Pezeshkian’s Apology to Neighbors Triggers Backlash in Iran

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)
TT

Pezeshkian’s Apology to Neighbors Triggers Backlash in Iran

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)

An apology by Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to neighboring countries for attacks that struck parts of their territories - and his pledge to halt such strikes unless their soil is used to attack Iran - has triggered sharp political debate within Tehran’s ruling establishment.

Lawmakers swiftly condemned the remarks, while military and judicial officials reiterated that US and Israeli interests across the region would remain legitimate targets. The dispute is unfolding at a delicate moment for Iran, following the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Pezeshkian framed the apology as a political signal intended to reassure neighbors and prevent a wider regional confrontation. Critics, however, called it “an unjustified concession in the middle of an open war.”

Military and judicial leaders stressed that any US or Israeli base or interest used against Iran would remain a legitimate target — even if located on the territory of other regional states.

The episode has turned the president’s apology from a diplomatic gesture to contain tensions into the center of an internal power struggle, highlighting divisions within Iran’s leadership over the limits and management of the war.

Following Khamenei’s killing, a temporary leadership council assumed his duties. The body consists of Pezeshkian, judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Alireza Arafi.

In a televised address, Pezeshkian said the council had decided not to target neighboring states or fire missiles at them unless Iran was attacked from their territory.

“I apologize in my name and on behalf of Iran to neighboring countries that Iran attacked,” he said, adding that Tehran does not intend to assault any state.

He said the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps had acted in recent days “based on a field decision” after senior commanders and the supreme leader were killed at the start of the war.

The comments quickly drew pushback. Mohseni-Ejei said evidence gathered by Iran’s armed forces showed that “the geography of some countries in the region has openly or secretly been placed in the service of the enemy,” allowing their territory to be used for attacks against Iran.

“Severe attacks on these targets will continue,” he said, adding that the strategy was already under way and backed by the government and other pillars of the system.

Iran’s military signaled little appetite for de-escalation. The command of Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, the joint operations center under the armed forces’ general staff, said that although it had “not carried out any aggression” against neighboring states so far, all US and Israeli bases and interests across land, sea and air in the region remained primary targets.

In a statement, the command said the armed forces “respect the interests and sovereignty of neighboring countries and have not carried out any aggression against them so far.” But it warned that if hostile actions continued, all military bases and interests belonging to the United States and the “Zionist entity” would face powerful strikes from Iranian armed forces.

A spokesman for the headquarters said any location from which attacks against Iran are launched would be considered a legitimate target, warning that any attempt to enter the region “will end at the bottom of the Gulf” and that Tehran “will not retreat” in confronting the United States and Israel.

In parliament, Mohammad Manan Raisi, a lawmaker representing Qom, said the president’s “strange apology to neighboring countries is regrettable.”

Addressing Pezeshkian, he wrote: “When will it be time for you to apologize to the Iranian people for these humiliating positions?”

Raisi added that the Assembly of Experts must urgently announce a new supreme leader, saying the president’s “humiliating statements” showed the need to select one as soon as possible.

“Is it not true that neighboring countries placed their land, property and hotels at the service of our enemies?” he said. “Should our military not have attacked these bases and enemy properties that you now apologize for striking in such a humiliating manner?”

Conservative lawmaker Jalal Rashidi Kouchi wrote on X: “With all due respect, Mr. President, an apology is offered when a mistake has been made... but we made no mistake.”

He said the president’s message lacked firmness, appearing weak in wording, delivery and even body language.

Iran’s foreign ministry also warned regional states against allowing their territory or resources to be used for attacks on Iran.

In a statement, it said international law prohibits using a country’s territory, directly or indirectly, to harm another state, citing UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 defining aggression.

Countries whose territory is used to launch military attacks against a third state bear international legal responsibility, including compensation for direct and indirect damages, the ministry said.

It added that Iran had been compelled, under its “inherent and natural right” of self-defense, to carry out necessary and proportionate defensive operations against the bases and facilities of aggressors in the region.

Those operations target facilities and capabilities that serve as sources or launch points for hostile acts against the Iranian people, the ministry said, adding that US bases in the region had not strengthened security but had instead supported “American aggressors and the Zionist entity.”

The ministry stressed that Iran seeks to maintain and develop friendly relations with regional states based on mutual respect, good neighborliness and respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. Iranian defensive operations against US bases in the region, it added, should not be interpreted as hostility toward neighboring countries.

Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf also weighed in, writing on X that the Islamic Republic’s defense policies are “constant” and rooted in “principles.”

“As long as there are US bases in the region, its countries will not see stability,” he wrote, adding that “all officials and the people are united around this principle.”

