Pezeshkian’s Apology to Neighbors Triggers Backlash in Iran

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)
TT

Pezeshkian’s Apology to Neighbors Triggers Backlash in Iran

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)

An apology by Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to neighboring countries for attacks that struck parts of their territories - and his pledge to halt such strikes unless their soil is used to attack Iran - has triggered sharp political debate within Tehran’s ruling establishment.

Lawmakers swiftly condemned the remarks, while military and judicial officials reiterated that US and Israeli interests across the region would remain legitimate targets. The dispute is unfolding at a delicate moment for Iran, following the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Pezeshkian framed the apology as a political signal intended to reassure neighbors and prevent a wider regional confrontation. Critics, however, called it “an unjustified concession in the middle of an open war.”

Military and judicial leaders stressed that any US or Israeli base or interest used against Iran would remain a legitimate target — even if located on the territory of other regional states.

The episode has turned the president’s apology from a diplomatic gesture to contain tensions into the center of an internal power struggle, highlighting divisions within Iran’s leadership over the limits and management of the war.

Following Khamenei’s killing, a temporary leadership council assumed his duties. The body consists of Pezeshkian, judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Alireza Arafi.

In a televised address, Pezeshkian said the council had decided not to target neighboring states or fire missiles at them unless Iran was attacked from their territory.

“I apologize in my name and on behalf of Iran to neighboring countries that Iran attacked,” he said, adding that Tehran does not intend to assault any state.

He said the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps had acted in recent days “based on a field decision” after senior commanders and the supreme leader were killed at the start of the war.

The comments quickly drew pushback. Mohseni-Ejei said evidence gathered by Iran’s armed forces showed that “the geography of some countries in the region has openly or secretly been placed in the service of the enemy,” allowing their territory to be used for attacks against Iran.

“Severe attacks on these targets will continue,” he said, adding that the strategy was already under way and backed by the government and other pillars of the system.

Iran’s military signaled little appetite for de-escalation. The command of Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, the joint operations center under the armed forces’ general staff, said that although it had “not carried out any aggression” against neighboring states so far, all US and Israeli bases and interests across land, sea and air in the region remained primary targets.

In a statement, the command said the armed forces “respect the interests and sovereignty of neighboring countries and have not carried out any aggression against them so far.” But it warned that if hostile actions continued, all military bases and interests belonging to the United States and the “Zionist entity” would face powerful strikes from Iranian armed forces.

A spokesman for the headquarters said any location from which attacks against Iran are launched would be considered a legitimate target, warning that any attempt to enter the region “will end at the bottom of the Gulf” and that Tehran “will not retreat” in confronting the United States and Israel.

In parliament, Mohammad Manan Raisi, a lawmaker representing Qom, said the president’s “strange apology to neighboring countries is regrettable.”

Addressing Pezeshkian, he wrote: “When will it be time for you to apologize to the Iranian people for these humiliating positions?”

Raisi added that the Assembly of Experts must urgently announce a new supreme leader, saying the president’s “humiliating statements” showed the need to select one as soon as possible.

“Is it not true that neighboring countries placed their land, property and hotels at the service of our enemies?” he said. “Should our military not have attacked these bases and enemy properties that you now apologize for striking in such a humiliating manner?”

Conservative lawmaker Jalal Rashidi Kouchi wrote on X: “With all due respect, Mr. President, an apology is offered when a mistake has been made... but we made no mistake.”

He said the president’s message lacked firmness, appearing weak in wording, delivery and even body language.

Iran’s foreign ministry also warned regional states against allowing their territory or resources to be used for attacks on Iran.

In a statement, it said international law prohibits using a country’s territory, directly or indirectly, to harm another state, citing UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 defining aggression.

Countries whose territory is used to launch military attacks against a third state bear international legal responsibility, including compensation for direct and indirect damages, the ministry said.

It added that Iran had been compelled, under its “inherent and natural right” of self-defense, to carry out necessary and proportionate defensive operations against the bases and facilities of aggressors in the region.

Those operations target facilities and capabilities that serve as sources or launch points for hostile acts against the Iranian people, the ministry said, adding that US bases in the region had not strengthened security but had instead supported “American aggressors and the Zionist entity.”

The ministry stressed that Iran seeks to maintain and develop friendly relations with regional states based on mutual respect, good neighborliness and respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. Iranian defensive operations against US bases in the region, it added, should not be interpreted as hostility toward neighboring countries.

Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf also weighed in, writing on X that the Islamic Republic’s defense policies are “constant” and rooted in “principles.”

“As long as there are US bases in the region, its countries will not see stability,” he wrote, adding that “all officials and the people are united around this principle.”

The presidency later sought to clarify the president’s remarks. Mehdi Tabatabaei, head of public relations at the presidential office, said the message was straightforward: if regional states do not cooperate with US attacks on Iran, Tehran will not target them.

“The Islamic Republic will not bow to pressure,” he wrote on X. “Our armed forces will respond firmly, according to rules of engagement, to any attack launched from US bases.”



France Criticizes ‘Demagogic’ Move by Israel to Ban Hard-Left Leader Melenchon

 09 November 2026, France, Paris: France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot, speaks during a G7 foreign ministers' meeting in Paris. (dpa)
09 November 2026, France, Paris: France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot, speaks during a G7 foreign ministers' meeting in Paris. (dpa)
TT

France Criticizes ‘Demagogic’ Move by Israel to Ban Hard-Left Leader Melenchon

 09 November 2026, France, Paris: France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot, speaks during a G7 foreign ministers' meeting in Paris. (dpa)
09 November 2026, France, Paris: France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot, speaks during a G7 foreign ministers' meeting in Paris. (dpa)

France has ‌criticized as "demagogic" a decision by Israel to ban French hard-left presidential candidate Jean-Luc Melenchonand another leading figure in his France Unbowed (La France Insoumise) party from entering the country.

Israel's Foreign Ministry said on Thursday it would bar Melenchon and Mathilde Panot, the party’s parliamentary group chair, over "the extreme anti-Israel stance of La France Insoumise party and the outrageous statements made by ‌its leaders."

"This demagogic ‌decision, coming from a ‌government ⁠that has repeatedly violated international ⁠law, plays into the hands of those who, like La France Insoumise, thrive on exploiting the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on X.

"France will continue to work tirelessly toward a two-state solution and the ⁠peaceful coexistence of the Israeli and ‌Palestinian peoples,” he ‌said.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry said in a ‌statement on Thursday that both Melenchon and ‌Panot had made statements spreading "blood libels" against Israel, and that Melenchon had called for French ships to escort illegal flotillas to Gaza.

"Israel will respond ‌firmly to those who seek to harm it and will not allow ⁠individuals ⁠who act against Israel and incite against its citizens to enter the country," it said.

Melenchon told Franceinfo radio: "I am banned from entering a territory I did not ask to enter...I regret that the Israeli government is pursuing me like this."

In a campaign speech last Saturday, Melenchon made clear that, if he were elected president, French vessels would accompany activists hoping to force aid into the Gaza Strip.


UN Hails Progress in Ebola Response, Cites Insecurity as Biggest Challenge

Congolese workers wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) walk outside the Ebola Treatment Center at the Bunia General Referral Hospital following a resurgence of Ebola involving the Bundibugyo strain, in Bunia, Ituri province, the Democratic Republic of Congo, November 2, 2026. (Reuters)
Congolese workers wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) walk outside the Ebola Treatment Center at the Bunia General Referral Hospital following a resurgence of Ebola involving the Bundibugyo strain, in Bunia, Ituri province, the Democratic Republic of Congo, November 2, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

UN Hails Progress in Ebola Response, Cites Insecurity as Biggest Challenge

Congolese workers wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) walk outside the Ebola Treatment Center at the Bunia General Referral Hospital following a resurgence of Ebola involving the Bundibugyo strain, in Bunia, Ituri province, the Democratic Republic of Congo, November 2, 2026. (Reuters)
Congolese workers wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) walk outside the Ebola Treatment Center at the Bunia General Referral Hospital following a resurgence of Ebola involving the Bundibugyo strain, in Bunia, Ituri province, the Democratic Republic of Congo, November 2, 2026. (Reuters)

UN health officials on Friday hailed progress in the Ebola response six months after the outbreak first prompted global concerns, but cautioned that the disease continues to spread to more remote and dangerous parts of Congo.

With the number of confirmed cases now surpassing 11,000, the outbreak is the second-worst for Ebola on record and ‌has spread to parts ‌of east, central and ‌west ⁠Africa.

Flagged by health ⁠authorities in mid-May, the outbreak is driven by the rare Bundibugyo species of the virus, for which there are no approved treatments or vaccines.

"We do see encouraging signs," said Chikwe Ihekweazu, head of ⁠the World Health Organization's Health Emergencies Program, ‌citing falling ‌cases in former hotspots like Bunia in eastern Democratic ‌Republic of Congo.

