How SK Hynix’s Bet on a Niche Memory Chip Made It More Valuable Than Samsung

 People stand near a logo of SK Hynix at the South Korean chipmaker's booth during the China International Supply Chain Expo (CISCE) in Beijing, China June 22, 2026. (Reuters)
People stand near a logo of SK Hynix at the South Korean chipmaker's booth during the China International Supply Chain Expo (CISCE) in Beijing, China June 22, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

How SK Hynix’s Bet on a Niche Memory Chip Made It More Valuable Than Samsung

 People stand near a logo of SK Hynix at the South Korean chipmaker's booth during the China International Supply Chain Expo (CISCE) in Beijing, China June 22, 2026. (Reuters)
People stand near a logo of SK Hynix at the South Korean chipmaker's booth during the China International Supply Chain Expo (CISCE) in Beijing, China June 22, 2026. (Reuters)

SK Hynix's overtaking of Samsung Electronics to become South Korea's most valuable firm was the culmination of 14 years of bets that brought it skepticism and scorn but ultimately put it at the center of the global AI gold rush.

In 2012, conglomerate SK Group acquired Hynix Semiconductor in a deal that was considered financially irresponsible. Samsung, in contrast, was valued at more than 10 times SK Hynix and was the global leader in Dynamic Random-Access Memory (DRAM), a memory type that powers laptops and smartphones.

Eager to find an edge, SK Hynix bet on a different memory type that was considered niche: high-bandwidth memory chips (HBM), which could feed data fast but were not widely used by data center customers.

It released the world's first HBM product with Advanced Micro Devices in 2014, but stumbled with the chip's second generation, falling behind Samsung in the late 2010s. That prompted executives to debate whether to halt HBM development, two ex-executives said.

They eventually decided to double down, revamping their technology and investing heavily in new production capacity as they expected growing demand from Nvidia - back then known as a supplier of ‌3D graphic chips to ‌the computing and video game markets - said Shim Dae-yong, who led HBM development at SK Hynix at ‌the time.

That ⁠gamble, which involved ⁠an 880 billion won ($640 million) investment into a packaging facility in Icheon and other assets, initially appeared to backfire. That facility struggled with underutilization in 2019 as demand from Nvidia and cryptocurrency miners plummeted.

"It was a headache back in 2019," Shim said. "It was obsolete."

But it eventually paid off when OpenAI's ChatGPT release in 2022 ignited the artificial intelligence boom and global demand for HBM chips, which became critical to Nvidia's AI accelerators used in data centers to train and run AI models.

Today, SK Hynix is Nvidia's main HBM supplier.

"No one expected the HBM market would post such explosive growth," Shim said. "But we were ready in terms of performance and capacity."

Reuters spoke to three ex-SK Hynix executives including Shim and reviewed two books on the firm to help illustrate its early days and meteoric ⁠rise.

SK Hynix declined to comment on Reuters' questions about this story.

South Korea's stock market has been volatile of ‌late and SK Hynix's market cap fell below Samsung's on Wednesday.

CRISIS-RIDDEN

Founded in 1983 as Hyundai ‌Electronics, the firm went through crises and acquisitions before it became SK Hynix.

In 2001, it flirted with bankruptcy as chip prices plummeted before creditor banks, led by ‌state lenders, rescued it.

The creditors then tried to sell their stakes several times, including to Micron Technology in 2002, a decision that was ‌rejected by the company's board.

SK Group, then known for its telecoms and energy businesses, bought Hynix a decade later in a deal that prompted Standard & Poor's Ratings Services to assign SK Telecom a negative outlook, warning of the highly cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry and large capital expenditure requirements.

SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won explained his thinking in a book published in January.

"What I really wanted to accomplish when we acquired Hynix was to transform it from a commodity memory producer into a mainstream ‌semiconductor company whose products are indispensable," Chey said.

Hyun Sun-yeop, a former SK Hynix HR executive, said its underdog status made it work harder.

