Iran: Enriching Uranium at 60% Does Not Violate NPT

A photo published by the International Atomic Energy Agency of a meeting between Grossi and Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi last October
A photo published by the International Atomic Energy Agency of a meeting between Grossi and Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi last October
TT

Iran: Enriching Uranium at 60% Does Not Violate NPT

A photo published by the International Atomic Energy Agency of a meeting between Grossi and Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi last October
A photo published by the International Atomic Energy Agency of a meeting between Grossi and Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi last October

Iran on Thursday criticized the statements of UN atomic agency chief Rafael Grossi, calling them “unprofessional” and “politically charged.”

Enriching uranium at 60% does not violate the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said.

At a press conference in Tokyo, Grossi had said Iran was “enriching (uranium) at 60%, so almost weapon level.”

“Iran is not still cooperating as we would like them to do, although my visit to Iran in November was constructive,” the IAEA chief said.

He added: “We want to make ourselves available, providing technically sound alternatives to eliminate the possibility that Iran develops a nuclear weapon, to prevent Iran, or to help Iran prove that they don't want to develop a nuclear weapon.”

The IAEA chief also said the agency was prepared to help Iran prove it did not seek a bomb.

In a statement posted on X, Gharibabadi lambasted Grossi’s remarks as “unprofessional and totally politically charged”, insisting his country’s nuclear program was solely for peaceful purposes.

The Iranian official stressed that Grossi’s claim that 60% enrichment is ‘nearly weapons-grade’ is legally and technically unfounded.

“Under the NPT, there is no restriction on the level of uranium enrichment, and non-nuclear-weapon states are only obligated not to divert their programs toward weaponization,” he said.

Gharibabadi said if the IAEA chief is concerned about proliferation risks, he should also address the AUKUS security pact between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, and which involves the deployment of nuclear-powered submarines with weapons-grade fuel.

“Grossi has complained that Iran is not cooperating with the Agency as it ‘wishes’ or ‘prefers.’ Is the level of cooperation determined by the Agency’s preferences or inclinations?!” he said, adding that Iran has commitments, and it cooperates accordingly—specifically under the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement.

“If Grossi wants Iran to accept additional verification measures beyond its legal obligations, he should also tell other parties that he ‘wants’ them to lift sanctions against Iran. Has he ever had the courage to make such a request to those imposing these unjust and illegal sanctions?!” Gharibabadi noted.

Iran’s deputy foreign minister also noted that while Grossi acknowledged a constructive visit to Iran in November, it is surprising that he did not address the counterproductive resolution pushed by three countries in the IAEA Board of Governors.

“Iran’s nuclear program remains peaceful, with no deviation from its legal obligations,” Gharibabadi affirmed, stressing that Grossi’s remarks about Iran’s “need to prevent” and “prove the absence of” nuclear weapon development are speculative and unprofessional.



US Judge Rules Pentagon Press Restrictions Unconstitutional

The Pentagon and the surrounding area is seen in this aerial view in Washington, Jan. 26, 2020. (AP)
The Pentagon and the surrounding area is seen in this aerial view in Washington, Jan. 26, 2020. (AP)
TT

US Judge Rules Pentagon Press Restrictions Unconstitutional

The Pentagon and the surrounding area is seen in this aerial view in Washington, Jan. 26, 2020. (AP)
The Pentagon and the surrounding area is seen in this aerial view in Washington, Jan. 26, 2020. (AP)

A federal judge on Friday ruled that the Pentagon's press access overhaul, which saw accreditations from a host of prominent media outlets withdrawn, violated the constitution.

Elements of the policy are "unlawful because they violate the First and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution," a judge in Washington said in response to a lawsuit brought by The New York Times.

US media including the Times and Fox News, and a host of international news outlets such as AFP and AP, declined to sign the new policy in mid-October, resulting in the stripping of their Pentagon credentials.

It was the latest in a series of measures by President Donald Trump and top officials against journalists and outlets that are often derided as "fake news" when their reporting displeases the administration.

The ruling striking down the policy comes amid the US-Israeli bombing campaign against Iran that began on February 28.

The court said that while national security must be protected, it was vital for the public to have information in light of the US war with Iran and its recent intervention in Venezuela.

"It is more important than ever that the public have access to information from a variety of perspectives about what its government is doing -- so that the public can support government policies, if it wants to support them; protest, if it wants to protest," the ruling said.

