Lebanese Expat Admits to Working with Israel in Abduction of Former Officer

Retired Lebanese General Security officer Ahmad Shukr, who was abducted in eastern Lebanon (Family file photo / Asharq Al-Awsat)
Retired Lebanese General Security officer Ahmad Shukr, who was abducted in eastern Lebanon (Family file photo / Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Lebanese Expat Admits to Working with Israel in Abduction of Former Officer

Retired Lebanese General Security officer Ahmad Shukr, who was abducted in eastern Lebanon (Family file photo / Asharq Al-Awsat)
Retired Lebanese General Security officer Ahmad Shukr, who was abducted in eastern Lebanon (Family file photo / Asharq Al-Awsat)

Lebanese authorities have concluded their investigation into the abduction and disappearance of retired General Security captain Ahmed Shukr, reaching what officials described as a “decisive conclusion” three weeks after he vanished under mysterious circumstances.

A senior judicial source told Asharq Al-Awsat that Shukr was kidnapped in a “highly precise and complex security operation” planned and executed by Israel’s Mossad, which exploited security gaps and relied on the direct cooperation of a Lebanese operative recruited specifically for the mission.

The source stressed that the operation “was not random, but part of an organized intelligence effort,” adding that Shukr was targeted for reasons that remain unknown.

Public Prosecutor Judge Jamal Hajjar ordered the closure of the investigation’s preliminary phase, during which only one suspect was arrested: A Lebanese expatriate residing in Africa, believed to have worked for the Mossad and to have played a central role in luring and abducting Shukr.

According to the judicial source, the suspect initially denied any involvement but soon confessed to cooperating with the Mossad and carrying out multiple assignments, including the task of luring Shukr prior to his abduction.

He admitted to meeting Mossad officers in Africa and receiving payments ranging from $5,000 to $10,000 for each mission.

Investigators said the suspect had prior acquaintance with Shukr, enabling him to build a relationship of trust. After returning to Lebanon roughly ten days ago — apparently in an attempt to dispel suspicion — the suspect rented an apartment owned by Shukr in the town of Choueifat.

Investigators described this detail as crucial in understanding how Shukr was drawn into the trap, alongside other technical and logistical evidence that reinforced the conclusion the operation was carried out with high precision under the supervision of a professional intelligence service.

The suspect’s confessions were corroborated by technical evidence, particularly telecommunications data tracing Shukr’s movements and the timing of his disappearance.

While the initial phase of the investigation has been concluded, authorities say it remains open to the possible involvement of additional suspects believed to be inside Lebanon. Efforts are also ongoing to determine Shukr’s fate, which remains unknown.

The case is expected to be referred to Government Commissioner to the Military Court Judge Claude Ghanem for prosecution of the suspect and anyone else implicated.

Hajjar has also issued search warrants for two individuals—a Swedish national of Syrian origin and a French national of Lebanese origin, suspected of luring Shukr from his hometown of Nabi Sheet to an area near Zahle under the pretext of assisting with a property purchase.

Both men disappeared following Shukr’s abduction. The Swedish suspect is known to have left Lebanon via Beirut’s international airport within hours, while it remains unclear whether the French suspect fled illegally.

Investigators believe the operation may be linked to the long-standing case of Israeli pilot Ron Arad, who went missing in Lebanon in 1986.

Shukr’s family has rejected links to Fuad Shukr, a Hezbollah official killed by Israel in July 2024 in Beirut’s southern suburbs, saying no one in the town even knew him.



Drone Strikes Hit 15 Power Stations Across Sudan in Days

Damage at the Al-Markhiyat power station north of Omdurman following a drone attack on October 28 (AFP). 
Damage at the Al-Markhiyat power station north of Omdurman following a drone attack on October 28 (AFP). 
TT

Drone Strikes Hit 15 Power Stations Across Sudan in Days

Damage at the Al-Markhiyat power station north of Omdurman following a drone attack on October 28 (AFP). 
Damage at the Al-Markhiyat power station north of Omdurman following a drone attack on October 28 (AFP). 

Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have continued drone attacks on electricity infrastructure in army-controlled areas, targeting power generation plants and substations across the country, causing widespread electricity and water outages and raising fears of a partial collapse of the national grid.

The escalating strikes have also threatened hospital operations and agricultural projects, with warnings of severe consequences if the attacks continue at their current pace.

Reports indicate that around 15 stations were targeted between October 20 and November 1, while the Emergency Lawyers group said Sunday that 15 facilities had been attacked in October alone.

Early Sunday, drones launched simultaneous strikes on the Abu Hamad substation in River Nile State and the Al-Dabbah station in Northern State, according to eyewitnesses. Local sources said fuel facilities in Northern State were also hit.