"We believed that it would be impossible to overcome Samsung in commodity DRAM ⁠products," he said. "We were desperate to change ⁠the market dynamics. We needed a breakthrough."

Its focus on HBM later helped SK Hynix recover from the global memory industry's boom-and-bust cycle faster than Samsung. In 2023, a severe downturn battered memory prices, pushing SK Hynix to report an annual operating loss of 7.73 trillion won.

In 2024, the company posted a record operating profit and it briefly overtook Samsung as the world's top DRAM maker in 2025.

"No one would ever have imagined that SK Hynix would overtake Samsung," said Shin Jae-yong, a business administration professor at Seoul National University.

"It is almost impossible for a runner-up to catch up with the market leader in this capital-intensive industry, which requires massive investment. HBM was the powerful driver behind how they turned the tables."

Today, Samsung is playing catch-up. Its in-house foundry business supplies key components for HBM chips, while SK Hynix relies on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing to produce the so-called base die using less advanced technology.

SK Hynix's fortunes helped power South Korea's economy, its stock market and made its employees attractive marriage material. It is preparing to list shares in the US as soon as August to broaden its investor base, Reuters has reported.

It has also outpaced the expectations of its top bosses, with shares rallying more than 340% this year.

In 2024, Chey, the SK Group chair, said SK Hynix should seek a market capitalization of 1 quadrillion won and eventually raise that to 2 quadrillion won, according to a book, Super Momentum.

On Monday, it became South Korea's most valuable listed company, with a market value of nearly 2.1 quadrillion won.



Huawei Launches New Foldable Smartphone as Competition with Xiaomi, Apple Heats Up

The Huawei logo is seen in this illustration taken on January 29, 2025. (Reuters)
The Huawei logo is seen in this illustration taken on January 29, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Huawei Launches New Foldable Smartphone as Competition with Xiaomi, Apple Heats Up

The Huawei logo is seen in this illustration taken on January 29, 2025. (Reuters)
The Huawei logo is seen in this illustration taken on January 29, 2025. (Reuters)

Huawei launched a new version of its flagship foldable smartphone on Monday as it seeks to defend its lead in the Chinese market for premium handsets against Apple and Xiaomi, both of which are also unveiling new products.

The new Mate XT2 folds out twice to open into a tablet-sized screen and ‌features Huawei's ‌new Kirin 9050 Pro chip.

Huawei ‌says ⁠the chip's design ⁠allows it to deliver more computing power while using less electricity, helping the company overcome US restrictions on access to advanced technology.

Xiaomi launches a rival foldable phone later on Monday, while Apple unveils its latest ⁠iPhone series on Wednesday, with expectations ‌high that it ‌too will be unveiling a foldable phone.

The Mate XT2 ‌features a redesigned folding mechanism, improved water ‌resistance as well as an optional screen that prevents people nearby from seeing what is displayed. It also has upgraded cameras and delivers ‌42% better overall performance than its predecessor, based on company tests.

Huawei, which ⁠does ⁠not sell in the US due to sanctions, leads China's smartphone market with a 22.6% share in the second quarter, ahead of Apple's 18.1%, according to consultancy IDC. Xiaomi has 12.4% of the market.

Huawei is even more dominant in folding phones, accounting for 68% of shipments in China in the second quarter, according to Smart Analytics Global, a US-based research company.


AI Data Centers Are Less Thirsty Now, Tech Giants Say

 A drone view shows construction underway on Microsoft's ATL11 data center in Union City, Georgia, US, September 1, 2026. (Reuters)
A drone view shows construction underway on Microsoft's ATL11 data center in Union City, Georgia, US, September 1, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

AI Data Centers Are Less Thirsty Now, Tech Giants Say

 A drone view shows construction underway on Microsoft's ATL11 data center in Union City, Georgia, US, September 1, 2026. (Reuters)
A drone view shows construction underway on Microsoft's ATL11 data center in Union City, Georgia, US, September 1, 2026. (Reuters)

Data centers are running into a wall of public anger in the United States over their thirst for water and power.

