Asharq Al-Awsat Reports on Return of Lebanese to ‘Scorched Earth’ in the South

Lebanese walk through rubble in destroyed Meis El-Jabal, Lebanon (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Lebanese walk through rubble in destroyed Meis El-Jabal, Lebanon (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Asharq Al-Awsat Reports on Return of Lebanese to ‘Scorched Earth’ in the South

Lebanese walk through rubble in destroyed Meis El-Jabal, Lebanon (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Lebanese walk through rubble in destroyed Meis El-Jabal, Lebanon (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The Lebanese army has reached the country’s southern borders for the first time since war broke out between Hezbollah and Israel late last year, reclaiming occupied villages. But its return has uncovered widespread destruction, something that security sources described as an “expected surprise.”

The Israeli military used the 60-day withdrawal period—extended by an additional two weeks—to systematically devastate the villages under a scorched earth policy, both in the literal and figurative sense.

Security information reviewed by Asharq Al-Awsat showed that Israeli forces remain in at least seven positions, rather than the five officially declared.

Despite pulling back, Israel has continued to carry out attacks in Lebanon, firing warning shots at Lebanese soldiers, launching an airstrike on a vehicle, and wounding two civilians in a separate attack.

Deployment in Southern Lebanon

The Lebanese army has deployed around 6,500 soldiers south of the Litani River, with plans to increase the number to 8,000 soon. These forces have established multiple military positions in areas previously caught in the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.

Under the ceasefire agreement, Hezbollah was expected to withdraw from these areas following the November 27 truce and the extended Israeli pullout deadline, which ended on Tuesday. However, Israeli forces have remained in certain locations along the border.

Israeli Troop Presence Exceeds Official Figures

Israel had announced its forces would stay in five positions, but security sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Israeli troops remain in at least seven locations inside Lebanese territory, with the deepest incursion reaching about three kilometers.

One of these positions, extending into Lebanese territory like an arrow, is considered a weak point for Israeli forces if they maintain a prolonged presence. The Israeli troops’ locations stretch from al-Hamamis Hill, south of Khiam, where they have advanced 1.5 to 3 kilometers, to Kfar Kila, where they control a road running along the border fence.

This area was previously disputed, with Israel insisting it was part of its territory before eventually withdrawing and recognizing it as Lebanese land.

Another position near Markaba, in southeastern Lebanon, sits adjacent to a UNIFIL post, while the border road from Kfar Kila to Markaba remains under Israeli control.

Nearby, Israel has reinforced a site close to Tallat al-Abbad, where a contested grave has historically been split between Lebanese and Israeli territory. Israel has now taken full control of the site and begun renovations.

Additional Israeli positions include Aitaroun, where Israeli forces have taken control of a wedge-shaped area known as Jal al-Deir, and Jabal Balat, where Israeli troops have blocked the road between Ramyah and Marwahin.

Another unannounced position near Dhayra has seen Israel cut off a road without establishing a permanent presence, while the final known position is in Labouneh, overlooking Naqoura on the coast—a site of Israeli-Lebanese disputes since 2000.

A Lebanese army field study, reviewed by Asharq Al-Awsat, found that these Israeli positions offer little strategic military advantage, with poor visibility for reconnaissance.

The report suggests Israel’s continued presence is driven more by political considerations than military necessity. Notably, these positions face key Israeli settlements, from Metula in the east to Shlomi in the west.

Lebanese Troops Face Harsh Conditions Amid Destruction

As the Lebanese army moved into the border areas, troops encountered widespread devastation. According to a Lebanese security source, nearly 80% of border villages have been destroyed, including all former army positions, which were abandoned before Israel's ground invasion in September.

With harsh winter conditions and strong polar winds, soldiers have been forced to sleep in their vehicles, using them as shelter at night and transport during the day. The army also faces logistical challenges in maintaining supplies for units stationed along the border.

Clearing Debris and Recovering Bodies

Beyond securing the border and stabilizing liberated villages, the Lebanese army is assisting civilians by clearing debris, reopening roads, and removing unexploded ordnance.

Troops have also recovered the bodies of fallen fighters, retrieving 69 Hezbollah casualties on the first day of the Israeli withdrawal alone.

