One-Fifth of Australian Teens Still Use TikTok, Snapchat After Social Media Ban

 Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Kick, YouTube, Facebook, Twitch, Reddit, Threads and X applications are displayed on a mobile phone ahead of new law banning social media for users under 16 in Australia, in this picture illustration taken on December 9, 2025. (Reuters)
Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Kick, YouTube, Facebook, Twitch, Reddit, Threads and X applications are displayed on a mobile phone ahead of new law banning social media for users under 16 in Australia, in this picture illustration taken on December 9, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

One-Fifth of Australian Teens Still Use TikTok, Snapchat After Social Media Ban

 Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Kick, YouTube, Facebook, Twitch, Reddit, Threads and X applications are displayed on a mobile phone ahead of new law banning social media for users under 16 in Australia, in this picture illustration taken on December 9, 2025. (Reuters)
Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Kick, YouTube, Facebook, Twitch, Reddit, Threads and X applications are displayed on a mobile phone ahead of new law banning social media for users under 16 in Australia, in this picture illustration taken on December 9, 2025. (Reuters)

One-fifth of Australian teenagers under 16 were still using social media two months after the country banned platforms from allowing minors, industry data showed, raising questions about the effectiveness of their age-gating methods.

The number of 13-to-15-year-olds using TikTok and Snapchat, among the most popular social media apps with Australian teenagers, fell from before the ban took effect in December to February, but still more than 20% used the apps, according to a report by parental control software maker Qustodio provided to Reuters.

The data is among the first to show the effects on youth online ‌behavior since Australia ‌rolled out the ban, which is being copied by governments ‌around ⁠the world. The ⁠Australian government and at least two university studies are tracking the ban's impact but none has published data yet.

"Among children whose parents haven't blocked access, a meaningful number continue to use restricted platforms in the months following the ban," Qustodio said in the report, which was based on data collected from Australian families from late 2024 to February.

Under the ban, platforms including Meta's Instagram, Facebook and Threads, Google's YouTube, TikTok and Snapchat must block people aged under ⁠16 or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million ($35 ‌million).

A spokesperson for internet regulator the eSafety Commissioner said ‌the office was aware of reports some under-16s remained on social media and was "actively engaging with platforms ‌and their age assurance providers ... while continuing to monitor for any systemic failures ‌that may amount to a breach of the law".

The regulator was "actively drawing on a range of insights to assess compliance," the spokesperson added.

A spokesperson for communications minister Anika Wells said the government had always been clear "that increasing the minimum age to access social media is a cultural change that will ‌take time".

A representative for Snapchat was not immediately available for comment. A TikTok spokesperson declined to comment.

The Qustodio data showed ⁠the number of ⁠Australians aged 13-15 using Snapchat tumbled 13.8 percentage points to 20.3% from November to February, while the number in that age group using TikTok fell 5.7 percentage points to 21.2%.

The number in that age group using YouTube dipped by one percentage point to 36.9%, although the data did not specify whether the users were logged into accounts. The Australian ban allows people of all ages to use YouTube without logging in.

Australian teenage social media use typically dips in December and January due to the country's long summer school break, but the data showed a steeper decline than the previous year, suggesting the ban had an impact, Qustodio said.

But "some dips seen in December-January are slowly beginning to recover," the report added.

Fears that teenagers might migrate to unregulated platforms have not materialized, the data showed, although WhatsApp recorded a small uptick in use among 13-15-year-olds.



AI Agent 'Lobster Fever' Grips China Despite Risks

A man wears a lobster hat that represents the OpenClaw logo, an open-source AI assistant at the Baidu headquarters in Beijing on March 11, 2026. (Photo by ADEK BERRY / AFP)
A man wears a lobster hat that represents the OpenClaw logo, an open-source AI assistant at the Baidu headquarters in Beijing on March 11, 2026. (Photo by ADEK BERRY / AFP)
TT

AI Agent 'Lobster Fever' Grips China Despite Risks

A man wears a lobster hat that represents the OpenClaw logo, an open-source AI assistant at the Baidu headquarters in Beijing on March 11, 2026. (Photo by ADEK BERRY / AFP)
A man wears a lobster hat that represents the OpenClaw logo, an open-source AI assistant at the Baidu headquarters in Beijing on March 11, 2026. (Photo by ADEK BERRY / AFP)

Chinese entrepreneur Frank Gao used to spend long hours running his social media accounts but now outsources the chore to AI agent tool OpenClaw, which is taking the country by storm despite official warnings over cybersecurity.

OpenClaw, created in November by an Austrian coder, differs from bots like ChatGPT because it can execute real-life tasks such as sending emails, organizing files or even booking flight tickets.

"Since January, I've spent hours on the lobster every day," Gao told AFP, referring to OpenClaw's red crustacean mascot. "We're family."

