‘Jerusalem After the West Bank’: Israel Effectively Erases the Land of a Palestinian State

The Neve Yaakov settlement north of East Jerusalem, with the Israeli wall visible separating the Palestinian neighborhood of al-Ram in the West Bank (AFP). 
The Neve Yaakov settlement north of East Jerusalem, with the Israeli wall visible separating the Palestinian neighborhood of al-Ram in the West Bank (AFP). 
TT

‘Jerusalem After the West Bank’: Israel Effectively Erases the Land of a Palestinian State

The Neve Yaakov settlement north of East Jerusalem, with the Israeli wall visible separating the Palestinian neighborhood of al-Ram in the West Bank (AFP). 
The Neve Yaakov settlement north of East Jerusalem, with the Israeli wall visible separating the Palestinian neighborhood of al-Ram in the West Bank (AFP). 

A day after an unprecedented Israeli decision allowing the seizure of land in the occupied West Bank, Hebrew-language reports revealed a settlement plan that would, in effect, extend Jerusalem’s boundaries beyond the pre–1967 lines.

According to a report published by Yedioth Ahronoth, a housing plan being promoted in the settlement of Adam (also known as Geva Binyamin), in the Binyamin region, is formally presented as an expansion of the settlement bloc.

In practice, however, it would push Jerusalem’s municipal boundaries beyond the lines that existed before the June 1967 war. Such a move would amount to the imposition of de facto sovereignty over the city and a further expansion of Israel’s occupation of Jerusalem.

The Palestinian Authority (PA), backed by international resolutions, demands East Jerusalem as the capital of the hoped-for Palestinian state on the basis of the pre-1967 borders, within the framework of a two-state solution.

Limited Options for the Palestinian Authority

Israeli efforts to seize Palestinian land are effectively undermining the prospects of statehood, while the PA appears to have few tools at its disposal to confront the occupation.

The Palestinian presidency rejected the Israeli decisions, saying it does not recognize them and that they “do not change reality in any way.” It described the moves as a threat to security and stability and as an annulment of signed agreements.

A well-informed Palestinian source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the PA’s options are limited to “the steadfastness of Palestinians on their land and confronting this Israeli encroachment by relying on and adhering to international law and international legitimacy resolutions, turning to the UN Security Council, relevant institutions, international courts, and diplomatic channels.”

The source acknowledged that the PA’s tools are confined to resisting on the ground and rejecting Israeli decisions on the basis that they neither create nor negate rights and do not alter the status of the West Bank as occupied territory.

The PA is also betting on a global rejection of these measures and on pressure by influential states on Israel and the United States to halt them.

He added that the PA has instructed its apparatuses and ministries not to deal with any situation imposed by Israel in the West Bank and is relying on public awareness among Palestinians to avoid engaging with Israeli attempts to create new facts on the ground.

In parallel, the international community, the Security Council, and all legal and international bodies have been urged to confront these unilateral steps and take urgent action.

The PA is also awaiting the outcome of US President Donald Trump’s plan for Gaza, hoping it will lead to a political process toward statehood.

It remains committed to the plan’s provisions and pins hopes on potential changes in Israel’s upcoming elections that could unseat the current right-wing government in favor of a less extreme coalition.

Trump’s “Peace Council” is scheduled to hold its first meeting in Washington on Thursday, as the US president speaks of achieving what he calls “global peace.”

The Jerusalem Plan

The plan for Jerusalem calls for the construction of hundreds of housing units on land located some distance from the Adam settlement, currently without direct access from it, despite earlier discussions about building a bridge to link the two areas.

Construction in the designated zone would create geographic contiguity within Jerusalem and effectively expand the Neve Yaakov neighborhood. According to the plan, the housing units are intended for the Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) community.

Advancing the plan through the West Bank planning system has become significantly easier following sweeping changes introduced by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich within the Civil Administration, including the creation of a new settlement authority.

Approval is expected to proceed rapidly, and under procedures adopted in recent years, the project could be implemented within a few years. Smotrich has reshaped the government’s approach to settlement construction by replacing lengthy bureaucratic processes with fast-track approval channels.

A “Misleading Cover”

The Jerusalem Governorate said Israel’s Ministry of Construction and Housing plans to build around 2,780 settlement units to expand the Adam settlement, describing this as a misleading cover aimed at extending Jerusalem’s municipal boundaries beyond the Green Line—the demarcation between territories occupied in 1948 and those occupied in 1967—as part of a calculated policy to impose new sovereign realities without an official declaration.