The tech giants spending billions of dollars on them say the water part, at least, is solvable.

Data centers are the warehouses full of computer servers that run the internet and increasingly artificial intelligence.

The computers get hot, and keeping them cool takes water.

American chip giant Nvidia said in a June report that it can eliminate water consumption almost entirely at some facilities when deploying DSX, its newest system for designing and managing AI data centers.

It's a bold claim, and one the industry is under mounting pressure to make good on.

In 2025, data centers consumed 222 billion liters (59 billion gallons) of water worldwide for cooling, according to consultancy Rystad Energy.

Without adaptive measures, the figure could nearly triple to 644 billion liters by 2030, Rystad estimates. Steps to limit the growth could keep it under double.

Nvidia's new method uses a closed-loop cooling system in which liquid flows directly through the servers, as close as possible to the chips, whose temperature can rise above 80C (176F).

The problem is that "there's a pretty direct trade-off between how much water is used and how much energy is used" for temperature control, said Andy Masley, an independent researcher who covers AI and data centers.

Cutting back on water use usually means more power as the liquid in those sealed pipes still has to be cooled down somehow, usually by blowing air over it -- and that takes electricity.

Nvidia gets around some of this by letting the liquid enter the servers warmer than usual, at 45C.

Most other closed-loop systems ran at about 32C in 2024, according to the Uptime Institute, which certifies data centers.

By starting with warmer water, Nvidia does not need to pump in cooled air year-round.

"Simple fans circulating the air" are often enough, though sometimes a mix of methods is needed, said Josh Parker, Nvidia's head of sustainability.

At sites in extreme climates, or during a heatwave, chill airflow or water evaporation is still necessary.

- Public relations -

Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Meta told AFP that they also use closed-loop systems, which they said involve no net water loss.

The two cloud computing giants, which have been expanding their already huge data center footprints, used more water overall between 2022 and 2025, but their water use efficiency improved by 25 percent at Microsoft and 37 percent at AWS, according to their most recent sustainability reports.

There is no industry-wide consistency, however, in how companies report data on so-called environmental, social and governance (ESG) efforts.

Elon Musk's SpaceX, now a major player in data centers after it acquired his artificial intelligence company xAI, has never published an ESG report.

In June, ratings agency MSCI gave SpaceX its lowest ESG score.

"Because water is generally much cheaper than electricity," companies have less incentive to cut water use on cost grounds alone, said Shaolei Ren, an engineering professor at the University of California, Riverside.

"There are incentives," Ren said, but they have more to do with public relations amid the growing backlash to data centers across the United States.

Another obstacle is that upgrading an older data center to newer, less thirsty technology is expensive.

That may matter less than it sounds.

Older data centers are smaller and less powerful than the enormous new ones being built now, so they need less cooling in the first place, said Minh K. Le, who leads data center and hydrogen research at Rystad.

And the water a data center uses directly is only part of the story.

Water is used to generate the electricity that powers the data center, and to manufacture its chips and servers.

In the United States, that hidden water use can be twice the amount a data center consumes on its own.


From Dance Floor to War: China Readies Humanoid Robots for Combat

A UBTech humanoid robot, Walker S, picks up an object operated by a staff member, during a demonstration simulating a factory's assembly line, at the robotics exhibition center Robot World, during an organized media tour to the Beijing Robotics Industrial Park, in Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area, also known as Beijing E-Town, in China May 16, 2025. (Reuters)
A UBTech humanoid robot, Walker S, picks up an object operated by a staff member, during a demonstration simulating a factory's assembly line, at the robotics exhibition center Robot World, during an organized media tour to the Beijing Robotics Industrial Park, in Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area, also known as Beijing E-Town, in China May 16, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

