Sudan's RSF Detains El-Fasher Survivors for Ransom

Sudanese displaced people who fled El-Fasher after the city fell to the Rapid Support Forces on 26 October (AFP)
Sudanese displaced people who fled El-Fasher after the city fell to the Rapid Support Forces on 26 October (AFP)
TT

Sudan's RSF Detains El-Fasher Survivors for Ransom

Sudanese displaced people who fled El-Fasher after the city fell to the Rapid Support Forces on 26 October (AFP)
Sudanese displaced people who fled El-Fasher after the city fell to the Rapid Support Forces on 26 October (AFP)

Witnesses, aid workers and researchers said the Rapid Support Forces, which surrounded El-Fasher in Darfur before capturing it in late October, have been holding survivors from the siege in a systematic campaign, demanding ransom for their release and killing or beating those whose families cannot pay, according to a Reuters report.

Reuters said it could not determine how many people are being held by the RSF and allied armed groups in and around El-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur.

However, accounts indicate that large groups are being detained in several villages about 80 kilometers from the city, while others were taken back into El-Fasher where the RSF demands payments worth thousands of dollars from their relatives.

The detention of survivors underlines the risks facing those who failed to escape El-Fasher, which had been the last major stronghold against the RSF in Darfur before its fall.

Witnesses described collective reprisals since the takeover, including summary executions and sexual violence.

The accounts also highlight the plight of tens of thousands still unaccounted for as relief agencies try to reach famine hit El-Fasher and its outskirts, which have become a focal point in the two and a half year war between the RSF and the Sudanese army.

Pay or be killed

Reuters said it interviewed 33 former detainees and 10 aid workers and researchers who provided previously unreported details about the violence faced by detainees, the locations where they were held and the scale of the arrests.

Survivors described ransoms ranging from five million Sudanese pounds, about 1400 dollars, to 60 million pounds, about 17 thousand dollars, sums that are enormous for residents of such a poor region.

Eleven survivors said some of those unable to pay were shot at close range or killed in groups, while others were severely beaten.

According to the agency, survivors who fled across the border to Chad were documented with injuries that appeared to result from beatings and gunshots. Reuters said it could not fully verify their accounts.

Mohamed Ismail, who spoke to Reuters by phone from Tawila, a neutral-held town near El-Fasher, said the RSF gives families three or four days to pay. If no transfer is sent, “they kill him,” he said.

He said he left El-Fasher when the RSF seized the city on 26 October but was arrested with 24 men in the village of Um Jalbakh. He and his nephew were forced to collect 10 million pounds from their family for their release. Nine other men were killed in front of them, he said.

RSF denies responsibility and says it is investigating

RSF legal adviser Mohamed al-Mukhtar told Reuters that most cases of detention and extortion of people from El-Fasher were carried out by a rival group wearing uniforms similar to the RSF.

A committee within the RSF is investigating more than 100 alleged abuses a day in El-Fasher, and many suspects have been detained while nine have been convicted, said committee head Ahmed al-Nour al-Hala.

The fall of El-Fasher after an 18-month siege marked a turning point in a war triggered by a power struggle between the army and the RSF, which the United Nations has described as the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. Both sides face accusations of war crimes.

Survivors of RSF detention in and around El-Fasher told Reuters they were often asked about their tribal identity and were subjected to racial insults.

The International Organization for Migration estimates that more than 100 thousand people fled El-Fasher after the RSF took control. Aid agencies say more than 15 thousand have reached Tawila and about 9500 have crossed into Chad, but most remain in RSF controlled villages around the city, including Garney and Um Jalbakh.

Aid groups say it remains unclear how many have stayed inside El-Fasher itself. Some residents could not flee because they could not afford the cost of leaving, while others were too sick or injured to travel.

Negotiations with families

Yassir Hamad Ali, 36, a former detainee who reached Chad, said RSF fighters arrested him on 29 October with 16 other men after he fled El-Fasher. He said they beat him heavily and demanded 150 million pounds for his release.

Speaking to Reuters from a hospital in Tine near the Chad Sudan border, he said the fighters used a Starlink satellite internet device mounted on their Toyota Land Cruiser to contact his family on Facebook Messenger.

