UN Chief Criticizes Divided Security Council for Failure of Leadership to End Wars, Calls for Unity

 UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres speaks during a UN Security Council meeting on the theme of "Leadership for Peace" at the United Nations headquarters in New York City on September 25, 2024. (AFP)
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres speaks during a UN Security Council meeting on the theme of "Leadership for Peace" at the United Nations headquarters in New York City on September 25, 2024. (AFP)
TT

UN Chief Criticizes Divided Security Council for Failure of Leadership to End Wars, Calls for Unity

 UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres speaks during a UN Security Council meeting on the theme of "Leadership for Peace" at the United Nations headquarters in New York City on September 25, 2024. (AFP)
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres speaks during a UN Security Council meeting on the theme of "Leadership for Peace" at the United Nations headquarters in New York City on September 25, 2024. (AFP)

The United Nations chief sharply criticized the powerful but deeply divided Security Council at a high-level meeting Wednesday for a failure of leadership to end wars in Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan and beyond.

“Peace demands action. And peace demands leadership,” Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the 15-member council charged with ensuring international peace and security. “Instead, we’re seeing deepening geopolitical divisions and mistrust.”

He pointed to repeated violations of the UN Charter and international law, conflicts multiplying and becoming more deadly, and civilians paying the steepest price.

The council has been blocked from any action on Ukraine because Russia is a veto-wielding member and a party to the conflict – invading its neighbor in violation of the UN Charter which requires all members to ensure the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all other nations.

It has been stymied in taking tough action on the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza because of Israel’s close ally, the United States, another veto-wielding member. And in Sudan, there are divisions among some members supporting the warring rival generals.

The secretary-general said peace is possible in Ukraine, Gaza and Sudan if council members unite and follow the UN Charter and international law.

“A divided council cannot,” he said. “It is imperative that council members spare no effort to work together to find common ground” as it has done overseeing 11 peacekeeping operations on three continents and authorizing humanitarian aid to global hotspots.

Slovenia, which holds the Security Council presidency this month, chose the topic, “Leadership for Peace” for its signature event during the annual gathering of world leaders at the UN General Assembly – and invited leaders from the 15 council nations to attend.

The advance speakers list has five presidents and prime ministers, six foreign ministers, a deputy foreign minister, a vice foreign minister, the US ambassador, who is also listed as a member of President Joe Biden’s Cabinet, and a Russian representative.

At the same time as the council was meeting, Biden was appearing on “The View,” a popular daytime talk show, while Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s schedule said he was scheduled to attend a meeting of the Group of 20 major economic powers soon after.

Mirjana Spoljaric Egger, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, which works in the world's crisis areas, called for a renewed respect for international humanitarian law. “Wars can be fought and won while adhering to the letter and the spirit of the law,” she told the council.

Spoljaric said the Red Cross today sees warring parties overlooking their international humanitarian law obligations “to justify violations, destruction and impediments to humanitarian action.”



Trump's Words on Greenland and Borders Ring Alarms in Europe, But Officials Have a Guarded Response

FILE PHOTO: Greenland's flag flies in Igaliku settlement, Greenland, July 5, 2024. Ritzau Scanpix/Ida Marie Odgaard via REUTERS
FILE PHOTO: Greenland's flag flies in Igaliku settlement, Greenland, July 5, 2024. Ritzau Scanpix/Ida Marie Odgaard via REUTERS
TT

Trump's Words on Greenland and Borders Ring Alarms in Europe, But Officials Have a Guarded Response

FILE PHOTO: Greenland's flag flies in Igaliku settlement, Greenland, July 5, 2024. Ritzau Scanpix/Ida Marie Odgaard via REUTERS
FILE PHOTO: Greenland's flag flies in Igaliku settlement, Greenland, July 5, 2024. Ritzau Scanpix/Ida Marie Odgaard via REUTERS