After downloading OpenClaw, users connect it to existing artificial intelligence models of their choice, then give it simple instructions through instant messaging apps, as if to a friend or colleague.

The tool has fascinated tech circles worldwide but particularly in China, gripping tech-savvy companies and individuals keen to keep up with the next big thing in AI.

Hundreds of people queued at tech giant Baidu's Beijing headquarters this week for an OpenClaw event where engineers helped attendees set up their "little lobsters".

It was one of many similar meetups to experiment with the tool, which are drawing crowds from Shanghai to Shenzhen.

Some municipalities, including the eastern cities of Wuxi and Hangzhou, have pledged hundreds of thousands of dollars to support the adoption and development of OpenClaw and other AI agents.

But the lobster fever, as it has been dubbed, has also sparked security concerns.

"What's truly scary about agents like OpenClaw is this: once they have your digital keys, they can theoretically access all the services you've authorized, and can autonomously decide when to activate them," Gao warned.

"The attacker effectively gains a 'master key' to your digital identity," said the engineer, who has named his OpenClaw agent "Q" after his business name QLab.

- 'Use with caution' -

Chinese national cybersecurity authorities and Beijing's ministry of industry and IT have warned of the risks of OpenClaw hacks.

"Use intelligent agents such as 'lobster' with caution," national IT research institute expert Wei Liang advised government agencies, public institutions, companies and individuals in a message on state media.

The mixed signals of rolling out policy incentives while issuing warnings "reflects the authorities' cautious tolerance towards 'lobster fever'," Zhang Yi, founder of tech consultancy iiMedia, told AFP.

Austrian programmer Peter Steinberger, who built OpenClaw to help organize his digital life, was hired last month by ChatGPT maker OpenAI.

Meanwhile, a separate team of coders that made Moltbook, a Reddit-like pseudo social network where OpenClaw agents converse, are joining Meta.

Top Chinese tech companies have also been quick to get involved.

The likes of Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance and Baidu are offering simplified installation and affordable coding plans to help users who want to host OpenClaw agents on their cloud servers -- seen as safer than downloading it onto a personal computer.

In recent days AI companies big and small have also launched their own competing agent tools, such as ByteDance's ArkClaw, Tencent's WorkBuddy and Zhipu AI's AutoClaw.

The relatively low cost for cloud deployment of OpenClaw in China, subsidised by big tech firms, is one factor behind its popularity, said Gao Rui, a senior product manager at Baidu AI Cloud.

"For most people, it's likely just the price of a cup of coffee... which is why people will probably be keen to give it a try," she told AFP.

- FOMO -

Fear of missing out is also a big driver behind OpenClaw's success in China, said Chen Yunfei, an AI developer who created a popular online guide for using the tool.

"Most Chinese people are quite studious and forward-looking, so when confronted with new things, they might have stronger feelings" of so-called FOMO, he said.

Xie Manrui, a programmer whose latest project is a visualized system for managing OpenClaw agents, said the tool had arrived "at the right moment" to change perceptions in China of what AI can do.

"For many, AI is merely a clever chatbot that talks all the time but cannot act," he said.

Either way, it has piqued the curiosity of many young users.

At the Baidu event in Beijing, 24-year-old college student Zheng Huimin was waiting patiently in line with her friends.

"I'd like to give it a go to see what tasks it can actually help me accomplish," she told AFP.


EU Spokesperson: X Submits Remedies Relating to Blue Check Mark

FILE PHOTO: A 3D-printed miniature model of Elon Musk and the X logo are seen in this illustration taken January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A 3D-printed miniature model of Elon Musk and the X logo are seen in this illustration taken January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
TT

EU Spokesperson: X Submits Remedies Relating to Blue Check Mark

FILE PHOTO: A 3D-printed miniature model of Elon Musk and the X logo are seen in this illustration taken January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A 3D-printed miniature model of Elon Musk and the X logo are seen in this illustration taken January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

Elon Musk's social media platform X has submitted remedies in relation to its blue checkmark verification feature following a fine of 120 million euros ($137.63 million), a European Commission spokesperson said on Friday.

EU tech regulators fined X in December for breaching online content rules, the first such action under a landmark legislation that drew criticism from the US government.

Here are the details:

The Commission will ⁠now carefully assess ⁠the proposed remedies, European Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier added, without giving details.

X did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment.

The EU action against X had followed a two-year-long investigation under ⁠the bloc's Digital Services Act (DSA), which requires online platforms to do more to tackle illegal and harmful content.

The European Commission in July 2024 had charged X with deceiving users, saying that the blue checkmark does not correspond to industry practices and that anyone can pay to get a "verified" status.

Bloomberg News first reported on ⁠Thursday ⁠that X has agreed to change its verification mechanism in the European Union.

The blue checkmark had previously indicated that an account belonged to a public figure whose identity was verified, but Musk changed it to indicate it belonged to a paid subscriber after acquiring X, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022.


