Iran Attacks Unify American Position in Support of Israel

Former CENTCOM Commander to Asharq Al-Awsat: I am concerned about a broader regional conflict.

Israeli defenses intercept Iranian drones and missiles. (Reuters)
Israeli defenses intercept Iranian drones and missiles. (Reuters)
TT

Iran Attacks Unify American Position in Support of Israel

Israeli defenses intercept Iranian drones and missiles. (Reuters)
Israeli defenses intercept Iranian drones and missiles. (Reuters)

The American administration and Congressmen are anticipating a potential Israeli response to the rocket and drone attack launched against it by Iran overnight on Saturday.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, former American officials agreed on the need to avert a broader military escalation in the region.

The attack managed to unify the ranks of Democratic and Republican legislators in support of Israel, with voices that were critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s handling of the war against Hamas in Gaza dying down.

Concern and anticipation

Former US Central Command (CENTCOM) Commander General Joseph Votel expressed his deep concern over Iran waging attacks against Israel from its own territory.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he said: “It is very concerning that Iran appears to have launched attacks from their own territory. I now believe that Israel feels, given the size and scope of the attack launched against them, that they must respond.”

“I am concerned, as others are, that this will lead to another round of escalation and a broader regional conflict - leading to more instability,” he added.

“I think the US reaction is appropriate at this point - strong support in defending Israel but emphasizing the need not to expand the conflict and get this situation back into the diplomatic channels,” Votel went on to say.

Former Assistant Secretary of State for political-military affairs General Mark Kimmitt told Asharq Al-Awsat: “I am hoping that President Joe Biden and the Israeli War Cabinet can prevent Prime Minister Netanyahu from escalating the situation further.”

Former strategy and policy director for Qatar and Kuwait in the Pentagon Adam Clements said: ““The level of sophistication and volume of drones and missiles in a direct Iranian response sets a new precedent in the current shadow war between it and Israel.”

“Israel must have known Iran would need to respond in a way to ‘save face’ in response to the bombing of its diplomatic facilities in Syria. It is telling that Iran has already publicly signaled its intention to not escalate the situation further,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

On the American stance on the situation, he warned: “An escalation in the conflict is detrimental to the security and economic development of the entire region.”

“The US response should be viewed as not only its commitment to helping Israel defend itself, but to also to protect the wider region from further conflict,” he stressed.

Former advisor for Iran to ex-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Gabriel Noronha said Iran's launching over 300 drones and missiles against Israel was a significant escalation and since the drones and missiles originated from Iranian territory.

“The attack is estimated to have cost Israel over a billion US dollars in defensive weapons used to intercept the incoming munitions. But Iran doesn't appear to have actually killed any Israelis or hit any significant targets,” he noted to Asharq Al-Awsat.

“This remains a tactical win for Israel who demonstrated the vast superiority of their defensive infrastructure and demonstrates the limits of Iranian capabilities to actually hold Israel at risk,” he stated.

Moreover, Noronha added that “the Biden administration doesn't feel any need for the United States to respond kinetically to the attack considering that it did not directly harm US personnel or infrastructure, but also is trying to have Israel limit its response to Iran.”

“Israel, however, still feels the need to respond to this attack because it cannot leave the impression that Iran can launch such a massive attack without repercussions. Ideally, Israel will find a way to demonstrate its determination in a way that continues to keep pressure and diplomatic scrutiny on Iran,” he said.

Vottel and other former officials contacted by Asharq Al-Awsat agreed that the current phase will be marked by anticipation of the Israeli response. This uncertainty, however, was not reflected at Congress, where reactions were firmly in support of Israel.

Unified stances

There can be no doubt that the Iranian attack unified Democratic and Republican ranks in support of Tel Aviv, erasing any criticism or calls to limit assistance to Israel over the war in Gaza that has killed over 33,000 people in six months.

No sooner had news of the attack broken out than calls poured in at Congress to approve the frozen package of aid worth around 17 billion dollars.

Majority Leader of the US House of Representatives Steve Scalise was quick to announce a change the House’s schedule to consider legislation that supports Israel.

In a statement, he said: “In light of Iran’s unjustified attack on Israel, the House will move from its previously announced legislative schedule next week to instead consider legislation that supports our ally Israel and holds Iran and its terrorist proxies accountable.

The Iranian regime must know “there will be consequences for these attacks,” he added.