President-elect Donald Trump has tossed expansionist rhetoric at US allies and potential adversaries with arguments that the frontiers of American power need to be extended into Canada and the Danish territory of Greenland, and southward to include the Panama Canal.Trump's suggestions that international borders can be redrawn — by force if necessary — are particularly inflammatory in Europe. His words run contrary to the argument European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are trying to impress on Russian President Vladimir Putin.But many European leaders — who've learned to expect the unexpected from Trump and have seen that actions don't always follow his words — have been guarded in their response, with some taking a nothing-to-see-here view rather than vigorously defend European Union member Denmark.Analysts, though, say that even words can damage US-European relations ahead of Trump's second presidency.A diplomatic response in Europe Several officials in Europe — where governments depend on US trade, energy, investment, technology, and defense cooperation for security — emphasized their belief that Trump has no intention of marching troops into Greenland.“I think we can exclude that the United States in the coming years will try to use force to annex territory that interests it,” Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni said.German Chancellor Olaf Scholz pushed back — but carefully, saying “borders must not be moved by force" and not mentioning Trump by name.This week, as Ukrainian President Zelenskyy pressed Trump’s incoming administration to continue supporting Ukraine, he said: “No matter what’s going on in the world, everyone wants to feel sure that their country will not just be erased off the map.” Since Putin marched troops across Ukrainian borders in 2022, Zelenskyy and allies have been fighting — at great cost — to defend the principle that has underpinned the international order since World War II: that powerful nations can’t simply gobble up others.The British and French foreign ministers have said they can't foresee a US invasion of Greenland. Still, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot portrayed Trump’s remarks as a wake-up call."Do we think we’re entering into a period that sees the return of the law of the strongest?" the French minister said. “‘Yes."On Friday, the prime minister of Greenland — a semiautonomous Arctic territory that isn’t part of the EU but whose 56,000 residents are EU citizens, as part of Denmark — said its people don’t want to be Americans but that he’s open to greater cooperation with the US.“Cooperation is about dialogue," leader Múte B. Egede said.Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called the US "our closest ally” and said: “We have to stand together.”Analysts find Trump's words troubling European security analysts agreed there’s no real likelihood of Trump using the military against NATO ally Denmark, but nevertheless expressed profound disquiet.Analysts warned of turbulence ahead for trans-Atlantic ties, international norms and the NATO military alliance — not least because of the growing row with member Canada over Trump's repeated suggestions that it become a US state.“There is a possibility, of course, that this is just ... a new sheriff in town," said Flemming Splidsboel Hansen, who specializes in foreign policy, Russia and Greenland at the Danish Institute for International Studies. "I take some comfort from the fact that he is now insisting that Canada should be included in the US, which suggests that it is just sort of political bravado.“But damage has already been done. And I really cannot remember a previous incident like this where an important ally — in this case the most important ally — would threaten Denmark or another NATO member state.”Hansen said he fears NATO may be falling apart even before Trump's inauguration.“I worry about our understanding of a collective West," he said. "What does this even mean now? What may this mean just, say, one year from now, two years from now, or at least by the end of this second Trump presidency? What will be left?”Security concerns as possible motivation Some diplomats and analysts see a common thread in Trump's eyeing of Canada, the Panama Canal and Greenland: securing resources and waterways to strengthen the US against potential adversaries.Paris-based analyst Alix Frangeul-Alves said Trump's language is “all part of his ‘Make America Great Again’ mode.”In Greenland's soils, she noted, are rare earths critical for advanced and green technologies. China dominates global supplies of the valuable minerals, which the US, Europe and other nations view as a security risk.“Any policy made in Washington is made through the lens of the competition with China,” said Frangeul-Alves, who focuses on US politics for the German Marshall Fund.Some observers said Trump's suggested methods are fraught with peril.Security analyst Alexander Khara said Trump’s claim that “we need Greenland for national security purposes” reminded him of Putin's comments on Crimea when Russia seized the strategic Black Sea peninsula from Ukraine in 2014.Suggesting that borders might be flexible is “a completely dangerous precedent,” said Khara, director of the Centre for Defense Strategies in Kyiv.“We’re in a time of transition from the old system based on norms and principles,” he said, and “heading to more conflicts, more chaos and more uncertainty.”