Sudan’s Burhan Warns Islamist Group Over Call to Fight with Iran

Burhan attends a Ramadan iftar with police personnel in the Haj Youssef district of Khartoum on Wednesday (Sudanese Sovereignty Council)
Burhan attends a Ramadan iftar with police personnel in the Haj Youssef district of Khartoum on Wednesday (Sudanese Sovereignty Council)
TT

Sudan’s Burhan Warns Islamist Group Over Call to Fight with Iran

Burhan attends a Ramadan iftar with police personnel in the Haj Youssef district of Khartoum on Wednesday (Sudanese Sovereignty Council)
Burhan attends a Ramadan iftar with police personnel in the Haj Youssef district of Khartoum on Wednesday (Sudanese Sovereignty Council)

Head of Sudan’s Transitional Sovereignty Council and army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan warned that the military would confront an Islamist group wearing army uniforms after it called on fighters it described as “mujahideen” to join Iran if it faced a ground invasion by the United States or Israel.

Burhan said the Sudanese Armed Forces would not allow any party to speak in its name or exploit its identity to pursue political or ideological goals.

He signaled that strict measures could be taken, warning to back down and return to what he called “the right path”.

His remarks echoed a statement issued Tuesday by the official spokesperson of the Sudanese army, which said the armed forces would take legal action against groups linked to the Islamist movement.

The group had declared during a communal Ramadan iftar that it was ready to defend Iran if it faced a ground invasion by the United States or Israel, sparking wide debate in political and media circles.

Burhan: We stand with Gulf states

Speaking Wednesday evening after a joint iftar with military leaders, Burhan described the war in the Middle East as “sad for us,” adding that the Sudanese people know the harshness of war after suffering from it for years.

“No Sudanese would encourage the outbreak of war or call for it,” he said, urging all those carrying weapons to lay them down and work to halt the cycle of violence.

Burhan also expressed solidarity with the Gulf Arab states, saying they had supported Sudan over the years.

“Our brothers in the Gulf have extended many helping hands to Sudan and played great roles in supporting it. We stand with them in full solidarity,” he said.

He stressed that Sudan rejects any violation of the sovereignty of the Gulf states and said Sudan does not wish to see their peoples placed in painful situations or subjected to infringements on their sovereignty, adding that Sudan’s solidarity with them is “complete and unwavering.”

Burhan warned what he called “our brothers who are making noise inside Sudan,” without naming them, saying: “We will not allow any group to speak in the name of the armed forces or the Sudanese state on matters that do not concern them.”

“Everyone should open their eyes carefully, and if they do not... we will open them for them and then close them,” he said, adding that the authorities would not accept exploiting the space of freedom against Sudan and its people.

He vowed to stand against them and against anyone who supports or encourages aggression anywhere in the world. “We are a peaceful state and seek peace. Therefore, in clear terms, we warn anyone against making statements that harm the state,” he added.

Islamist commander calls for supporting Iran

Burhan’s reaction came after Naji Abdullah, one of the leaders of Islamist jihadist fighters, said in a speech to members of the al-Baraa bin Malik Brigade, in the presence of militia leader al-Misbah Talha, that the group backed Iran.

“We support Iran, and I say this on behalf of all the mujahideen in Sudan: if a ground war begins between the Americans and the Iranians, open the way for us to participate in it,” he said.

The al-Baraa bin Malik group was one of the shadow battalions during the rule of the Islamist movement under former president Omar al-Bashir. After the outbreak of war between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces, it joined the army in the fighting.

Abdullah’s remarks align with the stance of Sudan’s Islamist movement, historically aligned with Iran, while the army’s position reflects Sudan’s current regional relations.

Divisions among Islamists

Islamists fighting alongside the army appeared divided over the issue. Some criticized the army’s position on the Middle East conflict, describing it as “weak,” while others appeared to accept it tactically, even as they condemned measures taken against Abdullah.

Separately, Ali Karti, secretary-general of the Islamic Movement in Sudan, condemned what he described as the targeting of Arab and Islamic countries and attempts to “stir discord and fragment the unity of the nation.”

In a statement, he said the challenges facing the Muslim world were not isolated incidents but part of a broader project aimed at weakening it and undermining its unity.

Karti condemned attacks on Arab and Islamic countries and violations of their sovereignty, describing the war as aggression by Israel and those backing it against “resistance forces” in the region, with the aim of “breaking the will of the nation and weakening its ability to defend itself.”

