Written Guarantees, Disputes Over Prisoners Mark Final Hours of Gaza Deal

Senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya gestures during a meeting ahead of the Gaza ceasefire announcement in Egypt’s Sharm el-Sheikh on Wednesday (Cairo News TV)
Senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya gestures during a meeting ahead of the Gaza ceasefire announcement in Egypt’s Sharm el-Sheikh on Wednesday (Cairo News TV)
TT

Written Guarantees, Disputes Over Prisoners Mark Final Hours of Gaza Deal

Senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya gestures during a meeting ahead of the Gaza ceasefire announcement in Egypt’s Sharm el-Sheikh on Wednesday (Cairo News TV)
Senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya gestures during a meeting ahead of the Gaza ceasefire announcement in Egypt’s Sharm el-Sheikh on Wednesday (Cairo News TV)

Sources from Hamas and other Palestinian factions revealed details of the final hours of negotiations over a Gaza ceasefire agreement hosted in the Egyptian resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh.

US President Donald Trump announced on his Truth Social platform that Israel and Hamas had signed the first phase of what he called a “Peace Plan,” an agreement he proposed that includes the release of all Israeli hostages.

“I am very proud to announce that Israel and Hamas have both signed off on the first Phase of our Peace Plan,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

“This means that ALL of the Hostages will be released very soon, and Israel will withdraw their Troops to an agreed upon line as the first steps toward a Strong, Durable, and Everlasting Peace,” he added.

According to sources who spoke to Asharq Al-Awsat, the talks in Sharm el-Sheikh were held “in two separate rooms” for the Israeli and Palestinian delegations, with mediators shuttling between them. The atmosphere was described as “positive,” at least from the Palestinian side.

A Hamas source said that “the Israeli delegation held several phone consultations with senior officials, particularly Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” before responding to proposals.

US and Regional Guarantees

Palestinian faction representatives said they received “clear guarantees” from Trump and the US delegation - reinforced by mediators, especially Türkiye - that Washington would ensure Israel does not resume military operations. The source added that the Palestinian side “obtained a written guarantee” to that effect.

Partial Withdrawal

The Palestinian delegation, the sources said, insisted on a full withdrawal of Israeli ground forces from densely populated areas in Gaza.

The sources added that “there was a notable shift” in Israel’s withdrawal plan, particularly from parts of Khan Younis and Rafah in the south, a move seen as a prelude to a broader pullback once all captives, both alive and dead, are handed over.

A map released by the White House showed the stages of the withdrawal under Trump’s proposed plan.

Joint Monitoring Team

The sources also disclosed that a joint operations team - comprising representatives from Hamas, Israel, Egypt, Qatar, Türkiye, and the United States - will oversee the implementation of the agreement and prevent any field incidents or disputes that could trigger renewed violence.

Dispute Over Prisoners

Regarding prisoners, Palestinian sources said their delegation submitted a list of names for release. Hamas also demanded the return of bodies of Palestinians killed and held by Israel, including senior Hamas figures and others involved in the Oct. 7, 2023, assault.

The sources said the issue “remains contentious,” with Israel vetoing the release of at least 20 prisoners and refusing to free any living detainees or hand over the bodies of those linked to the Oct. 7 attack.

This dispute, the sources added, has delayed the official announcement of the ceasefire, which had been expected to take effect at noon local time in Gaza and Makkah.

Compromise on Missing Bodies

On the issue of dead hostages, Hamas reportedly accepted a compromise proposed by mediators. Under the arrangement, joint teams from Egypt, the United States, and Türkiye will search for and identify the remains of hostages believed to be buried under rubble or collapsed tunnels after Israeli strikes.

Some of the remains, the sources said, “may have decomposed and require forensic examination,” noting that both the Israeli delegation - after consultations with Netanyahu - and Hamas agreed to the plan.

Aid Flows to Increase Gradually

The first phase of the agreement also provides for a sharp increase in humanitarian aid, allowing 400 trucks to enter Gaza daily during the first week.

The number would gradually rise to about 800 or more per day, through several land crossings opened by Israel during the war, points previously used to permit aid deliveries amid international criticism over the siege and starvation of Gaza’s population.

