One Year On, Deterrence Offensive Set Assad’s Rule on Path to Collapse

Citizens stand atop an overturned statue of late Syrian president Hafez al Assad in Damascus on December 8, 2024 (AFP)
Citizens stand atop an overturned statue of late Syrian president Hafez al Assad in Damascus on December 8, 2024 (AFP)
TT

One Year On, Deterrence Offensive Set Assad’s Rule on Path to Collapse

Citizens stand atop an overturned statue of late Syrian president Hafez al Assad in Damascus on December 8, 2024 (AFP)
Citizens stand atop an overturned statue of late Syrian president Hafez al Assad in Damascus on December 8, 2024 (AFP)

With the dawn of November 27, 2024, Syria and its people were confronted with the opposition’s “Deterrence of Aggression” offensive, the first spark of a military and political shift that ended an era of repression, injustice, killing and torture.

The campaign returned the initiative to Syrians and opened the door to a new beginning they had long hoped for since their uprising began in March 2011.

The “Deterrence of Aggression” operation, launched by armed opposition factions operating under the Military Operations Administration led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, began in western rural Aleppo.

It came in response to heavy artillery bombardment by the former regime’s army and its allies on opposition areas in Idlib, a strike that killed dozens of civilians.

During the first two days, the offensive drew attention as opposition forces seized most of western rural Aleppo, numerous villages in the southern countryside of the city and parts of eastern Idlib countryside.

Their advance culminated in the full recapture of Aleppo amid a continuous collapse of president Bashar al-Assad’s forces and widespread defections in their ranks.

Assurances from “Deterrence of Aggression” forces that residents of all backgrounds would be protected in their homes and livelihoods helped dispel fears that the former regime had long cultivated.

Most Syrians welcomed the advance with widespread elation.

The rapid shift in control in just two days, an unprecedented scene since the start of the Syrian uprising, left Syrians at home and abroad closely watching the course of the battle.

Twelve days after the operation began, it resulted in the fall of the Assad government.

At the outset, Syrians were struck by how quickly regime forces crumbled, despite being backed by dozens of Iran-linked militias, including Lebanon’s Hezbollah, as well as Russian forces.

Ministry of Defense

Brig. Gen. Hassan Abdel-Ghani of the Syrian Arab Army said in remarks carried by the Syrian Arab News Agency that the “Deterrence of Aggression” campaign “freed the Syrian people from the system of injustice and terrorism”

He said “the Syrian Arab Army today protects every inch of the homeland,” urging Syrians to rally around it and work to rebuild the country.

Abdel-Ghani added: “People of free Syria, our noble families, in these days, after the triumphs, victories and achievements our beloved country has witnessed in all fields, and as we closely follow what is unfolding on all fronts, the Ministry of Defense declares with unwavering will and unbreakable resolve the passing of one year since the launch of the ‘Deterrence of Aggression’ operation.”

“Twelve months have passed since we repelled the system of injustice and terrorism and freed our people from death, bombardment and suffering, and the displaced have returned to their homes after the end of darkness.”

The decisive moment in the operation

Syrian military and strategic expert Ismat al-Absi said the launch of the “Deterrence of Aggression” operation marked a military and political turning point that ended the era of repression and returned the initiative to the Syrian people.

“In just twelve days, the frontlines moved from the liberation of Aleppo to the heart of Damascus, and the regime’s defenses collapsed despite Syrian and Russian airstrikes attempting to slow the advance,” he said.

Al-Absi told Asharq Al-Awsat that the timing of the offensive came shortly after a ceasefire between Israeli forces and Hezbollah in Lebanon went into effect.

“This reduced pressure on the northern front and created an operational opening for rapid progress. The planning and command were local, under a new structure known as the Military Operations Administration led by Hayat Tahrir al Sham, with factions from the National Front and the Syrian National Army operating in coordination across multiple axes.”

The operational expectation for the first day, he said, was to break the initial defensive lines and sever key supply routes within 24 hours, which would trigger a rapid collapse of the regime’s defensive structure around Aleppo.

He noted “broad popular support from the first hours, with a priority placed on protecting civilians and opening the way for displaced families to return, which boosted morale and facilitated the initial breakthroughs. Aleppo became the clearest sign that the initiative had returned to Syrians, serving as a logistical base for the continued advance south.”

Al-Absi estimated that the force that launched the “Deterrence of Aggression” offensive numbered between 18,000 and 25,000 fighters across western rural Aleppo and eastern Idlib.

They were deployed in assault groups, engineering units, reconnaissance teams and drone operators, with Red Band units operating behind enemy lines. A reserve force of eight to twelve thousand fighters was positioned for reinforcement and consolidation.

He estimated the number of Iran-backed militia fighters and allied groups present in Aleppo at the outset of the offensive at between 15,000 and 25,000.

They operated in defensive and fire support formations and included a mix of ideological groups and local loyalist units, with engineering teams and artillery and short-range missile crews, reflecting the presence of “dozens of sectarian militias” on the battlefield.

