Putin, Sharaa Talks Focus on Strengthening Bilateral Ties

Russian President Vladimir Putin receives Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa at the Kremlin (DPA)
Russian President Vladimir Putin receives Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa at the Kremlin (DPA)
TT

Putin, Sharaa Talks Focus on Strengthening Bilateral Ties

Russian President Vladimir Putin receives Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa at the Kremlin (DPA)
Russian President Vladimir Putin receives Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa at the Kremlin (DPA)

The second meeting in three months between Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and Russian President Vladimir Putin signaled an apparent rise in confidence and a shared push to fast-track the rebuilding of ties between Damascus and Moscow.

Unlike their first meeting in October, which focused on the historical legacy of bilateral ties and the need to review relations during the era of the ousted president, Bashar al-Assad, the two leaders appeared more at ease during Sharaa’s second visit to Moscow.

Putin received the Syrian president at the Kremlin alongside a high-level Russian delegation and praised what he described as the Syrian leadership’s successes in rebuilding a new Syria, unifying the country, and extending government control across its territory.

Sharaa responded by commending Russia’s active role in maintaining stability in Syria.

The Russian delegation included Defense Minister Andrey Belousov, Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, Construction and Housing Minister Irek Faizullin, presidential aide Yuri Ushakov, Deputy Chief of the Presidential Administration Maxim Oreshkin, First Deputy Defense Minister Yunus-Bek Yevkurov, and Dmitry Shugaev, head of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation.

Admiral Igor Kostyukov, head of the Main Directorate of the Russian General Staff, also took part in the talks.

Kostyukov has previously participated in Russian-Syrian discussions and recently led Russia’s delegation to trilateral talks with the United States and Ukraine in Abu Dhabi.

The composition of the Russian delegation underscored the Kremlin’s level of interest in the visit and the breadth of issues on the agenda.

Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani, Defense Minister Murhaf Abu Qasra, and Secretary-General of the Presidency Maher al-Sharaa accompanied Sharaa.

Opening the meeting, Putin said bilateral relations had continued to develop, noting that the two countries had advanced economic cooperation despite complex conditions.

He pointed to economic growth exceeding 4%, saying it may not be as ambitious as desired but represented tangible progress that should be maintained. Putin added that relations between Moscow and Damascus had seen notable development, crediting Sharaa’s personal efforts.

He congratulated his guest on what he described as growing momentum toward restoring Syria’s territorial unity, calling recent advances by government forces in northeastern Syria a decisive and essential step. Russia, he said, was closely monitoring Syria’s efforts to reassert control over its territory.

Putin told Sharaa that much work remained in reconstruction and rehabilitation, adding that Russian economic institutions, including those in the construction sector, were fully prepared for cooperation.

Sharaa thanked Russia for its role in stabilizing the situation, saying Moscow played a critical part in that process. He expressed hope for productive talks and said the two sides shared many common issues.

He said Syria had overcome several significant challenges over the past year, most recently unifying its territory, and that Damascus was seeking to move from destruction toward stability and peace.

Sharaa also noted that the following day would mark one year since the first Russian delegation visited Syria after the start of the new era, referring to a visit by Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov that paved the way for dialogue and the rebuilding of ties.

On bilateral issues, the two presidents discussed increased cooperation among relevant ministries in areas such as industry, humanitarian affairs, sports, medicine, and construction.

In their public remarks, the leaders avoided contentious topics such as the future of Russian military bases in Syria. However, the Kremlin had indicated ahead of the meeting that the issue would be discussed.

They also did not publicly address the situation along Syria’s coast, where tensions persist amid accusations that figures linked to the former regime and now based in Russia are attempting to destabilize the area.

Sources have previously said Sharaa may seek the extradition of some second- and third-tier figures involved in unrest.

Other sources said Damascus had prepared lists of former regime figures with whom reconciliation could be pursued, a proposal previously encouraged by Moscow.

The situation in northeastern Syria was also expected to feature in closed-door talks, particularly after Russia withdrew from Qamishli airport two days before the visit, reportedly at Damascus’s request.

A source said Sharaa was also likely to raise the situation in southern Syria, amid Syrian interest in a Russian role that could strengthen Damascus’s position in ongoing negotiations with Israel.

Russian involvement in southern Syria, including possible patrols to curb Israeli incursions and acting as a guarantor between Damascus and Tel Aviv, has been discussed during previous visits.

However, some sources said Israel appeared unenthusiastic about reviving an active Russian role in the area.

Regarding Russian military bases, estimates suggest the two sides may begin discussions on a new arrangement that would see Moscow retain its presence at the Tartous naval facility, a key logistics hub supporting Russia’s operations in Africa and naval movements in the Mediterranean.

Talks are also expected on the Hmeimim air base, with sources anticipating discussions on a new framework involving cooperation to support the rehabilitation of the Syrian army.



