French Judges to Decide Next Step in Probe of Telegram Boss Durov

Telegram app logo is seen in this illustration taken, August 27, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights
Telegram app logo is seen in this illustration taken, August 27, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights
TT

French Judges to Decide Next Step in Probe of Telegram Boss Durov

Telegram app logo is seen in this illustration taken, August 27, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights
Telegram app logo is seen in this illustration taken, August 27, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights

French investigative judges are due to decide on Wednesday whether to place Russian-born Telegram boss Pavel Durov under formal investigation following his arrest as part of a probe into organised crime on the messaging app.

Durov's detention as he landed at an airport near Paris on a private jet on Saturday evening has put the spotlight on the criminal liability of app providers and fuelled debate on where freedom of speech ends and enforcement of the law begins, according to Reuters.

The judges' decision is expected by 8.00 p.m.(1800 GMT), 96 hours - or four days - after Durov was taken into custody, the maximum period he can be detained before they decide whether or not to put him under formal investigation.

Durov's arrest has also put in focus the uneasy relationship between Telegram, which has close to 1 billion users, and governments.

President Emmanuel Macron, who with his team uses Telegram to communicate, had lunch with Durov in 2018 as part of a series of meetings the French leader had with tech entrepreneurs, a source close to Macron said.

Being placed under formal investigation in France does not imply guilt or necessarily lead to trial, but indicates that judges consider there is enough to the case to proceed with the probe. Investigations can last years before being sent to trial or shelved.

If Durov, who has been in police custody since his arrest, is placed under formal investigation, judges will also decide whether to put him in pretrial detention. One of the factors they will consider is whether he could try to flee.

A source at the Paris prosecutor's office said an update on the probe was likely to be issued late on Wednesday.

-INVESTIGATION

The overall investigation is at this stage directed against unspecified people.

It focuses on suspected complicity in crimes including running an online platform that allows illicit transactions; possessing images of child sex abuse; drug trafficking; fraud; refusing to pass information to authorities; and providing cryptographic services to criminals, prosecutors said.

The prosecutor's office did not say which crime or crimes Durov himself might be suspected of.

Durov's French lawyer did not reply to repeated Reuters requests for comment through emails and phone calls.

Faced with accusations from Russia, and also Elon Musk, over the stifling of freedom of speech with Durov's arrest, Macron took the unusual step on Monday of issuing a message on X about what he said were "false information."

France, he said, was committed to free speech and the independence of the judiciary, which he said had decided alone to arrest Durov.

A source close to the matter reiterated on Wednesday that Macron and his government had nothing to do with the arrest.



Dutch Watchdog Fines Uber $324 Million for Alleged Inadequate Protection of Drivers’ Data 

An Uber sign is displayed at the company's headquarters in San Francisco, Sept. 12, 2022. (AP)
An Uber sign is displayed at the company's headquarters in San Francisco, Sept. 12, 2022. (AP)
TT

Dutch Watchdog Fines Uber $324 Million for Alleged Inadequate Protection of Drivers’ Data 

An Uber sign is displayed at the company's headquarters in San Francisco, Sept. 12, 2022. (AP)
An Uber sign is displayed at the company's headquarters in San Francisco, Sept. 12, 2022. (AP)

The Dutch data protection watchdog slapped a 290 million euro ($324 million) fine Monday on ride-hailing service Uber for allegedly transferring personal details of European drivers to the United States without adequate protection. Uber called the decision flawed and unjustified and said it would appeal.

The Dutch Data Protection Authority said the data transfers spanning more than two years amounted to a serious breach of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, which requires technical and organizational measures aimed at protecting user data.

“In Europe, the GDPR protects the fundamental rights of people, by requiring businesses and governments to handle personal data with due care,” Dutch DPA chairman Aleid Wolfsen said in a statement.

“But sadly, this is not self-evident outside Europe. Think of governments that can tap data on a large scale. That is why businesses are usually obliged to take additional measures if they store personal data of Europeans outside the European Union. Uber did not meet the requirements of the GDPR to ensure the level of protection to the data with regard to transfers to the US. That is very serious.”

The case was initiated by complaints from 170 French Uber drivers, but the Dutch authority issued the fine because Uber’s European headquarters is in the Netherlands.

Uber insisted it did nothing wrong.

“This flawed decision and extraordinary fine are completely unjustified. Uber’s cross-border data transfer process was compliant with GDPR during a 3-year period of immense uncertainty between the EU and US. We will appeal and remain confident that common sense will prevail,” the company said in a statement.

The alleged breach came after the EU’s top court ruled in 2020 that an agreement known as Privacy Shield that allowed thousands of companies — from tech giants to small financial firms — to transfer data to the United States was invalid because the American government could snoop on people’s data.

The Dutch data protection agency said that following the EU court ruling, standard clauses in contracts could provide a basis for transferring data outside the EU, “but only if an equivalent level of protection can be guaranteed in practice.”

“Because Uber no longer used Standard Contractual Clauses from August 2021, the data of drivers from the EU were insufficiently protected,” the watchdog said. It added that Uber has been using the successor to Privacy Shield since the end of last year, ending the alleged breach.