Several generals close to the Israeli military leadership have launched a broad campaign against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's policies, accusing him of seeking to "ignite a third intifada in the West Bank" as his "only way out to remain in power."
Six hundred former generals and senior officials sent a letter to US President Donald Trump, urging him to "halt the deterioration in the West Bank and exploit his meeting with Netanyahu to rein in his comrades and allies in the far-right who are drowning the country in blood."
Netanyahu departed for the US for a meeting with Trump on Monday.
In their letter, the generals argued that "faced with US pressure to end the war, remaining aside on the Iranian front, and withdrawing from vast areas in Lebanon, Syria, and the Gaza Strip, Netanyahu has nothing left but the West Bank. He needs a conflict to maintain the state of emergency, which he requires either to unite the right around him or to postpone the elections that appear poised to cost him power."
Several opinion polls regarding the upcoming general elections in October indicate that Netanyahu's chances of forming a government appear to be declining, contrasted with the growing chances of his main rival, former Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, making significant gains.
The generals, who are making media statements, writing articles, or organizing protest petitions, have noted the bloody attacks carried out by Israeli settlers against Palestinians with overt government backing.
These attacks reached a new peak last week when hundreds of settlers torched Palestinian homes, cars, and shops, resulting in the deaths of two Israeli soldiers and four Palestinian citizens in the village of Tal, near Nablus.
Although the Israeli military is decisively fueling the situation under the pretext of protecting settlers, its generals directly accused the government of planning the current unrest, driven in part by certain ministers with far-right ideological motives aimed at preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state, and in part by others for partisan and personal electoral purposes.
‘Playing with fire’
Yedioth Ahronoth published an editorial on Monday written by military correspondent Yossi Yehoshua under the headline "Playing with Fire," in which he stated that the military feels caught in an ambush: settlers attack, Palestinians respond, the military defends, Palestinians express their anger, settlers react, and so on, until the cycle of violence expands and can no longer be stopped.
He added that "in an attempt to calm the situation, the Israeli military requires a massive force, deploying 26 battalions to the West Bank alone while maintaining long, open war fronts in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, and the West Bank, leaving almost no room to breathe."
Yehoshua expressed his belief that "the root of the scourge lies in the settlement map of the West Bank, which is undergoing the largest shift in its history; plans for 80 settlements have been approved, 34 of which have already been built. Alongside this, more than 100 pastoral farms and a similar number of outposts have been established, some of which are currently undergoing regularization procedures."
He stated: "It is important to understand that every new settlement is not just a point on the map, but requires protection; it creates transit routes, friction points, security missions, and a defensive routine. As Israeli territory expands, the area that the Israeli military must protect also widens."
The author pointed to a grim equation emerging: Palestinians are initiating almost no resistance activities, yet the more they reduce these acts, the more settlers increase their attacks against them.
According to data from the security establishment and the police, 660 Israeli attacks against Palestinians were recorded in the first half of 2026, representing a 63 percent increase compared to the second half of 2025, which saw 405 recorded incidents.
On the verge of a third intifada
Also in Yedioth Ahronoth, Nahum Barnea wrote that "the third intifada is on the brink of erupting, and if it happens, it will be different from its two predecessors; it will be the first to break out according to the vision of the Israeli government. There are those who sow the wind in hopes of reaping a whirlwind. Netanyahu sowed the wind, and he is pursuing and pushing for a third intifada."
However, Barnea held the army responsible, stating: "If the weekend's round of violence turns into a third intifada, the Israeli military will not be exempt from responsibility for the bloodshed. The commander's mission is to protect Israelis residing in Area C, but he has a prior mission rooted in the country's laws and international law: to be the sovereign, enforce his rule over the area, and ensure the security of all residents. This is his military, leadership, and legal duty."
Effective international intervention
In Haaretz, historians Dr. Assaf Bondy and Dr. Adam Raz wrote that "what Israel is doing against the Palestinians requires effective international intervention."
They noted that "even under the darkest regimes that adopted killing as a method of governance, these regimes often sought to prosecute those who committed crimes of murder and looting in violation of their own 'regulations' and 'laws' - not out of integrity, but because even a murderous regime seeks to monopolize crime to ensure that killing is carried out by order, or according to specific goals and plans, rather than individual initiative."
The two historians noted that "Israel in 2026, after nearly three years of genocide in the Gaza Strip, has abandoned even this appearance; crime is no longer merely remote from justice, but is now openly celebrated."
They cited Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich smiling proudly while holding the Peace Now movement's report on massacres in the Palestinian territories and the accelerated pace of annexation.
They warned that while "many of the state's citizens pin their hopes on the judicial system, a realistic view reveals that the judicial system in Israel is nothing but another cog in the crime machine called the State of Israel."
The historians concluded that "foreign intervention is necessary, otherwise the number of Palestinian victims will increase dramatically."