“But what we have ‌seen now is the emergence of cases in more rural and more difficult-to-reach areas ... The biggest challenge the response faces right now ‌is the rising insecurity," he said, citing WHO data showing 80 attacks ⁠on health ⁠sites and workers so far.

French medical charity Médecins Sans Frontières has been more downbeat on the Ebola response, saying that supplies are missing and the virus is still spreading out of control.

Julien Harneis, the UN's special Ebola coordinator, said in response to the criticism: "The area of operation is vast, just unimaginable vast...But 80% of the time, and across this vast area, we're able to operate."


Five Facts About APEC with Trump, Putin and Xi Set to Attend

Workers install signage for the upcoming Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) China 2026 summit on the wall of a building in Shenzhen, China's Guangdong province on November 12, 2026. (AFP)
Workers install signage for the upcoming Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) China 2026 summit on the wall of a building in Shenzhen, China's Guangdong province on November 12, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Five Facts About APEC with Trump, Putin and Xi Set to Attend

Workers install signage for the upcoming Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) China 2026 summit on the wall of a building in Shenzhen, China's Guangdong province on November 12, 2026. (AFP)
Workers install signage for the upcoming Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) China 2026 summit on the wall of a building in Shenzhen, China's Guangdong province on November 12, 2026. (AFP)

Attention will focus next week ‌on a summit of US, Chinese and Russian leaders set for the 21-member gathering of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum in China's southern technology hub of Shenzhen.

WHAT IS APEC?

Founded as an informal 12-member dialogue effort in 1989 in the Australian capital of Canberra, it has become the region's premier economic forum to foster ties on advancing growth, trade and investment.

Accounting for about 62% of global GDP and roughly half of global trade, the grouping of "member economies" rather than nations allows participation by Chinese-ruled Hong Kong and democratically governed Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its own territory.

It does not include India, the world's most populous nation, however.

APEC operates on non-binding commitments reached strictly by consensus, with commitments undertaken on a voluntary basis.

The APEC Economic Leaders' Meeting is set for November 18 and 19, preceded by an annual summit of CEOs on November 17-18.

WHY SHENZHEN?

China is ‌hosting the summit ‌for the third time, after events in the commercial hub of Shanghai ‌in ⁠2001 and the ⁠capital, Beijing, in 2014.

Both domestic and international reasons govern the choice of Shenzhen, adjacent to the financial center of Hong Kong, said Chim Lee, senior analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit.

As part of China's Greater Bay Area home to Hong Kong and Macau, which Beijing seeks to establish as a global hub for technology and innovation, the city offers a platform to showcase China's vision for development and trade.

It also highlights Shenzhen's resilience to geopolitical turbulence, Lee added.

The city is the base of several leading Chinese auto and tech giants, such as BYD, ⁠Huawei and Tencent .

WHO WILL BE THERE?

China has said President Xi Jinping ‌will chair the leaders' meeting and deliver remarks. US President Donald ‌Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. are among those expected.

The leaders of Canada, Australia, Mexico ‌and Indonesia are also due to attend, along with those of Malaysia, South Korea and Vietnam among ‌Asia-Pacific nations.

Taiwan has designated Stan Shih, founder of Acer, as its envoy.

WHAT TO WATCH AND KEY STICKING POINTS

Middle East Instability: The economic ripple effects of conflict, such as risks to energy security, trade flows, supply chains and inflation are ‌major concerns expected to figure in talks.

Tripartite Dynamics: All eyes are on the possible meeting of Chinese, Russian and US leaders. China is hesitant to ⁠engage in talks on nuclear ⁠disarmament, as it has fewer such weapons than the other two, analysts said.

The US and Russia will also be keen to discuss the Ukraine war, but not necessarily China, they said.

China-US Relations: A key focus to see if ties can stay stable. Both sides are falling short on commitments to an extended trade truce, analysts said. Rare earth supplies, artificial intelligence and tariffs are also likely to figure on the agenda, with US arms sales to Taiwan closely watched.

China's ties with Japan and the Philippines: Strains in Japan and China ties have persisted since Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi angered Beijing in November 2025 by suggesting that Japan could deploy its military if a Chinese move against neighboring Taiwan also threatened its territory.

China-Philippines relations will likewise be closely watched amid continuing tension in the disputed waterway of the South China Sea.

WHO ARE APEC'S MEMBERS?

These are Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, the United States and Vietnam.