Biden in the crossfire

House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson called on the White House to deliver a “proper response”.

“The Biden administration’s undermining of Israel and appeasement of Iran have contributed to these terrible developments,” he said in a post on the X platform.

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said such an attack by Iran would not have happened were former President Donald Trump still at the White House, accusing the Biden administration of lacking a policy of deterrence against Iran.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell urged Congress to approve the aid package as soon as possible, adding: “Tehran and its proxies are emboldened when they see divisions between the US and Israel.”

Meanwhile, Democrat Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who had made scathing criticism against Netanyahu over the war on Gaza, was quick to change his tone and express his unwavering support to Israel and its people in wake of Iran’s attack.

“As Israel is under attack from Iran, we stand with Israel and its people, and the United States will do everything we can to support Israel’s defense against Iran,” he declared.

Firm American support

Democratic Senator Chris Coons, who had previously said he was open to imposing restrictions on military aid to Israel, changed tone over the weekend, and urged the House to “promptly pass this coming week the long delayed national security supplemental to ensure that our Israeli allies have everything they need to defend themselves from attacks by Iran and its proxies.”

Another Democrat, Senator Chris Van Hollen, said he condemned the Iranian attack on Israel and “supports Israel's right to defend itself against this aggression. I also stand with Biden in seeking to prevent an even wider conflict that engulfs the people of the entire region.”

The calls for restraint were not supported by everyone. John Bolton, National Security Adviser under Trump, told CNN the said the Biden administration and Israel must reestablish deterrence against Iran and urged Tel Aviv to respond to the attack.

“I think Israel should be looking at this as an opportunity to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program,” he added, hoping that Biden would not persuade Netanyahu against making such a move.



WHO Urges DR Congo's Neighbors to Act Immediately on Ebola Risk

Response team members are helped to wear protective suits before burying a person suspected of having died from Ebola in Bunia, in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, on May 25, 2026. (AFP)
Response team members are helped to wear protective suits before burying a person suspected of having died from Ebola in Bunia, in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, on May 25, 2026. (AFP)
TT

WHO Urges DR Congo's Neighbors to Act Immediately on Ebola Risk

Response team members are helped to wear protective suits before burying a person suspected of having died from Ebola in Bunia, in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, on May 25, 2026. (AFP)
Response team members are helped to wear protective suits before burying a person suspected of having died from Ebola in Bunia, in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, on May 25, 2026. (AFP)

States neighboring the Democratic Republic of Congo are at great danger from Ebola and should act immediately to counter the deadly virus, the head of the World Health Organization said on Monday.

"Countries bordering DRC are at especially high risk and should take immediate action," said WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, adding that he would travel on Tuesday to the DRC, the vast, central African country at the epicenter of the current outbreak.

"The outbreak is spreading rapidly," Tedros told a virtual ministerial meeting on the viral hemorrhagic fever, which spreads through direct contact with bodily fluids. It can cause severe bleeding and organ failure.

He said the current outbreak was "especially challenging".

"First, the delay in detecting the outbreak means that we are now playing catch-up with a very fast-moving epidemic. We are urgently scaling up operations but at the moment, the epidemic is outpacing us," he said by video link from Geneva.

Secondly, the eastern provinces of the DRC, where the outbreak was first detected in mid-May, "are highly insecure, with intensified fighting in recent months (and) there is also significant distrust of outside authorities among the local population".

Thirdly, he pointed out, there were "no approved vaccines or therapeutics" for the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola behind the current outbreak.

The WHO has recorded 10 confirmed Ebola deaths and 220 suspected deaths in the DRC since mid-May, while also recording a further 900 suspected cases since Kinshasa declared the outbreak on May 15.

The United Nations agency said the true spread of the virus -- which experts suspect was circulating under the radar for some time -- was probably much wider.

One person is confirmed dead in neighboring Uganda with a further six confirmed infected after Monday saw the health ministry confirm two new cases.

Ten other African countries are "at risk" of infection, the African Union's health agency, Africa CDC, warned on Saturday.

These are Angola, Burundi, the Central African Republic, the Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania and Zambia.

- Building trust -

Africa CDC head Jean Kaseya said "high mobility and insecurity" contributed to the regional spread of the outbreak, which the WHO has declared an international emergency.

Insecurity is a huge obstacle in the eastern DRC, which has been plagued for three decades by conflict involving a litany of armed groups.