From Dance Floor to War: China Readies Humanoid Robots for Combat

A UBTech humanoid robot, Walker S, picks up an object operated by a staff member, during a demonstration simulating a factory's assembly line, at the robotics exhibition center Robot World, during an organized media tour to the Beijing Robotics Industrial Park, in Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area, also known as Beijing E-Town, in China May 16, 2025. (Reuters)
A UBTech humanoid robot, Walker S, picks up an object operated by a staff member, during a demonstration simulating a factory's assembly line, at the robotics exhibition center Robot World, during an organized media tour to the Beijing Robotics Industrial Park, in Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area, also known as Beijing E-Town, in China May 16, 2025. (Reuters)

At the World Humanoid Robot Games in China last month, robots jumped, boxed and danced. Some fleet-footed bots ran faster than Usain Bolt over 100 meters. Spectators cheered the machines’ improving capabilities and their meme-worthy stumbles.

Two days after the Games ended, the People's Liberation Army's official newspaper drew its own conclusions from the show. The PLA Daily called for researchers to accelerate the transfer of cutting-edge technologies from laboratories to military training grounds for robotic "combatants."

China's defense establishment is accelerating research into humanoids’ military uses and planning for their eventual wartime deployment, according to a Reuters review of more than 100 Chinese military procurement notices, academic studies, patents, official publications, government records and defense-company materials.

Military institutions are testing humanoids against battlefield requirements, seeking to acquire robots and technologies to train them, and studying how they might function alongside troops, the previously unreported records show. The work gained momentum in 2025 and 2026, focusing on robot perception, manipulation, and training data.

Chinese manufacturers accounted for about 95% of global humanoid shipments in 2025, according to BofA Global Research. That commercial dominance gives the PLA access to an expanding industry while developing its own military applications.

China’s robot defense research underscores how rapidly military technologies are evolving globally. In the Russia-Ukraine war, semiautonomous drones that use artificial intelligence for navigation and targeting have transformed reconnaissance and attack, while robots carry supplies and retrieve casualties. Reuters has previously documented the Chinese military’s efforts to learn from Europe’s deadliest conflict since World War II.

That evolution is driving worldwide military interest in autonomous systems.

"Going where we don’t want humans to go is one of the most compelling reasons to develop robots in the first place," said Dennis Hong, a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at UCLA. "If losing a robot means avoiding the loss of a human life, then the robot can become expendable."

China's defense ministry and the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), the PLA’s premier research institution, ‌didn’t respond to requests ‌for comment about humanoid robots’ military applications.

Reuters found no evidence that China has deployed an armed humanoid with an operational PLA unit. The robots remain energy-intensive ‌and unreliable ⁠outside controlled demonstrations. Battlefield ⁠environments pose many variables and challenge robots’ abilities in unpredictable ways, said Aaron Johnson, a professor of mechanical engineering at Carnegie Mellon University.

URBAN ASSAULT FORCE

Already, China has a vision for humanoid robots in urban warfare.

Six "combat robots" – humanoids, robot dogs or unmanned vehicles – would be split up between two assault teams. Working with ground troops, the robots would clear an enemy-occupied building, floor-by-floor and room-by-room.

That scenario was described in an August 2025 paper by researchers at NUDT’s test center in Xi’an. The study modeled an urban assault force using equipment the authors projected could be available within five to 10 years. It didn’t specify the robots’ rules of engagement, the weapons they would carry, nor how they would handle civilian encounters.

Improvements in balance, perception and endurance could make humanoids useful in places including buildings, tunnels and ship interiors, said Juo-Min Chou, a researcher at Taiwan's Institute for National Defense and Security Research. "Their two hands and two feet could, in theory, combine mobility, climbing and manipulation," she said.

For simpler reconnaissance or logistics missions, however, quadruped, tracked or wheeled robots would generally be cheaper and easier to deploy at scale, Chou added.

Chinese military commentary envisions an expanding range of roles for humanoids. A July 2025 article in PLA Daily argued that humanoid ⁠missions could eventually evolve "from supporting combat toward primary combat" and discussed how robots might be authorized to fire on a living target that had been verified ‌by a human.