The presidency later sought to clarify the president’s remarks. Mehdi Tabatabaei, head of public relations at the presidential office, said the message was straightforward: if regional states do not cooperate with US attacks on Iran, Tehran will not target them.

“The Islamic Republic will not bow to pressure,” he wrote on X. “Our armed forces will respond firmly, according to rules of engagement, to any attack launched from US bases.”



Britain’s King Charles Honors Fallen US Troops on Last Day of Visit

 Britain's King Charles and Queen Camilla take part in a wreath-laying ceremony at the tomb of the unknown soldier in Arlington National Cemetery, in Arlington, Virginia, US, April 30, 2026. (Saul Loeb/Pool via Reuters)
Britain's King Charles and Queen Camilla take part in a wreath-laying ceremony at the tomb of the unknown soldier in Arlington National Cemetery, in Arlington, Virginia, US, April 30, 2026. (Saul Loeb/Pool via Reuters)
TT

Britain’s King Charles Honors Fallen US Troops on Last Day of Visit

 Britain's King Charles and Queen Camilla take part in a wreath-laying ceremony at the tomb of the unknown soldier in Arlington National Cemetery, in Arlington, Virginia, US, April 30, 2026. (Saul Loeb/Pool via Reuters)
Britain's King Charles and Queen Camilla take part in a wreath-laying ceremony at the tomb of the unknown soldier in Arlington National Cemetery, in Arlington, Virginia, US, April 30, 2026. (Saul Loeb/Pool via Reuters)

King Charles III paid respects to fallen US troops at a military cemetery on Thursday, the final day of a state visit aimed at healing ties between Britain and the United States strained by the war in Iran.

By all accounts, the four-day visit has been a success, with President Donald Trump serving as solicitous host-in-chief who kicked off the monarch's stay with a pomp-filled welcome and lavish white-tie banquet at the White House.

"He's a great king -- the greatest king, in my book," Trump told reporters as Charles and Queen Camilla arrived at the White House for a brief farewell ceremony under bright spring sunshine on Thursday morning.

As the royal couple drove off following handshakes and a bit of chat, Trump added: "Great people. We need more people like that in our country."

Charles and Camilla then visited Arlington National Cemetery just outside Washington, where they laid a wreath and flowers at the hilltop Tomb of the Unknown Soldier honoring America's unidentified war dead.

The pair stood solemnly as a bugler played "Taps," before visiting the adjacent display room of military exhibits and artifacts.

Next on the agenda was a "block party" to mark 250 years since American independence from Britain and meetings with Native Americans at a national park, before departing for the British island territory of Bermuda in the Atlantic.

- Light moments -

The centerpiece of the whirlwind trip was Charles's speech Tuesday to the US Congress, the first by a British monarch since Queen Elizabeth II in 1991.

The address was warmly received, even as Charles ranged over subjects from climate change and the need for restraints on presidential power to the importance of NATO and defense of Ukraine -- sensitive issues for Trump's ruling Republicans.

The 77-year-old monarch skirted around tensions between Trump and Prime Minister Keir Starmer over Britain's refusal to join the war against Iran, insisting the partnership between the two countries was "born out of dispute, but no less strong for it."

The royals visited New York on Wednesday, where they stopped at the 9/11 memorial and met leftist Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

Charles, who is passionate about gardening and the environment, later visited an urban sustainable farming project in Harlem, while Camilla celebrated the 100th birthday of Winnie the Pooh at the New York Public Library.

Security has been tight for the royal visit, which came just days after an alleged assassination attempt against Trump at a Washington media gala.

The trip has seen light moments between Charles and Trump, including the US president joking that his Scottish-born mother had a crush on the future king when he was younger.


Pivotal US-Iran War Deadline Approaches with No End in Sight for Conflict

 The US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, April 28, 2026. (Reuters)
The US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, April 28, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Pivotal US-Iran War Deadline Approaches with No End in Sight for Conflict

 The US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, April 28, 2026. (Reuters)
The US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, April 28, 2026. (Reuters)

US President Donald Trump faces a deadline on Friday to end the Iran war or make the case to Congress for extending it, but the date is most likely to pass without altering the course of a conflict that has lapsed into a standoff over shipping routes.

Ending the war appears highly unlikely.

Instead, analysts and congressional aides said they expect Trump to either notify Congress that he plans a 30-day extension or disregard the deadline, with his administration arguing that a current ceasefire with Tehran marked an end to the conflict.

Like most policies in a bitterly divided Congress, war powers have become deeply partisan, with opposition Democrats calling for Congress to reassert its constitutional right to declare war and Republicans accusing Democrats of trying to use War Powers law to weaken Trump.