The decisive moment on the first day of the battle, according to al-Absi, was “the breaching of initial defensive lines and the rapid capture of key sites such as Regiment 46 and Sheikh Aqil, alongside simultaneous advances toward southern rural Aleppo and eastern Idlib. This severed the Damascus Aleppo highway and disrupted redeployment. Behind enemy lines, Red Band shock units carried out operations after six weeks of reconnaissance, mine clearing and opening the major breach that enabled armored vehicles and forward units to push through.”

He said the first day ended with “a new and unprecedented map of control since 2011 that cemented the course of the regime’s subsequent collapse.”

Weapons and decisive impact

Al-Absi said that the use of Shaheen drones to paralyze movement and establish tactical control of the air with precise fire direction and support “significantly hindered the regime’s ability to maneuver around Aleppo.”

“Engineering units cleared mines and opened routes while specialized night combat units provided tactical superiority in the early decisive hours,” he revealed.

He said the regime’s response consisted of intense Syrian Russian airstrikes and attempts to provide air cover to slow the advance, “but these efforts failed to regain the initiative amid severed routes, collapsing defenses and rapid changes in the map of control.”

“The regime sought Russian cover and deterrence signals, yet the pace of events exposed its inability to absorb the shock, ending with its fall within twelve days,” affirmed al-Absi.



Qassem’s Call to Topple Lebanon's Govt Exposes Differences with Berri

President Joseph Aoun chairs a cabinet meeting at the Baabda palace. (Lebanese Presidency file)
President Joseph Aoun chairs a cabinet meeting at the Baabda palace. (Lebanese Presidency file)
TT

Qassem’s Call to Topple Lebanon's Govt Exposes Differences with Berri

President Joseph Aoun chairs a cabinet meeting at the Baabda palace. (Lebanese Presidency file)
President Joseph Aoun chairs a cabinet meeting at the Baabda palace. (Lebanese Presidency file)

Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem’s call to topple the Lebanese government was not only rejected by the group’s political opponents, but also appeared out of step with the position of its main ally, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who along with Hezbollah has ministers in government.

While Qassem escalated his attack on the negotiations the Lebanese state is conducting with Israel and called on the street to bring down the government, the positions of Berri’s Development and Liberation bloc appeared closer to containing the escalation and stressing the priority of preserving institutions and internal stability.

In the absence of any practical signs that Hezbollah intends to move toward executive steps, such as the resignation of its ministers or an actual push to topple the government, Qassem’s remarks appeared closer to raising the political ceiling and maintaining media and popular pressure against the negotiations.

Qassem had called on Sunday evening for “toppling the government that is implementing the American Israeli project,” saying “the people have the right to take to the streets and topple the government and the American Israeli project.”

“There is no political sovereignty in Lebanon; it is subject to American tutelage,” he alleged.

He renewed his attack on the direct negotiations the Lebanese state is conducting with Israel, saying “they are rejected and a net gain for Israel,” and calling on the Lebanese authorities to abandon the talks and “not give America what it is asking for.”

Divergence within the Shiite duo

Ministerial sources close to the Lebanese presidency said Qassem’s remarks were merely “part of Hezbollah’s escalation and continuing attack on the negotiations, something that has not received a positive response, not only among Hezbollah’s opponents, but also among its allies.”

Hezbollah and Berri’s Amal movement are allies, commonly known as the Shiite duo.

“If Hezbollah wants to overthrow the government in which it is represented, it should first start by withdrawing its ministers from it, which it will not do under the current circumstances,” the sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

MP Qassem Hashem, a member of Berri’s bloc, said Qassem’s call to topple the government “is nothing more and nothing less than an opinion.”

Hashem said in a radio interview that “more work must be done to unify the internal position and confront challenges in order to preserve common ground among the Lebanese, and this is Speaker Nabih Berri’s position.”

He ruled out any possibility that Hezbollah would withdraw its ministers, saying “the situation does not allow that.” He stressed “the need to preserve all institutions, especially as the government withstood the most difficult circumstances.”

President Joseph Aoun had issued a statement marking Liberation Day on Monday, hours after Qassem’s comments, in which he said that “Lebanon will not accept this reality and will not make peace with it. The path toward full Israeli withdrawal will remain a firm national demand that cannot be abandoned.”

He added that the Lebanese state was working to achieve this “through the option of negotiation, which will not be a concession or surrender, but an affirmation of Lebanon’s exclusive right to protect its land and sovereignty and extend its authority through its army and legitimate security forces.”

“The army will remain the sole guarantor of national security and territorial integrity,” he declared.

Rejection of Qassem’s attack

Aoun’s positions and the government’s decisions continue to receive broad support in Lebanon.

On the centenary of the Lebanese Constitution, the Kataeb Party stressed “the need to uphold its authority as the national pact among the Lebanese and the fundamental guarantee for the establishment of the state and the protection of freedoms.”

The Kataeb placed Qassem’s remarks “within the context of Iran’s insistence on undermining the independence of Lebanese decision-making,” saying that “if he objects to the government’s performance and decisions, it would be more appropriate for him to withdraw his ministers from it instead of resorting to fueling strife.”

