Armed Clashes Erupt in Libya’s Misrata for First Time Since 2011

Government security forces restore control in Misrata (Social media pages in Misrata)
Government security forces restore control in Misrata (Social media pages in Misrata)
TT

Armed Clashes Erupt in Libya’s Misrata for First Time Since 2011

Government security forces restore control in Misrata (Social media pages in Misrata)
Government security forces restore control in Misrata (Social media pages in Misrata)

Armed clashes erupted in the western Libyan city of Misrata and continued into the early hours of Friday, in the latest episode of the city’s long-running struggle for security dominance among rival factions.

It was the first time since the overthrow of late president Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 that Misrata, Libya’s third-largest city, had witnessed fighting between its own armed groups.

The clashes broke out south of the city, between two factions loyal to the Tripoli-based Government of National Unity (GNU), led by Prime Minister Abdulhamid al-Dbeibah.

The rival groups were the “Joint Operations Force” and the “24th Infantry Battalion” commanded by Najib Ghabaq, along with affiliated units. The fighting was reportedly triggered by disputes over control of local security zones.

Videos circulated on social media showed exchanges of gunfire across southern Misrata before the fighting spread toward the airport road in the al-Ghiran district, forcing authorities to suspend flights and close the airport.

Witnesses reported a large deployment of vehicles mounted with heavy weapons belonging to the 24th Infantry Battalion along the airport road, while the Joint Operations Force gathered dozens of armed vehicles on Tripoli Street in central Misrata.

Political activist Abdelhamid Suleiman Khudr, one of the leaders of the “Misrata Movement,” described the sudden escalation between the two factions as “something unseen since 2011,” saying it had terrified residents.

Khudr said the intensity of the fighting was “indescribable,” citing the widespread use of medium and light weapons and rocket-propelled grenades that reached areas near the city’s Oncology Hospital.

He urged Misrata’s security services to intervene immediately to stop the fighting and called on residents to protest, demanding the removal of all armed groups from the city.

Eyewitnesses said Ghabaq’s men had recently been setting up random checkpoints and stopping citizens “without legal authority.” The latest confrontation, they added, was sparked after members of the 24th Infantry Battalion detained and assaulted an officer from the Joint Operations Force, igniting the standoff.

Armored units from the Joint Operations Force then advanced to confront Ghabaq’s battalion, which was backed by fighters from al-Ghiran. The clashes left at least four civilians wounded, who were taken to hospital, though no official casualty figures had been released by Friday afternoon.

Misrata, located about 200 km (125 miles) east of Tripoli, is home to some of the country’s most powerful armed formations, which have played a key role in supporting Dbeibah against the “Special Deterrence Force” led by Abdulrauf Kara.

Calm returned to the city by Friday morning after the intervention of the 111th Brigade, the Special Missions Directorate, and the 63rd Infantry Brigade, which managed to contain the fighting. However, many residents continued to demand “a lasting solution to remove all armed groups from Misrata.”

The GNU has remained silent over the incident. A military source in western Libya told Asharq Al-Awsat that the situation was now under control following the intervention of government security units, adding that “an urgent investigation will be launched to prevent similar incidents.”

Armed clashes between militias are common in western Libya, driven by persistent rivalries over territorial control and influence.

The fighting coincided with the fifth anniversary of the ceasefire agreement between eastern and western Libya. The country’s Joint Military Commission (5+5) reiterated its commitment to disbanding all armed formations and militias nationwide.

The issue of militias remains one of the most pressing challenges for the executive authorities in Tripoli.

According to a military source, the GNU continues to seek ways to dismantle these groups and integrate them into state institutions. But political observers say Dbeibah’s government has struggled to address the crisis, given its dependence on some of the same armed factions to maintain power.



