When Will the Manchester United Cycle Stop?

Erik ten Hag has overseen Manchester United’s worst defensive record since the 1970s. Photograph: Catherine Ivill/Getty Images
Erik ten Hag has overseen Manchester United’s worst defensive record since the 1970s. Photograph: Catherine Ivill/Getty Images
TT

When Will the Manchester United Cycle Stop?

Erik ten Hag has overseen Manchester United’s worst defensive record since the 1970s. Photograph: Catherine Ivill/Getty Images
Erik ten Hag has overseen Manchester United’s worst defensive record since the 1970s. Photograph: Catherine Ivill/Getty Images

Erik ten Hag arrived at Manchester United promising to inspire flowing, thrilling transition football. And, you have to say, mission accomplished. You only had to watch Crystal Palace pouring forward at speed on Monday night, or Sheffield United bombing up the pitch at Old Trafford a couple of weeks ago, or indeed Coventry City in the recent FA Cup semi-final. Thanks to Ten Hag, United fans are being treated to sumptuous counterattacking fare on a near-weekly basis, even if – unhappily for Ten Hag’s job prospects – most of it these days seems to be getting played by the opposition.

Yes: it’s an even-numbered year, so we’re discussing whether the Manchester United manager should be sacked. And so to David Moyes (2014), Louis van Gaal (2016), José Mourinho (2018), Ole Gunnar Solskjær (a pandemic-delayed 2021) and Ralf Rangnick (2022) can almost certainly be added Ten Hag (2024), another well-credentialled manager who just didn’t have what it takes to manage a massive club like United. Seriously unlucky! How do they keep ending up with these guys?

Ten Hag talks a lot about “following the script”, and if he has read this particular treatment to the end, he will know the moment of reckoning is probably close at hand. And of course there would be a satisfying structural circularity to it: a reign bookended by two stunning 4-0 defeats in London, 30-year-old and 32-year-old Christian Eriksens floundering alike in midfield, a coach as bereft of explanations at the end as he was at the start.

“Individual mistakes; we had a good plan but put it in the bin,” Ten Hag said after the Brentford game in 2022. “Big mistakes; not following the plan or the script,” he said after the Palace defeat in 2024. Sometimes you just have to submit to the pull of the narrative.

So barring a miraculous victory in the FA Cup final against Manchester City or an unlikely reprieve by the new Ineocracy, Ten Hag will probably go at the end of the season. And – you know – fair enough. You simply cannot play this badly, this often, and expect to keep your job. The most defeats in any season since 1977-78. The most goals conceded since 1976-77. A now familiar inability to prevent teams from shooting: indeed, in the time since you started reading this article André Onana has saved another four shots, and flapped at two more.

But more damning even than the statistics are the optics. The general sense of panic and disarray that spreads through the entire team when someone runs at them. The reliable Jonny Evans, reliably perched 10 yards behind the rest of his defence, as if auditioning to be their drummer. The forlorn sight of Casemiro sliding in on Michael Olise on Monday night and missing not just Olise but the memory of Olise: like a man walking into a room and immediately forgetting why he entered it.

Of course, everyone knows why United keep conceding. The front three press high, the defence fail to push up, and so enormous gaps open up in the middle of the pitch that far better midfielders than Sofyan Amrabat would struggle to cover. Beat the first press, and you have 60 yards of clear, beautiful air. The full-backs can overlap. Quick switches and through balls magically open up. The result: crosses, shots, mayhem, fume.

If some bloke off YouTube can see all this, then let’s assume that a former coach at Bayern Munich, Ajax and PSV Eindhoven – a man once described by Pep Guardiola as the ideal candidate to succeed him at Manchester City – can too. So why hasn’t he fixed it? Personnel is one reason. Lisandro Martínez, a defender signed to be Ten Hag’s general on the pitch, has only played nine league games all season; Luke Shaw 12, Tyrell Malacia none.

That’s three-quarters of Ten Hag’s first-choice backline. In their absence he has been left with more reactive, last-line defenders like Evans, Victor Lindelöf and Harry Maguire, or non-defenders like Amrabat and Casemiro, who lack the capability to play a sophisticated, organised, high-line defence. Could Ten Hag have tried it anyway, even if the personnel didn’t fit? Could he have reconfigured the entire setup, gone back to a low block, abandoned his principles entirely? Could United have helped him out with an emergency signing in January? Perhaps. But we have to recognise that none of these felt like guaranteed solutions at the time.