Next Phase: Gaza’s Future

The second phase of negotiations - expected to begin after the end of Jewish holidays or once all hostages are handed over, likely within a week - will tackle more sensitive political issues. These include Hamas’s future rule in Gaza, the territory’s postwar governance, the group’s disarmament, and safe passage for its leaders and senior members.

Mediators anticipate difficult talks on these points. Hamas sources said the movement would “maintain a positive approach” and has asked Egypt to host an “inclusive national dialogue” involving all factions, including Fatah, to discuss these critical issues.



Will STC Keep its Gains in Yemen or Prepare for a Major Confrontation?

A supporter of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) stands in the back of a pickup truck in the Khor Maksar district of the second city of Aden on August 29, 2019. (AFP file)
A supporter of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) stands in the back of a pickup truck in the Khor Maksar district of the second city of Aden on August 29, 2019. (AFP file)
TT

Will STC Keep its Gains in Yemen or Prepare for a Major Confrontation?

A supporter of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) stands in the back of a pickup truck in the Khor Maksar district of the second city of Aden on August 29, 2019. (AFP file)
A supporter of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) stands in the back of a pickup truck in the Khor Maksar district of the second city of Aden on August 29, 2019. (AFP file)

Yemen's eastern provinces of Hadhramaut and Al-Mahra are passing through a critical phase amid the unprecedented unilateral military escalation carried out by the Southern Transitional Council (STC) that has been met with widespread regional and international condemnation.

Observers have said the STC cannot be allowed to impose a new status quo through the use of force no matter its justifications or claims.

They said the situation is not a passing development that can be ignored by the Saudi-led Arab coalition to restore legitimacy in Yemen and its supporters. Rather, this is a multifaceted political and security test where southern interests, the war against the Houthis and regional peace collide.

At the moment, the STC is opting to maneuver under pressure instead of leading the challenge head-on. In its recent statements, the council has resorted to political claims to justify its actions on the ground, speaking of "coordination" and "understanding concerns", reflecting a growing realization that its room to maneuver is shrinking and that it must take the right decision.

Saudi Arabia has made clear warnings over the situation, starting with a political warning, followed by an airstrike on Hadhramaut. The stern response means that a firm decision has been taken to prevent Hadhramaut and Al-Mahra from being dragged into an internal conflict or becoming an arena where agendas are imposed by force.

The STC is aware that ignoring the warnings puts it in a direct confrontation with a regional heavyweight - Saudi Arabia. The council does not have the political or military means to come out on top, so it has been advised to seriously deal with the warnings and avoid resorting to stalling tactics if it is considering taking the option of minimal losses to the gains it has amassed over the years.

Failing to heed the warning will mean it will have to come to heel through force, which will end in its major defeat.

The observers said the STC has landed itself in an unprecedented crisis. The council has justified its unilateral military actions as aimed at "protecting the southern cause" and that it was meeting the demands of the people. It also claimed that it sought to block Houthi smuggling routes and fight terrorist groups.

Despite everything, it is not too late for the STC to salvage the situation, as stated by Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman on Saturday. The STC can still end the crisis while taking minimal losses by immediately withdrawing its forces from Hadhramaut and Al-Mahra.

Should it stand its ground, the STC does not have the means to consolidate its presence in the two provinces, especially amid wide popular opposition, notably in Hadhramaut. Moreover, the STC lacks regional cover and international support that is a main condition for creating any security changes in critical areas.

So, it would seem that the best and easiest scenario would be for the STC to withdraw its forces, under such pretexts of "redeployment" or "security arrangements", to minimize its political losses, said the observers.

Should it ignore the warnings and choose to continue to escalate the situation, then the STC will lose its partnership with the legitimate Yemeni authorities, transforming into an obstacle in efforts to restore stability in the country. International sanctions may even be imposed on its leaders.

On the military level, the Arab coalition was clear in stating that it will not allow a new status quo to be imposed by force in eastern Yemen. Any escalation may be met with direct deterrence, meaning casualties on the ground that the STC cannot justify.

On the ground, the STC does not enjoy the support of the people in Hadhramaut and Al-Mahra and the continued escalation will deepen opposition to it in the south. The southern cause will transform from an issue that enjoys consensus to one that causes division.