In a statement issued Monday, the governorate said promoting what is called the “expansion of Adam” is an attempt to obscure the truth.

The plan shows that the new settlement neighborhood would, in practice, be administered as part of Jerusalem’s municipality, despite being formally presented as part of the settlement, an open attempt to conceal annexation behind deceptive planning labels.

Israeli Opposition

Knesset member Gilad Kariv, from the opposition Democrats party warned that the planned step would exacerbate friction between Israelis and Palestinians and inflame unnecessary tensions.

He added that the plans contradict Israel’s international commitments, including those toward Trump, and reflect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s complete submission to his extremist partners.

The Israeli peace group Peace Now sharply criticized the move, saying that for the first time since 1967, the government is clandestinely annexing land under the pretext of establishing a new settlement.

In a message to Trump, the group warned: “Netanyahu is deceiving you. You said you would not allow annexation, yet he is carrying it out before your eyes.”

The Jerusalem plan comes amid a series of controversial decisions by the Israeli government regarding the West Bank. On Sunday, the government approved the reopening of land registration in the West Bank for the first time since 1967, endorsing a proposal to register vast areas in the name of the state—effectively granting legal cover to the seizure of Palestinian land.



Iraq PM to Meet Trump in Washington Next Week

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi (Reuters)
Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi (Reuters)
TT

Iraq PM to Meet Trump in Washington Next Week

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi (Reuters)
Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi (Reuters)

Iraq's Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi will travel on Monday to the United States to meet President Donald Trump in his first international visit since taking office, his government spokesperson said.

Zaidi, who came to power this year with Trump's blessing, assumed office amid growing US pressure on Baghdad to disarm pro-Iran armed groups that have frequently targeted US facilities in Iraq.

In Washington, Zaidi hopes to attract US investments to the country, which urgently needs to boost its economy, especially after significant revenue losses caused by the halt in oil exports during the Middle East war, AFP reported.

Zaidi is "heading to Washington on Monday, leading a high-level delegation, at the invitation of the US president", government spokesperson Haidar al-Aboudi said.

The talks will focus on "strengthening economic relations and investments", especially in the oil and power sectors, he added.

The state's monopoly on arms is a necessary requirement to "ensure internal stability... and attract investments capable of boosting" the economy, Aboudi said.

Zaidi has vowed to ensure pro-Iran armed groups hand over their weapons, but he is facing pushback from some powerful factions.

In recent months, Iraq has signed several deals with US companies in the oil sector.

During his one-week trip to Washington, Zaidi is expected to sign several more agreements, including a deal to establish a fund into which Iraq will deposit half a million barrels of oil per day in exchange for boosting the country's electricity supply.


Iraqi Factions Pledge Allegiance to Khamenei, Reject Disarmament

Members of Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataib Hezbollah) gather in a mourning procession for one of their comrades who was killed the previous day in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. (Photo by AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP)
Members of Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataib Hezbollah) gather in a mourning procession for one of their comrades who was killed the previous day in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. (Photo by AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP)
TT

Iraqi Factions Pledge Allegiance to Khamenei, Reject Disarmament

Members of Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataib Hezbollah) gather in a mourning procession for one of their comrades who was killed the previous day in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. (Photo by AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP)
Members of Iraq's Hezbollah Brigades (Kataib Hezbollah) gather in a mourning procession for one of their comrades who was killed the previous day in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. (Photo by AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP)

About a week before Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi is due to visit Washington, factions and groups linked to the so-called Islamic Resistance in Iraq have rejected calls to hand over their weapons to the state.

As the US administration presses Baghdad to disarm the factions and sever their ties with Iran, the latest positions of these factions confront al-Zaidi with complex political and security challenges.

The government had previously set the end of September as the final deadline for weapons to be surrendered and dismantled, coinciding with the end of the international coalition’s military presence under an agreement with the Iraqi government.

Al-Zaidi said last week that the government had entered into talks with the factions, whose activities would “later shift to the political and social arenas.”

Once the deadline for disarmament and the transfer of weapons to government security institutions expires, “arms will be held exclusively and entirely by the official institutions of the state and its specialized armed and security forces,” al-Zaidi said.