He said the movement’s current focus is on defending Sudan and its people against what he called “forces of evil,” adding that its leadership and members remain committed to that approach and that any statements contradicting it do not represent the movement.



Drone Attacks Target Khartoum Airport

Smoke rises from inside Khartoum Airport during previous clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the Sudanese army (file photo – Reuters)
Smoke rises from inside Khartoum Airport during previous clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the Sudanese army (file photo – Reuters)
TT

Drone Attacks Target Khartoum Airport

Smoke rises from inside Khartoum Airport during previous clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the Sudanese army (file photo – Reuters)
Smoke rises from inside Khartoum Airport during previous clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the Sudanese army (file photo – Reuters)

Khartoum Airport came under drone attack on Monday, with Sudanese army air defenses intercepting the aircraft, a military source told AFP

The incident follows attacks by the Rapid Support Forces on the Sudanese capital two days earlier that left five people dead.

Smoke rises from inside Khartoum Airport during previous clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the Sudanese army (file photo – Reuters)

The military source said: “Our air defenses successfully shot down drones targeting the eastern perimeter of Khartoum Airport.”

Witnesses reported hearing explosions and seeing plumes of smoke rising from the Safa neighborhood, located east of the airport.


‘Freshly Dug Graves’ as Hezbollah Pays Steep Price in Battle to Reverse its Fortunes

FILE PHOTO: Mourners carry coffins during the funeral of four Hezbollah fighters and two civilians, amid a temporary ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, in the village of Maaroub, southern Lebanon, April 26, 2026. REUTERS/Marko Djurica/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Mourners carry coffins during the funeral of four Hezbollah fighters and two civilians, amid a temporary ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, in the village of Maaroub, southern Lebanon, April 26, 2026. REUTERS/Marko Djurica/File Photo
TT

‘Freshly Dug Graves’ as Hezbollah Pays Steep Price in Battle to Reverse its Fortunes

FILE PHOTO: Mourners carry coffins during the funeral of four Hezbollah fighters and two civilians, amid a temporary ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, in the village of Maaroub, southern Lebanon, April 26, 2026. REUTERS/Marko Djurica/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Mourners carry coffins during the funeral of four Hezbollah fighters and two civilians, amid a temporary ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, in the village of Maaroub, southern Lebanon, April 26, 2026. REUTERS/Marko Djurica/File Photo

Hezbollah has paid a heavy price for going to war with Israel on March 2: Israel has occupied a chunk of southern Lebanon, displaced hundreds of thousands of its Shiite constituents and killed as many as several thousand of its fighters, according to previously unreported casualty estimates from within the group.

The move has brought severe political consequences, too. In Beirut, opposition has hardened to its status as an armed group, which domestic rivals see as exposing Lebanon to repeated wars with Israel.

In April, Lebanon's government held face-to-face talks with Israel for the first time in decades, a decision Hezbollah firmly opposed. However, more than a dozen Hezbollah officials told Reuters they see a chance to reverse deteriorating fortunes by aligning with Tehran in its war with Israel and the United States.

The group, founded by Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps in 1982, opened fire two days into the conflict, which began with US and Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28.

The group's calculations are based on the assessment that its participation would force Lebanon onto the agenda of US-Iranian negotiations, and that Iranian pressure can secure a more robust ceasefire than one that took effect in November 2024 following a conflict sparked by the war in Gaza, the officials said.

Hezbollah was mauled in the last war, which killed its leader, Hassan Nasrallah, along with some 5,000 fighters, and weakened its long-dominant hold over the Lebanese state.

Rearmed with Iranian help, it has used new tactics and drones, surprising many with its capabilities after a fragile 15-month truce during which Hezbollah held fire, even as Israel continued to kill its members.

Hezbollah lawmaker Ibrahim al-Moussawi denied the group was acting on Iran's behalf when it resumed hostilities, as alleged by opponents. He told Reuters Hezbollah saw a window to "break this vicious cycle ... where the Israelis can target, assassinate, bombard, kill, without any revenge."

He acknowledged losses and damage in southern ⁠Lebanon but said "you don't ⁠go into making calculations of how many are going to be killed" when "pride and sovereignty and independence" are at stake.

Hezbollah’s media office said the figure of several thousand fighters killed in the present war was false.

