Debate in Iran over Khamenei’s Office Considering Nuclear Weapons’ Fatwa Revision

Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Facility (AFP)
Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Facility (AFP)
TT

Debate in Iran over Khamenei’s Office Considering Nuclear Weapons’ Fatwa Revision

Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Facility (AFP)
Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Facility (AFP)

Debate is growing in Iran over changes to its defense policy and a review of the ban on producing nuclear weapons, with the issue reportedly reaching Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s office.

In recent days, Iranian media close to Khamenei expressed concerns about the country’s lack of nuclear deterrence. The Tehran Times said that "uncontrolled Israeli threats are driving Iranian calls for nuclear weapons."

On Thursday, the Fars news agency quoted Rasoul Sanai-Rad, a political adviser to Khamenei, warning that any Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites would violate key regional and international boundaries.

Sanai-Rad added that some Iranian politicians are considering changes to nuclear policy, as an attack on energy sites would have serious consequences during and after any conflict.

Iranian military and political leaders have frequently suggested a shift in nuclear policy toward producing nuclear weapons, but they consistently remind the public that this is forbidden by a fatwa from Khamenei.

The current regional tensions are creating a new situation for Iran, especially after recent setbacks for Lebanon’s Hezbollah, its main ally, leading to a belief that Iran is now directly confronting Israel.

Israel is considering its response to Iranian ballistic missile threats. The government is likely to empower Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant to decide when and where to strike.

Gallant previously stated that Israel has prepared a “devastating and surprising response to Iran” following an inconclusive call between Netanyahu and US President Joe Biden.

In a session of the Iranian parliament, Deputy Hassanali Akhlaghi Amiri called on the Supreme National Security Council to urgently rethink Iran’s defense doctrine.

Political institutions in Iran are promoting the idea that increasing deterrence against Israel is gaining support among influential and elite groups.

Akhlaghi Amiri asked parliament members, “Why do you limit yourselves to just condemning Israel's actions? Are you afraid? Is life so precious that you accept humiliation?”

He added that revising the fatwa against nuclear weapons, according to Imamite jurisprudence, should consider current circumstances and be presented to the Supreme Leader. However, he acknowledged that “the fatwa still remains in place.”

In 2003, Khamenei issued a fatwa banning nuclear weapons, which is considered a binding advisory opinion.

The Iranian government later announced this fatwa during a meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna. A former Iranian president called the fatwa the best guarantee for Iran's pursuit of peaceful nuclear technology.

According to IAEA estimates, Tehran is close to enriching its uranium stock to nearly 90% within two weeks, a level that would allow it to produce a nuclear bomb.



Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
TT

Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)

Iran on Saturday hinted it would be willing to negotiate on a nuclear agreement with the upcoming administration of US President-elect Donald Trump, but that it has conditions.
Last Thursday, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a “comprehensive” report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.
Ali Larijani, advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said Iran and the US are now in a new position concerning the nuclear file.
In a post on X, he said, “If the current US administration say they are only against Iran’s nuclear weapons, they must accept Iran’s conditions and provide compensation for the damages caused.”

He added, “The US should accept the necessary conditions... so that a new agreement can be reached.”
Larijani stated that Washington withdrew from the JCPOA, thus causing damage to Iran, adding that his country started increasing its production of 60% enriched uranium.
The Iran nuclear accord, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was reached to limit the Iranian nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
The deal began unraveling in 2018, when Washington, under Trump’s first administration, unilaterally withdrew from the accord and re-imposed a sanction regime of “maximum pressure” on Tehran.
In retaliation, Iran has rapidly ramped up its nuclear activities, including by increasing its stockpiles of enriched uranium to 60% — close to the 90% threshold required to develop a nuclear bomb.
It also began gradually rolling back some of its commitments by increasing its uranium stockpiles and enriching beyond the 3.67% purity -- enough for nuclear power stations -- permitted under the deal.
Since 2021, Tehran has significantly decreased its cooperation with the IAEA by deactivating surveillance devices to monitor the nuclear program and barring UN inspectors.
Most recently, Iran escalated its confrontations with the Agency by announcing it would launch a series of “new and advanced” centrifuges. Its move came in response to a resolution adopted by the United Nations nuclear watchdog that censures Tehran for what the agency called lack of cooperation.
Centrifuges are the machines that enrich uranium transformed into gas by rotating it at very high speed, increasing the proportion of fissile isotope material (U-235).
Shortly after the IAEA passed its resolution last Thursday, Tehran spoke about the “dual role” of IAEA’s chief, Raphael Grossi.
Chairman of the Iranian Parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, Ebrahim Azizi said, “The statements made by Grossi in Tehran do not match his actions in Vienna.”
And contrary to the statements of Azizi, who denied his country’s plans to build nuclear weapons, Tehran did not originally want to freeze its uranium stockpile enriched to 60%
According to the IAEA’s definition, around 42 kg of uranium enriched to 60% is the amount at which creating one atomic weapon is theoretically possible. The 60% purity is just a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
Spokesperson and deputy head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Behrouz Kamalvandi, said on Friday that IAEA inspectors were scheduled to come immediately after the meeting of the Board of Governors to evaluate Iran’s capacity, “with those capacities remaining for a month without any interruption in enrichment at 60% purity.”
Iran’s news agency, Tasnim, quoted Kamalvandi as saying that “the pressures resulting from the IAEA resolution are counterproductive, meaning that they increase our ability to enrich.”
He added: “Currently, not only have we not stopped enrichment, but we have orders to increase the speed, and we are gradually working on that."