50 travelers on Tuesday, including 19 patients, most of the remainder being their companions, as part of ongoing humanitarian efforts to evacuate medical cases for treatment abroad.

Another 50 travelers returned late Monday.

As of Monday evening, a total of 397 travelers had crossed Rafah, out of 1,600 scheduled to travel in both directions, representing a compliance rate of about 25%, according to the government media office.


Lebanon, Jordan Seek Solutions After Damascus Bans Non-Syrian Trucks

Lebanese truck drivers block the road on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing in protest against Syria's decision to ban non-Syrian trucks from entering its territory, on February 10, 2025. (AFP)
Lebanese truck drivers block the road on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing in protest against Syria's decision to ban non-Syrian trucks from entering its territory, on February 10, 2025. (AFP)
TT

Lebanon, Jordan Seek Solutions After Damascus Bans Non-Syrian Trucks

Lebanese truck drivers block the road on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing in protest against Syria's decision to ban non-Syrian trucks from entering its territory, on February 10, 2025. (AFP)
Lebanese truck drivers block the road on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing in protest against Syria's decision to ban non-Syrian trucks from entering its territory, on February 10, 2025. (AFP)

Lebanon and Jordan are seeking a solution with Syria after the latter barred foreign trucks from entering its territory, officials from both countries told AFP on Tuesday.

Damascus had issued a decision on Saturday stipulating that "non-Syrian trucks will not be allowed to enter" the country, and that goods being imported by road must be unloaded at specific points at border crossings.

The decision exempts trucks that are only passing through Syria to other countries.

Dozens of trucks unable to enter the country were lined up on the Lebanese side of the Masnaa border crossing on Tuesday, an AFP photographer saw.

Ahmad Tamer, head of land and maritime transportation at the Lebanese transport ministry told AFP that discussions were underway with Damascus over the decision.

He said the issue was not specifically targeting Lebanon -- which is trying to reset ties with Damascus after the fall of Bashar al-Assad -- adding that he hoped to hold a meeting with the Syrian side soon.

Lebanon sends around 500 trucks to Syria per day, according to Tamer.

In Jordan, also affected by the decision, transport ministry spokesperson Mohammed al-Dweiri told AFP that "discussions are currently underway, and we are awaiting a response from the Syrian side regarding allowing foreign trucks to enter and cross".

Dweiri said that Jordanian trucks were continuing to unload their cargo at the free zone at the Nassib border crossing with Syria despite some "confusion".

Around 250 Jordanian trucks travel to Syria daily, according to him.

A source in the Syrian General Authority for Ports and Customs told AFP that the decision aimed to "regulate the movement of cargo through the ports".

Representatives of unions and associations in Lebanon's transport sector denounced the decision on Tuesday and warning of "negative repercussions", according to the state-run National News Agency.

Syria is the only land route Lebanon can use to export merchandise to wealthy Gulf markets.

As part of continued attempts to rekindle ties, the two countries signed an agreement on Friday to hand around 300 Syrian convicts over to Damascus.