Large areas under RSF control have been cut off from telecommunications since the start of the war, prompting widespread use of Starlink devices. Starlink did not respond to a request for comment.

Ali said his family negotiated the amount down to five million pounds, which they sent via a Sudanese mobile money platform, according to transfer receipts seen by Reuters.

Another man in Tine, Ibrahim Kitr, 30, said his family borrowed against their home in Atbara to pay the 35 million pound ransom, saying he doubted they would be able to repay the loan.

His brother, Alhaj Altijany Kitr, 31, said fighters placed a gun to his head and beat him severely during a video call with their family, a method similar to that used by smuggling gangs on migrant routes in neighboring Libya, where captors show relatives the abuse to pressure them for higher ransom.

The RSF has often recruited fighters or allied factions with the promise of looting rather than a fixed salary, and widespread looting has taken place in areas under its control.

But aid workers said the large ransom demands around El-Fasher represent a new phenomenon.

Satellite images of Garni village on 28 November show hundreds of newly built temporary shelters over the past month. Two aid workers said this suggests people could be held there for extended periods.

Detention inside El-Fasher

Reuters said men and women were separated on arrival in Garney, but women were also detained there. One woman said she was blindfolded and raped repeatedly over several days. Another said she witnessed similar assaults.

The second woman cried as she spoke by phone from Tawila. She said RSF fighters threatened to kill her when she tried to intervene.

Eight former detainees said they were taken back to El-Fasher and held for ransom in buildings that included military facilities and university dormitories.

A 62-year-old teacher, who requested anonymity, said he found himself in El-Fasher Children’s Hospital with hundreds of other men.

They were packed in rows, he said, with nothing to drink, so they took water from a stagnant pool in the hospital grounds that they later discovered was sewage. The teacher said about 300 men died.

Two human rights researchers who spoke to witnesses gave Reuters similar estimates.

Mujahid Eltahir, 35, who was detained in El-Fasher, said he was released after a beating for a ransom of 30 million pounds, only to be detained again in Zalingei, where his captors forced his family to pay another six million pounds.

Speaking to Reuters in N’Djamena, Chad, he said he saw the bodies of seven men he had fled with lying along the road, shot in the head and chest. Eltahir displayed a photo of his feet covered in sores from walking barefoot after RSF fighters took his shoes.

Since taking El-Fasher, the RSF has posted videos showing people receiving food and medical care in the city.

A nurse who said she had been detained by the RSF told Reuters that fighters filmed her receiving food and saying she was treated well. She said they abuse people, then show them moments later on livestreams.



Iraq Arrests 38 Politicians and Government Officials in Green Zone Raids

A circulating image shows Iraqi Humvees at an entrance to the Green Zone at dawn Sunday
A circulating image shows Iraqi Humvees at an entrance to the Green Zone at dawn Sunday
TT

Iraq Arrests 38 Politicians and Government Officials in Green Zone Raids

A circulating image shows Iraqi Humvees at an entrance to the Green Zone at dawn Sunday
A circulating image shows Iraqi Humvees at an entrance to the Green Zone at dawn Sunday

Iraqi security forces arrested politicians, lawmakers and senior government officials early on Sunday after Elite Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) units raided their homes inside Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone, security sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The newspaper quoted an Iraqi official as saying that the number of detainees has reached 38.

The security sources said that the heaquarters of Midland Oil Company south of Baghdad were raided too.

A senior source quoted by ⁠state news ⁠agency INA said that some of the latest arrests were based on testimony provided by Adnan al-Jumaili, deputy oil minister for refining affairs, after his detention on corruption charges.

The source told INA that al-Jumaili's statements implicated a wider network of officials in alleged corruption schemes.

 

Iraqi security personnel are seen near a house in the Green Zone at dawn Sunday (X)

Sunday's operation was launched on direct orders from Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, a government official told Asharq Al-Awsat.

An Iraqi official said earlier that an official statement will be made about the ⁠arrests.