State services in rural areas of Ituri province have been largely absent for decades.

South Kivu province is controlled by the M23 armed group, which has never managed an epidemic like Ebola.

Tedros said it was vital to address the trust deficit in Ebola-affected communities.

Two hospitals in Ituri have been attacked by suspicious locals in the past five days -- one in Mongbwala, where the outbreak was initially detected, and the other in Rwampara, where tents used to isolate Ebola patients were torched.

The violence in Rwampara erupted after a deceased man's family was prevented from taking his body away for burial because of contamination risks.

"Loved ones are throwing themselves at the bodies, touching the corpses... while organizing mourning rituals bringing together loads of people," Jean Marie Ezadri, a civil society leader in Ituri, told AFP last week.

Tedros said the WHO was pouring money, medical supplies and staff into the DRC to support the authorities and speeding up clinical trials on potential treatments.

"It will get worse before it gets better," he said. "But we know this virus and we know how to stop it."


Iran’s Top Envoys Discussing Potential Peace Deal in Qatar

 A drone view shows vessels sailing through the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, May 25, 2026. (Reuters)
A drone view shows vessels sailing through the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, May 25, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Iran’s Top Envoys Discussing Potential Peace Deal in Qatar

 A drone view shows vessels sailing through the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, May 25, 2026. (Reuters)
A drone view shows vessels sailing through the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, May 25, 2026. (Reuters)

Iran's top negotiator and its foreign minister were in Doha for talks with Qatar's prime minister on a potential deal with the US to end the three-month-old war, an official briefed on the visit said on Monday, after Washington and Tehran played down hopes for an imminent breakthrough.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters in New Delhi earlier that the US would give diplomacy every chance to succeed before considering whether to deal with Iran in "another way".

There was a "pretty solid thing on the table in terms of their ability to open up the strait (of Hormuz), get the strait open, enter into a very real, significant, time-limited negotiation on the nuclear matter, and hopefully we can pull it off," Rubio said.

In a lengthy post on Truth Social on Monday, US President Donald Trump said talks with Iran were going "nicely", but warned of fresh attacks if they failed. It "will only be a Great Deal for all, or no Deal at all," he wrote.

Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said ‌in a briefing that conclusions ‌had been reached on many topics but that did not mean the sides were close to agreement.

The ‌official briefed ⁠on the Iranians' ⁠Doha visit told Reuters the discussions focused primarily on the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium while Iran's central bank governor attended to discuss the potential release of frozen Iranian funds as part of a final deal.

Baghaei said earlier that nuclear issues would only be negotiated on if the framework accord is agreed first.

Trump has said his key aim in the war is to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon with its highly enriched uranium. Tehran has consistently denied it has plans to do that.

The two sides remain at odds on several other issues, such as Israel's war in Lebanon with the Iranian-backed Hezbollah and Tehran's demands for the lifting of sanctions and the release of tens of billions of dollars of Iranian oil revenues frozen in foreign banks.

As efforts to reach a deal ⁠continued, Iran said it had downed a "hostile" stealth drone using a new air defense system, Iranian news agencies reported, ‌without saying where it had come from.

"This is a sign from us that no more stealth ‌drones can penetrate the skies of the Gulf," Fars quoted unnamed officials as saying.

IRAN DEAL STICKING POINTS

Baghaei said the potential Iran deal contained no specific details on management of the Strait of Hormuz, through which about a fifth of the world's oil and liquefied gas usually flows.

Iran will not charge tolls for ships to pass through but there will be a cost for services offered such as navigation and steps to protect the environment, he said, under a protocol to be agreed with Oman, which lies on the opposite shore of the waterway.

Since the US and Israel first launched strikes on Iran on February 28, only a handful of vessels have been passing through the Strait of Hormuz compared with 125 to 140 daily previously.

Iran's state TV said on Monday that 32 vessels and five oil tankers passed through the strait in the past 24 hours with the authorization of Iran's Revolutionary Guards naval forces.

The standoff has caused a spike in oil prices and driven up the costs of fuel, fertilizer and food. On Monday, oil prices fell more than 4% to two-week lows amid optimism that a deal might come soon.

Trump, whose approval ratings have been hit by the impact on US energy prices, and who has faced congressional efforts to curb his war powers, has repeatedly played up the prospect of a deal to end the war.