Syrian Army Enters Latakia, Tartus after Attacks by Regime Remnants

Syrian Security forces stand atop a military vehicle in the city of Latakia, Syria, 28 December 2025. (EPA)
Syrian Security forces stand atop a military vehicle in the city of Latakia, Syria, 28 December 2025. (EPA)
TT

Syrian Army Enters Latakia, Tartus after Attacks by Regime Remnants

Syrian Security forces stand atop a military vehicle in the city of Latakia, Syria, 28 December 2025. (EPA)
Syrian Security forces stand atop a military vehicle in the city of Latakia, Syria, 28 December 2025. (EPA)

The Syrian Defense Ministry announced on Sunday the deployment of military forces in the coastal cities of Latakia and Tartus in wake of an armed attack against security forces and civilians during recent protests.

Syrian television said the deployment was happening after "outlawed groups" carried out attacks against security forces and the people.

The military will work on preserving security and restoring calm in cooperation with the internal security forces, it added.

Earlier, local media reported that three people were killed and 48 wounded when gunmen affiliated with the ousted regime opened fire at civilians and security forces during protests in Latakia and Tartus.

State television said a member of the security forces was killed and others were injured while they were protecting protests in Latakia.

Head of the security forces in the Latakia province Abdulaziz al-Ahmed said the attack was carried out by terrorist members of the former regime.

The protests in Latakia were called for by Ghazal Ghazal.

Al-Ahmed added that masked gunmen were spotted at the protests and they were identified as members of Coastal Shield Brigade and Al-Jawad Brigade terrorist groups, reported the official SANA news agency.

The groups were responsible for bombings on the M1 highway and extrajudicial killings, it added.

A member of the groups was arrested in the Jableh countryside during a security operation, announced the Interior Ministry. Three other members were killed, while explosives and various weapons and ammunition were seized during the operation.

The Al-Jawad Brigade is affiliated with Suheil al-Hassan, a notorious former Syrian military officer.

In a statement, the Interior Ministry said the group was involved in assassinations, bombings and attacks against the Interior Ministry forces and the army.

It was planning attacks on New Year celebrations, it revealed. The detainee also revealed the locations of weapons caches used by the group.


Hezbollah Chief Accuses Lebanese Authorities of Working ‘in the Interest of What Israel Wants’

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem
Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem
TT

Hezbollah Chief Accuses Lebanese Authorities of Working ‘in the Interest of What Israel Wants’

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem
Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem on Sunday said moves to disarm the group in Lebanon are an "Israeli-American plan,” accusing Israel of failing to abide by a ceasefire agreement sealed last year.

Under heavy US pressure and fears of expanded Israeli strikes, the Lebanese military is expected to complete Hezbollah's disarmament south of the Litani River -- located about 30 kilometers from the border with Israel -- by the end of the year.

It will then tackle disarming the Iran-backed movement in the rest of the country.

"Disarmament is an Israeli-American plan," Qassem said.

"To demand exclusive arms control while Israel is committing aggression and America is imposing its will on Lebanon, stripping it of its power, means that you are not working in Lebanon's interest, but rather in the interest of what Israel wants."

Despite a November 2024 ceasefire that was supposed to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, Israel has kept up strikes on Lebanon and has maintained troops in five areas it deems strategic.

According to the agreement, Hezbollah was required to pull its forces north of the Litani River and have its military infrastructure in the vacated area dismantled.

Israel has questioned the Lebanese military's effectiveness and has accused Hezbollah of rearming, while the group itself has rejected calls to surrender its weapons.

"The deployment of the Lebanese army south of the Litani River was required only if Israel had adhered to its commitments... to halting the aggression, withdrawing, releasing prisoners, and having reconstruction commence," Qassem said in a televised address.

"With the Israeli enemy not implementing any of the steps of the agreement... Lebanon is no longer required to take any action on any level before the Israelis commit to what they are obligated to do."

Lebanese army chief Rodolphe Haykal told a military meeting on Tuesday "the army is in the process of finishing the first phase of its plan.”

He said the army is carefully planning "for the subsequent phases" of disarmament.