Additionally, two Hezbollah fighters were found alive in a shelter in Kfar Kila, having been trapped inside for over two months during the conflict.

As for recent security events, an Israeli drone strike targeted a vehicle in the southern Lebanese town of Aita al-Shaab, in Bint Jbeil district, killing the son of the town’s mayor and critically injuring his wife, as residents continue returning to their devastated villages.

Israeli military spokesperson Avichay Adraee later claimed on social media platform X that the strike was aimed at “eliminating a threat” and had “neutralized a Hezbollah operative in Aita al-Shaab after he was spotted handling weapons.”

Adraee added that the Israeli army continues to act against any threats in line with understandings between Israel and Lebanon.

Moreover, Israeli forces opened fire from their Radar site near Shebaa, targeting homes in the town, and later carried out another round of gunfire from al-Hamamis Hill.

Meanwhile, an Israeli bulldozer erected a new earth barrier near the square of Adaisseh, in the Khallat al-Mahafir area.

Israeli troops also threw stun grenades at a gathering of residents in Kfar Kila. In a separate incident, two Israeli Merkava tanks fired at a Lebanese army post in the Barakat Naqqar area, south of Shebaa, though no casualties were reported.

Several people were wounded when Israeli forces opened fire on parks in Wazzani, where returning residents were inspecting the area. An Israeli soldier also shot a Lebanese man in the leg as he checked his property along the Wazzani River.



Gaza's Rafah Crossing Reopens, Allowing Limited Travel as Palestinians Claim Delays, Mistreatment

Ayada Al-Sheikh is welcomed by his sister, Nisreen, upon his arrival in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip after returning to Gaza following the long-awaited reopening of the Rafah border crossing, early Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Ayada Al-Sheikh is welcomed by his sister, Nisreen, upon his arrival in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip after returning to Gaza following the long-awaited reopening of the Rafah border crossing, early Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
TT

Gaza's Rafah Crossing Reopens, Allowing Limited Travel as Palestinians Claim Delays, Mistreatment

Ayada Al-Sheikh is welcomed by his sister, Nisreen, upon his arrival in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip after returning to Gaza following the long-awaited reopening of the Rafah border crossing, early Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Ayada Al-Sheikh is welcomed by his sister, Nisreen, upon his arrival in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip after returning to Gaza following the long-awaited reopening of the Rafah border crossing, early Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

A limited number of Palestinians were able to travel between Gaza and Egypt on Sunday, after Gaza's Rafah crossing reopened after a two-day closure, Egyptian state media reported.

The vital border point opened last week for the first time since 2024, one of the main requirements for the US-backed ceasefire. The crossing was closed Friday and Saturday because of confusion about reopening operations.

Egypt's Al Qahera television station said that Palestinians began crossing in both directions around noon on Sunday. Israel didn't immediately confirm the information, according to The AP news.

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to travel to Washington this week, though the major subject of discussion will be Iran, his office said.

Over the first four days of the crossing's opening, just 36 Palestinians requiring medical care were allowed to leave for Egypt, plus 62 companions, according to UN data, after Israel retrieved the body of the last hostage held in Gaza and several American officials visited Israel to press for the opening.

Palestinian officials say nearly 20,000 people in Gaza are seeking to leave for medical care that isn't available in the territory. Those who have succeeded in crossing described delays and allegations of mistreatment by Israeli forces and other groups involved in the crossing, including an Israeli-backed Palestinian armed group, Abu Shabab.

A group of Palestinian patients and wounded gathered Sunday morning in the courtyard of a Red Crescent hospital in Gaza’s southern city of Khan Younis, before making their way to the Rafah crossing with Egypt for treatment abroad, family members told The Associated Press.

Amjad Abu Jedian, who was injured in the war, was scheduled to leave Gaza for medical treatment on the first day of the crossing’s reopening, but only five patients were allowed to travel that day, his mother, Raja Abu Jedian, said. Abu Jedian was shot by an Israeli sniper while he doing building work in the central Bureij refugee camp in July 2024, she said.

On Saturday, his family received a call from the World Health Organization notifying them that he is included in the group that will travel on Sunday, she said.

“We want them to take care of the patients (during their evacuation),” she said. “We want the Israeli military not to burden them.”

