Google Should Break Up Digital Ad Business over Competition Concerns, European Regulators Say



FILE - A Google sign is shown at the company's office in San Francisco, on April 12, 2023. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
FILE - A Google sign is shown at the company's office in San Francisco, on April 12, 2023. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
TT

Google Should Break Up Digital Ad Business over Competition Concerns, European Regulators Say



FILE - A Google sign is shown at the company's office in San Francisco, on April 12, 2023. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
FILE - A Google sign is shown at the company's office in San Francisco, on April 12, 2023. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

European Union regulators hit Google with fresh antitrust charges Wednesday, saying the only way to satisfy competition concerns about its lucrative digital ad business is by selling off parts of the tech giant’s main moneymaker.

The unprecedented decision to push for such a breakup marks a significant escalation by Brussels in its crackdown on Silicon Valley digital giants, and follows a similar move by US authorities seeking to bust Google’s alleged monopoly on the online ad ecosystem.

The European Commission, the bloc’s executive branch and top antitrust enforcer, said its preliminary view after an investigation is that “only the mandatory divestment by Google of part of its services” would address the concerns.

The 27-nation EU has led the global movement to crack down on Big Tech companies — including moving closer to groundbreaking rules on artificial intelligence — but it has previously relied on issuing blockbuster fines, including three antitrust penalties for Google worth billions.

It is the first time the bloc has told a tech giant that it should split up key parts of its business over violations of the EU’s strict antitrust laws, though details on what that could look like are not clear following the preliminary finding.

Google can now defend itself by making its case before the commission issues its final decision. The company said it disagreed with the finding and “will respond accordingly,” adding that the EU’s investigation focused on a narrow part of its ad business.

“Our advertising technology tools help websites and apps fund their content, and enable businesses of all sizes to effectively reach new customers,” said Dan Taylor, Google vice president of global ads. “Google remains committed to creating value for our publisher and advertiser partners in this highly competitive sector.”

The commission’s decision stems from a formal investigation that it opened in June 2021, looking into whether Google violated the bloc’s competition rules by favoring its own online display advertising technology services at the expense of rival publishers, advertisers and advertising technology services.

Online display ads are banners and text that appear on websites such as newspaper home pages and are personalized based on an internet user’s browsing history.

European Commission Vice President Margrethe Vestager says Google is dominant on both sides of the ad-selling market. Google abused that position by favoring its own ad exchange, reinforcing its ability to charge a high fee for its services, the commission said.

“Google is representing the interests of both buyers and sellers. And at the same time, Google is setting the rules on how demand and supply should meet,” she said at a news conference. “This gives rise to inherent and pervasive conflicts of interest.”

Vestager added that if Google sold off, for example, its real-time marketplace for buying and selling ads or a tool for publishers to manage their ads, “we would put an end to the conflicts of interest.”

The commission is seeking a forced sale because past cases that ended with fines and requirements for Google to stop anti-competitive practices have not worked, allowing the company to continue its behavior, “just under a different disguise,” she said.

“This is a big deal” and a sign that the commission has “lost all trust in Google and lost all trust in those behavioral remedies” mandating changes to the way it operates, said Rich Stables, CEO of rival search engine Kelkoo, which was involved in two of the EU’s previous Google antitrust cases.

Google’s ad tech business is also under investigation by Britain’s antitrust watchdog and faces litigation in the US that calls for the company to divest its digital ad tools.

European and US authorities are acknowledging that “the only way to address this egregious conflict of interest is to force Google to divest part of its business,” said Max von Thun, director of the Europe office of the Open Markets Institute, a proponent of stronger antitrust enforcement.

The commission’s move is “a clear illustration of the power competition authorities have when they work in parallel,” he said.

Brussels has previously hit Google with more than 8 billion euros (now $8.6 billion) worth of fines in three separate antitrust cases, involving its Android mobile operating system and shopping and search advertising services. The company is appealing all three penalties.

EU regulators can impose penalties worth up to 10% of annual revenue and also could fine Google alongside any sale order.

Google brought in $54.5 billion in ad sales and YouTube earned nearly $6.7 billion in ad sales in the first three months of the year, but that marked a back-to-back slump as companies spend more cautiously.