UN Says Sudan Resources Fuel Civil War

FILE PHOTO: A displaced Sudanese mother of five, including her child, prepares food at a camp shelter amid the ongoing conflict between the RSF and the Sudanese army, in Tawila, North Darfur, Sudan, July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Mohamed Jamal/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A displaced Sudanese mother of five, including her child, prepares food at a camp shelter amid the ongoing conflict between the RSF and the Sudanese army, in Tawila, North Darfur, Sudan, July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Mohamed Jamal/File Photo
TT

UN Says Sudan Resources Fuel Civil War

FILE PHOTO: A displaced Sudanese mother of five, including her child, prepares food at a camp shelter amid the ongoing conflict between the RSF and the Sudanese army, in Tawila, North Darfur, Sudan, July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Mohamed Jamal/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A displaced Sudanese mother of five, including her child, prepares food at a camp shelter amid the ongoing conflict between the RSF and the Sudanese army, in Tawila, North Darfur, Sudan, July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Mohamed Jamal/File Photo

Sudan's rival factions are profiting from control over the country's resources and the "war economy" was sustaining the conflict, the United Nations said Wednesday.

To fund the growing cost of military operations, the two sides rely on exploiting territory, trade routes, and commodities, contributing to a conflict that has become "increasingly self-perpetuating", said the UN human rights office OHCHR.

The war between Sudan's regular army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), that erupted in April 2023, has killed 200,000 people by some estimates and displaced upwards of 11 million.

Several areas of Sudan have been plunged into hunger and famine.

OHCHR called on the two sides, and corporations involved in collecting and selling Sudanese commodities, to ensure compliance with international law.

"Sudan's vast wealth of natural resources should benefit its people," said UN rights chief Volker Turk.

"Distressingly, what we are seeing today is anything but that. In fact, this wealth is only serving to undermine human rights and drive conflict, bringing pain and suffering on an enormous scale.

"This war economy must be disrupted, and the international community must pay much closer attention to the commodities and trade routes that help keep it alive."

OHCHR issued a report focusing on the trade in gum arabic -- a key ingredient in products ranging from soft drinks, to cosmetics and pharmaceuticals.

Sudan accounted for 70-80 percent of global crude gum arabic exports before the war.

Although modest in export value compared with other commodities, it is an important income source for millions of Sudanese, and remains one of the country's most internationally relied-upon exports.

The report found that many who depend on the gum arabic trade have faced looting, extortion, arbitrary detention and threats -- particularly at the hands of the parties to the conflict and their allies.

In May 2025, for instance, the Gum Arabic Exchange and its warehouses, plus part of the local market in El-Nuhud in West Kordofan state, were reportedly looted by the RSF when stocks were full and ready for export.

This severely disrupted local trade and livelihoods, the report said.

OHCHR said that Sudan's gum arabic trade had been reshaped by the fragmentation of the country since the war started.

Gum arabic from areas controlled by the armed forces goes towards Port Sudan for export, while significant quantities from RSF-controlled areas have been redirected to neighboring countries via cross-border smuggling routes.

The report said this may then be treated and traded as locally-produced, making its origin hard to verify.

According to AFP, Turk, the UN high commissioner for human rights, urged countries and companies linked to trade in Sudanese commodities, including gum arabic, to ensure their business was not fueling the conflict or damaging human rights.

He urged countries to strengthen accountability, traceability and regulatory oversight and respect human rights.

"Companies cannot continue business as usual when sourcing from conflict-affected value chains," Turk said.


Israel Kills Four People in Gaza, Including a Child, Medics Say

Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike in southern Gaza City, 12 July 2026. (EPA)
Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike in southern Gaza City, 12 July 2026. (EPA)
TT

Israel Kills Four People in Gaza, Including a Child, Medics Say

Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike in southern Gaza City, 12 July 2026. (EPA)
Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike in southern Gaza City, 12 July 2026. (EPA)

An Israeli airstrike killed a man, his wife and their six-year-old daughter in the Gaza Strip on Wednesday, Palestinian health officials said as talks to advance the US-brokered Gaza ceasefire deal faltered.

The strike on an apartment building in Deir Al-Balah in central Gaza killed Omar Abu Qassem, his wife, Asma, and their daughter, Habeeba, medics said. Their son survived, but was injured, medics said.

The Israeli military said the strike targeted a Hamas fighter.

In Sheikh Radwan neighborhood in Gaza City, an Israeli airstrike killed one person, medics said.

The Israeli military didn't immediately comment on this incident.

The deaths add to a toll of more than 1,100 Palestinians, mostly civilians, killed by Israeli attacks since an October ceasefire between ‌Israel and Hamas ‌to end the war took effect, according to health officials in the ‌enclave. ⁠Hamas doesn't usually disclose ⁠information about its fatalities.