The Israeli defense branch that oversees the operation of the crossing didn't immediately confirm the opening.

Heading back to Gaza A group of Palestinians also arrived Sunday morning at the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing to return to the Gaza Strip, Egypt’s state-run Al-Qahera News satellite television reported.

Palestinians who returned to Gaza in the first few days of the crossing's operation described hours of delays and invasive searches by Israeli authorities and Abu Shabab. A European Union mission and Palestinian officials run the border crossing, and Israel has its screening facility some distance away.

The crossing was reopened on Feb. 2 as part of a fragile ceasefire deal to halt the Israel-Hamas war.

The Rafah crossing, an essential lifeline for Palestinians in Gaza, was the only one in the Palestinian territory not controlled by Israel before the war. Israel seized the Palestinian side of Rafah in May 2024, though traffic through the crossing was heavily restricted even before that.

Restrictions negotiated by Israeli, Egyptian, Palestinian and international officials meant that only 50 people would be allowed to return to Gaza each day and 50 medical patients — along with two companions for each — would be allowed to leave, but far fewer people have so far crossed in both directions.

A senior Hamas official, Khaled Mashaal, said the militant group is open to discuss the future of its arms as part of a “balanced approach” that includes the reconstruction of Gaza and protecting the Palestinian enclave from Israel.

Mashaal said the group has offered multiple options, including a long-term truce, as part of its ongoing negotiations with Egyptian, Qatari and Turkish mediators.

Hamas plans to agree to a number of “guarantees,” including a 10-year period of disarmament and an international peacekeeping force on the borders, “to maintain peace and prevent any clashes,” between the militants and Israel, Mashaal said at a forum in Qatar’s capital, Doha.

Israel has repeatedly demanded a complete disarmament and destruction of Hamas and its infrastructure, both military and civil.

Mashaal accused Israel of financing and arming militias, like the Abu Shabab group which operates in Israeli military-controlled areas in Gaza, “to create chaos” in the enclave.

In the forum, Mashaal was asked about Hamas’ position from US President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace. He didn’t offer a specific answer, but said that the group won’t accept “foreign intervention” in Palestinian affairs.

“Gaza is for the people of Gaza. Palestinians are for the people of Palestine,” he said. “We will not accept foreign rule.”


Three Deadly Attacks on Health Centers in Sudan's South Kordofan in Past Week, Says WHO

Sudanese families prepare to ride on trucks while on their way to Egypt through the Qustul border, after the crisis in Sudan's capital Khartoum, in the Sudanese city of Wadi Halfa, Sudan May 1, 2023. (Reuters)
Sudanese families prepare to ride on trucks while on their way to Egypt through the Qustul border, after the crisis in Sudan's capital Khartoum, in the Sudanese city of Wadi Halfa, Sudan May 1, 2023. (Reuters)
TT

Three Deadly Attacks on Health Centers in Sudan's South Kordofan in Past Week, Says WHO

Sudanese families prepare to ride on trucks while on their way to Egypt through the Qustul border, after the crisis in Sudan's capital Khartoum, in the Sudanese city of Wadi Halfa, Sudan May 1, 2023. (Reuters)
Sudanese families prepare to ride on trucks while on their way to Egypt through the Qustul border, after the crisis in Sudan's capital Khartoum, in the Sudanese city of Wadi Halfa, Sudan May 1, 2023. (Reuters)

Sudan's South Kordofan region has seen attacks on three health facilities in the past week alone, leaving more than 30 dead, the World Health Organization said Sunday, AFP reported.

"Sudan's health system is under attack again," WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on X, pointing out that, since February 3, "three health facilities were attacked in South Kordofan, in a region already suffering acute malnutrition".


Killing of Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi Raises Succession Questions in September Current

Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi (file photo, Reuters)
Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi (file photo, Reuters)
TT

Killing of Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi Raises Succession Questions in September Current

Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi (file photo, Reuters)
Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi (file photo, Reuters)

Since the killing of Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi, son of Libya’s late leader Moammar Gadhafi, in the western Libyan city of Zintan last Tuesday, urgent questions have surfaced over who might succeed him in leading the political current he represented.

The questions reflect Seif al-Islam’s symbolic status among supporters of the former regime, known as the September Current, a reference to backers of the September 1 Revolution led by Moammar Gadhafi in 1969.