Iraq’s PM Sends Positive Signals Ahead of Trump Meeting

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi during his meeting with Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Kazem Al-Sadeq in Baghdad (Government media)
Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi during his meeting with Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Kazem Al-Sadeq in Baghdad (Government media)
TT

Iraq’s PM Sends Positive Signals Ahead of Trump Meeting

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi during his meeting with Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Kazem Al-Sadeq in Baghdad (Government media)
Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi during his meeting with Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Kazem Al-Sadeq in Baghdad (Government media)

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi has been sending positive signals to Washington ahead of a planned mid-July visit, as analysts say his government is trying to reorganize ties with the United States based on an economic and security partnership while preserving relations with Iran.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington had recently received good and constructive signals from the Iraqi government on armed factions, in a reference to efforts to place weapons under state control and disarm armed groups.

In his latest remarks carried by state media, al-Zaidi urged armed factions to “preserve their history after contributing to the fight against terrorism, and to work through the state,” renewing his government’s rejection of “weapons outside official institutions.”

Al-Zaidi said his government sought a “strong economic partnership” with the US, while stressing that Baghdad’s ties with Tehran were “based on good neighborliness, respect and common interests, as is our relationship with all countries of the region.”

“Iraq does not accept dictates from any party, and the decision will always be made according to the interests of Iraqis first,” he said, adding that his government’s strategic direction was built on “a strong partnership with the US, starting from Iraq’s interest, and not at the expense of any other party.”

He said Iraq “does not follow a policy of blocs or hostility, and wants to be a space for communication and stability, not an arena for conflict,” in a reference to US-Iranian competition in Iraq.

On Iraq’s regional ties, al-Zaidi said the “Gulf Arab states represent a historical, cultural and social depth and a source of strength for Iraq.”

Balancing Iran

Al-Zaidi’s expected visit to Washington comes as Baghdad seeks to reshape its relationship with the US while maintaining balanced ties with Iran, amid regional shifts that followed this year’s Israel-Iran war.

Iraqi researcher Muhanad Seloom said al-Zaidi “is clearly seeking a strong partnership with the US at all levels,” calling the approach “good.”

Seloom said there was popular support for fighting corruption and restricting weapons to the state, giving the government the basic tools to move ahead despite the complexity of the issue of militias.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Seloom described Iranian as “negative.” He added that it was not in Iraq’s interest to enter into hostility with Iran, and that the US understood the special nature of Baghdad’s relationship with Tehran.

The ‘project to eliminate militias’

Political science professor Talib Muhammed Karim said al-Zaidi “is not going to Washington carrying a project to eliminate militias in the military sense, but rather a project to strengthen the state and restore its legitimate monopoly over the use of force.”

Karim told Asharq Al-Awsat that the wager was to build an internal consensus, backed by regional and international support, that would allow weapons to be gradually restricted to the state under the law.

He said Iranian influence was not confined to the security sphere, but extended to political, economic and social ties built up over more than two decades.

Reducing that influence, he said, would not come through a political decision or external pressure alone, but through stronger Iraqi state institutions, a more diversified economy and broader Arab and international partnerships. That, he said, would automatically reduce the impact of any outside influence.

Karim said the success of the Washington visit “will not be measured by whether there is a confrontation with armed factions,” but by Iraq’s ability to secure US and international backing for the state project, attract investment, strengthen the economy and expand security cooperation in ways that reinforce state sovereignty.

A shifting US view

Political science professor Abbas Abboud Salem offered a different reading, saying Iraq’s political system “cannot be reduced to the will of one person.” The post-2003 political scene, he said, is built on multiple competing political forces.

Salem told Asharq Al-Awsat that the silence of these forces does not mean they have given al-Zaidi a mandate to radically change Iraq’s policy.

What has changed most, he said, is the US view of Iraq. According to Salem, Washington moved from direct occupation to managing Iraq after the withdrawal as a zone of influence balanced with Iran, and then to seeking a return through direct influence amid regional geopolitical shifts.

Salem said these shifts were pushing Iraq to rebuild its alliance with the US in response to regional challenges and to reduce losses as the regional order is being reshaped.