The truce halted major fighting, but has failed to stop near-daily Israeli strikes. Four Israeli soldiers have been killed by fighters in Gaza over the same period.

CEASEFIRE FALTERS

The latest violence comes as Hamas leaders wrapped up another round of truce talks in Cairo on Tuesday.

The discussions — mediated by Egypt, Türkiye and Qatar — were aimed at implementing the second phase of US President Donald Trump's Gaza peace plan.

The talks included the disarmament of Hamas and the Israeli military's withdrawal from the strip, according to sources ⁠close to the talks, who said there had been little progress amid deep distrust ‌between the two sides.

The second phase also includes allowing ‌a US-backed Palestinian technocratic committee to assume power from Hamas, the deployment of an international security force, and the ‌start of the reconstruction of Gaza, which has been devastated by the war.

Five countries — Indonesia, Morocco, Kazakhstan, ‌Kosovo and Albania — have committed to providing troops to the US-backed International Stabilization Force. However, none have yet been deployed as negotiations between Trump's Board of Peace and Hamas have stalled for months.

Speaking at an aid donor meeting in Brussels on Monday, Nickolay Mladenov, the Board of Peace envoy for Gaza, said he would be visiting Morocco on ‌Tuesday to "sign Morocco's contribution to the International Stabilization Force, and soon we hope to see them on the ground undertaking their tasks."

Mladenov said the ⁠October ceasefire was holding ⁠but "imperfectly" with violations continuing, adding that Hamas has yet to agree to what he called a "roadmap" for negotiations.

Hamas official Basem Naim accused Mladenov of supporting Israel’s position in negotiations, and failing to hold the country accountable for violating the ceasefire and not upholding the terms of the first phase of the Trump plan.

The plan called for Israel to withdraw its troops to a demarcated "yellow" line, but Israel has been slowly moving its troops forward and now effectively occupies more than 60% of the strip.

Hamas has repeatedly said that it cannot advance to the second phase of the peace plan until the terms of the first phase are fulfilled.

Nearly all of Gaza's 2 million people, most of whom have been displaced several times, now live on a tiny strip of land along the coast, mainly in makeshift tents or damaged buildings, under Hamas control.

Hamas-led fighters killed 1,200 people during their cross-border attack into Israel on October 7, 2023, according to Israeli tallies. The Gazan health ministry said Israel’s subsequent offensive on the strip killed more than 73,000 Palestinians.


Yemeni Information Minister to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Prevented Sanaa Airport from Becoming an Iranian Platform

Graphic content / TOPSHOT - This screen grab taken from a video footage made available via AFPTV on July 13, 2026 shows smoke rising from the airport in Sanaa
Graphic content / TOPSHOT - This screen grab taken from a video footage made available via AFPTV on July 13, 2026 shows smoke rising from the airport in Sanaa
TT

Yemeni Information Minister to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Prevented Sanaa Airport from Becoming an Iranian Platform

Graphic content / TOPSHOT - This screen grab taken from a video footage made available via AFPTV on July 13, 2026 shows smoke rising from the airport in Sanaa
Graphic content / TOPSHOT - This screen grab taken from a video footage made available via AFPTV on July 13, 2026 shows smoke rising from the airport in Sanaa

Yemeni Minister of Information Moammar Al-Eryani said on Wednesday that the state will not tolerate any new violations, and will take all political, diplomatic, legal, and military measures guaranteed by the constitution and international law to prevent any attempt to undermine Yemen’s sovereignty or impose faits accomplis by force.

Al-Eryani made his remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat following the Yemeni Ministry of Defense’s announcement on Monday that it had targeted the runway of Sanaa International Airport to prevent an Iranian aircraft from landing outside legal and sovereign procedures.

Al-Eryani said the Yemeni government’s position had been clear since the beginning of the crisis. He noted that the government had exhausted all political, diplomatic, and legal avenues and had put forward initiatives aimed at maintaining civilian flights through Yemenia Airways in a manner that safeguarded citizens’ interests while respecting Yemen’s sovereignty.

Al-Eryani stated that “the terrorist Houthi militia, with direct support from the Iranian regime, has rejected these initiatives and insisted on imposing a fait accompli outside the institutions of the state.”