Democrats have tried repeatedly since the war began on February 28 to pass resolutions seeking to force Trump to withdraw US forces or obtain congressional authorization. But Trump's Republicans, who hold slim majorities in the Senate and House of Representatives, have voted them down almost unanimously.

Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, the ‌US president can wage ‌military action for only 60 days before ending it, coming to Congress for authorization or seeking ‌a 30-day ⁠extension due to "unavoidable ⁠military necessity regarding the safety of United States Armed Forces."

The Iran conflict began on February 28, when Israel and the United States began airstrikes on Iran. Trump formally notified Congress of the conflict 48 hours later, as the law requires, starting the 60-day deadline clock that ends May 1.

FRAIL CEASEFIRE

Trump is scheduled to receive a briefing on Thursday on plans for fresh military strikes on Iran to compel it to negotiate an end to the conflict, a US official told Reuters.

If fighting resumes, Trump can tell lawmakers that he has started another 60-day clock, something that presidents from both parties have done repeatedly since Congress passed the War Powers law, over then-President Richard Nixon's veto, in response to the Vietnam War.

That conflict also was not ⁠authorized by Congress.

Iran said on Thursday that if Washington renewed attacks it would respond with "long and ‌painful strikes" on US positions, complicating Washington's hopes for an international coalition to open the ‌Strait of Hormuz.

Opinion polls show that the Iran war is unpopular among Americans, six months before November elections that will determine who controls Congress next year.

Trump's ‌approval rating sank to the lowest level of his current term this month, as Americans increasingly soured on the cost of living ‌and blamed the war for higher prices.

But Trump remains strongly in control of his party and few Republicans have objected to his policies. Additionally, Republicans strongly back Israel, which is also striking Iran, and welcome weakening of Iran, a bitter enemy of the United States.

"It's partisanship, plain and simple," said Christopher Preble, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center think tank in Washington. "Republicans refuse to defy the president, simple as that."

'ACTIVE CONVERSATIONS'

The White House has not said how it ‌plans to proceed, or if it will ask Congress to approve an Authorization for the Use of Military Force against Iran.

"The administration is in active conversations with the Hill on this topic. Members ⁠of Congress who try to ⁠score political points by usurping the Commander-in-Chief’s authority would only undermine the United States Military abroad, which no elected official should want to do," a White House official said on condition of anonymity.

The US Constitution says only Congress, not the president, can declare war, but that restriction does not apply for short-term operations or to counter an immediate threat.

A few Republicans who have voted against war powers resolutions to date said they may reconsider after May 1. Republican Senator John Curtis of Utah published an essay saying he supported Trump's actions but would not support ongoing military action beyond the deadline without congressional approval.

But others said they wanted to wait to act.

Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the Senate's Republican majority leader, said it would be "ideal" if Washington and Tehran could reach a peace agreement, although he told reporters he has not ruled out a potential vote on authorizing the war.

"We're listening, obviously trying to stay dialed in to what's there and getting regular updates from the administration about forward progress," Thune told reporters.

Democratic Senate leader Chuck Schumer of New York has co-sponsored resolutions seeking to end the war.

"Republicans know Trump’s handling of this war has been a disaster. They see how much the American people are hurting right now," he said in a Senate speech, referring to sharp increases in gasoline and other prices.

"How many War Powers Resolutions do Democrats need to put forward before Senate Republicans do what’s right?" Schumer asked.


Israel Defense Minister Says Country May Have to ‘Act Again’ Against Iran

A firefighter stands on the rubble of residential buildings near Niloufar square in Tehran during the ongoing joint US-Israeli military campaign on Iran on March 2, 2026. (AFP via Getty Images)
A firefighter stands on the rubble of residential buildings near Niloufar square in Tehran during the ongoing joint US-Israeli military campaign on Iran on March 2, 2026. (AFP via Getty Images)
TT

Israel Defense Minister Says Country May Have to ‘Act Again’ Against Iran

A firefighter stands on the rubble of residential buildings near Niloufar square in Tehran during the ongoing joint US-Israeli military campaign on Iran on March 2, 2026. (AFP via Getty Images)
A firefighter stands on the rubble of residential buildings near Niloufar square in Tehran during the ongoing joint US-Israeli military campaign on Iran on March 2, 2026. (AFP via Getty Images)

Israel's defense minister on Thursday said his country may soon have to "act again" against Iran, to ensure the Islamic republic "does not once again become a threat to Israel".

"US President Donald Trump, in coordination with (Israeli) Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is leading the efforts to achieve the campaign's objectives, to ensure that Iran does not once again become a threat to Israel, the United States and the free world in the future," Israel Katz said during a military ceremony, according to a statement from his office.

"We support this effort and are providing the necessary support, but it is possible that we may soon have to act again to ensure these objectives are met," he added.