Hezbollah Links Ceasefire Stance to Iran Track

Hezbollah supporters wave flags during a march marking Ashura in Beirut’s southern suburbs (EPA)
Hezbollah supporters wave flags during a march marking Ashura in Beirut’s southern suburbs (EPA)
TT

Hezbollah Links Ceasefire Stance to Iran Track

Hezbollah supporters wave flags during a march marking Ashura in Beirut’s southern suburbs (EPA)
Hezbollah supporters wave flags during a march marking Ashura in Beirut’s southern suburbs (EPA)

Israeli escalation in southern Lebanon has slowed, but not stopped, as Hezbollah seeks to cement a two-track position: declaring commitment to the ceasefire while documenting Israeli violations.

The latest came Saturday, when Israel struck the outskirts of Nabatieh. The Israeli military said it targeted Hezbollah members who had approached its positions.

Despite continued Israeli strikes in the South and drone flights over Beirut’s southern suburbs, Hezbollah said after a strike near Zawtar al-Sharqiya that it remained committed to the ceasefire. It called the Israeli army’s actions a “flagrant violation” of the agreement and said it was documenting all Israeli breaches.

Hezbollah part of the Iranian track

Political writer Harith Suleiman said Hezbollah’s insistence that it remains committed to the ceasefire, while documenting Israeli violations, “does not reflect a position within the Lebanese track, but falls within the framework of understandings underway between Iran and the United States.”

He said the group was acting as part of that track.

“Hezbollah wants Iran, not Lebanon, to negotiate on its behalf,” Suleiman told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“It is trying to make Lebanon part of the negotiations between Iran and the United States, and to present the ceasefire as part of an understanding between America, Israel and Iran, not as part of the Lebanese track.”

“When Hezbollah says it is committed to the ceasefire while Israel is violating it, it is effectively sending a message to Iran. It is saying: The agreement we are part of is being violated, and you, together with the United States and Israel, must act. That is why Hezbollah is part of the Iranian track, not the Lebanese track.”

Commitment tied to Iran talks

Suleiman said Hezbollah’s documentation of violations, coupled with its repeated commitment to calm, pointed to the continued existence of negotiation channels between Tehran and Washington.

“As long as negotiations between the Americans and Iranians are going well, Iran does not need Hezbollah to create a problem to improve its negotiating position. That is why Hezbollah is committed to calm and to the agreement. But if Iran decides to open a front or create a crisis, Hezbollah will be ready to move in that direction.”

Asked about the Hezbollah secretary-general’s Ashura speech, Suleiman said: “There is a difference between ideological rhetoric and operational conduct. Deals and understandings are built on practical steps, not slogans or ideological positions. What determines the actual course is what happens on the ground, and that remains tied to what Iran wants and decides.”

Hezbollah abides by what Iran agrees to

Retired Brig. Gen. Yarub Sakher said Hezbollah’s stated commitment to the ceasefire, alongside its documentation of Israeli violations, showed that its decision was tied more to Iranian understandings than to the Lebanese-Israeli negotiation track.

“When Hezbollah says it is committed to the ceasefire, it is sending a clear message that it abides by what Iran agrees to,” Sakher told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“During negotiations with the United States in Switzerland, Tehran reached an understanding to halt military operations and attacks on different fronts, including the Lebanese front. That is why Hezbollah is declaring its commitment to this track.”

“This position is not tied to the ongoing Lebanese-US-Israeli negotiations, which may lead to consolidating the ceasefire or to later security arrangements. It is meant to entrench the Iranian view.”

Documenting violations: building a case for escalation

Sakher said Hezbollah’s announcement that it was documenting Israeli violations “does not change the reality, because these violations are documented daily by the Lebanese state and the Lebanese army, and are also monitored by surveillance systems and satellites.”

“The documentation itself is not new, but it carries political significance.”

“Hezbollah is using this documentation to build a narrative it can use later if Iran decides to reopen the front. It would then say it showed strategic patience for a long time, documented the violations and remained committed to the ceasefire before justifying any new escalation.”

“This is exactly what it did before the latest confrontation, when it spoke of months of restraint before moving to military action.”

“There are Lebanese forces influenced by Hezbollah’s position that are betting on a US-Iranian understanding and, in practice, trying to give that track precedence over the Lebanese negotiation track.”

“At the same time, the US administration is treating the separation between the two files with a degree of political oversimplification, despite attempts by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to address this gap.”