FILE PHOTO: A family stand next to a fire outside their tent at a temporary encampment for displaced people, amid escalating hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, in Beirut, Lebanon, March 30, 2026. REUTERS/Adnan Abidi/File Photo

While a US-mediated ceasefire that took effect on April 16 has led to a significant reduction in hostilities, Israel and Hezbollah have continued to trade blows in the south, where Israel maintains troops in a self-declared "buffer zone".

Yezid Sayigh, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, said Hezbollah had "shown more resilience than many thought possible, but that was not a strategic gain in itself".

"The only thing that will contain Israel is a comprehensive US-Iran deal," he said. "Without a deal, there's going to be a lot of pain for everyone. At best, a hurting stalemate."

More than 2,600 people have been killed since March 2, around a fifth of them women, children and medics, Lebanon's health ministry has reported. Its toll does not distinguish between civilians and combatants.

Three sources, two of them Hezbollah officials, said the ministry's figures do not include many of the group's casualties. They said several thousand Hezbollah fighters have been killed, though the group does not have the ⁠full picture yet.

In a statement to Reuters, Hezbollah’s media office denied the figures cited by the sources, and that the numbers published by Lebanon’s health ministry included its members killed in Israeli strikes.

One source, a Hezbollah commander, said scores of fighters had gone to the frontline towns of Bint Jbeil and Khiyam intending to fight to the death. Their bodies have yet to be recovered.

In the Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs of Beirut, more than two dozen freshly dug graves were quickly filled with fighters' bodies in the days after the ceasefire took hold. Simple marble tombstones identify some as commanders, others as fighters.

In one southern village alone, Yater, the council recorded the deaths of 34 Hezbollah fighters.

Lebanon's Shiite community has borne the brunt of Israel's attacks, forced to flee into Christian, Druze and other areas, where many blame Hezbollah for starting the war.

Smoke rises from the site of Israeli airstrikes that targeted the southern Lebanese village of Habbouch on May 1, 2026. (Photo by Abbas FAKIH / AFP)

Israel has been entrenching its hold over a security zone stretching as far as 10 km (6 miles) into Lebanon and demolishing villages, saying it aims to shield northern Israel from attacks by Hezbollah militants embedded in civilian areas.

An Israeli government official said Hezbollah had abrogated the November 2024 ceasefire by firing on Israeli citizens on March 2. The threat to northern Israel would be eradicated, the official said, adding thousands of Hezbollah militants had been killed, and Israel was steadily destroying the group's infrastructure.

The Israeli military says Hezbollah has fired hundreds of rockets and drones at Israel since March 2. Israel has announced 17 soldiers killed in southern Lebanon, along with two civilians in northern Israel.

Citing ongoing Israeli strikes, Hezbollah has called the April ceasefire meaningless and continued to attack.

A diplomat who has contact with Hezbollah described its decision to enter the war as a big gamble and a survival strategy, saying it felt it needed to be part of the ⁠problem so it could be part of an eventual regional ⁠solution.

It has yet to be seen if the gamble will pay off.

Tehran has demanded that Israel's campaign against Hezbollah be included in any deal on the wider war. But US President Donald Trump said last month that any deal Washington reaches with Tehran "is in no way subject to Lebanon".

A spokesperson for Pakistan's Foreign Ministry, Tahir Andrabi, referred Reuters to an April 16 statement in which he said peace in Lebanon was essential to the talks it is mediating between the US and Iran.

A Western official said they saw a possibility the US and Iran might eventually reach a settlement that does not address the war in Lebanon.

Asked about this, the US State Department, Iran's mission to the United Nations in Geneva and Lebanon's government did not immediately comment.

Hezbollah's Moussawi said a ceasefire in Lebanon continues to be a top priority for Iran, adding Tehran shares Lebanon's objectives, including that Israel halt attacks and withdraw from Lebanon. Hezbollah has "full trust in Iran - that the Iranians will not sell their own friends", he said.

The State Department referred Reuters to an April 27 interview Secretary of State Marco Rubio did with Fox News, in which he said Israel had a right to defend itself against Hezbollah's attacks, and that he didn't think Israel wanted to maintain its buffer zone in Lebanon indefinitely.

The United States has urged Israel "to make sure their responses are proportional and targeted," he said.

When the April 16 ceasefire was announced, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Hezbollah's disarmament would be a fundamental demand in peace talks with Lebanon.

Hezbollah has ruled out disarmament, saying the matter of its weapons is a topic for a national dialogue. Any move by Lebanon to disarm the group by force would risk igniting conflict in a country shattered by civil war from 1975 to 1990.

Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam have sought Hezbollah's peaceful disarmament since last year. On March 2, the government banned the group's military activities.

Hezbollah has demanded the government cancel that decision and end its direct talks with Israel.

Lebanese officials have told Reuters they believe direct talks with Israel under the auspices of the US are the best way to secure a lasting ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli troops, as only Washington has enough leverage with Israel to achieve those aims.


Scramble for Ministries Threatens 'Honeymoon' between Al-Zaidi, Iraq's Political Blocs

This handout photograph released by the Iraqi Presidency Press Office on April 27, 2026 shows Iraq's President Nizar Amedi (4th L) shaking hands with newly Iraq's Prime Minister designated Ali al-Zaidi (4th R), surrounded by Iraqi political leaders, in Bagdad. (Iraqi Presidency / AFP)
This handout photograph released by the Iraqi Presidency Press Office on April 27, 2026 shows Iraq's President Nizar Amedi (4th L) shaking hands with newly Iraq's Prime Minister designated Ali al-Zaidi (4th R), surrounded by Iraqi political leaders, in Bagdad. (Iraqi Presidency / AFP)
TT

Scramble for Ministries Threatens 'Honeymoon' between Al-Zaidi, Iraq's Political Blocs

This handout photograph released by the Iraqi Presidency Press Office on April 27, 2026 shows Iraq's President Nizar Amedi (4th L) shaking hands with newly Iraq's Prime Minister designated Ali al-Zaidi (4th R), surrounded by Iraqi political leaders, in Bagdad. (Iraqi Presidency / AFP)
This handout photograph released by the Iraqi Presidency Press Office on April 27, 2026 shows Iraq's President Nizar Amedi (4th L) shaking hands with newly Iraq's Prime Minister designated Ali al-Zaidi (4th R), surrounded by Iraqi political leaders, in Bagdad. (Iraqi Presidency / AFP)

Iraq’s Prime Minister-designate Ali al-Zaidi is facing an early test in forming a government as disputes over cabinet posts risk straining ties with political blocs, despite what observers describe as unprecedented US backing.

Al-Zaidi concluded a visit Saturday to the Kurdistan Region, where he met head of the Kurdistan Democratic Party Masoud Barzani in Erbil and lader of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan Bafel Talabani in Sulaymaniyah. He said he had secured strong Kurdish support.

Deep divisions persist between the two main Kurdish parties, particularly over the presidency — traditionally held by the PUK — and over the delayed formation of the regional government, stalled for more than a year. Those disputes could spill into Baghdad as parties negotiate ministries based on electoral representation.

Al-Zaidi’s reported breakthrough includes persuading the KDP to return its lawmakers to the federal parliament, paving the way for participation in government. But bargaining over ministries is expected to be the first major hurdle, as blocs seek to retain key portfolios or demand additional ones reflecting their gains in the elections.

Concerns have also emerged among Shiite factions, particularly within the ruling Coordination Framework, over al-Zaidi’s perceived US backing. US President Donald Trump was cited as saying al-Zaidi came “with American help,” heightening unease, especially among groups with armed branches.

US factor

A senior Iraqi source told Asharq Al-Awsat that Coordination Framework leaders, who had remained publicly silent about what appeared to be a lengthy call between Trump and al-Zaidi last week, later pressed him in a private meeting to disclose its details.

The source said al-Zaidi outlined the conversation clearly, prompting the bloc to encourage him to maintain balanced ties with Washington — avoiding provoking discontent while not fully yielding to US demands — and to leave contentious issues to be resolved over time.

The source added that this position followed briefings on the broad outlines of a US message, after which an initial shipment of US dollars was sent, seen as an incentive. Washington is said to be insisting on a government “free of terrorism,” referring to pro-Iran armed Iraqi factions.

At the same time, al-Zaidi has drawn backing from civil and political groups. A meeting hosted by former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi discussed political developments and endorsed efforts to form a government based on competence, integrity and broad representation.

Participants urged political forces to prioritize national interests, overcome divisions and meet constitutional deadlines.

However, pressure is mounting. Political blocs are pressing for specific ministries, seeking to rotate portfolios, or proposing new posts, including deputy prime ministers, to accommodate party figures, even in roles with limited authority.

Political observers in Baghdad warned that if these demands persist, the current “honeymoon” between al-Zaidi and the blocs could unravel.

The prime minister-designate is seeking to form a government free of armed factions, bureaucratic bloat and partisan dictates, buoyed by broad regional and international support that gives him room to maneuver.