"And decide based on full, complete, and open information who they are going to vote for in the next election."

- 'Learning opportunity' -

The Pentagon Press Association (PPA) hailed the ruling and demanded the "immediate reinstatement" of accreditations for journalists who refused to sign on to the new policy.

"This is a great day for freedom of the press in the United States. It is also hopefully a learning opportunity for Pentagon leadership, which took extreme steps to limit press access to information in wartime," the association said in a statement.

"We look forward to returning to the Pentagon and providing the public, including the members of the military currently involved in conflicts around the world, information about why and how the Defense Department is waging war," it said.

The new policy, enforced in October last year, was the latest in a series of moves restricting journalists' access to information from the Defense Department, the nation's single largest employer, with a budget in the hundreds of billions of dollars a year.

The department had announced earlier last year that eight media organizations including The Times, The Washington Post, CNN, NBC and NPR had to vacate their dedicated office spaces in the Pentagon, alleging that there was a need to create room for other -- predominantly conservative -- outlets.

It also required journalists to be accompanied by official escorts if they go outside a limited number of areas in the Pentagon -- another new restriction on the press.

And in January, Trump said he would sue what he has called the "failing" New York Times over an unfavorable opinion poll, after initially filing a $15 billion defamation suit last year.

He has fired off multiple defamation lawsuits against media companies, including the BBC, CNN, The Wall Street Journal, CBS and ABC. Some have ended in multimillion-dollar settlements.


Britain Condemns Iran’s ‘Reckless Attacks’ on Diego Garcia Air Base

Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) are taken from a US Air Force B-1 Lancer bomber at RAF Fairford in south-west England on March 15, 2026. (AFP)
Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) are taken from a US Air Force B-1 Lancer bomber at RAF Fairford in south-west England on March 15, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Britain Condemns Iran’s ‘Reckless Attacks’ on Diego Garcia Air Base

Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) are taken from a US Air Force B-1 Lancer bomber at RAF Fairford in south-west England on March 15, 2026. (AFP)
Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) are taken from a US Air Force B-1 Lancer bomber at RAF Fairford in south-west England on March 15, 2026. (AFP)

Britain has condemned “Iran’s reckless attacks” after its military fired missiles at the UK-US air base on the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.

UK officials have not given details of the attempted strike, which was unsuccessful. It’s unclear how close the missiles came to the base, which is about 2,500 miles (4,000 kilometers) from Iran.

The Ministry of Defense said Saturday that Iran’s “lashing out across the region and holding hostage the Strait of Hormuz, are a threat to British interests and British allies.”

Britain has not participated in US Israeli attacks on Iran, but has allowed American bombers to use UK bases to attack Iran’s missile sites.

On Friday, the British government said US bombers can also use UK bases, including Diego Garcia, in operations to prevent Iran attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran targeted the base before that UK statement.


Iranian Man, Romanian Woman Charged Over Attempt to Enter UK Submarine Base

A photograph shows a general view of HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane, north-west of Glasgow, Scotland on March 14, 2026. (AFP)
A photograph shows a general view of HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane, north-west of Glasgow, Scotland on March 14, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Iranian Man, Romanian Woman Charged Over Attempt to Enter UK Submarine Base

A photograph shows a general view of HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane, north-west of Glasgow, Scotland on March 14, 2026. (AFP)
A photograph shows a general view of HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane, north-west of Glasgow, Scotland on March 14, 2026. (AFP)

An Iranian man and a Romanian woman have been charged after attempting to enter Britain's nuclear submarine base in Scotland, Police Scotland said on Saturday.

The two, who British media have ‌called suspected ‌Iranian spies, were ‌arrested ⁠on Thursday.

The charges ⁠come three weeks into the US-Israeli war on Iran. While Britain has not taken part in the ⁠attacks on Iran, the ‌country's ‌forces have downed Iranian missiles ‌and drones in the ‌Gulf region.

HM Naval Base Clyde is located on the west coast of ‌Scotland and is key to Britain's security, hosting ⁠the ⁠country's nuclear-armed submarine fleet, as well as its attack submarines.

Police Scotland said the Iranian man, 34, and the Romanian woman, 31, are due to appear at Dumbarton Sheriff Court on March 23.