River Nile State Governor Mohammed al-Badawi said after inspecting the site that a drone strike had completely destroyed the Abu Hamad substation, cutting electricity supplies across the state.

The attacks came less than 24 hours after drones targeted the Haya substation, still under construction in Red Sea State, along with oil transportation facilities.

Warnings of a Nationwide Blackout

Former Sudanese Energy Minister Adel Ibrahim warned that most major electricity substations had been bombed and taken out of service, leaving, by his estimate, only three principal stations: Merowe Dam and Atbara in northern Sudan, and Maranjan in Wad Madani, the capital of Al-Jazira State.

“If electricity stations continue to be targeted at this rate, complete darkness will engulf the country,” Ibrahim told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He cautioned that repairing the damage and restoring operations could take considerable time, while replacing destroyed transformers and other equipment would involve substantial costs.

Substations play a critical role in connecting power generation facilities to consumers. Their destruction can therefore leave entire cities and states without electricity even when generating plants remain operational.

Ten States Affected

Reports show that the attacks have spread to 10 of Sudan’s 18 states, with White Nile and Gedaref recording the highest number of targeted facilities, at three each. Five states in Darfur under RSF control were not targeted.

In White Nile State, drones struck the Tendelti, Mashkoor and Um Dabakir thermal power stations. In Gedaref, attacks hit Al-Hawata and Al-Faw, along with other electricity facilities cited in reports.

Al-Jazira State saw strikes on the Al-Junayd and Al-Managil stations, while Shendi and Abu Hamad were targeted in River Nile State.

In Sennar State, the Singa station came under attack. Other strikes hit Al-Markhiyat, northwest of Omdurman in Khartoum State; Haya in Red Sea State; and Al-Dabbah in Northern State.

There were also reports of an attack on an electricity facility in Kadugli, South Kordofan State.

White Nile and Gedaref thus topped the list in terms of sites mentioned in the reports, although the absence of standardized technical data makes it impossible to rank states by the scale of damage or duration of outages.

The wave of attacks began on October 20 with a strike on Tendelti before expanding on October 26 to Singa, Al-Hawata, Al-Faw, Mashkoor and Al-Junayd.

Al-Markhiyat was hit the following day, followed by Al-Managil on October 28, Um Dabakir on October 29, Shendi on October 30 and Haya on October 31.

The latest strikes targeted Abu Hamad and Al-Dabbah early Sunday.

Accusations Against Ethiopia

The Sudanese government has accused the RSF of carrying out the attacks and Ethiopia of allowing its territory to be used to launch drones against facilities inside Sudan.

On Saturday, the Foreign Ministry briefed diplomatic missions on the allegations, identifying locations inside Ethiopia that it said were being used to support drone operations.

During a recent visit to Moscow, Sudanese Foreign Minister Mohieddin Salem also accused Ukrainian military personnel of assisting the RSF and training its members to operate drones.

The expanding geographical reach, frequency and precision of some strikes suggest that the paramilitary group possesses substantial numbers of long-range drones and increasingly sophisticated operational capabilities.

Emergency Lawyers said the attacks had disrupted electricity and water supplies and threatened healthcare services, worsening civilian suffering.

On Saturday, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres condemned the escalation of drone attacks by both sides in Sudan’s war, expressing shock at their devastating impact on civilians.

His spokesperson, Stephane Dujarric, said the strikes had killed hundreds of civilians, including women and children, across Sudan and the Abyei region.

Guterres stressed the need to protect civilians and critical infrastructure, including healthcare facilities, and urged both parties to immediately cease hostilities and engage seriously in mediation efforts to end the war.

The attacks have raised growing concerns about hospitals’ ability to operate medical equipment, maintain drinking water supplies and keep irrigation projects running, particularly as the winter agricultural season approaches.

Sudan’s electricity sector has suffered extensive damage since the war erupted in April 2023, affecting thermal generation units, transmission stations, transformers and power lines.

The latest strikes have placed further strain on an already weakened grid struggling with equipment shortages, maintenance difficulties and limited funding.


Israeli Reports Heighten Lebanese Fears of Another War

Israeli heavy machinery bulldozes houses in Mansouri, as seen from Hinniyeh, Southern Lebanon, September 19, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli heavy machinery bulldozes houses in Mansouri, as seen from Hinniyeh, Southern Lebanon, September 19, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Israeli Reports Heighten Lebanese Fears of Another War

Israeli heavy machinery bulldozes houses in Mansouri, as seen from Hinniyeh, Southern Lebanon, September 19, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli heavy machinery bulldozes houses in Mansouri, as seen from Hinniyeh, Southern Lebanon, September 19, 2026. (Reuters)

Israeli reports of military preparations for a possible offensive in South Lebanon have heightened fears among Lebanese officials and residents of another war, amid continuing Israeli attacks, mounting domestic political tensions and uncertainty over Hezbollah’s response to any renewed regional confrontation.