EU Launches Antitrust Probe into Google’s Use of Online Content for AI Purposes 

01 December 2025, Hamburg: The Google logo shines above the entrance to Google's German headquarters. (dpa)
01 December 2025, Hamburg: The Google logo shines above the entrance to Google's German headquarters. (dpa)
TT

EU Launches Antitrust Probe into Google’s Use of Online Content for AI Purposes 

01 December 2025, Hamburg: The Google logo shines above the entrance to Google's German headquarters. (dpa)
01 December 2025, Hamburg: The Google logo shines above the entrance to Google's German headquarters. (dpa)

The European Commission has opened an antitrust probe to assess whether Google is breaching EU competition rules in its use of online content from web publishers and YouTube for artificial intelligence purposes, it said on Tuesday.

"The investigation will notably examine whether Google is distorting competition by imposing unfair terms and conditions on publishers and content creators, or by granting itself privileged access to such content, thereby placing developers of rival AI models at a disadvantage," the Commission said.

It said it was concerned Google may have used content from web publishers to generate AI-powered services on its search results pages without appropriate compensation to publishers and without offering them the possibility to refuse such use of their content.

The Commission said it is also concerned whether Google has used content uploaded to YouTube to train its own generate AI models without offering creators compensation or the possibility to refuse.


US to Allow Nvidia H200 Chip Shipments to China, Trump Says 

A Nvidia logo appears in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. (Reuters) 
A Nvidia logo appears in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. (Reuters) 
TT

US to Allow Nvidia H200 Chip Shipments to China, Trump Says 

A Nvidia logo appears in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. (Reuters) 
A Nvidia logo appears in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. (Reuters) 

The United States will allow Nvidia's H200 processors, its second-best artificial intelligence chips, to be exported to China and collect a 25% fee on such sales, US President Donald Trump said on Monday.

The decision appears to settle a US debate about whether Nvidia and rivals should maintain their global lead in AI chips by selling to China or withhold the exports, though Beijing has told companies not to use US technology, leaving it unclear whether Trump's decision would lead to new sales.

Nvidia shares rose 2% in after-hours trading after Trump made the announcement on Truth Social, following a 3% rise during the day on a report by Semafor.

Trump said in his post that he had informed President Xi Jinping of China, where Nvidia's chips are under government scrutiny, about the move and that he "responded positively."

He said the US Commerce Department was finalizing details of the arrangement and the same approach would apply to other AI chip firms such as Advanced Micro Devices and Intel.

Trump's post said the fee to be paid to the US government was "$25%", and a White House official confirmed he meant 25%, higher than the 15% proposed in August.

"We will protect National Security, create American Jobs, and keep America’s lead in AI," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "NVIDIA’s US Customers are already moving forward with their incredible, highly advanced Blackwell chips, and soon, Rubin, neither of which are part of this deal."

Trump did not say how many H200 chips would be authorized for shipment or what conditions might apply, only that exports would occur "under conditions that allow for continued strong National Security."

Administration officials consider the move a compromise between sending Nvidia's latest Blackwell chips to China, which Trump has declined to allow, and sending China no US chips at all, which officials believe would bolster Huawei's efforts to sell AI chips in China, a person familiar with the matter said.

"Offering H200 to approved commercial customers, vetted by the Department of Commerce, strikes a thoughtful balance that is great for America," Nvidia said in a statement.

Intel declined to comment. The US Commerce Department, which oversees export controls, and AMD did not respond to requests for comment.

A White House official said that the 25% fee would be collected as an import tax from Taiwan, where the chips are made, to the United States, where the chips will undergo a security review by US officials before being exported to China.

FEARS OF CHIPS STRENGTHENING CHINA'S MILITARY

China hawks in Washington are concerned that selling more advanced AI chips to China could help Beijing supercharge its military, fears that had first prompted limits on such exports by the Biden administration.

The Trump administration had been considering greenlighting the sale, sources told Reuters last month. Trump said last week he met with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and that the executive was aware of where he stood on export controls.

"It’s a terrible mistake to trade off national security for advantages in trade," said Eric Hirschhorn, who was a senior Commerce Department official during the Obama administration. "It cuts against the consistent policies of Democratic and Republican administrations alike not to assist China’s military modernization."

According to a report released on Sunday by the non-partisan think tank, the Institute for Progress (IFP), the H200 would be almost six times as powerful as the H20, the most advanced AI semiconductor that can legally be exported to China, after the Trump administration reversed its short-lived ban on such sales this year.