And then we come to what Mourinho so beautifully expressed as “football heritage”. Ten Hag has probably gone further than any of his predecessors in trying to work out how a United team should play, rather than simply bolting their own ideas on to the existing squad. His stated desire to make United the “best transition team in the world” springs not just from his own principles but from an assessment of what United fans – and importantly, United plc – would demand. A game of back-and-forth, lightning counterattacks, pace and verve in attacking areas, exciting wingers, heroic comebacks, lots of goals, late drama.

And again, you have to say – with less sarcasm – mission accomplished. United have scored eight times in the first 10 minutes, won seven games in the last 10 minutes, conceded 13 times in the 87th minute or later. They’ve failed to close out a winning position 11 times in all competitions. Their games this season have averaged 3.4 goals. This may not be the optimum outcome for United the team. But it is a clear win for United the global entertainment product.

Meanwhile players like Alejandro Garnacho and Kobbie Mainoo have blossomed into indispensable talents, Rasmus Højlund has found his feet in a tough league, Diogo Dalot has improved, Willy Kambwala has impressed. Bruno Fernandes has come through for them again. Onana, Amrabat, Marcus Rashford and Mason Mount have struggled, but are not so bad as to be utterly irredeemable. The point is this: for all the horrors of the last 12 months, United have won a trophy and reached two finals, and are probably a functioning defence, a firing Jadon Sancho and a few other incremental improvements away from being quite good.

But of course this is not what moves the dial at a club like United. Recently there have been multiple stories about how everyone at the club is theoretically up for sale, about how the new regime of Dave Brailsford and Jim Ratcliffe wants to clear the decks, starting but not ending with Ten Hag.

This stuff feels good and cathartic. Purgation, bloodletting, burning it all down and starting again. Drain the swamp. Flush the bowl. By a happy coincidence, this is also the approach that drives the most content, incites the most transfer gossip and late-night panel discussion, feeds the most performative online chatter, shines the flashlight of attention most gloriously and most lucratively upon the hallowed name of Manchester United Football Club.

So the cycle starts again. Thomas Tuchel, Gareth Southgate, Graham Potter. A tranche of new signings. New dawns and new hope. Give the new manager time. Give the new players a chance to settle. Late goals, heroic wins. Rashford is back. But is the football really an improvement? Are United going backwards? Drubbings, humiliations, cup exits. Players unhappy with training, reports unnamed dressing room source. Mark Goldbridge is trending. Official club statement. New manager search begins. Welcome to Manchester United, where the transition never ends.

- The Guardian Sport



Brazil at Rock Bottom: How the Seleção Lost their Way

Brazil are on their fourth manager since exiting the 2022 World Cup in the quarter-finals. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images
Brazil are on their fourth manager since exiting the 2022 World Cup in the quarter-finals. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images
TT

Brazil at Rock Bottom: How the Seleção Lost their Way

Brazil are on their fourth manager since exiting the 2022 World Cup in the quarter-finals. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images
Brazil are on their fourth manager since exiting the 2022 World Cup in the quarter-finals. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images

If this isn’t rock bottom for the Seleção, it’s as near as makes no difference. Another early tournament exit. Another Brazil team making unwanted history. Their defeat to Uruguay on penalties in the quarter-finals of Copa América marks the seventh time they’ve been dumped from a tournament held outside Brazil before the semi-finals since 2009.

It may not be 1950 or 7-1, but the latest defeat paints as grim a picture as those famous results.

Heading into this summer’s Copa América, there was little expectation that Brazil would win their 10th title. But this could have been, should have been, a chance to build momentum. After years of turmoil at the federation, there was hope that a strong showing could spark a shift before the next round of World Cup qualifiers, where Brazil sit sixth in the standings – putting them perilously close to missing the 2026 tournament altogether.

After strong outings against Spain and England in March, coach Dorival Júnior, who was drafted in to stop the rot, looked to have stabilized the team. But Copa América did little to silence Dorival’s doubters. He has been criticized for failing to react in-game and for making substitutions too late. More alarmingly, his authority over a star-studded squad is being questioned. Before the penalty shootout, as the players huddled up, Dorival was left out of the circle. Raising his hand to speak, Dorival was ignored.