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Chairman of the Presidential Leadership Council (PLC), the Supreme Defense Council, the Cabinet, and the Ministry of Defense had all stressed that protecting Yemen’s sovereignty, airspace, and ports of entry is a constitutional duty that cannot be compromised.

The minister reassured the Yemeni people, saying that the armed forces and security agencies are currently at the highest level of preparedness, in implementation of directives issued by the PLC Chairman, the National Defense Council, and Cabinet decisions.

He stressed that they are fully capable of carrying out their constitutional duty to protect Yemen’s sovereignty and defend its airspace and land, sea, and air borders.

Crisis Management Room

Asked about Yemen’s options should the Houthis choose to escalate, Al-Eryani highlighted the role of a crisis management room through which state institutions are working in full coordination.

He revealed that developments are being monitored around the clock and that necessary measures are being taken based on military, security, and political assessments.

According to him, this ensures the protection of citizens and national interests and demonstrates that the state has the ability to deal decisively and responsibly with any developments.

He also placed full responsibility for any escalation and its consequences on “the Houthi militia and the Iranian regime, which chose to reject all peaceful initiatives and continue violating international law and undermining peace opportunities.”

Houthi Rejection of Government Initiatives

Regarding the Iranian plane’s eventual landing at Hodeidah Airport, Al-Eryani stressed that the government’s success in this crisis should not be measured by where the aircraft landed, but rather by preventing Iran and the Houthis from achieving their objective of establishing Sanaa Airport as a permanent platform for Iranian flights outside state authority.

He explained that the government handled the crisis from the outset with responsibility, exhausting all political, diplomatic, and legal means. It also proposed practical solutions to spare Yemen and the region further escalation, including operating civilian flights through Yemenia Airways and facilitating the transport of the Houthi delegation via the national carrier. However, he said, the militia rejected all such initiatives.

“When the militia insisted on imposing a fait accompli, the state implemented what it had previously announced and prevented the Iranian aircraft from landing at Sanaa Airport, demonstrating that its warnings ... were an expression of a sovereign position stemming from the state’s responsibility to protect its airspace and ports,” Al-Eryani explained.

He reiterated that preventing the aircraft from landing at Sanaa Airport was the most significant turning point in the crisis, because it thwarted attempts to establish the airport as a platform for regular Iranian flights and confirmed that the Yemeni government would not grant the Houthis sovereign powers they do not possess.

Allowing the Plane to Land in Hodeidah

Al-Eryani noted that “the decision to allow the aircraft to land at Hodeidah Airport was taken from a position of strength, after the state had demonstrated its readiness and ability to impose its will.”

He stressed that this did not alter Yemen’s legal and sovereign position, which rejects the operation of any Iranian flights outside official frameworks.

He argued that the crisis had established a new equation: Any future Iranian air movement toward Yemeni territory would not be viewed as a civilian flight but rather as an attempt to violate Yemeni sovereignty and impose a new reality.

He stressed that the Yemeni state would deal with any similar attempt in line with the constitution and international law so as to protect Yemen’s sovereignty and prevent its territory and airports from being used to serve Iran’s regional project.

On Monday, Al-Eryani announced that the Houthis had detained an International Committee of the Red Cross aircraft at Sanaa Airport, preventing it from departing, and had held the pilot and co-pilot hostage.

In his remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he described this as “not an isolated incident, but part of a systematic pattern by the militia of violating international law and international humanitarian law.”

“The militia has previously abducted dozens of UN employees and staff members of international agencies and humanitarian organizations from their workplaces and homes, detaining them arbitrarily. It has also targeted humanitarian institutions, confiscated their property, and used humanitarian workers as leverage for political blackmail, in blatant violation of all international norms and conventions.”

Seizure of National Airline Aircraft

Al-Eryani further revealed that the Houthis’ record includes “the seizure of four Yemenia Airways aircraft and the disruption of the national carrier’s operations, causing severe harm to citizens and to the civil aviation sector.”

He expressed surprise that some international organizations continue to operate flights to Sanaa Airport despite the absence of security and legal guarantees and despite the militia’s ongoing detention of aircraft, individuals, and threats to civil aviation safety.

The minister said this requires a serious review by the United Nations and international organizations of how they deal with such violations. He called for a firmer stance to ensure the protection of their personnel and aircraft and to prevent the militia from using humanitarian work as a cover for imposing a fait accompli or extorting the international community.