The Blackwell chip now in use by US AI firms is about 1.5 times faster than H200 chips for training AI systems, the IFP said, and five times faster for inferencing work where AI models are put to use. Nvidia's own research has suggested Blackwell chips are 10 times faster than H200 chips for some tasks.

Several Democratic US senators in a statement described Trump's decision as a "colossal economic and national security failure" that would be a boon to China's industry and military.

Republican Representative John Moolenaar, who chairs the House China Select Committee, said in a statement to Reuters that China would use the chips to strengthen its military capabilities and surveillance.

"Nvidia should be under no illusions - China will rip off its technology, mass-produce it themselves and seek to end Nvidia as a competitor," he said.

CHINA EYES POTENTIAL SECURITY RISKS

The approval, however, comes as China is strengthening its resolve to wean the country off its reliance on Nvidia's chips. China's cyberspace regulator in July also accused Nvidia's H20 chips of potentially carrying backdoor security risks, an allegation Nvidia has denied.

In recent months, Beijing has cautioned Chinese tech companies against buying chips that Nvidia downgraded to sell to the Chinese market, which are the H20, RTX 6000D and L20, two sources said.

"Chinese firms want H200s, but the Chinese state is driven by paranoia and pride," said Craig Singleton, a senior fellow at the Washington think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies. "Washington may approve the chips, but Beijing still has to let them in."

The H200 change of stance comes the same day that Trump's Justice Department announced it had cracked a China-linked chip smuggling ring that in late 2024 and early 2025 exported and attempted to export at least $160 million worth of controlled Nvidia H100 and H200 chips.

Chris McGuire, an expert on technology and national security who served at the US State Department until this summer, said Chinese firms would likely still buy H200s, given that the chip "is better than every chip the Chinese can make."

China's domestic AI chip companies now include tech giant Huawei Technologies, which in September released a three-year product roadmap, as well as smaller players such as Cambricon and Moore Threads.

China's SSE STAR Chip Index and the CSI Semiconductor Industry Index both dropped more than 1% at market open on Tuesday but soon recovered most of the losses.


NextEra Expands Google Cloud Partnership, Secures Clean Energy Contracts with Meta

Electric power transmission pylon miniatures and Nextera Energy logo are seen in this illustration taken, December 9, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
Electric power transmission pylon miniatures and Nextera Energy logo are seen in this illustration taken, December 9, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
TT

NextEra Expands Google Cloud Partnership, Secures Clean Energy Contracts with Meta

Electric power transmission pylon miniatures and Nextera Energy logo are seen in this illustration taken, December 9, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
Electric power transmission pylon miniatures and Nextera Energy logo are seen in this illustration taken, December 9, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

NextEra Energy expanded its partnership with Alphabet's Google Cloud to scale up data center capacity, while securing over 2.5 gigawatts of clean energy contracts from Meta across the US, the company said on Monday.

Shares of NextEra were up 2.7% in premarket trading.

Under the expanded deal with Google Cloud, the companies will develop multiple new gigawatt-scale (GW) data centre campuses, each with accompanying generation and capacity, Reuters reported.

NextEra and Google Cloud plan to launch an AI-powered product by mid-2026 to predict equipment issues, optimize crew scheduling and boost grid reliability amid storms, aging assets, and rising demand.

The deal comes as US electricity demand grows due to rapid AI adoption, prompting cloud companies and utilities to secure land, grid connections and new generation to support large data center loads.

In October, the company had partnered with Google to restart an Iowa nuclear power plant shut down five years ago.

The technology industry's quest for massive amounts of electricity for AI processing has renewed interest in the country's nuclear reactors.

NextEra said it had signed 11 power purchase agreements and two energy storage agreements with Meta, totaling over 2.5 GW of clean energy contracts. The projects are scheduled to come online between 2026 and 2028.

The utility also reached an agreement with WPPI Energy to continue supplying 168 megawatts of the output from the Point Beach Nuclear Plant in Two Rivers into the 2050s.

Separately, NextEra forecast higher adjusted profit in 2026 as well as the current-year as it continues to benefit from the surge in power demand.

NextEra now expects adjusted earnings for 2025 of between $3.62 and $3.70 per share, compared with its prior view of between $3.45 and $3.70 per share.

For 2026, it expects adjusted profit between $3.92 and $4.02 per share, compared with its prior view of between $3.63 and $4.00 per share.