Software Companies Fight Back Against Fears that AI Will Kill Them

Software Companies Fight Back Against Fears that AI Will Kill Them
TT

Software Companies Fight Back Against Fears that AI Will Kill Them

Software Companies Fight Back Against Fears that AI Will Kill Them

Oracle's Mike Sicilia is the latest software CEO to wade in to the debate on whether artificial intelligence tools that heavily automate human tasks will mean the demise of his industry. His verdict was a resounding "no."

"You've all heard ... that new companies coding quickly using AI will spell the death of SaaS (software as a service)," he told analysts on a conference call on Tuesday. "I don't agree with that at all. I do think that AI tools and their coding capabilities would be a threat if we weren't adopting them, but we are, and very rapidly."

Sicilia was responding to Wall Street concerns that new AI tools can now perform some of the tasks that traditional software companies' products were built for, such as organizing customer information or guiding people through business processes.

Those worries led to a nearly $1 trillion rout in software stocks last month after heavyweight AI startup Anthropic introduced AI plugins for its Claude Cowork agent, a digital assistant that can automate such tasks. CEOs of software companies have since used their post-earnings conference calls to fight back.

Sicilia also laid out a case that Oracle was ahead of its smaller rival Salesforce, saying his company was using AI to actually build new products and automate full business processes, not just add AI features on top of existing tools.

Salesforce, for its part, has offered a different defense, with CEO Marc ⁠Benioff last ⁠month telling analysts that his company will outlast any so-called SaaS-pocalypse, a term for last month's share rout that hit software-as-a-service companies.

Benioff brought in Salesforce customers who positioned Salesforce as a company that has transformed itself into an enterprise platform that builds, deploys and governs those AI agents, using the company's mountains of proprietary customer and sales-process data. Even Jensen Huang, an AI pioneer and the CEO of chipmaker Nvidia , last month dismissed fears that AI would replace software and related tools, calling the idea "illogical."

UNIQUE DATA IS THE BEST DEFENSE

Oracle predicted on Tuesday that the AI boom would power its revenue for several quarters to come, sending its shares up 10% on Wednesday. The company owns deep enterprise data across finance, supply chain and human resources, which is hard for AI to replicate.

Oracle offers cheaper, efficient cloud systems and a database that ⁠can run on any major cloud, said Rebecca Wettemann, CEO of technology research firm Valoir. "That flexibility gives customers choice - and that’s a powerful position to be in as the AI ecosystem evolves," she said.

Nearly a dozen tech analysts and investors surveyed by Reuters said the owners of years of exclusive financial, legal, design, or technical data likely have the best defense.

"Proprietary data is the deepest moat by far," said James St. Aubin, chief investment officer at Ocean Park Asset Management.

In the case of Salesforce, while startups are nibbling away at the company's dominance in the customer-relationship software sector, its software remains deeply embedded in corporate systems, with its real-time data platform managing more than 50 trillion records. It is also trying to reinvent itself as an AI-agent company through its Agentforce service - still a small business.

Some analysts said Salesforce is also hard to replace because businesses have spent years building their day-to-day operations around the company's products and the cost of switching away is high.

But AI is beginning to erode that barrier, making it easier to generate code and build applications with far less human effort and expense.

While businesses experiment with isolated AI tools, Salesforce has built a comprehensive system that helps it stand out, said Madhav Thattai, executive vice president of Salesforce AI, adding ⁠that the company benefits from decades of ⁠enterprise experience.

Oracle did not return emails seeking comment.

NOT ALL IS DOOM AND GLOOM

But concerns about the demise of traditional software companies have lingered, and analysts said not all data is equal.

Employee data and payroll company Workday has plenty of data, but analysts said its core products run on HR and payroll data, which tend to follow uniform, industry-standard formats. That means an AI company can more easily learn from or replicate tools built on that kind of data.

Workday brought back its founder, Aneel Bhusri, as CEO last month to lead the company "in the rapidly evolving AI era."

But the company's shares have declined by more than a third this year, hitting more than a five-year low last month after a sluggish sales forecast. Bhusri said last month that Workday systems embed two decades of business processes that AI cannot replicate.

"AI, for all of its incredible capabilities, is probabilistic by nature," he told analysts on the post-earnings conference call. "It reasons, predicts and recommends based on patterns and likelihoods. Maybe it will eventually become a state machine - a system that follows the same steps and gets the same result, every time - but it is not there today."

Asked for a comment for this story, a Workday spokesperson referred Reuters to Bhusri's comments on the call.

Some analysts believe the enterprise software industry will prove more resilient than valuations currently indicate, arguing that higher productivity brought by AI could spur hiring and growth.

"I would not write the obituary for some of these companies just yet because there is an opportunity for them to reinvent themselves with AI," Ocean Park's Aubin said.