Defections Shake Sudan’s RSF, Threaten Cohesion of Tasis Alliance

Sudan’s army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan meets Major General Al-Nour al-Qubba, who defected from the Rapid Support Forces. (Sovereign Council)
Sudan’s army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan meets Major General Al-Nour al-Qubba, who defected from the Rapid Support Forces. (Sovereign Council)
TT

Defections Shake Sudan’s RSF, Threaten Cohesion of Tasis Alliance

Sudan’s army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan meets Major General Al-Nour al-Qubba, who defected from the Rapid Support Forces. (Sovereign Council)
Sudan’s army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan meets Major General Al-Nour al-Qubba, who defected from the Rapid Support Forces. (Sovereign Council)

The resignation of Fares al-Nur, a senior figure in the Sudan Founding Alliance (Tasis), from all his posts in the Rapid Support Forces and the political bloc backing it has revived questions about a wave of defections from the force in recent months and what they may mean for its military and political cohesion.

The move comes as Sudan’s war enters its fourth year with no clear sign that either side is close to a decisive military victory.

Al-Nur told Asharq Al-Awsat on Wednesday that he had left all positions of responsibility within the RSF and Tasis. He said he acted because of what he described as a deepening political deadlock, the continuation of the war and the vast humanitarian suffering it has caused.

He said his resignation was intended to open space for a broad Sudanese dialogue that brings together different parties, away from political and military polarization, and helps reach a settlement to end the crisis.

The importance of the step lies not only in al-Nur’s position inside the alliance, but also in its nature. He is not a battlefield commander with troops on the ground.

He is instead viewed as one of the most prominent political figures associated with the project that the RSF sought to build alongside its military campaign. That gives his resignation political weight beyond any immediate military effect.

Al-Nur was a member of the Tasis presidential council and had been appointed “governor of Khartoum Region” in the parallel government announced by the alliance. He had previously served for years as an adviser to RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti, and was one of the most prominent members of the RSF negotiating delegation at the 2023 Jeddah talks.

What makes this different?

This type of departure differs from earlier splits within the RSF over the past two years. Most of those involved were field commanders with military influence or fighters on the ground.

In May, Bashara al-Huweira, who was responsible for military operations on the Bara axis in North Kordofan State, announced his defection from the RSF. Before him, field commander Al-Nour Adam, known as Al-Nour al-Qubba, said he had withdrawn from the RSF and joined the Sudanese army after his forces left their positions in North Darfur.

Before them all, Abu Aqla Keikal, one of the RSF’s most prominent commanders and the governor of Gezira State while it was under RSF control, announced his cooperation with the Sudanese army.

File photo showing the defecting commander Abu Aqla Keikal (third from left) with Rapid Support Forces elements before joining the army.

That was seen as one of the most consequential defections because of his influence in central Sudan. Most recently, field commander Ali Rizq Allah, known as Al-Savannah, announced his defection and joined the Sudanese Armed Forces.

The political and military weight of these figures varies. But the pace of defections over a short period has raised a sharper question: do they point to growing pressure inside the RSF camp, or are they still individual moves that do not affect the force’s core structure?

The RSF has tried to project a different picture. In recent days, it broadcast video clips that it said, according to its Telegram platform, showed groups from the Joint Force of armed movements allied with the army joining its ranks.

The message was clear: movement between the camps is not going in one direction only.

Such messages are part of a propaganda and media war running alongside the fighting, with each side trying to prove its cohesion and its ability to attract leaders and fighters.

Shartai Samir, a prominent RSF supporter on social media, played down the importance of Fares al-Nur’s departure. He said the political and military project represented by Tasis had moved beyond individuals, and that the departure of leaders or groups would not affect its continuity.

He also said the developments were part of attempts to attract political and military figures from the RSF camp after its opponents, as he put it, failed to achieve their goals militarily.

But the key question is not how many people leave. It is what effect they have.

Political researcher Mohamed Latif says it is important to distinguish between political and military defections.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that Sudanese politics has seen repeated splits inside parties and alliances over many decades, but that they have rarely produced a radical shift in the balance of power.

Latif said most political splits are driven by personal disputes or ambitions rather than ideological or programmatic differences. For that reason, their impact often remains limited.

He said the impact of “military defections” is measured by how far they affect a party’s fighting strength or geographical deployment. In his view, most of the defections from the RSF in the recent period have not had a tangible effect on its basic military structure or its main areas of influence.

That is why he said he did not expect the departure of Fares al-Nur, as a political and civilian figure, to have a major impact on the cohesion of the Tasis alliance.

But not everyone agrees with that assessment.

Commander Al-Savannah, who defected from the Rapid Support Forces, speaking at a press conference in Khartoum (Sudan News Agency/SUNA)

Retired Brigadier General Dr. Jamal al-Shaheed, a strategic expert specializing in security and military affairs, says defections should not be judged by the announcement alone, but by their practical effects on the ground.

Al-Shaheed told Asharq Al-Awsat that defections become significant when they reach middle-ranking and field commanders, or political figures with organizational and social influence. Such figures, he said, are the link between the top leadership and the base.

“The indicators that should be monitored are not limited to the number of defectors, but include whether the phenomenon continues and expands, and its impact on internal discipline, the ability to recruit and mobilize, and the maintenance of field deployments,” he said.

According to al-Shaheed, the decisive test is ultimately military performance.