Lebanon faces the prospect of a third war, with concerns that Hezbollah could once again draw the country into a conflict in support of Iran, as it has done in the past.

Israel’s Maariv newspaper reported that the Israeli military was preparing for the possible occupation of three major cities in South Lebanon - Tyre, Sidon and Nabatieh - if war with Iran resumes and Hezbollah joins the fighting.

Israeli assessments believe that Tehran could activate several fronts simultaneously, including Lebanon, it said.

Tel Aviv was taking the possibility of Hezbollah’s involvement seriously, despite assessing the group’s military capabilities as weakened, and was preparing to deploy “extremely heavy firepower,” it added.

The scenarios outlined by Maariv include intensified strikes across large parts of Beirut’s southern suburbs, a naval blockade of the ports of Beirut and Tripoli, and attacks on coastal cities followed by possible ground advances.

Lebanese concerns

Lebanese ministerial sources expressed alarm over the reports, warning that another Israeli offensive could not be ruled out.

“There is no doubt that the situation is worrying. We cannot exclude the possibility of Israel launching another war against Lebanon, particularly if Hezbollah fails to honor its promise, as it has done before, and once again enters the conflict,” the sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Israeli threats are nothing new. Officials in Tel Aviv have repeated them many times, placing us before a genuine danger. Unfortunately, we may reach the point where the plans being discussed in the media are carried out,” they added.

Riad Kahwaji, a researcher specializing in security and defense affairs, said the Maariv report should be taken seriously.

“The threat clearly concerns the entire South, without distinguishing between areas north and south of the Litani River. It extends to the occupation of all of South Lebanon and, inevitably, parts of the western Bekaa if Hezbollah decides to join the fight,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Kahwaji noted that Israel was already preparing for such an operation because it expects Hezbollah to intervene. “Israel fully understands that Hezbollah will enter the confrontation and is preparing for an operation of this kind,” he said.

“Hezbollah has not disappointed the Israelis so far, particularly Benjamin Netanyahu and his government. Each time, it acts as the other side expects, allowing Israel to expand the territory under its occupation,” he remarked.

He warned that any subsequent Israeli withdrawal would take place on Israel’s terms, leaving Lebanon to accept the conditions imposed.

Kahwaji urged the Lebanese government to accelerate efforts to bring all weapons under state control and called on Shiite community leaders to take a decisive position on Hezbollah and its arsenal.

“This threat must serve as an incentive for the Lebanese government to speed up its work and become more active on the issue of bringing weapons under state control,” he noted. “We cannot ignore this threat and wait for disaster to strike again.”

Looking ahead, Kahwaji predicted that another war appeared inevitable after the US elections, citing remarks Saturday by Iranian supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei reaffirming the unity of regional fronts.

His statement contradicted reports that Hezbollah would stay out of any future confrontation, added Kahwaji.

Al-Rahi calls for Lebanon to stay out of regional conflicts

Amid growing fears of a third war, Lebanese figures have renewed calls to keep the country out of regional confrontations.

Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi stressed during Sunday Mass that preventing Lebanon from being dragged into another war had become a major national responsibility.

He warned that the Lebanese people could not withstand another conflict and insisted that decisions on war and peace must rest with the state rather than multiple competing authorities.

Al-Rahi also reiterated the need to place weapons exclusively under the control of the state and its legitimate institutions.

The warnings come as Israeli attacks continue across South Lebanon, maintaining military pressure despite concerns over a wider escalation.

Social Affairs Minister Haneen Sayed visited the town of Froun in the Bint Jbeil district to inaugurate a center and hand over several prefabricated housing units intended to shelter displaced families.

While delivering remarks at the inauguration ceremony, Israeli warplanes struck the town of Qoussair with two missiles. Sayed interrupted her speech upon hearing the explosion and recorded the strike on her phone before resuming her address.

She stressed the importance of supporting displaced people, strengthening humanitarian and social assistance, and providing shelters and essential supplies to affected families.

Israeli artillery also shelled the outskirts of Aita al-Jabal, the Baraashit-Kounine area and Bani Hayyan.