Search for new leadership

Othman Barka, a leading figure in the National Current that backed Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi, said supporters of the former regime had yet to agree on a new leader but retained the organizational and political capacity to overcome the current phase and later move toward an alternative leadership framework.

Barka told Asharq Al-Awsat that ties to Gadhafi and his sons had been both emotional and political, but said that what he described as national work would continue. He said organized efforts would be made to reach a new leadership after the repercussions of the killing were overcome.

It remains unclear how Ahmed Gaddaf al-Dam, the political official in the Libyan National Struggle Front and one of the most prominent figures of the former regime, views the future leadership of the September Current following Seif al-Islam’s killing.

Sources close to him told Asharq Al-Awsat it was too early to speak of a new leadership while mourning ceremonies continued in Bani Walid.

Gaddaf al-Dam limited his public response to reposting a statement by those describing themselves as supporters of the Jamahiriya system on his Facebook page. He stressed unity, saying the killing would not lead to the fragmentation of the current and that September supporters remained a single, solid bloc.

In Bani Walid in western Libya, where Seif al-Islam was buried on Friday, shock was evident in the tone of Libyan activist Hamid Gadhafi, a member of the late leader’s tribe. He told Asharq Al-Awsat that clarity over the future leadership would emerge after about 10 days.

Possible successors

Libyan social media pages circulated the names of potential successors, including Seif al-Islam’s sister, Aisha, and his brother, Saadi. Libyan political analyst Ibrahim Belqasem rejected that view, telling Asharq Al-Awsat that the only remaining driver for supporters of the former regime would be the emergence of an unexpected, nonpolitical figure, describing it as an attempt to rescue the current.

After the fall of Gadhafi’s rule in 2011, following 42 years in power since the 1969 revolution, his supporters reemerged under the banner of the September Current. They are popularly known as the Greens, a reference to the Green Book.

Fragmented components and the absence of unified leadership mark the September Current. Seif al-Islam was widely seen as a central symbol among supporters, as well as among political figures and groups calling for the reintegration of former regime supporters into political life and for the recognition of their rights.

Nasser Saeed, spokesman for the Libyan Popular National Movement, one of the political arms of former regime supporters, said he expected a national political leadership to take shape in the coming phase to continue what he described as national work until the country stabilizes. Libyans can determine their future.

He said the emergence of a new leader or symbol was a matter for a later stage, stressing that the project was ideological rather than tied to individuals.

Saeed told Asharq Al-Awsat that Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi’s legacy lay in a unifying national project that rejected foreign intervention and sought to restore sovereignty and stability. He said Seif al-Islam had represented hope for overcoming the crisis and that his project extended the path of the September Revolution as a liberation choice that still retained supporters.

Structural challenges

Organizationally, the former regime cannot be confined to a single political framework. Its structures and leadership are diverse, including independent organizations and figures.

Among the most prominent are the Libyan Popular National Movement, founded in 2012, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Libya, formed in 2016 by politicians and tribal leaders in support of Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi.

Their representatives increased their presence after 2020, whether in the Geneva forum that led to the formation of the Government of National Unity or in UN-sponsored structured dialogue tracks, before suspending participation following Seif al-Islam’s killing.

Voices within the September Current believe the killing marked a decisive turning point that cast heavy shadows over the ability of former regime supporters to forge unified leadership, citing structural difficulties rooted in historical disagreements between what is known as the old guard and supporters of change led by Seif al-Islam.

Khaled al-Hijazi, a prominent political activist in the September Current, agreed with that assessment, saying Seif al-Islam’s symbolic role had helped balance internal disputes due to his reformist project before the February 17 uprising.

Al-Hijazi told Asharq Al-Awsat that the loss of that symbolism could revive old divisions and complicate efforts to recreate an inclusive leadership, amid internal and external factors that make unification highly complex in the foreseeable future.

Barka said differences were natural, stressing that the current was not a closed party and believed in democracy and pluralism. He said generational competition did not amount to conflict and noted there had been no violent clashes between supporters of different paths within the September Current.

He concluded by saying that the diversity of approaches served a single goal: the freedom and prosperity of Libyan citizens and the building of a sovereign state capable of overcoming the crisis that has persisted since 2011.