If defections are accompanied by battlefield retreats, the loss of areas of influence, or a weaker ability to carry out coordinated operations, then they move from being a political or media event to a factor affecting the balance of the conflict.

The retired military expert points to earlier experiences of Sudanese armed movements during the civil war in southern Sudan and the Darfur conflict. Some defections yielded no meaningful strategic results, while others weakened entire factions by stripping them of influential leaders and undermining their organizational cohesion.

All of this raises a broader question about the future of the war itself.

RSF supporters say the latest defections are no more than individual moves that will not affect their political and military project. Others argue that their repetition warrants close attention as a sign of internal pressures and challenges that may extend beyond individuals to the organizational structure itself.

So far, there is no evidence that defections between the parties to the war can, on their own, change the course of the conflict or force a political settlement.

But their persistence and spread among military and political figures make them a phenomenon worth watching in a long, open-ended war. Its final outcome still depends on what the battlefield reveals in the coming months, and on whether the warring parties can preserve both military and political cohesion.


US Issues Sanctions on Hezbollah-linked Targets

A man walks with a boy, carrying a Hezbollah flag, past a mural depicting former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and other senior figures near the burial site of Hassan Nasrallah on the outskirts of Beirut, Lebanon, June 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
A man walks with a boy, carrying a Hezbollah flag, past a mural depicting former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and other senior figures near the burial site of Hassan Nasrallah on the outskirts of Beirut, Lebanon, June 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
TT

US Issues Sanctions on Hezbollah-linked Targets

A man walks with a boy, carrying a Hezbollah flag, past a mural depicting former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and other senior figures near the burial site of Hassan Nasrallah on the outskirts of Beirut, Lebanon, June 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
A man walks with a boy, carrying a Hezbollah flag, past a mural depicting former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and other senior figures near the burial site of Hassan Nasrallah on the outskirts of Beirut, Lebanon, June 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir

Washington has issued new "counter ‌terrorism" ‌sanctions ​targeting ‌individuals ⁠and entities ​linked to ⁠Lebanon’s ‌Hezbollah, details ‌posted ​to ‌the US‌ Treasury Department's ‌website on Thursday showed.

It announced sanctions against several Lebanese officials it said were aligned with Hezbollah and members of the sanctioned ⁠Alaa Hassan Hamieh ⁠business network for obstructing Lebanon’s peace process and delaying the disarmament of Hezbollah.

The Treasury said its Office of Foreign Assets Control was also designating individuals in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq, who it said were raising ⁠funds ⁠and operating front companies to generate revenue for Hezbollah, an Iran-backed militant group.
 


Paris Awards Honorary Citizenship to Palestinian Civilians, Journalists

Paris' mayor Emmanuel Gregoire delivers a speech during the launch of a Citizens' Convention on Protecting Children and Their Time at School at Paris city hall in central Paris on May 18, 2026. (Photo by Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD / AFP)
Paris' mayor Emmanuel Gregoire delivers a speech during the launch of a Citizens' Convention on Protecting Children and Their Time at School at Paris city hall in central Paris on May 18, 2026. (Photo by Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD / AFP)
TT

Paris Awards Honorary Citizenship to Palestinian Civilians, Journalists

Paris' mayor Emmanuel Gregoire delivers a speech during the launch of a Citizens' Convention on Protecting Children and Their Time at School at Paris city hall in central Paris on May 18, 2026. (Photo by Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD / AFP)
Paris' mayor Emmanuel Gregoire delivers a speech during the launch of a Citizens' Convention on Protecting Children and Their Time at School at Paris city hall in central Paris on May 18, 2026. (Photo by Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD / AFP)

The City of Paris on Thursday granted honorary citizenship to Palestinian civilians and journalists, in a symbolic gesture of support for "the suffering the Palestinian people."

"Honorary citizenship is not just a symbol, but a commitment to peace. We are extending a hand to an entire people," Emmanuel Gregoire, the capital's Socialist mayor, said before the Council of Paris.

He spoke in the presence of the Palestinian representative in France, Hala Abou-Hassira, who received a long round of applause.

"Recognizing the suffering of the Palestinian people in no way erases that of the Israeli people," AFP quoted Gregoire as saying.

"We will never forget October 7, 2023," he added, stressing that the French capital had earlier granted honorary citizenship to the hostages of Palestinian militant group Hamas.

A resolution adopted by the Council of Paris said "the humanitarian situation of Gaza's population remains dramatic".

The right voted against the resolution, pointing to a resurgence of antisemitic acts in France.

Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,221 people on the Israeli side, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official data.

It sparked the war in Gaza, where a ceasefire in effect since October last year has largely halted fighting.

The war has reduced much of the Palestinian territory to rubble, with an estimated death toll of more than 73,000 people, the majority of them civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory, whose figures are considered reliable by the United Nations.

Last week, Paris hosted a meeting of Palestinian and Israeli civil society groups, who urged global leaders to take urgent action and help implement a permanent ceasefire.

France as well as Britain, Canada and several other countries recognized a Palestinian state last year. Paris has earlier bestowed honorary citizenship on the people of Nagorno-Karabakh and the Ukrainian capital Kyiv.