The manager talked throughout the tournament about his focus on penalties. Brazil spent pre-game sessions practising spot kicks, knowing the odds of a shootout were increased with Copa América moving straight to penalties during the knockout rounds without extra time. Yet despite reportedly missing every spot-kick in training, Éder Militão was chosen as the first to take a penalty and promptly fluffed his lines, as did Douglas Luiz.

Accosted by angry fans at the team’s hotel, calling for Dorival and captain Danilo to step down, Danilo said Brazil are a “young team showed that can do great things” and that he “only hopes that people have a little patience”.

Few would agree. Patience was already running thin before the tournament, and the results and performances point to a team that has again lost its way. Brazil won just one game, a 4-1 hammering of lowly Paraguay in their second group game. In their other three matches against Costa Rica, Colombia and Uruguay, they drew in regular time and failed to score from open play.

Brazil are associated with slick, free-flowing moves, but Dorival’s team were meandering. The joy looked like it had been stripped away. There was little intensity. The players expected to inject dynamism – Rodrygo, Endrick, Vinícius Júnior – were either left on the bench or disappointed. Much of the focus has been placed on Vinícius, who is hearing criticism from all angles.

“Vinícius is not the player you say ‘if he plays well, Brazil will be champion.’ If he plays well, he will [only] help Brazil a lot,” Brazilian great Romário said recently.

The evidence of this summer suggests he is right. Vinícius was once again unable to convince on the big stage for his country – and was suspended for the quarter-final after picking up two cheap bookings in the group stage. He scored twice in the win over Paraguay, but went missing in the draws against Costa Rica and Colombia. For his club side, Vinícius is a blur of speed. He’s inventive in the final third. When he’s rolling, no defender can stop him. But that player vanishes when he puts on the yellow shirt. Under successive managers, he’s struggled to find his role. Should he be driving in from the left? Holding up play in the middle? Dropping deeper? Does he connect play or initiate it? He ebbs between periods of frustration, drifting without the ball, or leading fruitless one-man missions into closed corridors. In 251 minutes at this summer’s Copa, he had double the number of unsuccessful touches as he had passes leading to a shot.

But for as much as Vinícius shoulders the creative burden, the failure to get him more involved falls on those around him. The forward can only thrive in a structured team with a stable base. And as Vinícius has grown to become the nation’s most influential player, the team around him has descended into mediocrity.

Before the Uruguay game, midfielder Andreas Pereira said that Brazil’s squad was one that Uruguay could only dream of having. It was a strange statement. Brazil’s midfield, full of Premier League players, had just been steamrolled by a Colombian midfield filled with players from the often ridiculed Brasileirão. But it also served as a motivation for La Celeste’s players.

“To talk about Uruguay you need to have a little more respect,” Luis Suárez said after Uruguay’s win. “Know the history of Uruguay before saying that there are players who would like to be in the Brazil national team. Whoever made that comment was [Giorgian] De Arrascaeta’s back-up in Brazilian football [at Flamengo], so imagine what it’s like for us to hear that.”

If Pereira’s words appeared tone-deaf before kick-off, they sounded laughable afterward. Lucas Paquetá, João Gomes, Bruno Guimarães and Pereira could not handle Uruguay’s high-octane press, just as they had struggled against Colombia. Unable to play through the middle in either game, they resorted to Alisson launching hit-and-hope long balls from the back, fracturing any attempt to build up play.

Standing on the sideline, Dorival could not find solutions. Whereas once Brazil could call on Casemiro or Fernandinho to offer strength and tenacity at the base of midfield, now they’re reliant on a midfield trio – Gomes, Guimarães and Paquetá – who are too often bystanders.

Only Endrick offers any real glimmer of light. The 17-year-old was handed his starting debut by Dorival in the quarter-final in place of Vinícius. But to expect him to carry the team at such a young age, in a difficult moment, is too much to ask. Against Uruguay, he completed just two passes (one from a kick-off), struggling to deal with the physicality of La Celeste’s back line.

Endrick may be viewed as a saviour, but he alone will not fix the structural problems in midfield or the lack of cohesion throughout the team. The reality is that Brazil are now the fourth-best team in South America, behind Argentina, Uruguay and Colombia, who are on a 27-game unbeaten streak. Those sides do not necessarily have more talent than the Seleção, but they all have a have clear way of playing and strong, dogmatic coaches.

If things do not turn around quickly, Brazil are in danger of missing the 2026 World Cup. And if Dorival can not halt the spiral, they will probably be on their fifth manager since 2022.