Separately, two sources said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has told his confidants that Israel now has little ability to influence Trump's decision-making over the conflict.


Israeli Opposition Leader Lapid Says Trump’s Emerging Deal with Iran Is ‘Bad for the Region’

Yair Lapid, founder of the new "Together" party and head of the Israeli opposition, speaks during a press briefing for the foreign media in Jerusalem, 25 May 2026. (EPA)
Yair Lapid, founder of the new "Together" party and head of the Israeli opposition, speaks during a press briefing for the foreign media in Jerusalem, 25 May 2026. (EPA)
TT

Israeli Opposition Leader Lapid Says Trump’s Emerging Deal with Iran Is ‘Bad for the Region’

Yair Lapid, founder of the new "Together" party and head of the Israeli opposition, speaks during a press briefing for the foreign media in Jerusalem, 25 May 2026. (EPA)
Yair Lapid, founder of the new "Together" party and head of the Israeli opposition, speaks during a press briefing for the foreign media in Jerusalem, 25 May 2026. (EPA)

The deal being discussed between the US and Iran fails to achieve any of Israel’s goals for the war, Israel’s opposition leader Yair Lapid said on Monday, as he accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of failing to influence a better agreement.

Lapid, who is part of an alliance attempting to unseat Netanyahu in elections this year, said details of the emerging deal are “disturbing.”

“The deal is bad for Israel, bad for the region, bad for the citizens of Iran,” Lapid told reporters in Jerusalem.

Israel and the US launched the war on Feb. 28 vowing to destroy Iran’s ballistic missile program, end its support for proxy armed groups across the region and end Iran’s ability to pursue a nuclear bomb. Both Netanyahu and President Donald Trump also said they hoped to create conditions to topple Iran’s government.

According to regional officials, under the current deal being discussed Iran would give up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium and reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz in exchange for ending a US blockade of Iranian ports and the lifting of sanctions against Iran. Key details on Iran’s nuclear program would then be negotiated during a 60-day period. It is unclear if the deal will address Iran’s missiles or support for regional militant groups.

Lapid expressed gratitude to Trump for launching the war with Israel, but criticized Netanyahu for allowing Washington to negotiate a potential deal with little coordination with Israel.

“The Israeli government is at an all-time low in its ability to influence decisions in Washington,” he said, noting that Trump said last week: “Netanyahu will do whatever I want him to do.”

Netanyahu has repeatedly stressed to Trump that Israel maintains “freedom of action” against threats in any arena, according to an official familiar with Israel prime minister's conversations with Trump, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

“Israel is a sovereign state, we are not a vassal state and we are not a protectorate,” Lapid said.

Lapid, head of the centrist “Yesh Atid” party, briefly served as prime minister in 2022 under a rotation agreement with Naftali Bennett, leader of a small conservative party. Their coalition government ended 12 years of Netanyahu’s rule.

They have once again merged their parties into a single faction headed by Bennett as they attempt to unseat Netanyahu in elections which will be held by the end of October.

Lapid has served as Israel’s opposition leader since Netanyahu returned to power in late 2022, while Bennett took a break from politics. Their alliance is aimed at uniting a fragmented opposition united in large part by their shared hostility toward Netanyahu.

Lapid, one of a shrinking number of Israeli politicians who supports the idea of Palestinian independence, said the issue would not be on the next government’s agenda. He said the conditions are not right following the trauma of the Hamas attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, and wars that have followed.

“There will be no two-state solution in the coming years, because Israelis now understand this will become just another failing terrorist state on our borders,” said Lapid, adding that the Palestinian Authority does not have the ability to effectively prevent attacks against Israel.

But Lapid said he would oppose unilateral steps that would make a future Palestinian state impossible and had received assurances from Bennett, a former West Bank settlement leader, that Israel will not move toward annexing the occupied territory.

Lapid also ruled out cooperation with Arab parties to build a coalition to unseat Netanyahu.

Opinion polls indicate that Bennett and Lapid might not be able to form a governing majority coalition without the support of some Arab lawmakers, as they did in their previous government. They broke a longstanding taboo in 2021 when they invited Mansour Abbas, leader of a small Arab faction, into Israel’s governing coalition for the first and only time in Israel’s history.

Lapid said his previous cooperation with Abbas was “the right government for the moment,” but that Israel is in a very different place after nearly three years of wars and he and Bennett will not build a coalition with Abbas’ party in the next elections.