In December, the PLA Eastern Theater Command released an AI-generated montage that showed military robots, including humanoids and quadrupeds, overwhelming Taiwan's defenses in a hypothetical ‌future conflict.

China isn’t alone in exploring battlefield uses for humanoids. Last year, the US Army launched a competition to develop "militarized humanoid capabilities" that could eventually work alongside soldiers. The Army said potential roles included reconnaissance, security, obstacle clearing, hazardous-material operations and offensive ‌and defensive missions in urban terrain.

Up to 10 finalists were due to test their systems with US military experts this year, with as much as $1.25 million available for follow-on contracts.

The US robotics industry, however, trails ‌far behind China in developing two-legged and four-legged machines. Reuters reported last month that China’s Unitree robots – among the world’s leading producers of humanoids and quadrupeds – based designs for its best-selling robot dogs on innovations financed by the US military.

The Pentagon and the US Army didn’t comment for this story.

INFILTRATING ENEMY LINES

Chinese interest in humanoid robots’ military applications began to pick up in 2024. That year, NUDT and China’s Academy of Military Sciences hosted a defense-technology forum that included a session on military applications for humanoid systems, according to NUDT’s website. Neither institution responded to Reuters’ questions.

A year later, NUDT explicitly framed humanoid robots as battlefield tools. A university competition in June 2025 featured an event that simulated "infiltration behind enemy lines," requiring robots to enter an area, map it and locate targets, ‌according to its website. Another envisioned robots conducting identity checks, discipline inspections and security patrols at military bases.

The military-research university described the competition in part as a proving ground for humanoids to eventually "move toward the battlefield."

Procurement records around that time reflected that ultimate goal.

In May 2025, the PLA issued a tender to ⁠purchase a humanoid robot, including installation and technical training. Four months ⁠later, a procurement notice that listed an NUDT email as its contact address sought an "embodied humanoid robot intelligent perception and dexterous operation system."

The records contained few specifics. Reuters couldn’t determine whether the tenders were filled, and if so, which companies won or which robot models were supplied.

In June this year, the PLA budgeted about $300,000 for a system to collect and label camera, radar and motion data for humanoids, including information about terrain they could traverse, according to another military procurement document.

The specifications show Chinese military interest is extending from robot bodies into the perception, manipulation and training systems that defense scholars say are essential for humanoids to move beyond controlled demonstrations.

REMOTE OPERATION

By 2026, humanoid development had spread beyond military academia into China's defense industry.

The Fuxi robot made by Norinco, a state-owned defense conglomerate, is one example. Company materials published in August described the full-size humanoid as capable of sentry duty, all-weather reconnaissance, intelligent patrol and fulfilling dangerous roles.

Fuxi can be paired with Norinco’s teleoperation system, which allows a human operator to control a humanoid remotely, according to the company. Removing the need for a robot to make all decisions autonomously would address what many robotics experts say is the biggest challenge with humanoids.

Norinco didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Malcolm Davis, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, said he didn’t see humanoid robots as practical battlefield systems at present. "But in five to 10 years," he said, "they could very well be."

Even if remotely operated today, humanoid systems designed for autonomous deployment would eventually need to navigate ethical dilemmas. The laws of war require forces to distinguish combatants from civilians and to refrain from attacking wounded or surrendering fighters.

The International Committee of the Red Cross has cautioned that autonomous weapons may struggle to interpret signs of surrender reliably because such judgments can depend on context, conduct and intent.

The US military requires autonomous weapons to undergo legal review and realistic testing and for commanders and operators to exercise appropriate judgment over the use of force. China’s defense ministry said in March that AI-powered weapons should remain under human control.

Those concerns haven’t deterred China's exploration of humanoids’ military uses.

Wang Yonghua, a researcher at China’s Academy of Military Sciences, wrote in a November commentary that humanoids face unresolved problems in movement, perception and intelligence. Technical breakthroughs, lower manufacturing costs and industrial-scale production would be needed for humanoids to become widespread military systems.

If those conditions are met, Wang wrote, "humanoid robots will stream onto the battlefield."