It stressed the need to continue the direct Lebanese-Israeli negotiations and implement the Lebanese government’s decisions independently of any negotiations underway in the region, with the aim of securing a ceasefire, ensuring Israeli withdrawal, releasing prisoners, enabling the return of the displaced, reconstruction and the demarcation of the land border.

The Kataeb also called on Lebanon’s friends among Arab countries and Western countries to support the government in this effort and back the army as it implements the government’s decisions.

MP Ghada Ayoub, of the Lebanese Forces bloc. Said: “Qassem’s remarks are misplaced. Hezbollah is participating in the government, and if it has an objection to it or to the negotiations taking place in the United States, it should have taken the initiative to withdraw its ministers from the government first before targeting it.”

“I believe Qassem’s remarks are a threat that reveals Hezbollah’s plan to turn inward if the results of the negotiations are not in its favor,” she said in a radio interview, pointing to “confusion in the party’s position.”


Palestinians Say Israeli Forces Kill Man in Jenin Refugee Camp

 Israeli soldiers keep watch during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, May 23, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli soldiers keep watch during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, May 23, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Palestinians Say Israeli Forces Kill Man in Jenin Refugee Camp

 Israeli soldiers keep watch during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, May 23, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli soldiers keep watch during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, May 23, 2026. (Reuters)

Israeli forces killed a Palestinian man inside the Jenin refugee camp in the northern West Bank, the Palestinian health ministry said on Tuesday.

"A citizen... was killed by Israeli fire in the Jenin camp, and ambulance crews transported his body to Jenin Government Hospital," the Ramallah-based ministry said in a statement, without specifying when he was killed.

Contacted by AFP, Israel's military said it was "checking" reports of the man's killing.

The director of Jenin's Government Hospital, Wissam Baker, identified the victim as Nasser al-Saadi, noting that "he arrived dead at the hospital after being shot in the thigh".

"It appears he bled heavily after being injured before an ambulance was called to transport him to the hospital," Baker told AFP.

The Palestinian Red Crescent had earlier announced that Israeli forces handed over the body of a 30-year-old from inside the Jenin refugee camp, which is adjacent to the city of Jenin.

Israeli forces have occupied and barred access to the Jenin refugee camp since January 2025, when they launched a wide-ranging operation aimed at uprooting Palestinian armed groups from the West Bank's densely populated refugee camps.

The operation has caused the displacement of nearly 40,000 people from the camps, according to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA.

At least 1,073 Palestinians, including several armed fighters, have been killed by Israeli soldiers or settlers since the outbreak of the Gaza war following Hamas's attack on 7 October 2023, according to an AFP tally based on Palestinian Authority data.

On the other hand, official Israeli data shows at least 46 Israelis -- civilians and soldiers -- have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military operations in the same period.


Israel Issues Expropriation Order for West Bank Religious Site

 Israeli soldiers keep watch during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, May 23, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli soldiers keep watch during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, May 23, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Israel Issues Expropriation Order for West Bank Religious Site

 Israeli soldiers keep watch during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, May 23, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli soldiers keep watch during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, May 23, 2026. (Reuters)

Israel has issued an expropriation order for land in the occupied West Bank near the site of a Biblical prophet's grave north of Jerusalem, an Israeli NGO reported Tuesday.

The site, known as Nabi Samuel, is believed in Christian, Jewish, and Muslim tradition to include the grave of the Biblical figure of prophet Samuel, and includes a mosque owned by Palestinian religious authorities, the Waqf.

"This marks the first time that the (Israeli) Civil Administration has expropriated a holy site owned by the Muslim Waqf in the occupied West Bank," Israeli settlement watchdog Peace Now said in a statement.

According to the Israeli order, dated May 9 but published this week, the area for expropriation will include 109.79 dunams (roughly 11 hectares), including access roads, agricultural land, and a mosque.

The order says the decision was made "for the development and preservation of the archaeological site of the Tomb of the Prophet Samuel".

A source in COGAT, the Israel defense ministry body in charge of civilian matters in the Palestinian territories, said the decision was made "following the refusal of Waqf officials to cooperate with the procedures required for the renovation of the tomb compound".

The Palestinian Authority's Ministry of Waqf and Religious Affairs issued a "strong condemnation" of the expropriation order for Nabi Samuel.

"This confiscation is part of a policy aimed at suffocating the mosque and completely isolating it from its Palestinian surroundings, turning it into a Jewish archaeological site by force of arms," the ministry said in a statement.

Peace Now's Yonatan Mizrahi pointed out that Israeli authorities had already taken over administration of much of the land by converting it into an Israeli national park in the 1990s, decades after demolishing a Palestinian village on the site.

"There was no need to decide about the expropriation of the land," Mizrahi told AFP, while Peace Now denounced "the messianic agenda of the Israeli government".

Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967.

In 2025, Israel expropriated an area in the center of the Tomb of the Patriarchs in the southern West Bank city of Hebron, arguing the order concerned an open area intended for roofing works and not a religious structure.