Kataib Hezbollah warning

In a strongly worded statement, Kataib Hezbollah official Abu Hussein al-Hamidawi demanded that the Iraqi government “submit” to the resistance.

In April, the US State Department offered a reward of up to $10 million for information leading to the capture or conviction of al-Hamidawi, who is regarded as one of the faction leaders closest to Iran.

Al-Hamidawi said Kataib Hezbollah was founded by the late Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and on his orders, adding that its members “were and remain loyal to this path.”

“At this historic juncture, we draw the attention of political leaders and government officials to the need to submit to the will of the people of resistance and jihad, and to exercise extreme caution against being drawn into arrogant projects or aligning themselves with their malicious agendas,” al-Hamidawi said, referring to the disarmament plan.

“We warn them that our people will make their position and decision known if the compass deviates,” he added.

A funeral procession in Baghdad for members of Iraq's Kataib Hezbollah killed in a raid targeting a Popular Mobilization Forces headquarters in March 2025 (Reuters)

The so-called Islamic Resistance in Iraq also rejected calls to surrender its weapons. The armed coalition comprises a range of undeclared factions whose agendas align with the activities of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. They are also widely viewed as covert wings of known Iran-backed factions.

The group said in a statement on Saturday that it remained “committed to the path of resistance.”

“Let the enemies know that the forces of the axis of truth are one body, operating according to the jihadist framework laid down for us by our leader, Khamenei,” it said.

“Hardships will not deter us, but will only strengthen our determination to continue on our path of supporting the oppressed and expelling the occupiers from Iraq and the region.”

“Our weapons have never been open to bargaining. They are a doctrine and a pledge for which we are responsible, and with them we will move forward to break the chains of domination and restrain the arrogant powers,” the group added.

“We therefore affirm to those near and far that we will not stop at what we have achieved. Rather, we will work to develop our military and security capabilities, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and raise our readiness in proportion to the scale of the growing challenges and threats.”

So far, Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, leader of the Sadrist movement, has responded to calls to bring all weapons under state control. Last month, he ordered his armed faction, Saraya al-Salam, to hand over its weapons and official headquarters to the state.

Asaib Ahl al-Haq and Kataib Imam Ali have also complied with the demand. However, some factions’ continued rejection of the move is likely to increase the challenges and complications the government faces on the issue, according to observers.

A member of Iraq's Kataib Hezbollah waving the faction's banner on a missile launch platform (Faction media)

Expected judicial action

Observers are divided over the prospect of disarming the factions. Some consider it impossible without flexibility or clear approval from Iran, while others believe the government can achieve it amid rapidly changing regional circumstances.

Political analyst Nizar Haidar told Asharq Al-Awsat that it was necessary to distinguish between what the militias publicly declared and what they concealed.

That included “secret understandings that will ultimately lead to the complete surrender of their weapons and the dismantling of their military formations,” he said.

Haidar said he expected the Iraqi judiciary to take a deterrent position against groups that violated the law by retaining weapons outside state control. He added that the judiciary was preparing, for the first time since 2003, to announce a legal code.

“Any military formation or military activity outside the state is expected to be classified as a terrorist act, punishable under existing Iraqi laws by up to the death penalty,” Haidar said.

He said the legal code, if issued, would “contribute significantly to helping the government implement its plans to place all weapons under state control.”

Efforts to disarm and dismantle the factions would also be reinforced by “government plans to purge the security and military institutions of militia members who refuse to sever their ties with their leaders and place their security and military decisions under the authority of the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, following the example of the factions that have announced such steps in recent months,” Haidar added.


Jordan Army: 3 Iranian Missiles Fell Inside Country

The Jordanian capital, Amman. Petra file photo
The Jordanian capital, Amman. Petra file photo
TT

Jordan Army: 3 Iranian Missiles Fell Inside Country

The Jordanian capital, Amman. Petra file photo
The Jordanian capital, Amman. Petra file photo

Jordan's army said Sunday that three Iranian missiles fell on the kingdom's territory at dawn amid renewed hostilities between Iran and the United States.

"Three missiles fired from Iranian territory fell at dawn in several locations across the kingdom, without causing any casualties. The damage is limited to minor material losses," said a military source quoted in an army statement.

The US attacked Iran early Sunday morning over an Iranian attack on a vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, setting the container ship ablaze and forcing its crew to abandon it.

In retaliation, Iran fired missiles on several Gulf countries and Jordan.