Al-Zaidi’s Regional Visits Aim to Reshape Iraq’s Foreign Relations

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi at the headquarters of the Iraqi Intelligence Service on October 29, 2026. (INA)
Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi at the headquarters of the Iraqi Intelligence Service on October 29, 2026. (INA)
TT

Al-Zaidi’s Regional Visits Aim to Reshape Iraq’s Foreign Relations

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi at the headquarters of the Iraqi Intelligence Service on October 29, 2026. (INA)
Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi at the headquarters of the Iraqi Intelligence Service on October 29, 2026. (INA)

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi is preparing to visit Kuwait and Bahrain this week as part of a diplomatic drive to reshape relations with neighboring countries, following trips to Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Türkiye and Iran, according to a government source.

Political assessments in Baghdad suggest his visits to Saudi Arabia and Jordan were aimed at building trust with both countries’ leaders following a series of attacks by armed factions operating in Iraq.

Al-Zaidi offered assurances that such attacks would not happen again, as efforts to bring weapons under state control continue despite opposition from some factions and attempts to delay implementation. The process is expected to be completed by June 2027.

In Türkiye, talks focused on the transit of Iraqi oil through the port of Ceyhan, the Development Road project and longstanding water disputes.

Old disputes and new prospects

As political circles await the upcoming Gulf visits, reports indicate that longstanding disputes between Baghdad and Kuwait will dominate one set of talks, while minority issues will feature on the Bahrain agenda.

An informed source told reporters that discussions would address maritime border demarcation, the Mubarak al-Kabeer Port project and its impact on Iraq’s Grand Faw Port, alongside security concerns and regional stability.

The source added that the Bahrain visit would focus on de-escalation to maintain security in the region, noting that Al-Zaidi had previously discussed the agenda for both trips with leaders of Iraq’s Coordination Framework alliance.

The prime minister’s recent diplomatic engagements included a July 28, 2026, visit to Türkiye, where he met President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, followed by talks with Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister, on October 14 and Jordan’s King Abdullah II on October 26.

On October 28, he traveled to Damascus for talks with Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa on bilateral relations and ways to strengthen political, economic and security cooperation.

Iraq's Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi meets Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa in Damascus, Syria, October 28, 2026. (Iraqi Prime Minister's Media Office/Handout via Reuters)

Pivotal visits

The Syria trip was particularly significant, marking the first by an Iraqi prime minister since the overthrow of Bashar Al-Assad’s regime in 2024 and the establishment of a new administration under Al-Sharaa, developments followed by political and sectarian complications.

According to observers, the meeting helped ease mutual concerns and address shared challenges, particularly border security amid the presence of ISIS cells on both sides of the frontier.

The two leaders also discussed the possibility of restarting the Iraqi oil pipeline through Syria’s port of Baniyas.

Al-Zaidi’s visit to Iran, meanwhile, appeared to extend beyond bilateral relations, fueling speculation in Iraqi political circles that he may have conveyed firm US messages to Tehran, particularly as the trip followed his visit to Washington in July.

Regional alignments and political settlements

Former Iraqi lawmaker and Azm Alliance leader Haidar Al-Mulla told Asharq Al-Awsat that Iraq remained more affected by regional conflicts than capable of influencing their outcome.

“The region is experiencing a state of conflict, and Iraq has no influence over this international equation. It is not part of the equation of political settlements but is affected by what is happening,” he said.

He described the prime minister’s diplomatic outreach as a positive step toward keeping Iraq out of competing regional blocs.

This handout picture released by the Jordanian Royal Palace shows Jordan's King Abdullah II receiving Iraq's Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi in Amman on October 26, 2026. (Jordanian Royal Palace / AFP)

“The prime minister’s shuttle visits are positive steps that put the state on the right path,” he noted.

“Iraq intends to open channels of dialogue with its Arab and non-Arab neighbors. This is a positive step that distances us from the alignments currently taking shape in the region.”

Essam Al-Faili, a political science professor at Al-Mustansiriya University, told Asharq Al-Awsat that Al-Zaidi was seeking balanced relations with countries across the region, drawing on Iraq’s geopolitical importance and economic potential to expand its international engagement.

“Al-Zaidi wants to establish strategic relations with Arab countries primarily through shared economic interests,” he said.

“He recognizes Iraq’s importance to the Gulf states, which could eventually contribute to its reintegration into the Gulf system.”

Al-Faili argued that Iraq should contribute to regional stability in the postwar period, particularly as competing alliances and political blocs have become more pronounced.

He said the prime minister was determined to distance Baghdad from such alignments and had succeeded in curbing the influence of Iran’s regional proxies.

“This ultimately sends a message to the Gulf states that Iraqi decision-making will carry weight, helping strengthen relations with all Arab countries,” he remarked.